Fox News Polls shows strong gun control support

[Deleted]

Wow.

[Deleted]

Oh. One not shown here. The guns in school doesn't mean teachers. The poll had 37% support for arming teachers with 57% against

[AlaCowboy]

Mar 25, 2018 10:39:47 GMT -5 @cwgbuckeyes35 said:

Oh. One not shown here. The guns in school doesn't mean teachers. The poll had 37% support for arming teachers with 57% against

I'm for banning civilian ownership of automatic firearms. But any firearm that requires a trigger pull to fire one bullet should not be banned. What say you, Mike?

[Deleted]

Mar 25, 2018 14:24:45 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Mar 25, 2018 10:39:47 GMT -5 @cwgbuckeyes35 said:

Oh. One not shown here. The guns in school doesn't mean teachers. The poll had 37% support for arming teachers with 57% against

I'm for banning civilian ownership of automatic firearms. But any firearm that requires a trigger pull to fire one bullet should not be banned. What say you, Mike?

Depends

[Walter]

Mar 25, 2018 14:24:45 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Mar 25, 2018 10:39:47 GMT -5 @cwgbuckeyes35 said:

Oh. One not shown here. The guns in school doesn't mean teachers. The poll had 37% support for arming teachers with 57% against

I'm for banning civilian ownership of automatic firearms. But any firearm that requires a trigger pull to fire one bullet should not be banned. What say you, Mike?

Just as a point of discussion and out of curiosity, explain to us why you think semi-automatic rifles should be legal.

[AlaCowboy]

Mar 25, 2018 14:37:13 GMT -5 Walter said:

Mar 25, 2018 14:24:45 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

I'm for banning civilian ownership of automatic firearms. But any firearm that requires a trigger pull to fire one bullet should not be banned. What say you, Mike?

Just as a point of discussion and out of curiosity, explain to us why you think semi-automatic rifles should be legal.

Because any firearm handled properly is a safe firearm. I have a .22 rifle that holds 7 bullets. I can fire them one at a time as fast as I can pull the trigger. I also have an AR-15 that can hold different capacity magazines. It also fires one bullet each time I pull the trigger. The only difference is the size of the bullet.
None of the rifles or handguns I have owned over the years have ever fired by themselves. There is no more inherent danger from my AR-15 than there is from my .22, or my .380, or my .38, or my 9mm Glock. Why do you think one style of firearm, that fires one bullet every time the trigger is pulled, should be banned over another style that also fires one bullet each time the trigger is pulled?

[Deleted]

Mar 25, 2018 16:47:21 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Mar 25, 2018 14:37:13 GMT -5 Walter said:

Just as a point of discussion and out of curiosity, explain to us why you think semi-automatic rifles should be legal.

Because any firearm handled properly is a safe firearm. I have a .22 rifle that holds 7 bullets. I can fire them one at a time as fast as I can pull the trigger. I also have an AR-15 that can hold different capacity magazines. It also fires one bullet each time I pull the trigger. The only difference is the size of the bullet.
None of the rifles or handguns I have owned over the years have ever fired by themselves. There is no more inherent danger from my AR-15 than there is from my .22, or my .380, or my .38, or my 9mm Glock. Why do you think one style of firearm, that fires one bullet every time the trigger is pulled, should be banned over another style that also fires one bullet each time the trigger is pulled?

If every single gun is safe. Why are automatic weapons banned? Why aren't you fighting to have them?

[AlaCowboy]

Mar 25, 2018 14:26:34 GMT -5 @cwgbuckeyes35 said:

Mar 25, 2018 14:24:45 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

I'm for banning civilian ownership of automatic firearms. But any firearm that requires a trigger pull to fire one bullet should not be banned. What say you, Mike?

Depends

On what?

[Deleted]

Mar 25, 2018 16:49:56 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Mar 25, 2018 14:26:34 GMT -5 @cwgbuckeyes35 said:

Depends

On what?

On how many bullets it can hold and how easy it is to reload

[Deleted]

Mar 25, 2018 16:47:21 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Mar 25, 2018 14:37:13 GMT -5 Walter said:

Just as a point of discussion and out of curiosity, explain to us why you think semi-automatic rifles should be legal.

Because any firearm handled properly is a safe firearm. I have a .22 rifle that holds 7 bullets. I can fire them one at a time as fast as I can pull the trigger. I also have an AR-15 that can hold different capacity magazines. It also fires one bullet each time I pull the trigger. The only difference is the size of the bullet.
None of the rifles or handguns I have owned over the years have ever fired by themselves. There is no more inherent danger from my AR-15 than there is from my .22, or my .380, or my .38, or my 9mm Glock. Why do you think one style of firearm, that fires one bullet every time the trigger is pulled, should be banned over another style that also fires one bullet each time the trigger is pulled?

I'll take a shot at it...
It's because Walt only wants guns that shoot one bullet at a time before you have to reload. He wants things real slow like a democrat voter is.

[Deleted]

Mar 25, 2018 16:49:39 GMT -5 @cwgbuckeyes35 said:

Mar 25, 2018 16:47:21 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Because any firearm handled properly is a safe firearm. I have a .22 rifle that holds 7 bullets. I can fire them one at a time as fast as I can pull the trigger. I also have an AR-15 that can hold different capacity magazines. It also fires one bullet each time I pull the trigger. The only difference is the size of the bullet.
None of the rifles or handguns I have owned over the years have ever fired by themselves. There is no more inherent danger from my AR-15 than there is from my .22, or my .380, or my .38, or my 9mm Glock. Why do you think one style of firearm, that fires one bullet every time the trigger is pulled, should be banned over another style that also fires one bullet each time the trigger is pulled?

If every single gun is safe. Why are automatic weapons banned? Why aren't you fighting to have them?

They aren't banned you dipshit. You can have one with enough money and the enhanced background check.

[Deleted]

Mar 25, 2018 16:52:37 GMT -5 @kelliers said:

Mar 25, 2018 16:49:39 GMT -5 @cwgbuckeyes35 said:

If every single gun is safe. Why are automatic weapons banned? Why aren't you fighting to have them?

They aren't banned you dipshit. You can have one with enough money and the enhanced background check.

So you can walk into a store and buy a full automatic weapon right now

[Deleted]

Mar 25, 2018 16:51:19 GMT -5 @cwgbuckeyes35 said:

Mar 25, 2018 16:49:56 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

On what?

On how many bullets it can hold and how easy it is to reload

And when you get that, then what? Your side stops? This never ends with people like you.

[Deleted]

Mar 25, 2018 16:54:10 GMT -5 @kelliers said:

Mar 25, 2018 16:51:19 GMT -5 @cwgbuckeyes35 said:

On how many bullets it can hold and how easy it is to reload

And when you get that, then what? Your side stops? This never ends with people like you.

I would. Not sure about my side. Would yours ever stop? Before or after you can own a tank with nuclear warheads?

[Deleted]

Mar 25, 2018 16:53:29 GMT -5 @cwgbuckeyes35 said:

Mar 25, 2018 16:52:37 GMT -5 @kelliers said:

They aren't banned you dipshit. You can have one with enough money and the enhanced background check.

So you can walk into a store and buy a full automatic weapon right now

Sure, in most states, so long as you have $20,000+ for the merchandise, pay the $200 government tax stamp and wait six months for the government approval. You've been told this I don't know how many f-in times on this forum. Patch the holes in your brain so the information doesn't leak out this time.