"The Sherriff" to retire

[Deleted]

Mar 7, 2016 11:49:06 GMT -5 Buckeye Dale said:

Mar 7, 2016 11:00:45 GMT -5 @muttmk2 said:

That's OK.
O.J. Simpson's legacy is MURDERER ............ and you can't top that.  I haven't heard of him repenting, for sure!

Just curious...there have been rumors for years that O.J. took the brunt of the suspicion and blame...but that his son was actually the killer, and daddy was not telling on his son...Either way, O.J. is not above the law, and is guilty of something; but would the circumstances being that he was covering for his son change your opinion?

It's still an open murder case. 

So how has a man with a known mental condition and a history of violence managed to not commit any more crimes simply because Daddy took the murder rap for him?  Yes, it is conceivable that Jason committed the killings, but what was the motive?

If he had ever been a serious suspect, search warrants could have been obtained for hair (both his and his dog's) and DNA samples, but none were.  If a PI could gather those facts, why can't LAPD?  Both LAPD and NYPD claim to be the best in the nation, so how could the left coasters be so easily fooled?

Let's out it this way ....... IF Jason did it, and O.J. went to all that trouble to cover up and obstruct justice, then YES, O.J. Simpson is guilty of 2 counts of murder as an accessory after the fact.  2 families are still without their daughter/sister and son/brother, and they deserve closure.


Here's another mystery:  How can one person with a knife brutally slash two people who are not restrained or confined in a closed space?  One of them should have been able to escape and try to get help.  
How about this:  O.J. was there and he HELD one of them while Jason killed the first one, then held the 2nd one for Jason as well?  Two on two sounds more logical, and even if he didn't cut either of them, this would make O.J. guilty of murder, too.  Why did Jason need a lawyer (provided BY O.J.) unless O.J. feared he might be interviewed and sing? 

[Buckeye Dale]

Mar 7, 2016 14:02:13 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Mar 7, 2016 13:28:54 GMT -5 Buckeye Dale said:

He had three kids by his first wife...the one that was mentioned (I think) was about 24-25...and he has an older son as well. 

Oh ok, I had never heard that about a "cover up". Interesting

Google it, there are several conspiracy stories. Again, who the hekk knows for sure?

[Buckeye Dale]

Mar 7, 2016 16:24:58 GMT -5 @muttmk2 said:

Mar 7, 2016 11:49:06 GMT -5 Buckeye Dale said:

Just curious...there have been rumors for years that O.J. took the brunt of the suspicion and blame...but that his son was actually the killer, and daddy was not telling on his son...Either way, O.J. is not above the law, and is guilty of something; but would the circumstances being that he was covering for his son change your opinion?

It's still an open murder case. 

So how has a man with a known mental condition and a history of violence managed to not commit any more crimes simply because Daddy took the murder rap for him?  Yes, it is conceivable that Jason committed the killings, but what was the motive?

If he had ever been a serious suspect, search warrants could have been obtained for hair (both his and his dog's) and DNA samples, but none were.  If a PI could gather those facts, why can't LAPD?  Both LAPD and NYPD claim to be the best in the nation, so how could the left coasters be so easily fooled?

Let's out it this way ....... IF Jason did it, and O.J. went to all that trouble to cover up and obstruct justice, then YES, O.J. Simpson is guilty of 2 counts of murder as an accessory after the fact.  2 families are still without their daughter/sister and son/brother, and they deserve closure.


Here's another mystery:  How can one person with a knife brutally slash two people who are not restrained or confined in a closed space?  One of them should have been able to escape and try to get help.  
How about this:  O.J. was there and he HELD one of them while Jason killed the first one, then held the 2nd one for Jason as well?  Two on two sounds more logical, and even if he didn't cut either of them, this would make O.J. guilty of murder, too.  Why did Jason need a lawyer (provided BY O.J.) unless O.J. feared he might be interviewed and sing? 

...answered your own question... 

[Walter]

One of the things that I thought about with OJ is all this new info regarding CTE.
There are apparently some research links between of domestic violence to CTE and his, assuming he did it, is the mother of all domestic violence cases.

[daleko]

Mar 7, 2016 19:18:11 GMT -5 Buckeye Dale said:

Mar 7, 2016 14:02:13 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Oh ok, I had never heard that about a "cover up". Interesting

Google it, there are several conspiracy stories. Again, who the hekk knows for sure?

Oh my, now you've done it. Look for you know who to start threads on this conspiracy.

[Buckeye Dale]

Mar 8, 2016 17:08:49 GMT -5 daleko said:

Mar 7, 2016 19:18:11 GMT -5 Buckeye Dale said:

Google it, there are several conspiracy stories. Again, who the hekk knows for sure?

Oh my, now you've done it. Look for you know who to start threads on this conspiracy.

I'm of the opinion that would only apply if it was IRT a Bronco...

[mscott59]

Mar 8, 2016 15:39:45 GMT -5 Walter said:

One of the things that I thought about with OJ is all this new info regarding CTE.
There are apparently some research links between of domestic violence to CTE and his, assuming he did it, is the mother of all domestic violence cases.

funny you brought that up... my wife has become addicted to this retelling of the entire saga and she said the exact same thing last night. had not heard anyone draw that connection... he had 2400+ carries in his pro career... another 700 or so at usc. you wonder if that's a possibility...