Hackers Altered 2016 Presidential Campaign Voter Data

[daleko]

Jan 11, 2018 15:02:43 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Jan 11, 2018 14:25:06 GMT -5 daleko said:

Another necro-post by Willie, trying to run up his posting numbers. Trying to be Christ raising the dead. Christ you aren't and Lazarus this thread isn't.

I'm just waiting for you Trump trolls to answer a basic question about an Email that Wikileaks sent to Donald Trump, Jr. on Election Night.

Care to answer the question, Cheese Burgher?

Don't know at this moment. Do you have a copy of the email, who sent it, where (who) it was sent (to) and confirmation of who received it? I'll have my peeps look into it and I'll then report back. Might take a bit of time as they are currently focused on making money for me but when they're done I'll have them look into it.

[Deleted]

Jan 11, 2018 15:56:42 GMT -5 daleko said:

Jan 11, 2018 15:02:43 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

I'm just waiting for you Trump trolls to answer a basic question about an Email that Wikileaks sent to Donald Trump, Jr. on Election Night.

Care to answer the question, Cheese Burgher?

Don't know at this moment. Do you have a copy of the email, who sent it, where (who) it was sent (to) and confirmation of who received it? I'll have my peeps look into it and I'll then report back. Might take a bit of time as they are currently focused on making money for me but when they're done I'll have them look into it.

Here's your reference.

Look at The Atlantic.  November 13, 2017.

"The Secret Correspondence Between Wikileaks and Donald Trump, Jr."

[daleko]

Jan 11, 2018 23:54:01 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Jan 11, 2018 15:56:42 GMT -5 daleko said:

Don't know at this moment. Do you have a copy of the email, who sent it, where (who) it was sent (to) and confirmation of who received it? I'll have my peeps look into it and I'll then report back. Might take a bit of time as they are currently focused on making money for me but when they're done I'll have them look into it.

Here's your reference.

Look at The Atlantic.  November 13, 2017.

"The Secret Correspondence Between Wikileaks and Donald Trump, Jr."

No joy. He said, he said. John 20:25, what.

[Deleted]

Jan 12, 2018 11:25:29 GMT -5 daleko said:

Jan 11, 2018 23:54:01 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Here's your reference.

Look at The Atlantic.  November 13, 2017.

"The Secret Correspondence Between Wikileaks and Donald Trump, Jr."

No joy. He said, he said. John 20:25, what.

Yeah, right... Because The Atlantic is such an unreliable source of quality information, eh?  NOT.

[daleko]

Jan 12, 2018 15:21:52 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Jan 12, 2018 11:25:29 GMT -5 daleko said:

No joy. He said, he said. John 20:25, what.

Yeah, right... Because The Atlantic is such an unreliable source of quality information, eh?  NOT.

Better men than them have been fooled. John 20:25.

[Deleted]

Jan 12, 2018 15:24:45 GMT -5 daleko said:

Jan 12, 2018 15:21:52 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Yeah, right... Because The Atlantic is such an unreliable source of quality information, eh?  NOT.

Better men than them have been fooled. John 20:25.

Excuses, excuses...

Let us assume, for the sake of argument, that the Atlantic story about Don, Jr.'s Emails is accurate.

What do you make of Wikileaks/Putin advising the Trump team to contest the vote counts (on Election night) in the event that Trump did not have a razor-thin margin of victory in Wisconsin and Michigan?

Just a lucky hunch?

[daleko]

Jan 12, 2018 15:30:12 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Jan 12, 2018 15:24:45 GMT -5 daleko said:

Better men than them have been fooled. John 20:25.

Excuses, excuses...

Let us assume, for the sake of argument, that the Atlantic story about Don, Jr.'s Emails is accurate.

What do you make of Wikileaks/Putin advising the Trump team to contest the vote counts (on Election night) in the event that Trump did not have a razor-thin margin of victory in Wisconsin and Michigan?

Just a lucky hunch?

Measure twice, cut once. Let's assume it's all horse crap until I can see the actual work and send it all to Liz for evaluation.

[Deleted]

Jan 12, 2018 15:34:15 GMT -5 daleko said:

Jan 12, 2018 15:30:12 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Excuses, excuses...

Let us assume, for the sake of argument, that the Atlantic story about Don, Jr.'s Emails is accurate.

What do you make of Wikileaks/Putin advising the Trump team to contest the vote counts (on Election night) in the event that Trump did not have a razor-thin margin of victory in Wisconsin and Michigan?

Just a lucky hunch?

Measure twice, cut once. Let's assume it's all horse crap until I can see the actual work and send it all to Liz for evaluation.

Answer the question.  At most, it's a smoking gun about Russian vote hacking in the 2016 election.

Would Wikileaks/Putin have advised a recount for no good reason?  I doubt it.

[daleko]

Jan 12, 2018 15:36:43 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Jan 12, 2018 15:34:15 GMT -5 daleko said:

Measure twice, cut once. Let's assume it's all horse crap until I can see the actual work and send it all to Liz for evaluation.

Answer the question.  At most, it's a smoking gun about Russian vote hacking in the 2016 election.

Would Wikileaks/Putin have advised a recount for no good reason?  I doubt it.

Can't say until I see it. John 20:25. Unlike you who believes whatever he sees that agrees w what he feels.

[Deleted]

Jan 12, 2018 17:02:52 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Jan 12, 2018 15:39:40 GMT -5 daleko said:

Can't say until I see it. John 20:25. Unlike you who believes whatever he sees that agrees w what he feels.

Read the Atlantic article.

You need to upgrade your information sources, in any case.

Are you still reading the CIA disinformation at McAdams.edu?