Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Nov 22, 2024 12:54:16 GMT -5
There is only one qualification that is relevant, and Gaetz was fully qualified for it. Bondi is a similarly excellent pick. "Trump first, The Constitution second". MAGA! You are a broken record. That is an incredibly stupid take, especially on Pam Bondi. You likely know nothing about her yet you are anxious to denigrate her because Trump picked her. You are a true misogynist. Claiming Bondi is a Trump toady is being misogynist? LOL... Let's face facts. If she or any of Trump's other picks hadn't pledged fealty to Trump over all else, do you honestly think he'd have nominated any of them? This is about setting up an authoritarian executive branch where Trump trumps all; nothing more, nothing less. MAGA! |
|
Make America Great Again !!!
Supreme Being-like Member
|
Post by Panama pfRedd on Nov 22, 2024 14:22:43 GMT -5
Deranged doesn't begin to describe what's wrong with this idiot's head ^^^^^
|
|
................................  ................................ = Panama pfRedd - 2021 Regular Season Champion = ...............................  ................................
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by canefan on Nov 22, 2024 16:33:45 GMT -5
You are a broken record. That is an incredibly stupid take, especially on Pam Bondi. You likely know nothing about her yet you are anxious to denigrate her because Trump picked her. You are a true misogynist. Claiming Bondi is a Trump toady is being misogynist? LOL... Let's face facts. If she or any of Trump's other picks hadn't pledged fealty to Trump over all else, do you honestly think he'd have nominated any of them? This is about setting up an authoritarian executive branch where Trump trumps all; nothing more, nothing less. MAGA! You think presidents should not appoint people who will put his policies into effect? Last time he had people openly working against what he wanted to do. The Judicial and Legislative branches are his checks. Guess what, when I was working and ordered a treatment plan for a patient, the employee responsible for that treatment did not have the option to implement his own plan. If he did I'd have fired him. Sorry but the rules don't change just because Trumps in charge. Deal with it. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by canefan on Nov 22, 2024 16:35:08 GMT -5
Deranged doesn't begin to describe what's wrong with this idiot's head ^^^^^ He wouldn't know a fact if it bit him on the ass. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Nov 22, 2024 17:27:29 GMT -5
Claiming Bondi is a Trump toady is being misogynist? LOL... Let's face facts. If she or any of Trump's other picks hadn't pledged fealty to Trump over all else, do you honestly think he'd have nominated any of them? This is about setting up an authoritarian executive branch where Trump trumps all; nothing more, nothing less. MAGA! You think presidents should not appoint people who will put his policies into effect? Last time he had people openly working against what he wanted to do. The Judicial and Legislative branches are his checks. Guess what, when I was working and ordered a treatment plan for a patient, the employee responsible for that treatment did not have the option to implement his own plan. If he did I'd have fired him. Sorry but the rules don't change just because Trumps in charge. Deal with it. That's because much of what he wanted to do was often illegal, and if what you asked your staff to do was illegal, hopefully they'd refuse to do it too. But Trump's new staff clearly will not be as concerned about that pesky problem. MAGA! |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by canefan on Nov 22, 2024 18:46:33 GMT -5
You think presidents should not appoint people who will put his policies into effect? Last time he had people openly working against what he wanted to do. The Judicial and Legislative branches are his checks. Guess what, when I was working and ordered a treatment plan for a patient, the employee responsible for that treatment did not have the option to implement his own plan. If he did I'd have fired him. Sorry but the rules don't change just because Trumps in charge. Deal with it. That's because much of what he wanted to do was often illegal, and if what you asked your staff to do was illegal, hopefully they'd refuse to do it too. But Trump's new staff clearly will not be as concerned about that pesky problem. MAGA! So what did he do that was illegal? You are telling me that Miley ignoring his order to provide troops for security on Jan 6 was his refusing to do so because it was illegal? You believe Miley saying that if Trump expressed an idea to attack China that he would warn China in advance was because it would be illegal? Please, you don't have a clue what he wanted to do that was resisted. And what better way to try to cover your ass than to insist well, what he wanted to do was illegal. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Nov 22, 2024 19:34:35 GMT -5
That's because much of what he wanted to do was often illegal, and if what you asked your staff to do was illegal, hopefully they'd refuse to do it too. But Trump's new staff clearly will not be as concerned about that pesky problem. MAGA! So what did he do that was illegal? You are telling me that Miley ignoring his order to provide troops for security on Jan 6 was his refusing to do so because it was illegal? You believe Miley saying that if Trump expressed an idea to attack China that he would warn China in advance was because it would be illegal? Please, you don't have a clue what he wanted to do that was resisted. And what better way to try to cover your ass than to insist well, what he wanted to do was illegal. “Can’t you just shoot them? Just shoot them in the legs or something?” -D. Trump about clearing protestors from around the WH "You know, if you had one day, like one real rough, nasty day, one rough hour, and I mean real rough, the word will get out and it will end immediately. End immediately. You know, it'll end immediately." -D. Trump on the campaign trail Both are illegal. In the case of the border, Immigration and Customs Enforcement staff rebuffed Trump’s plan to bus migrants on legal grounds; meanwhile, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Kevin McAleenan refused to turn away migrants seeking asylum, concluding that it was illegal.www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/04/no-one-listens-to-the-president/587557/If you need more examples, let me know. But like I said, we needn't worry about that problem in January. MAGA! |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by canefan on Nov 22, 2024 20:13:44 GMT -5
So what did he do that was illegal? You are telling me that Miley ignoring his order to provide troops for security on Jan 6 was his refusing to do so because it was illegal? You believe Miley saying that if Trump expressed an idea to attack China that he would warn China in advance was because it would be illegal? Please, you don't have a clue what he wanted to do that was resisted. And what better way to try to cover your ass than to insist well, what he wanted to do was illegal. “Can’t you just shoot them? Just shoot them in the legs or something?” -D. Trump about clearing protestors from around the WH Was that an order? Sounds more like he was asking a question of one of his advisors. Strike one! "You know, if you had one day, like one real rough, nasty day, one rough hour, and I mean real rough, the word will get out and it will end immediately. End immediately. You know, it'll end immediately." -D. Trump on the campaign trail www.politico.com/news/2024/09/29/trump-violent-day-policing-crime-00181619Wasn't said when he was President but before this election. "Asked whether the former president’s idea amounted to a new proposal and how such an operation would work, a campaign official said Trump was “clearly just floating it in jest.” Strike 2! Both are illegal. In the case of the border, Immigration and Customs Enforcement staff rebuffed Trump’s plan to bus migrants on legal grounds; meanwhile, Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Kevin McAleenan refused to turn away migrants seeking asylum, concluding that it was illegal.Hmmm... seems Biden has been busing migrants all over the place for four years. www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/04/no-one-listens-to-the-president/587557/If you need more examples, let me know. But like I said, we needn't worry about that problem in January. MAGA! Strike 3! |
|
