How silly can the dumbasses at NRA get?

[kaz]

Mar 25, 2018 12:30:11 GMT -5 @kelliers said:

Mar 25, 2018 12:22:51 GMT -5 kaz said:

You're taking words from Fred's post and attributing them to me.

Come on, Walt. Admit it. You're being disingenuous with your posts.

What are you talking about? I never said those words. I said I agree with the NRA (in general).

Didn't say they were your words, I said they were in your post. There's a difference, even if Walt doesn't get it.

[Deleted]

Mar 24, 2018 15:48:52 GMT -5 Walter said:

A march is formulated and primarily organized by a bunch of high schoolers.
The NRA's response: "March For Our Lives is backed by radicals with a history of violent threats, language, and actions,"

LOL...ooooookay.

   

     Looks like Rox has started a new wing nut thread based on this ludicrous NRA propaganda video, entitled, "TRUTH."  Does the ass clown narrator really believe his nonsensical NRA script?

     It's beyond pathetic-- something written and produced by an NRA version of Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels.

     America has a serious-- possibly catastrophic-- wing nut propaganda problem.

[roxalot]

Mar 25, 2018 9:48:16 GMT -5 Walter said:

Mar 25, 2018 9:32:17 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

So where does the NRA state anything about "violent radicals?" You just make things up to suit your own warped ideas. Try being honest and truthful just once.

?
Uh...in addition to the guy's words, it is in the title of the NRA's own video.

so you don't think madonna stating that she wants to blow up the White house is not violent and radical..?..

[Walter]

Apr 3, 2018 20:03:19 GMT -5 roxalot said:

Mar 25, 2018 9:48:16 GMT -5 Walter said:

?
Uh...in addition to the guy's words, it is in the title of the NRA's own video.

so you don't think madonna stating that she wants to blow up the White house is not violent and radical..?..

You mean the woman who stated that she wanted to start a "revolution of love"? The woman who said she was angry enough to want to blow up the White House, but announced that instead she would choose love as her weapon?
That woman?

I am guessing you never actually heard her speech. Instead, you obviously filter life through Wayne LaPierre's bathroom toilet.

[daleko]

Apr 3, 2018 21:47:50 GMT -5 Walter said:

Apr 3, 2018 20:03:19 GMT -5 roxalot said:

so you don't think madonna stating that she wants to blow up the White house is not violent and radical..?..

You mean the woman who stated that she wanted to start a "revolution of love"? The woman who said she was angry enough to want to blow up the White House, but announced that instead she would choose love as her weapon?
That woman?

I am guessing you never actually heard her speech. Instead, you obviously filter life through Wayne LaPierre's bathroom toilet.

Walt, if those not aligned w the NRA's current positions studied the history of the NRA, the solution to their angst is clear. But perhaps not quick enough, however, as you have said you gotta start somewhere. The NRA was different org prior to about 1977. A pivot date. Soooooooooo, do it w the vote. 5 million members in the NRA, do today what was done in '77. If you're right, get you and 10 million of your friends to join the NRA. And vote the leadership out of office.

[AlaCowboy]

Apr 3, 2018 21:47:50 GMT -5 Walter said:

Apr 3, 2018 20:03:19 GMT -5 roxalot said:

so you don't think madonna stating that she wants to blow up the White house is not violent and radical..?..

You mean the woman who stated that she wanted to start a "revolution of love"? The woman who said she was angry enough to want to blow up the White House, but announced that instead she would choose love as her weapon?
That woman?

I am guessing you never actually heard her speech. Instead, you obviously filter life through Wayne LaPierre's bathroom toilet.

Well, I heard her speech. She said, "YES I'm angry, YES I'm outraged, yes I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House, but I know that this won't change anything," she explained to the crowd.

Sounded like (and reads like) she said she thought about blowing up the White House. What did YOU think she said in that sentence?

[Walter]

Apr 3, 2018 22:48:32 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Apr 3, 2018 21:47:50 GMT -5 Walter said:

You mean the woman who stated that she wanted to start a "revolution of love"? The woman who said she was angry enough to want to blow up the White House, but announced that instead she would choose love as her weapon?
That woman?

I am guessing you never actually heard her speech. Instead, you obviously filter life through Wayne LaPierre's bathroom toilet.

Well, I heard her speech. She said, "YES I'm angry, YES I'm outraged, yes I have thought an awful lot about blowing up the White House, but I know that this won't change anything," she explained to the crowd.

Sounded like (and reads like) she said she thought about blowing up the White House. What did YOU think she said in that sentence?

...and then she ended by saying...what?

[Walter]

Apr 3, 2018 22:43:58 GMT -5 daleko said:

Apr 3, 2018 21:47:50 GMT -5 Walter said:

You mean the woman who stated that she wanted to start a "revolution of love"? The woman who said she was angry enough to want to blow up the White House, but announced that instead she would choose love as her weapon?
That woman?

I am guessing you never actually heard her speech. Instead, you obviously filter life through Wayne LaPierre's bathroom toilet.

Walt, if those not aligned w the NRA's current positions studied the history of the NRA, the solution to their angst is clear. But perhaps not quick enough, however, as you have said you gotta start somewhere. The NRA was different org prior to about 1977. A pivot date. Soooooooooo, do it w the vote. 5 million members in the NRA, do today what was done in '77. If you're right, get you and 10 million of your friends to join the NRA. And vote the leadership out of office.

That is just whackamole. If the NRA is defanged, the gun kooks will slide over to the GOA and start anew.
Neither org is about guns as much as they have become political agents of the far right.
The vote that matters is in gov races, not within private right wing groups masquerading as gun orgs.

[roxalot]

Apr 3, 2018 21:47:50 GMT -5 Walter said:

Apr 3, 2018 20:03:19 GMT -5 roxalot said:

so you don't think madonna stating that she wants to blow up the White house is not violent and radical..?..

You mean the woman who stated that she wanted to start a "revolution of love"? The woman who said she was angry enough to want to blow up the White House, but announced that instead she would choose love as her weapon?
That woman?

I am guessing you never actually heard her speech. Instead, you obviously filter life through Wayne LaPierre's bathroom toilet.

I get it. You liberals can say one thing but 'mean' another. I get it. You don't think one of your self imposed 'leaders' stating she wants to blow up the White house is violent and radical. Matters not what you think about the NRA, I still despise you communists, even after you changed your name to liberals.

[Walter]

Apr 4, 2018 5:20:05 GMT -5 roxalot said:

Apr 3, 2018 21:47:50 GMT -5 Walter said:

You mean the woman who stated that she wanted to start a "revolution of love"? The woman who said she was angry enough to want to blow up the White House, but announced that instead she would choose love as her weapon?
That woman?

I am guessing you never actually heard her speech. Instead, you obviously filter life through Wayne LaPierre's bathroom toilet.

I get it. You liberals can say one thing but 'mean' another. I get it. You don't think one of your self imposed 'leaders' stating she wants to blow up the White house is violent and radical. Matters not what you think about the NRA, I still despise you communists, even after you changed your name to liberals.

Sure you do.
"...I still despise you communists..."
Me and my bro Putin had a good laugh over that one.

[Buckeye Dale]

Mar 24, 2018 17:42:48 GMT -5 @kelliers said:

Mar 24, 2018 17:41:24 GMT -5 @cwgbuckeyes35 said:

There's a shock

You're right. No shock at all that you and Walt can't think straight.

FIFY

[Buckeye Dale]

Mar 25, 2018 12:22:51 GMT -5 kaz said:

Mar 25, 2018 9:28:08 GMT -5 Walter said:

Come on, Kaz. Admit it.
"violent radicals"?
Eli Broad? Clooney? Oprah?
On my planet that is called, "overselling".

You're taking words from Fred's post and attributing them to me.

Come on, Walt. Admit it. You're being disingenuous with your posts.

Shocker...standard MO from the liar...

[Deleted]

Apr 3, 2018 23:58:02 GMT -5 Walter said:

Apr 3, 2018 22:43:58 GMT -5 daleko said:

Walt, if those not aligned w the NRA's current positions studied the history of the NRA, the solution to their angst is clear. But perhaps not quick enough, however, as you have said you gotta start somewhere. The NRA was different org prior to about 1977. A pivot date. Soooooooooo, do it w the vote. 5 million members in the NRA, do today what was done in '77. If you're right, get you and 10 million of your friends to join the NRA. And vote the leadership out of office.

That is just whackamole. If the NRA is defanged, the gun kooks will slide over to the GOA and start anew.
Neither org is about guns as much as they have become political agents of the far right.
The vote that matters is in gov races, not within private right wing groups masquerading as gun orgs.

No. It's about keeping you ass holes from stripping everyone's rights away.

[bamorin]

Apr 4, 2018 10:02:01 GMT -5 @kelliers said:

No. It's about keeping you ass holes from stripping everyone's rights away.

stripping 'rights' is what governments do.

[Deleted]

Apr 4, 2018 10:41:06 GMT -5 bamorin said:

Apr 4, 2018 10:02:01 GMT -5 @kelliers said:

No. It's about keeping you ass holes from stripping everyone's rights away.

stripping 'rights' is what governments do.

And GDCs who live in the desert and cry GW...