Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Jan 25, 2017 10:33:34 GMT -5
^DJI (Dow Jones Industrial Average)
January 25 10:16 AM EST
20,046.57 +133.86 (0.67%)
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by mscott59 on Jan 26, 2017 14:07:10 GMT -5
^DJI (Dow Jones Industrial Average) January 25 10:16 AM EST 20,046.57 +133.86 (0.67%) it's continuing the growth achieved under the previous administration. hope it continues. |
|
|
mark scott
tosu 81
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Jan 26, 2017 14:12:48 GMT -5
^DJI (Dow Jones Industrial Average) January 25 10:16 AM EST 20,046.57 +133.86 (0.67%) it's continuing the growth achieved under the previous administration. hope it continues. the house from 2010 and senate from 2012 are previous administration? do tell |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by mscott59 on Jan 26, 2017 15:46:47 GMT -5
it's continuing the growth achieved under the previous administration. hope it continues. the house from 2010 and senate from 2012 are previous administration? do tell ah, ok. so it was congressional policy that was responsible? do tell. |
|
|
mark scott
tosu 81
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by mscott59 on Jan 26, 2017 15:47:43 GMT -5
the house from 2010 and senate from 2012 are previous administration? do tell ah, ok. so it was congressional policy that was responsible? do tell. because you posted the current financials, at least in appearance, in connection with the new administration taking office. or are you just trying to be contrarian? lol |
|
|
mark scott
tosu 81
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2017 15:48:40 GMT -5
the house from 2010 and senate from 2012 are previous administration? do tell ah, ok. so it was congressional policy that was responsible? do tell. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Jan 26, 2017 16:01:05 GMT -5
the house from 2010 and senate from 2012 are previous administration? do tell ah, ok. so it was congressional policy that was responsible? do tell. same as is was after the 94 midterms....newt and the boys turned the economy around. find the graph of the DOW and see what happens in 2007 after pelosi takes the house. there's always a "presidential bump" in the DOW......but not in your lifetime as there is now. the presidential bump of 08 couldn't fend off pelosi/reid 06. There is a(many) reason(s) she was fired in 2010. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by AlaCowboy on Jan 26, 2017 16:08:40 GMT -5
ah, ok. so it was congressional policy that was responsible? do tell. because you posted the current financials, at least in appearance, in connection with the new administration taking office. or are you just trying to be contrarian? lol |
|
|
56-43-2* OVER FLORIDA. ALWAYS IN THE LEAD.
THE CRYBABY LIZARDS WOULD ACCEPT THIS IF THEY WERE HONEST
*2020 Is Negated By Covid-19
15 SEC CHAMPIONSHIPS FOR GEORGIA
FLORIDA HAS ONLY 8 SEC CHAMPIONSHIPS
BACK-TO-BACK NATIONAL CHAMPIONS 2021! 2022!
FOUR NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS!
AMERICAN BY BIRTH. SOUTHERN BY THE GRACE OF GOD!!!
2017 GRAND DOUCHE AWARD WINNER - NOW RETIRED
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by mscott59 on Jan 26, 2017 16:20:46 GMT -5
ah, ok. so it was congressional policy that was responsible? do tell. same as is was after the 94 midterms....newt and the boys turned the economy around. find the graph of the DOW and see what happens in 2007 after pelosi takes the house. there's always a "presidential bump" in the DOW......but not in your lifetime as there is now. the presidential bump of 08 couldn't fend off pelosi/reid 06. There is a(many) reason(s) she was fired in 2010. what i saw in '94 was a house that worked with the white house much, much more than what happened in the last 6 years. btw, the economic needle started moving up before '10, too. |
|
|
mark scott
tosu 81
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by mscott59 on Jan 26, 2017 16:21:29 GMT -5
Can't blame Obama for the success of the market since 2010. Liberal rules. Walter said so. lol. well we all know if walt says it's so....  |
|
|
mark scott
tosu 81
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Jan 26, 2017 16:23:26 GMT -5
same as is was after the 94 midterms....newt and the boys turned the economy around. find the graph of the DOW and see what happens in 2007 after pelosi takes the house. there's always a "presidential bump" in the DOW......but not in your lifetime as there is now. the presidential bump of 08 couldn't fend off pelosi/reid 06. There is a(many) reason(s) she was fired in 2010. what i saw in '94 was a house that worked with the white house much, much more than what happened in the last 6 years. btw, the economic needle started moving up before '10, too. actually what you saw was a whitehouse work more with a congress in 94, than what you saw in the last 6. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by mscott59 on Jan 26, 2017 16:25:09 GMT -5
what i saw in '94 was a house that worked with the white house much, much more than what happened in the last 6 years. btw, the economic needle started moving up before '10, too. actually what you saw was a whitehouse work more with a congress in 94, than what you saw in the last 6. that goes both ways. the gop made a very concerted effort to make obama's legislative life very very difficult, and were very open about that. philosophical differences were not as much of a barrier in the mid 90s |
|
|
mark scott
tosu 81
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Jan 26, 2017 16:35:14 GMT -5
actually what you saw was a whitehouse work more with a congress in 94, than what you saw in the last 6. that goes both ways. the gop made a very concerted effort to make obama's legislative life very very difficult, and were very open about that. philosophical differences were not as much of a barrier in the mid 90s yep, they had an economy they had to turn around. stopping him was one tool to use to do so. The american voters agreed. they saw the improvement after 2010....handed the senate back to the pubs also. the economy got better yet. this year the americans decided to turn the whitehouse over to the pubs......and what is the topic of my thread? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Jan 26, 2017 17:12:30 GMT -5
Can't blame Obama for the success of the market since 2010. Liberal rules. Walter said so. lol. well we all know if walt says it's so.... ...especially if I never said it. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Jan 26, 2017 18:19:52 GMT -5
lol. well we all know if walt says it's so.... ...especially if I never said it. or typed it? ................  |
|
Jan 13, 2020 17:38:49 GMT -5
Jan 13, 2020 17:38:49 GMT -5
May 1, 2022 14:04:40 GMT -5
May 1, 2022 14:04:40 GMT -5
