Denver. ...figures...

[Deleted]

Kerry O'Grady, the special agent in charge of the Secret Service's Denver district, posted on social-media she wouldn't want to "take a bullet" for him.

O'Grady currently massively back pedaling.

It is amazing to me that the libtards haven't realized there is a new sheriff in town and bullshit WILL NOT be tolerated. I have been smiling a lot lately.


www.washingtonexaminer.com/senior-secret-service-agent-suggests-she-wouldnt-take-a-bullet-for-trump/article/2612814


Senior Secret Service agent suggests she wouldn't take 'a bullet' for Trump
By Susan Crabtree (@susancrabtree) • 1/24/17 12:58 PM

A senior U.S. Secret Service agent posted social-media condemnations of President Trump during the past seven months, including one in which she said she wouldn't want to "take a bullet" for him.

She explained herself saying she viewed his presidential candidacy as a "disaster" for the country, and especially for women and minorities.

Kerry O'Grady, the special agent in charge of the Secret Service's Denver district, oversees coordination with Washington-based advance teams for all presidential candidate and presidential trips to the area, including all upcoming or future trips by the president, vice president or Trump administration officials.

Despite her senior security role, she has made her disdain for Trump and his incoming administration clear to her Facebook followers, who included current and former Secret Service agents and other people who were employees at the time of the posts.

In one Facebook post O'Grady wrote at 11:07 p.m. on a Sunday in October, she endorsed Clinton and said she would endure "jail time" rather than "taking a bullet" for what she regarded as a "disaster" for America.

The post didn't mention Trump by name but clearly referred to him

"But this world has changed and I have changed. And I would take jail time over a bullet or an endorsement for what I believe to be disaster to this country and the strong and amazing women and minorities who reside here. Hatch Act be damned. I am with Her."

In a lengthy interview with the Examiner Monday, O'Grady says she took down the post after two to three days of greater reflection and wasn't trying to imply she wouldn't take a bullet for Trump or any officials in the Trump administration.

"It was an internal struggle for me but as soon as I put it up, I thought it was not the sentiment that I needed to share because I care very deeply about the mission," she said.

O'Grady repeatedly stressed that she would in no way shirk her duties to protect the president because of her opposition to Trump's candidacy and support for Clinton.

O'Grady posted the logo for the women's March on Denver as her Facebook cover backdrop on Inauguration Day, Friday, Jan. 21 at 12:25 p.m.

When one of her Facebook followers commented that "none of these women represent me #justsayin," O'Grady countered that "all of these women represent me! Proud to say it! #nasty." That back and forth, captured in a screengrab of the post, no longer appears on O'Grady's Facebook page.

At 11:23 p.m. on Inauguration Day, she updated her profile picture to an artist's rendering of Princess Leia with the words, "A woman's place is in the resistance."

[roxalot]

This traitor needs to be fired at once.

[Deleted]

Jan 24, 2017 21:19:23 GMT -5 @kelliers said:

Kerry O'Grady, the special agent in charge of the Secret Service's Denver district, posted on social-media she wouldn't want to "take a bullet" for him.

O'Grady currently massively back pedaling.

It is amazing to me that the libtards haven't realized there is a new sheriff in town and bullshit WILL NOT be tolerated. I have been smiling a lot lately.


www.washingtonexaminer.com/senior-secret-service-agent-suggests-she-wouldnt-take-a-bullet-for-trump/article/2612814


Senior Secret Service agent suggests she wouldn't take 'a bullet' for Trump
By Susan Crabtree (@susancrabtree) • 1/24/17 12:58 PM

Looks like President Trump will create another job opening very soon.   I hope this bitch can afford ObamaDeathCare, living on her unemployment checks and all. 

[oujour76]

Jan 24, 2017 21:19:23 GMT -5 @kelliers said:

Kerry O'Grady, the special agent in charge of the Secret Service's Denver district, posted on social-media she wouldn't want to "take a bullet" for him.

O'Grady currently massively back pedaling.

It is amazing to me that the libtards haven't realized there is a new sheriff in town and bullshit WILL NOT be tolerated. I have been smiling a lot lately.


www.washingtonexaminer.com/senior-secret-service-agent-suggests-she-wouldnt-take-a-bullet-for-trump/article/2612814


Senior Secret Service agent suggests she wouldn't take 'a bullet' for Trump
By Susan Crabtree (@susancrabtree) • 1/24/17 12:58 PM

A senior U.S. Secret Service agent posted social-media condemnations of President Trump during the past seven months, including one in which she said she wouldn't want to "take a bullet" for him.

She explained herself saying she viewed his presidential candidacy as a "disaster" for the country, and especially for women and minorities.

Kerry O'Grady, the special agent in charge of the Secret Service's Denver district, oversees coordination with Washington-based advance teams for all presidential candidate and presidential trips to the area, including all upcoming or future trips by the president, vice president or Trump administration officials.

Despite her senior security role, she has made her disdain for Trump and his incoming administration clear to her Facebook followers, who included current and former Secret Service agents and other people who were employees at the time of the posts.

In one Facebook post O'Grady wrote at 11:07 p.m. on a Sunday in October, she endorsed Clinton and said she would endure "jail time" rather than "taking a bullet" for what she regarded as a "disaster" for America.

The post didn't mention Trump by name but clearly referred to him

"But this world has changed and I have changed. And I would take jail time over a bullet or an endorsement for what I believe to be disaster to this country and the strong and amazing women and minorities who reside here. Hatch Act be damned. I am with Her."

In a lengthy interview with the Examiner Monday, O'Grady says she took down the post after two to three days of greater reflection and wasn't trying to imply she wouldn't take a bullet for Trump or any officials in the Trump administration.

"It was an internal struggle for me but as soon as I put it up, I thought it was not the sentiment that I needed to share because I care very deeply about the mission," she said.

O'Grady repeatedly stressed that she would in no way shirk her duties to protect the president because of her opposition to Trump's candidacy and support for Clinton.

O'Grady posted the logo for the women's March on Denver as her Facebook cover backdrop on Inauguration Day, Friday, Jan. 21 at 12:25 p.m.

When one of her Facebook followers commented that "none of these women represent me #justsayin," O'Grady countered that "all of these women represent me! Proud to say it! #nasty." That back and forth, captured in a screengrab of the post, no longer appears on O'Grady's Facebook page.

At 11:23 p.m. on Inauguration Day, she updated her profile picture to an artist's rendering of Princess Leia with the words, "A woman's place is in the resistance."

Incredibly stupid. I guess she can forget about Presidential detail. She will be lucky to keep her job.

[Deleted]

Jan 24, 2017 23:11:55 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Jan 24, 2017 21:19:23 GMT -5 @kelliers said:

Kerry O'Grady, the special agent in charge of the Secret Service's Denver district, posted on social-media she wouldn't want to "take a bullet" for him.

O'Grady currently massively back pedaling.

It is amazing to me that the libtards haven't realized there is a new sheriff in town and bullshit WILL NOT be tolerated. I have been smiling a lot lately.


www.washingtonexaminer.com/senior-secret-service-agent-suggests-she-wouldnt-take-a-bullet-for-trump/article/2612814


Senior Secret Service agent suggests she wouldn't take 'a bullet' for Trump
By Susan Crabtree (@susancrabtree) • 1/24/17 12:58 PM

A senior U.S. Secret Service agent posted social-media condemnations of President Trump during the past seven months, including one in which she said she wouldn't want to "take a bullet" for him.

Incredibly stupid. I guess she can forget about Presidential detail. She will be lucky to keep her job.

She should be transferred to external White House security detail ......... the Pooper Scooper Squad to be precise.    Some of those dog turds COULD be bombs, so they must be collected and analyzed by a seasoned agent.  
Muslimes and their close friends the Democrats have gotten very sneaky, so we can't afford to take any chances!

[Deleted]

       The lady has a very good point about Trump being a disaster for the U.S.A.

       However, her job is to protect the POTUS-- even if he's a greedy, lying bastard like the Donald.

       If she doesn't want to protect the POTUS, the Secret Service should fire her ass.

[Buckeye Dale]

Jan 24, 2017 23:40:29 GMT -5 @muttmk2 said:

Jan 24, 2017 23:11:55 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Incredibly stupid. I guess she can forget about Presidential detail. She will be lucky to keep her job.

She should be transferred to external White House security detail ......... the Pooper Scooper Squad to be precise.    Some of those dog turds COULD be bombs, so they must be collected and analyzed by a seasoned agent.  
Muslimes and their close friends the Democrats have gotten very sneaky, so we can't afford to take any chances!

Doin' your Beetlejuice thing again?  You post that, and look who shows up... ^^^

[Deleted]

Jan 25, 2017 0:29:40 GMT -5 Buckeye Dale said:

Jan 24, 2017 23:40:29 GMT -5 @muttmk2 said:

She should be transferred to external White House security detail ......... the Pooper Scooper Squad to be precise.    Some of those dog turds COULD be bombs, so they must be collected and analyzed by a seasoned agent.  
Muslimes and their close friends the Democrats have gotten very sneaky, so we can't afford to take any chances!

Doin' your Beetlejuice thing again?  You post that, and look who shows up... ^^^

LOL!!  I have no idea which dog turd showed up.  Several of them are not worthy of my attention now and have been banished from my world.

[daleko]

Jan 24, 2017 21:19:23 GMT -5 @kelliers said:

Senior Secret Service agent suggests she wouldn't take 'a bullet' for Trump
By Susan Crabtree (@susancrabtree) • 1/24/17 12:58 PM
In one Facebook post O'Grady wrote at 11:07 p.m. on a Sunday in October, she endorsed Clinton and said she would endure "jail time" rather than "taking a bullet" for what she regarded as a "disaster" for America.

Social media strikes again. Free speech meet consequences. She won't get fired. Though she may resign. DC comes to mind.

[Deleted]

Jan 25, 2017 12:16:28 GMT -5 daleko said:

Jan 24, 2017 21:19:23 GMT -5 @kelliers said:

Senior Secret Service agent suggests she wouldn't take 'a bullet' for Trump
By Susan Crabtree (@susancrabtree) • 1/24/17 12:58 PM
In one Facebook post O'Grady wrote at 11:07 p.m. on a Sunday in October, she endorsed Clinton and said she would endure "jail time" rather than "taking a bullet" for what she regarded as a "disaster" for America.

Social media strikes again. Free speech meet consequences. She won't get fired. Though she may resign. DC comes to mind.

Shirking your duty and showing cowardice are fireable offenses.  
Cowardice (yes, THAT word precisely) was expressly listed in our procedures manual as just cause for termination.

That's why you don't find too many liberal police officers .......... liberals are natural cowards.

[bamorin]

Jan 25, 2017 13:14:56 GMT -5 @muttmk2 said:

.......... liberals are natural cowards.

[/b][/i][/font][/quote]


Liberals are French???......

[mscott59]

Jan 25, 2017 13:14:56 GMT -5 @muttmk2 said:

Jan 25, 2017 12:16:28 GMT -5 daleko said:

Social media strikes again. Free speech meet consequences. She won't get fired. Though she may resign. DC comes to mind.

Shirking your duty and showing cowardice are fireable offenses.  
Cowardice (yes, THAT word precisely) was expressly listed in our procedures manual as just cause for termination.

That's why you don't find too many liberal police officers .......... liberals are natural cowards.

it's like a faucet of classlessness that you just can't turn off... lol. not to mention 100% false, like in the above 'statement'. i get it for you guys who hated obama and love trump, and thinking that it wouldn't be permanent is like thinking water is not wet. is it possible to actually have a discussion without the constant insults? someday? without the typical rationalization statement of 'it's because i love my country so you must not'?

[Deleted]

Jan 26, 2017 14:04:47 GMT -5 mscott59 said:

Jan 25, 2017 13:14:56 GMT -5 @muttmk2 said:

Shirking your duty and showing cowardice are fireable offenses.  
Cowardice (yes, THAT word precisely) was expressly listed in our procedures manual as just cause for termination.

That's why you don't find too many liberal police officers .......... liberals are natural cowards.

it's like a faucet of classlessness that you just can't turn off... lol. not to mention 100% false, like in the above 'statement'. i get it for you guys who hated obama and love trump, and thinking that it wouldn't be permanent is like thinking water is not wet. is it possible to actually have a discussion without the constant insults? someday? without the typical rationalization statement of 'it's because i love my country so you must not'?

How does one love his country while supporting its destruction from within?
Sorry ................  liberals do NOT love this country.

Who do you see burning the American flag whenever there is a "disagreement of ideals?"  Who do you see waving Mexican flags in the U.S. while they are demanding that the U.S. not protect its own interests? 
Is it conservatives?
Is it liberals?
Only one choice is correct.

[mscott59]

Jan 26, 2017 14:59:53 GMT -5 @muttmk2 said:

Jan 26, 2017 14:04:47 GMT -5 mscott59 said:

it's like a faucet of classlessness that you just can't turn off... lol. not to mention 100% false, like in the above 'statement'. i get it for you guys who hated obama and love trump, and thinking that it wouldn't be permanent is like thinking water is not wet. is it possible to actually have a discussion without the constant insults? someday? without the typical rationalization statement of 'it's because i love my country so you must not'?

How does one love his country while supporting its destruction from within?
Sorry ................  liberals do NOT love this country.

Who do you see burning the American flag whenever there is a "disagreement of ideals?"  Who do you see waving Mexican flags in the U.S. while they are demanding that the U.S. not protect its own interests? 
Is it conservatives?
Is it liberals?
Only one choice is correct.

wrong. you're as wrong as you can possible be. as in all ego and no id. all red blood cells and no white blood cells. the usa was not destroyed in the last 8 years under obama. it's not suddenly been righted in the last 6 days under trump. who do i see burning american flags and waving mexican flags? what does that have to do with liberal cops? nothing, of course you just bring other elements into a thread so you can wiggle your way over to 'loony liberals', kind of like greg of the omega house marching certain pledges into the right room of rejects. lmao.

and what's even more hiliarous.... for nearly a decade you've been calling obama hitler... talk about irony.

[Deleted]

Jan 26, 2017 16:03:52 GMT -5 mscott59 said:

Jan 26, 2017 14:59:53 GMT -5 @muttmk2 said:

How does one love his country while supporting its destruction from within?
Sorry ................  liberals do NOT love this country.

Who do you see burning the American flag whenever there is a "disagreement of ideals?"  Who do you see waving Mexican flags in the U.S. while they are demanding that the U.S. not protect its own interests? 
Is it conservatives?
Is it liberals?
Only one choice is correct.

wrong. you're as wrong as you can possible be. as in all ego and no id. all red blood cells and no white blood cells. the usa was not destroyed in the last 8 years under obama. it's not suddenly been righted in the last 6 days under trump. who do i see burning american flags and waving mexican flags? what does that have to do with liberal cops? nothing, of course you just bring other elements into a thread so you can wiggle your way over to 'loony liberals', kind of like greg of the omega house marching certain pledges into the right room of rejects. lmao.

and what's even more hiliarous.... for nearly a decade you've been calling obama hitler... talk about irony.

Obama IS Hitler-like.   That's a fact.  But I agree ......  it wasn't Obama alone.   Liberals have been weakening this country for the past 50 years or so.  This trend MUST be reversed, and Jan. 20 2017 was a good date to begin doing it.

No, America hasn't been set right yet, but at least NOW we have a leader who will try to do it.  No one but a dictator could suddenly change America in less than a week.  Wait, I take that back.   America will never ALLOW a dictator.  If I thought Trump was going to try to be a dictator, I would be after HIS ass, too.