Ivermectin - The Hidden (in Plain Sight) Cure for COVID

[Walter]

Feb 4, 2022 9:05:37 GMT -5 Panama pfRedd said:

Feb 4, 2022 6:55:52 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Seems like an architect would have more sense than this

You would think. Walt is liberal, ego-maniacal and he thinks his shit don't stink because his head is always up his ass.

Fred is a draftsman who couldn't pass the Architectural exam, has no idea what he doesn't know, yet thinks he is smart.

[Panama pfRedd]

^^^^^ blatant liar with psychological problems. His family should do an intervention.

[Walter]

Feb 4, 2022 9:41:57 GMT -5 Panama pfRedd said:

^^^^^ blatant liar with psychological problems. His family should do an intervention.

Blatant liar?
You mean you do not think you are smart?

[daleko]

Feb 4, 2022 9:18:37 GMT -5 Walter said:

Feb 4, 2022 9:05:37 GMT -5 Panama pfRedd said:

You would think. Walt is liberal, ego-maniacal and he thinks his shit don't stink because his head is always up his ass.

Fred is a draftsman who couldn't pass the Architectural exam, has no idea what he doesn't know, yet thinks he is smart.

Really, you want to go there, again? I thought we cleared this up awhile ago.  I really do not believe it is either fair nor even the slightest bit appropriate to attempt to compare the “smartness” of any person versus another, especially on some arbitrary basis such as their profession. 

Smart is relative to the need. The person that is smarter is the one that went into the field for which their talents and interests were best aligned.

And teams construct things.  Each has a part to play.  With different levels of "smartness". Which might lead to the Q............

Are Architects smarter or less smart than Architectural Engineers? Architects could be architectural engineers, perhaps, but don't have sufficient edu. WHich some might consider (AE that is) more intellectually challenging.

Anyway, and I don't know the answer so I rely on you, could Frank Lloyd Wright have passed the Cali exam, following his edu AE experience, which he never finished, at Wisky? Or after his short internship? Was he less smart because of his lack of a formal edu?

[Panama pfRedd]

I wonder how I accumulated my wealth and high standard of living... couldn't be that I make a shitload of money and invest it wisely. Nope.
(hint: it wasn't given to me and I've earned every penny from hard work, talent and investing)
Meanwhile the ego-maniacal 'architect' lives in a bungalow, when he's not sponging off his 'niece'...

P.S. I never took the A exam as the lying ass hole keeps saying again and again. One of the most talented engineers I ever worked with didn't have a PE or SE. But she was an equal partner in the firm and retired to a large horse range in OK.

Ass holes will be ass holes.

[Walter]

Feb 4, 2022 13:45:24 GMT -5 daleko said:

Feb 4, 2022 9:18:37 GMT -5 Walter said:

Fred is a draftsman who couldn't pass the Architectural exam, has no idea what he doesn't know, yet thinks he is smart.

Really, you want to go there, again? I thought we cleared this up awhile ago.  I really do not believe it is either fair nor even the slightest bit appropriate to attempt to compare the “smartness” of any person versus another, especially on some arbitrary basis such as their profession. 

Smart is relative to the need. The person that is smarter is the one that went into the field for which their talents and interests were best aligned.

And teams construct things.  Each has a part to play.  With different levels of "smartness". Which might lead to the Q............

Are Architects smarter or less smart than Architectural Engineers? Architects could be architectural engineers, perhaps, but don't have sufficient edu. WHich some might consider (AE that is) more intellectually challenging.

Anyway, and I don't know the answer so I rely on you, could Frank Lloyd Wright have passed the Cali exam, following his edu AE experience, which he never finished, at Wisky? Or after his short internship? Was he less smart because of his lack of a formal edu?

FLW could easily have passed the exam. Nearly any Architect worth anything could. Failure to pass the exam could be a lack of smarts, but mostly a failure of discipline and desire. You either want it and put in the work, or you don't.
I've told the story before about education. The best thing I ever learned about Architecture is the last thing my professor said to me as I paraded around in cap and gown. He said, 'Congratulations. You now know about 2% of what you need to be a good architect.'
...and he wasn't wrong.

[Walter]

Feb 4, 2022 13:52:43 GMT -5 Panama pfRedd said:

I wonder how I accumulated my wealth and high standard of living... couldn't be that I make a shitload of money and invest it wisely. Nope.
(hint: it wasn't given to me and I've earned every penny from hard work, talent and investing)
Meanwhile the ego-maniacal 'architect' lives in a bungalow, when he's not sponging off his 'niece'...

You certainly didn't do it in architecture. You don't know enough about it. You've demonstrated that.

[daleko]

Feb 4, 2022 13:53:31 GMT -5 Walter said:

He said, 'Congratulations. You now know about 2% of what you need to be a good architect.'
...and he wasn't wrong.

^5

[Panama pfRedd]

More ass holery by the head forum ass hole.

[lz2112]

Feb 4, 2022 8:53:57 GMT -5 Walter said:

Feb 4, 2022 3:49:54 GMT -5 lz2112 said:

Ivermectin is now generic. Anyone can make it and it is very cheap. It wouldn't be the cash cow things under patent would be. Also, any proven therapeutic for Covid would invalidate the Emergency Use Authorization for the vaccines, meaning the drug manufacturers would become legally liable for any adverse effects from the vaccines.

The vaccines are fully approved. Try again.
And hell, if aspirin was shown to work on Covid, are you suggesting Bayer would not want a piece of that market? Come on, man...Try again.

Not according to Pfizer and Moderna.

www.modernatx.com/covid19vaccine-eua/

The Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine has not been approved or licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID‑19) for use in individuals 18 years of age and older.
The EUA for the Moderna COVID‑19 Vaccine is in effect for the duration of the COVID‑19 EUA declaration justifying emergency use of the product, unless the declaration is terminated or the authorization is revoked sooner.

www.pfizer.com/news/press-release/press-release-detail/pfizer-and-biontech-initiate-rolling-submission-emergency

Emergency uses of the vaccine have not been approved or licensed by FDA, but have been authorized by FDA, under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in individuals 5 years of age and older. The emergency uses are only authorized for the duration of the declaration that circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of the medical product under Section 564(b)(1) of the FD&C Act unless the declaration is terminated or authorization revoked sooner.

If the vaccines are so safe, why do the pharmaceuticals still need to be protected from legal liability? And why are all existing possible therapeutic medications dismissed out of hand, except for these vaccines?

Your turn to try again.