What Hit the Pentagon on 09/11/01?

[dilligaf]

It was United Flight 175, without a doubt.   Another aircraft witnessed it.

FF to 1:01:54

The whole audio is really worth listening to.

[Panama pfRedd]

Obviously a holographic projection to cover for the planned detonation. Projector was set up on the grassy knoll to the southwest.

[DrSchadenfreude]

Get a clue. The Bush/Cheney/PNAC cover story was that AA 77 hit the Pentagon, but the video evidence, multiple non-Bush/Cheney/PNAC employed witnesses, and photographic evidence of the single titanium rotor at the site all confirm that the Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile.

9/11 was a major U.S./Israeli/Saudi black op/psy op that was used as a "New Pearl Harbor" to mobilize public support for U.S. military interventions in the Middle East.

That evidence has been posted here in exhaustive detail over the years.


Here's a security cam photo of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon-- far smaller than a Boeing 757.





Here's the single small titanium rotor recovered in the Pentagon wreckage-- far smaller than Boeing 757 rotors.

It's the same size as single engine rotors used in cruise missiles.

[DrSchadenfreude]

     There's no way that the average American Joe will ever learn the truth about the 9/11 op without first learning the truth about the close relationship between the U.S. military-industrial complex and our mainstream media (and social media/internet propaganda.)

     Most Americans eventually figured out that we were completely duped about the JFK assassination and, later, the pretext for invading Iraq in 2003, but very few have figured out yet that we were completely duped about the 9/11 op that was used to launch the Wolfowitz Doctrine of military intervention in the Middle East.

     There was a survey several years ago indicating that only about 5% of Americans knew that a third steel skyscraper-- World Trade Center 7-- had abruptly collapsed (in a symmetrical free fall) on 9/11, despite never being hit by an airplane.  5%.  The story was completely suppressed in the U.S. media, for a reason.

     What was even more absurd is that a BBC newscaster announced, on television, that WTC7 had collapsed before the building collapsed.

     When Dan Rather commented on the WTC7 film footage on 9/11, he accurately said, "It looks just like a building being demolished by dynamite."

     It was a pre-planned, expert demolition.

[cbisbig]

Jul 26, 2022 17:27:04 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Get a clue. The Bush/Cheney/PNAC cover story was that AA 77 hit the Pentagon, but the video evidence, multiple non-Bush/Cheney/PNAC employed witnesses, and photographic evidence of the single titanium rotor at the site all confirm that the Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile.

9/11 was a major U.S./Israeli/Saudi black op/psy op that was used as a "New Pearl Harbor" to mobilize public support for U.S. military interventions in the Middle East.

That evidence has been posted here in exhaustive detail over the years.


Here's a security cam photo of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon-- far smaller than a Boeing 757.





Here's the single small titanium rotor recovered in the Pentagon wreckage-- far smaller than Boeing 757 rotors.

It's the same size as single engine rotors used in cruise missiles.

WOW!!
You’re a NUT on top of the OCD

[AlaCowboy]

Jul 26, 2022 17:27:04 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Get a clue. The Bush/Cheney/PNAC cover story was that AA 77 hit the Pentagon, but the video evidence, multiple non-Bush/Cheney/PNAC employed witnesses, and photographic evidence of the single titanium rotor at the site all confirm that the Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile.

9/11 was a major U.S./Israeli/Saudi black op/psy op that was used as a "New Pearl Harbor" to mobilize public support for U.S. military interventions in the Middle East.

That evidence has been posted here in exhaustive detail over the years.


Here's a security cam photo of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon-- far smaller than a Boeing 757.





Here's the single small titanium rotor recovered in the Pentagon wreckage-- far smaller than Boeing 757 rotors.

It's the same size as single engine rotors used in cruise missiles.

You forgot to mention the live testimony at multiple media interviews on live TV from the passengers on the three airplanes the lying government claimed were hijacked. Post those interviews for the non-believers, Billy Nie der hut.

[lz2112]

Oct 22, 2022 22:12:36 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Jul 26, 2022 17:27:04 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Get a clue. The Bush/Cheney/PNAC cover story was that AA 77 hit the Pentagon, but the video evidence, multiple non-Bush/Cheney/PNAC employed witnesses, and photographic evidence of the single titanium rotor at the site all confirm that the Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile.

9/11 was a major U.S./Israeli/Saudi black op/psy op that was used as a "New Pearl Harbor" to mobilize public support for U.S. military interventions in the Middle East.

That evidence has been posted here in exhaustive detail over the years.


Here's a security cam photo of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon-- far smaller than a Boeing 757.





Here's the single small titanium rotor recovered in the Pentagon wreckage-- far smaller than Boeing 757 rotors.

It's the same size as single engine rotors used in cruise missiles.

You forgot to mention the live testimony at multiple media interviews on live TV from the passengers on the three airplanes the lying government claimed were hijacked. Post those interviews for the non-believers, Billy Nie der hut.

Or maybe the family's should just sue Willie for 2.3 trillion. Willie is every bit as ludicrous and offensive as Alex Jones.

[DrSchadenfreude]

Jul 26, 2022 17:27:04 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Get a clue. The Bush/Cheney/PNAC cover story was that AA 77 hit the Pentagon, but the video evidence, multiple non-Bush/Cheney/PNAC employed witnesses, and photographic evidence of the single titanium rotor at the site all confirm that the Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile.

9/11 was a major U.S./Israeli/Saudi black op/psy op that was used as a "New Pearl Harbor" to mobilize public support for U.S. military interventions in the Middle East.

That evidence has been posted here in exhaustive detail over the years.


Here's a security cam photo of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon-- far smaller than a Boeing 757.





Here's the single small titanium rotor recovered in the Pentagon wreckage-- far smaller than Boeing 757 rotors.

It's the same size as single engine rotors used in cruise missiles.

Can't fix LZ stupid.

[AlaCowboy]

Oct 23, 2022 10:09:07 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Jul 26, 2022 17:27:04 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Get a clue. The Bush/Cheney/PNAC cover story was that AA 77 hit the Pentagon, but the video evidence, multiple non-Bush/Cheney/PNAC employed witnesses, and photographic evidence of the single titanium rotor at the site all confirm that the Pentagon was hit by a cruise missile.

9/11 was a major U.S./Israeli/Saudi black op/psy op that was used as a "New Pearl Harbor" to mobilize public support for U.S. military interventions in the Middle East.

That evidence has been posted here in exhaustive detail over the years.


Here's a security cam photo of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon-- far smaller than a Boeing 757.





Here's the single small titanium rotor recovered in the Pentagon wreckage-- far smaller than Boeing 757 rotors.

It's the same size as single engine rotors used in cruise missiles.

Can't fix LZ stupid.

Sure you can. Post the live interviews of the passengers that were on the flight manifests of the planes you say were not hijacked on 9/11/2001. That will expose the conspiracy you claim the government and CIA orchestrated.
Why do you never comment on why you don't post these live interviews? Think of the money you'd make exposing the hoax.

[DrSchadenfreude]

Oct 23, 2022 11:00:16 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Oct 23, 2022 10:09:07 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Can't fix LZ stupid.

Sure you can. Post the live interviews of the passengers that were on the flight manifests of the planes you say were not hijacked on 9/11/2001. That will expose the conspiracy you claim the government and CIA orchestrated.
Why do you never comment on why you don't post these live interviews? Think of the money you'd make exposing the hoax.

Hard scientific data doesn't lie, Dung-kopf.

No Boeing jetliner crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11.  Period.

That scientific fact should be the starting point for any intellectually honest inquiry.

Exposing the details of complex CIA false flag ops is another matter.  It's a vast jigsaw puzzle.

Recall that there were no Muslim passengers listed on the flight manifests, or CCTV evidence of Muslim "hijackers," and that the FBI experts admitted during the Moussaoui trial that no phone calls were made from AA77 to the ground on 9/11.  

Therefore, the government was involved in fabricating a complex narrative blaming Muslims for 9/11.  They were the patsies of the false flag op.

It was PNAC's "New Pearl Harbor" event-- designed to mobilize popular support for Bush & Cheney's multi-trillion dollar wars in the Middle East.

[AlaCowboy]

Oct 23, 2022 12:52:04 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 23, 2022 11:00:16 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Sure you can. Post the live interviews of the passengers that were on the flight manifests of the planes you say were not hijacked on 9/11/2001. That will expose the conspiracy you claim the government and CIA orchestrated.
Why do you never comment on why you don't post these live interviews? Think of the money you'd make exposing the hoax.

Hard scientific data doesn't lie, Dung-kopf.

No Boeing jetliner crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11.  Period.

That scientific fact should be the starting point for any intellectually honest inquiry.

Exposing the details of complex CIA false flag ops is another matter.  It's a vast jigsaw puzzle.

Recall that there were no Muslim passengers listed on the flight manifests, or CCTV evidence of Muslim "hijackers," and that the FBI experts admitted during the Moussaoui trial that no phone calls were made from AA77 to the ground on 9/11.  

Therefore, the government was involved in fabricating a complex narrative blaming Muslims for 9/11.  They were the patsies of the false flag op.

It was PNAC's "New Pearl Harbor" event-- designed to mobilize popular support for Bush & Cheney's multi-trillion dollar wars in the Middle East.

POST THE INTERVIEWS. PROVE THE PASSENGERS ON THE FLIGHT MANIFESTS WERE NOT KILLED. THAT'S ALL IT TAKES TO PROVE YOUR IDIOTIC CONSPIRACY THEORY.

[DrSchadenfreude]

Oct 24, 2022 8:10:05 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Oct 23, 2022 12:52:04 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Hard scientific data doesn't lie, Dung-kopf.

No Boeing jetliner crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11.  Period.

That scientific fact should be the starting point for any intellectually honest inquiry.

Exposing the details of complex CIA false flag ops is another matter.  It's a vast jigsaw puzzle.

Recall that there were no Muslim passengers listed on the flight manifests, or CCTV evidence of Muslim "hijackers," and that the FBI experts admitted during the Moussaoui trial that no phone calls were made from AA77 to the ground on 9/11.  

Therefore, the government was involved in fabricating a complex narrative blaming Muslims for 9/11.  They were the patsies of the false flag op.

It was PNAC's "New Pearl Harbor" event-- designed to mobilize popular support for Bush & Cheney's multi-trillion dollar wars in the Middle East.

POST THE INTERVIEWS. PROVE THE PASSENGERS ON THE FLIGHT MANIFESTS WERE NOT KILLED. THAT'S ALL IT TAKES TO PROVE YOUR IDIOTIC CONSPIRACY THEORY.

Read my commentary, slowly, Dungkopf.  You, obviously still don't get it.

The fact that no Boeing jetliner hit the Pentagon must be the starting point for any intellectually honest inquiry about what really happened on 9/11-- along with the scientific fact that the WTC was demolished by explosives.

See if you can eventually grasp that basic concept.  (I won't hold my breath.)

Also, as the Swiss historian, Professor Daniel Ganser, has correctly pointed out, ALL THEORIES ABOUT 9/11 ARE CONSPIRACY THEORIES-- including the Bush/Cheney/Zelikow conspiracy theory that 9/11 was done by the CIA-trained mujaheddin Saudis.

[oujour76]

Oct 24, 2022 11:12:15 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 24, 2022 8:10:05 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

POST THE INTERVIEWS. PROVE THE PASSENGERS ON THE FLIGHT MANIFESTS WERE NOT KILLED. THAT'S ALL IT TAKES TO PROVE YOUR IDIOTIC CONSPIRACY THEORY.

Read my commentary, slowly, Dungkopf.  You, obviously still don't get it.

The fact that no Boeing jetliner hit the Pentagon must be the starting point for any intellectually honest inquiry about what really happened on 9/11-- along with the scientific fact that the WTC was demolished by explosives.

See if you can eventually grasp that basic concept.  (I won't hold my breath.)

Also, as the Swiss historian, Professor Daniel Ganser, has correctly pointed out, ALL THEORIES ABOUT 9/11 ARE CONSPIRACY THEORIES-- including the Bush/Cheney/Zelikow conspiracy theory that 9/11 was done by the CIA-trained mujaheddin Saudis.

IOW, no passengers. Who knew?

[DrSchadenfreude]

Oct 24, 2022 14:43:23 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Oct 24, 2022 11:12:15 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Read my commentary, slowly, Dungkopf.  You, obviously still don't get it.

The fact that no Boeing jetliner hit the Pentagon must be the starting point for any intellectually honest inquiry about what really happened on 9/11-- along with the scientific fact that the WTC was demolished by explosives.

See if you can eventually grasp that basic concept.  (I won't hold my breath.)

Also, as the Swiss historian, Professor Daniel Ganser, has correctly pointed out, ALL THEORIES ABOUT 9/11 ARE CONSPIRACY THEORIES-- including the Bush/Cheney/Zelikow conspiracy theory that 9/11 was done by the CIA-trained mujaheddin Saudis.

IOW, no passengers. Who knew?

Harry,
   
    You lack the intellect and the intellectual curiosity to unravel the 9/11 op.

     Explain the obvious, visible explosive demolitions of the WTC, the lone cruise missile rotor in the Pentagon wreckage, and the non-existent AA77 phone calls.

      You have no rational explanation for these phenomena, nor for a thousand other scientific and forensic facts in the case.

      You got played by a carefully orchestrated PNAC psy op.

[oujour76]

Oct 24, 2022 15:03:13 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 24, 2022 14:43:23 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

IOW, no passengers. Who knew?

Harry,
   
    You lack the intellect and the intellectual curiosity to unravel the 9/11 op.

     Explain the obvious, visible explosive demolitions of the WTC, the lone cruise missile rotor in the Pentagon wreckage, and the non-existent AA77 phone calls.

      You have no rational explanation for these phenomena, nor for a thousand other scientific and forensic facts in the case.

      You got played by a carefully orchestrated PNAC psy op.

Yeah, that must be it. ROFL. There was a plane (AA 77) at Dulles on 9/11. It was boarded by passengers. Those passengers have not been seen since that day. Those are facts. Where are those passengers? Shot? Exiled to a desert island? Blasted into space by Elon Musk? Buried with Jimmy Hoffa? CIA actors? The possibilities are endless.

The government went to great lengths to pull off this massive hoax and dispose of all passengers...except for one who was allowed to leave to change her name and identity? And then she didn't just disappear...no siree, she remarried her husband in a very public ceremony? The shit you're spewing takes the intellectual capacity of a walnut. With apologies to walnuts.