Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2017 22:11:25 GMT -5
between California and the United States of America.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2017 22:16:10 GMT -5
between California and the United States of America. There is already a huge gulf of good sense, and Californication is on the drowning side.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Jan 28, 2017 0:28:41 GMT -5
between California and the United States of America. There is already a huge gulf of good sense, and Californication is on the drowning side.We're not going away. And you better hope we don't. Our money pays for your public services. You live in a taker state. Deal with it.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2017 0:42:04 GMT -5
There is already a huge gulf of good sense, and Californication is on the drowning side. We're not going away. And you better hope we don't. Our money pays for your public services. You live in a taker state. Deal with it. Enjoy surviving without federal funds and gov't contracts if your dumbass Governor doesn't do the right thing and outlaw "sanctuary cities." Louisiana does NOT need California. We have our own crops, our own oil, AND we have a population with good sense. We have our own film production companies, too and our state has been around longer than yours. Louisianans also KEEP more of their income than Californicators, too. You keep on paying your high taxes. All you have to show for it is becoming North Mexico. ¿Entiende lo que le digo?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2017 11:11:42 GMT -5
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2017 11:12:32 GMT -5
Interesting news. Back in 2006 a bill was passed to build the wall. In fact, both Obama and Clinton voted for it.
"On October 26, 2006, U.S. President George W. Bush signed the Secure Fence Act of 2006 (Pub.L. 109–367) into law stating, “This bill will help protect the American people. This bill will make our borders more secure. It is an important step toward immigration reform."
The bill was introduced on Sep. 13, 2006 by Peter T. King (R-NY). In the House of Representatives, the Fence Act passed 283 -138 on September 14, 2006. On September 29, 2006 – the Fence Act passed in the Senate 80 -19.
The Secure Fence Act of 2006’s goal is to help secure America’s borders to decrease illegal entry, drug trafficking, and security threats by building 700 miles (1,100 km) of physical barriers along the Mexico-United States border. Additionally, the law authorizes more vehicle barriers, checkpoints, and lighting as well as authorizes the Department of Homeland Security to increase the use of advanced technology like cameras, satellites, and unmanned aerial vehicles to reinforce infrastructure at the border. Congress approved $1.2 billion in a separate homeland security spending bill to bankroll the fence, though critics say this is $4.8 billion less than what’s likely needed to get it built."
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2017 11:14:54 GMT -5
FIFME
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2017 11:17:35 GMT -5
Interesting news. Back in 2006 a bill was passed to build the wall. In fact, both Obama and Clinton voted for it. "On October 26, 2006, U.S. President George W. Bush signed the Secure Fence Act of 2006 (Pub.L. 109–367) into law stating, “This bill will help protect the American people. This bill will make our borders more secure. It is an important step toward immigration reform." The bill was introduced on Sep. 13, 2006 by Peter T. King (R-NY). In the House of Representatives, the Fence Act passed 283 -138 on September 14, 2006. On September 29, 2006 – the Fence Act passed in the Senate 80 -19. The Secure Fence Act of 2006’s goal is to help secure America’s borders to decrease illegal entry, drug trafficking, and security threats by building 700 miles (1,100 km) of physical barriers along the Mexico-United States border. Additionally, the law authorizes more vehicle barriers, checkpoints, and lighting as well as authorizes the Department of Homeland Security to increase the use of advanced technology like cameras, satellites, and unmanned aerial vehicles to reinforce infrastructure at the border. Congress approved $1.2 billion in a separate homeland security spending bill to bankroll the fence, though critics say this is $4.8 billion less than what’s likely needed to get it built." Yep. Approval for the wall already exists. So Donald Trump won't be building the wall. It will be the Congress of 2006 who authorized. Thus ends the wall argument. Liberals have NO argument. The go-ahead is already there; it just hasn't been go-aheaded yet.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2017 11:25:19 GMT -5
Interesting news. Back in 2006 a bill was passed to build the wall. In fact, both Obama and Clinton voted for it. "On October 26, 2006, U.S. President George W. Bush signed the Secure Fence Act of 2006 (Pub.L. 109–367) into law stating, “This bill will help protect the American people. This bill will make our borders more secure. It is an important step toward immigration reform." The bill was introduced on Sep. 13, 2006 by Peter T. King (R-NY). In the House of Representatives, the Fence Act passed 283 -138 on September 14, 2006. On September 29, 2006 – the Fence Act passed in the Senate 80 -19. The Secure Fence Act of 2006’s goal is to help secure America’s borders to decrease illegal entry, drug trafficking, and security threats by building 700 miles (1,100 km) of physical barriers along the Mexico-United States border. Additionally, the law authorizes more vehicle barriers, checkpoints, and lighting as well as authorizes the Department of Homeland Security to increase the use of advanced technology like cameras, satellites, and unmanned aerial vehicles to reinforce infrastructure at the border. Congress approved $1.2 billion in a separate homeland security spending bill to bankroll the fence, though critics say this is $4.8 billion less than what’s likely needed to get it built." Yep. Approval for the wall already exists. So Donald Trump won't be building the wall. It will be the Congress of 2006 who authorized. Thus ends the wall argument. Liberals have NO argument. The go-ahead is already there; it just hasn't been go-aheaded yet. No wall, sanctuary cities, bring 'em all in, take no action on the border, fast and furious... Zero was bent on destroying America and the liberals STILL defend that shit.
|
|