Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by canefan on Nov 16, 2024 21:43:27 GMT -5
I'm TDS free, dude. The guy's a crook. Your unwillingness to see it doesn't change the facts. The whole world, outside of the maga Bizarro kool-aid world, knows it: the guy's a crook. This site is full of people who turn their heads away from gagging -- they swallow it and praise Trump. Y'all will never understand. |
|
OK, throw Trump in jail in 2022
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by arkon on Nov 16, 2024 22:10:33 GMT -5
I'm TDS free, dude. The guy's a crook. Your unwillingness to see it doesn't change the facts. The whole world, outside of the maga Bizarro kool-aid world, knows it: the guy's a crook. This site is full of people who turn their heads away from gagging -- they swallow it and praise Trump. Naw, they don't turn their heads, they look up in adoration at the countenance of their idol while they swallow. |
|
|
It isn't enough to love Ohio State. You also have to hate m******n
|
OK, throw Trump in jail in 2022
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by arkon on Nov 16, 2024 22:16:37 GMT -5
Your tiny, tiny mind ...you SO adore such a despicable man and the equally despicable things he stands for that you won't allow yourself to believe what's staring you right in the face: evidence, confirmation, corroboration, proof of guilt beyond ANY reasonable doubt. Careful, your bias is showing. Georgia case, total BS. NY fraud case, total BS. NY hush money case, total BS. Documents case, could have been enough for a slap on the wrist. But ignoring Bidens and going hard at Trump makes it clear political prosecution. The J6 case, sorry, more lawfare BS. My ability to see guilt when it's as obvious as an elephant at a racoon convention has zero to do with bias, and everything to do with common sense. Ignoring, rejecting and rationalizing away evidence ~ THAT'S bias. |
|
|
It isn't enough to love Ohio State. You also have to hate m******n
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by nu5ncbigred on Nov 16, 2024 22:25:09 GMT -5
I'm TDS free, dude. The guy's a crook. Your unwillingness to see it doesn't change the facts. The whole world, outside of the maga Bizarro kool-aid world, knows it: the guy's a crook. This site is full of people who turn their heads away from gagging -- they swallow it and praise Trump. And it has coastal urban Californians who are clueless as to why they lost everything at the federal level. Most Americans including us in the red parts of California donāt buy the lawfare you all were trying to inflict on Trump and us. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by canefan on Nov 16, 2024 23:04:38 GMT -5
Careful, your bias is showing. Georgia case, total BS. NY fraud case, total BS. NY hush money case, total BS. Documents case, could have been enough for a slap on the wrist. But ignoring Bidens and going hard at Trump makes it clear political prosecution. The J6 case, sorry, more lawfare BS. My ability to see guilt when it's as obvious as an elephant at a racoon convention has zero to do with bias, and everything to do with common sense. Ignoring, rejecting and rationalizing away evidence ~ THAT'S bias. Yeah, there's a reason for rules of evidence, processes and procedures. You see what you want to see, what they want you to see and you buy in hook, linev& sinker. When the "evidence " becomes available you need to study it for yourself. When you do that with what's available the dog just flat out don't hunt. |
|
Enter your message here...
Godlike Member
|
Post by trnyerheadncough on Nov 16, 2024 23:58:40 GMT -5
Lol. Physician, heal thyself. Heās right and you are not. Lawyer tell the truth for once. š§ If you canāt see his bias, youāre not paying attention. Which, we already knowā¦youāre not. |
|
|
That's TrnYerHeadnCough...
"Champion Douche -- 2012 AND 2013"
Back to Back...they may have to retire the contest...
"Bowl Champion Douche --2012-2013"
Get it right.
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by nu5ncbigred on Nov 17, 2024 0:41:26 GMT -5
Heās right and you are not. Lawyer tell the truth for once. š§ If you canāt see his bias, youāre not paying attention. Which, we already knowā¦youāre not. I see your biasā¦ |
|
Enter your message here...
Godlike Member
|
Post by trnyerheadncough on Nov 17, 2024 8:46:13 GMT -5
If you canāt see his bias, youāre not paying attention. Which, we already knowā¦youāre not. I see your biasā¦ Iām not sure how, when you canāt seem to see anything else on this board that doesnāt fit your myopic view of the world. |
|
|
That's TrnYerHeadnCough...
"Champion Douche -- 2012 AND 2013"
Back to Back...they may have to retire the contest...
"Bowl Champion Douche --2012-2013"
Get it right.
|
OK, throw Trump in jail in 2022
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by arkon on Nov 17, 2024 8:47:00 GMT -5
My ability to see guilt when it's as obvious as an elephant at a racoon convention has zero to do with bias, and everything to do with common sense. Ignoring, rejecting and rationalizing away evidence ~ THAT'S bias. Yeah, there's a reason for rules of evidence, processes and procedures. You see what you want to see, what they want you to see and you buy in hook, linev& sinker. When the "evidence " becomes available you need to study it for yourself. When you do that with what's available the dog just flat out don't hunt. One really easy example: The guy had classified government documents in his possession at Mar-a-Lago; not properly secured. Whether you/I believe he had a right to take them ("They're mine!", he proclaimed) or whether he declassified them in his mind (š), isn't a necessary part of the debate. He was court-ordered to return ALL of them. He didn't. He kept some and hid them away. That's obstruction of justice. You can dispute and debate the other associated (alleged) crimes all you want. It's indisputable that he's guilty of obstruction. |
|
|
It isn't enough to love Ohio State. You also have to hate m******n
|
Enter your message here...
Godlike Member
|
Post by trnyerheadncough on Nov 17, 2024 8:50:49 GMT -5
Yeah, there's a reason for rules of evidence, processes and procedures. You see what you want to see, what they want you to see and you buy in hook, linev& sinker. When the "evidence " becomes available you need to study it for yourself. When you do that with what's available the dog just flat out don't hunt. One really easy example: The guy had classified government documents in his possession at Mar-a-Lago; not properly secured. Whether you/I believe he had a right to take them ("They're mine!", he proclaimed) or whether he declassified them in his mind (š), isn't a necessary part of the debate. He was court-ordered to return ALL of them. He didn't. He kept some and hid them away. That's obstruction of justice. You can dispute and debate the other associated (alleged) crimes all you want. It's indisputable that he's guilty of obstruction. Heās going to follow up with some bullshit that he was in the process of negotiating their return when the raid occurredā¦all the while ignoring the fact that he lied to a Court claiming heād already returned them all. |
|
|
That's TrnYerHeadnCough...
"Champion Douche -- 2012 AND 2013"
Back to Back...they may have to retire the contest...
"Bowl Champion Douche --2012-2013"
Get it right.
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Nov 17, 2024 10:19:34 GMT -5
My ability to see guilt when it's as obvious as an elephant at a racoon convention has zero to do with bias, and everything to do with common sense. Ignoring, rejecting and rationalizing away evidence ~ THAT'S bias. Yeah, there's a reason for rules of evidence, processes and procedures. You see what you want to see, what they want you to see and you buy in hook, linev& sinker. When the "evidence " becomes available you need to study it for yourself. When you do that with what's available the dog just flat out don't hunt. No he shouldn't study it for himself. He should just rely on finding 'experts' who are paid to tell him what he wants to hear. Is that not the preferred method around here? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by canefan on Nov 17, 2024 10:24:26 GMT -5
Yeah, there's a reason for rules of evidence, processes and procedures. You see what you want to see, what they want you to see and you buy in hook, linev& sinker. When the "evidence " becomes available you need to study it for yourself. When you do that with what's available the dog just flat out don't hunt. One really easy example: The guy had classified government documents in his possession at Mar-a-Lago; not properly secured. Whether you/I believe he had a right to take them ("They're mine!", he proclaimed) or whether he declassified them in his mind (š), isn't a necessary part of the debate. He was court-ordered to return ALL of them. He didn't. He kept some and hid them away. That's obstruction of justice. You can dispute and debate the other associated (alleged) crimes all you want. It's indisputable that he's guilty of obstruction. As I noted in my first post, there may be enough in the documents case to warrant a slap on the wrist. Obstruction? No. And they screwed the pooch when they decided not to do the same with Biden because he is an old man with a bad memory. The dude had documents dating back decades to his early senate years and no presidential records act to lean on for those. That is Selective political prosecution plain and simple. Now that case is done anyway since they violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution the way they named Smith. I am sure you saw the reaction of the New York Supreme Court to the "evidence" presented to them by the prosecution in the New York Fraud case. While libs here denied the claim there were no victims even the Justices of this court pointed out that rather obvious conclusion and openly questioned just about everything about the case including the ridiculous amount of the fine. You want to bet the appeal, if we ever get one, on the "hush money 34 felony convictions" goes any better for them? First, 34 felonies? For one pay off? If Trump just said yes, I banged Stormy and paid to her not tell anyone, what if? Is it illegal to have an affair and bang a willing participant? No. Is it illegal to pay her for a NDA? No. How did Bragg make that into 34 felonies? Trumps accounting paid his lawyer over twelve months and every transaction included a bill from Cohen, a routing certificate for the bookkeeping department, and a check written to Cohen. And Bragg charged each payment as three separate felonies even though it was Cohen who generated the invoice. And he did that for every check. And Bragg claimed these were illegal campaign donations. This despite the Federal Election Commission looking at the same payments and saying no, it was not a violation. You want to talk selective prosecution? Political prosecution? Hillary paid off the Steele Dossier and charged it to legal expenses, same as Trump. The FEC looked at hers and said hers was a campaign donation and fined her $30K. Bragg ignored hers, even though hers was an illegal campaign donation. Notice nobody changed her payments to felonies or charged her. Only Trump. Those two points are more than enough to make my case. I have a lot more if you want to go there but I'd recommend you just admit they tried and failed to stop him, suck it up and hope your party moves back to the center and gets a bit more realistic about the American people before 2028. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by canefan on Nov 17, 2024 10:26:14 GMT -5
Yeah, there's a reason for rules of evidence, processes and procedures. You see what you want to see, what they want you to see and you buy in hook, linev& sinker. When the "evidence " becomes available you need to study it for yourself. When you do that with what's available the dog just flat out don't hunt. No he shouldn't study it for himself. He should just rely on finding 'experts' who are paid to tell him what he wants to hear. Is that not the preferred method around here? For you, when you are trying as hard as you can to obscure the truth. It's what you do. Sadly it has never dawned on you that just about everyone here sees it for what it is. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by kaz on Nov 17, 2024 10:26:43 GMT -5
One really easy example: The guy had classified government documents in his possession at Mar-a-Lago; not properly secured. Whether you/I believe he had a right to take them ("They're mine!", he proclaimed) or whether he declassified them in his mind (š), isn't a necessary part of the debate. He was court-ordered to return ALL of them. He didn't. He kept some and hid them away. That's obstruction of justice. You can dispute and debate the other associated (alleged) crimes all you want. It's indisputable that he's guilty of obstruction. Heās going to follow up with some bullshit that he was in the process of negotiating their return when the raid occurredā¦all the while ignoring the fact that he lied to a Court claiming heād already returned them all. And still won a majority of the vote 12 days ago. NOBODY CARES ABOUT THAT SHIT. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by canefan on Nov 17, 2024 10:31:07 GMT -5
Heās going to follow up with some bullshit that he was in the process of negotiating their return when the raid occurredā¦all the while ignoring the fact that he lied to a Court claiming heād already returned them all. And still won a majority of the vote 12 days ago. NOBODY CARES ABOUT THAT SHIT. LOL!!! Do you know why FSU graduates laminate their diplomas? Because you can throw them up on your dashboard and park in Disabled Parking spaces. |
|
Jan 13, 2020 17:38:49 GMT -5
Jan 13, 2020 17:38:49 GMT -5
May 1, 2022 14:04:40 GMT -5
May 1, 2022 14:04:40 GMT -5
