Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by bgovolfan on Oct 16, 2016 22:19:51 GMT -5
North Carolina +7 1/2 @ Miami - Canes Ole Miss -7 1/2 @ Arkansas - Rebels
Stanford +3 @ Notre Dame - ND
Ohio State -10 @ Wisconsin - Wis...............................................win North Carolina State +17 1/2 @ Clemson - Tigers
Kansas State +11 @ Oklahoma - OU .............................................win Alabama -13 @ Tennessee - VOLS
UCLA +7 @ Washington State - UCLA .............................................win Nebraska -3 1/2 @ Indiana - Huskers ..........................................win West Virginia +1 @ Texas Tech - Mountaineers ..................................win Tulsa +21 1/2 @ Houston - Houston
Arizona State +13 1/2 @ Colorado - Devils5-6
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by mscott59 on Oct 17, 2016 7:21:07 GMT -5
As for cu, the buffs certainly qualify as one of the most improved teams in the country. And yes, they'd covered every game entering this game vs asu, a team they'd never beaten. I thought 2 Todd were too much to give and I was wrong. Probably because we never played those red devils during the years when we were one of the top four teams in college football.
But, in any case, Mark, I apologize for hurting your tender Midwestern feelings.
You and I have always disagreed about the statistical fact that most western teams tend to be under rated by the "national" sports idiots.
SO, I couldn't help responding to your latest cheap shot at the Buffs.
You sort of put that one on a tee for me. Lmao. The next time you hurt my feelings will be a first. And I repeat; start making your own picks before performing your "I'm smarter than you are" routine. As for your western bias claims? On a game where I picked cu not to cover against that eastern power, Arizona state? Lmao again.
|
|
mark scott tosu 81
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2016 8:49:04 GMT -5
North Carolina +7 1/2 @ Miami - Canes Ole Miss -7 1/2 @ Arkansas - Rebels
Stanford +3 @ Notre Dame - ND
Ohio State -10 @ Wisconsin - Wis...............................................win North Carolina State +17 1/2 @ Clemson - Tigers
Kansas State +11 @ Oklahoma - OU .............................................win Alabama -13 @ Tennessee - VOLS
UCLA +7 @ Washington State - UCLA .............................................win Nebraska -3 1/2 @ Indiana - Huskers ..........................................win West Virginia +1 @ Texas Tech - Mountaineers ..................................win Tulsa +21 1/2 @ Houston - Houston
Arizona State +13 1/2 @ Colorado - Devils5-6 That's some interesting Tennessee math. The candy canes lost.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2016 8:54:15 GMT -5
That's some interesting Tennessee math. The candy canes lost. He didn't cross it out because he read the final score wrong and counted it as a push.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Oct 17, 2016 12:13:10 GMT -5
That's some interesting Tennessee math. The candy canes lost. He didn't cross it out because he read the final score wrong and counted it as a push. I think you're just looking to push something.......
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by bgovolfan on Oct 17, 2016 12:51:50 GMT -5
That's some interesting Tennessee math. The candy canes lost. And thats typical gator comprehension Bg(Five wins....it would have been 6 had I counted the Canes as a win...dummy)VolFan
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by bgovolfan on Oct 17, 2016 12:54:41 GMT -5
That's some interesting Tennessee math. The candy canes lost. He didn't cross it out because he read the final score wrong and counted it as a push. It was an oversight on my part....but I didn't count it as a win and thats all that matters. Bg(Come on people....this week is already tough enough...give me a break<g>)VolFan
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Oct 17, 2016 13:43:10 GMT -5
He didn't cross it out because he read the final score wrong and counted it as a push. It was an oversight on my part....but I didn't count it as a win and thats all that matters. Bg(Come on people....this week is already tough enough...give me a break<g>)VolFan wadda ya want broke? Ba( )Morin
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2016 15:02:15 GMT -5
It was an oversight on my part....but I didn't count it as a win and thats all that matters. Bg(Come on people....this week is already tough enough...give me a break<g>)VolFan wadda ya want broke? Ba( )Morin willie can help with that
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2016 15:38:59 GMT -5
That's some interesting Tennessee math. The candy canes lost. And thats typical gator comprehension Bg(Five wins....it would have been 6 had I counted the Canes as a win...dummy)VolFan You didn't count it as a loss either. You're 5-7 for -2 on the week, not 5-6 for -1. It does make a difference in the results and standings. I know I'm dumb, thanks for the reminder, but I'm not that dumb.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by bgovolfan on Oct 17, 2016 16:46:23 GMT -5
And thats typical gator comprehension Bg(Five wins....it would have been 6 had I counted the Canes as a win...dummy)VolFan You didn't count it as a loss either. You're 5-7 for -2 on the week, not 5-6 for -1. It does make a difference in the results and standings. I know I'm dumb, thanks for the reminder, but I'm not that dumb. The person who PICKS THE MOST WINNERS WINS....how many LOSERS YOU HAVE MATTERS NOT. Bg(but feel free to keep trying to make hay out of a non issue ...thats your mo)VolFan
|
|
Go Bucks!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by beuycek on Oct 17, 2016 16:56:06 GMT -5
You didn't count it as a loss either. You're 5-7 for -2 on the week, not 5-6 for -1. It does make a difference in the results and standings. I know I'm dumb, thanks for the reminder, but I'm not that dumb. The person who PICKS THE MOST WINNERS WINS....how many LOSERS YOU HAVE MATTERS NOT. Bg(but feel free to keep trying to make hay out of a non issue ...thats your mo)VolFan I get what you are saying but Trn uses your wins and losses to get a weekly total, e.g. 5-7 is a -2. While Trn always posts the accurate totals, presenting a score as 5-6 would be a -1 and not represent your actual total for the week.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Oct 17, 2016 17:15:07 GMT -5
You didn't count it as a loss either. You're 5-7 for -2 on the week, not 5-6 for -1. It does make a difference in the results and standings. I know I'm dumb, thanks for the reminder, but I'm not that dumb. WHAT!!! Where does it say THAT?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Oct 17, 2016 17:30:13 GMT -5
WHAT!!! Where does it say THAT? dunno.......but I'm sitting on zero money, 14 back from 1st place
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 17, 2016 20:07:31 GMT -5
You didn't count it as a loss either. You're 5-7 for -2 on the week, not 5-6 for -1. It does make a difference in the results and standings. I know I'm dumb, thanks for the reminder, but I'm not that dumb. The person who PICKS THE MOST WINNERS WINS....how many LOSERS YOU HAVE MATTERS NOT. Bg(but feel free to keep trying to make hay out of a non issue ...thats your mo)VolFan huh?? If that was true I would never go lower in the standings!
|
|