Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Jan 19, 2017 11:39:45 GMT -5
This time they target an Iranian office building. Setting it on fire seemed like an odd thing to do to cover up the demolition since we already know that fire can't bring down a building. I guess they thought it would still be accepted by most people as the cause. But we're ready for them this time. We've got Architects and Engineers for Truth to leap into the fray and scour the area for nano-thermite. www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-building-idUSKBN1530YP
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Jan 19, 2017 11:47:26 GMT -5
This time they target an Iranian office building. Setting it on fire seemed like an odd thing to do to cover up the demolition since we already know that fire can't bring down a building. I guess they thought it would still be accepted by most people as the cause. But we're ready for them this time. We've got Architects and Engineers for Truth to leap into the fray and scour the area for nano-thermite. www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-building-idUSKBN1530YP Saw the story earlier today and have to admit I chuckled. Willie's bowels must be seizing.
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 19, 2017 15:35:35 GMT -5
This time they target an Iranian office building. Setting it on fire seemed like an odd thing to do to cover up the demolition since we already know that fire can't bring down a building. I guess they thought it would still be accepted by most people as the cause. But we're ready for them this time. We've got Architects and Engineers for Truth to leap into the fray and scour the area for nano-thermite. www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-building-idUSKBN1530YP Huh? Got any data about this demolition job? Was there any visible evidence of explosives-- as we clearly saw with the WTC demolitions on 9/11? Was there any evidence of pyroclastic flow, as was obvious in the WTC demolitions on 9/11?
How do you two hairy chickenss know that this Iranian building was demolished by mere "fire"-- what scientific data do you have?
Can you two hairy chickens name any historical cases of a steel skyscrapers collapsing in a free fall from a mere office fire?
You've had a few years now to give us an example, and you've got zilch.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Jan 19, 2017 17:23:53 GMT -5
This time they target an Iranian office building. Setting it on fire seemed like an odd thing to do to cover up the demolition since we already know that fire can't bring down a building. I guess they thought it would still be accepted by most people as the cause. But we're ready for them this time. We've got Architects and Engineers for Truth to leap into the fray and scour the area for nano-thermite. www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-building-idUSKBN1530YP Huh? Got any data about this demolition job? Was there any visible evidence of explosives-- as we clearly saw with the WTC demolitions on 9/11? Was there any evidence of pyroclastic flow, as was obvious in the WTC demolitions on 9/11?
How do you two hairy chickenss know that this Iranian building was demolished by mere "fire"-- what scientific data do you have?
Can you two hairy chickens name any historical cases of a steel skyscrapers collapsing in a free fall from a mere office fire?
You've had a few years now to give us an example, and you've got zilch.
Either the building was demolished with clandestine explosives, or it collapsed because of structural weakening by fire. Which is it?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Jan 19, 2017 17:50:05 GMT -5
Huh? Got any data about this demolition job? Was there any visible evidence of explosives-- as we clearly saw with the WTC demolitions on 9/11? Was there any evidence of pyroclastic flow, as was obvious in the WTC demolitions on 9/11?
How do you two hairy chickenss know that this Iranian building was demolished by mere "fire"-- what scientific data do you have?
Can you two hairy chickens name any historical cases of a steel skyscrapers collapsing in a free fall from a mere office fire?
You've had a few years now to give us an example, and you've got zilch.
Either the building was demolished with clandestine explosives, or it collapsed because of structural weakening by fire. Which is it? Was there really a fire? Can you really trust the Iranian media? I mean, they're controlled by the CIA, right?
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by lz2112 on Jan 19, 2017 18:28:48 GMT -5
Either the building was demolished with clandestine explosives, or it collapsed because of structural weakening by fire. Which is it? Was there really a fire? Can you really trust the Iranian media? I mean, they're controlled by the CIA, right? Maybe it was just a hologram.
|
|
Gator Bait!
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Jan 19, 2017 18:33:09 GMT -5
Was there really a fire? Can you really trust the Iranian media? I mean, they're controlled by the CIA, right? Maybe it was just a hologram. Of course! A hologram! When the weather machine is on the fritz, the CIA uses holograms. How could I have forgotten?
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2017 0:55:08 GMT -5
|
|