Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2017 1:00:31 GMT -5
Is it more humane for the U.S. to accept immigrants or for those potential immigrants to remain in their country of origin?
Consider that generically immigrants are better off than those left behind. They have ambition and resources, often with a higher education.
Immigration therefore drains the country of origin of those best positioned to bring about change in their country to improve the quality of life for their fellow countrymen. Do we really help humanity by allowing immigration?
Immigration can make life better for an individual, but not society at large.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Jan 29, 2017 9:26:04 GMT -5
Is it more humane for the U.S. to accept immigrants or for those potential immigrants to remain in their country of origin? Consider that generically immigrants are better off than those left behind. They have ambition and resources, often with a higher education. Immigration therefore drains the country of origin of those best positioned to bring about change in their country to improve the quality of life for their fellow countrymen. Do we really help humanity by allowing immigration? Immigration can make life better for an individual, but not society at large. If they are too lazy, or too scared to make a difference in their country, how will they make a positive difference in our country? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2017 9:32:13 GMT -5
Is it more humane for the U.S. to accept immigrants or for those potential immigrants to remain in their country of origin? Consider that generically immigrants are better off than those left behind. They have ambition and resources, often with a higher education. Immigration therefore drains the country of origin of those best positioned to bring about change in their country to improve the quality of life for their fellow countrymen. Do we really help humanity by allowing immigration? Immigration can make life better for an individual, but not society at large.
Until all AMERICANS are no longer in poverty, have health care, quality education and all the rest, then all of our resources need to go to AMERICANS, not outsiders. Why is this so hard for loony libs to understand?
NO ONE should be allowed in as an immigrant. From ANY country.
If all the f-ing loony libs who threatened to leave would go ahead and get the f-word out, maybe we would have room for people who APPRECIATE our country.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Jan 29, 2017 9:40:44 GMT -5
Is it more humane for the U.S. to accept immigrants or for those potential immigrants to remain in their country of origin? Consider that generically immigrants are better off than those left behind. They have ambition and resources, often with a higher education. Immigration therefore drains the country of origin of those best positioned to bring about change in their country to improve the quality of life for their fellow countrymen. Do we really help humanity by allowing immigration? Immigration can make life better for an individual, but not society at large. It is a shame that we didn't adopt this standard when your family was on the boat. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Jan 29, 2017 9:42:36 GMT -5
Is it more humane for the U.S. to accept immigrants or for those potential immigrants to remain in their country of origin? Consider that generically immigrants are better off than those left behind. They have ambition and resources, often with a higher education. Immigration therefore drains the country of origin of those best positioned to bring about change in their country to improve the quality of life for their fellow countrymen. Do we really help humanity by allowing immigration? Immigration can make life better for an individual, but not society at large.
Until all AMERICANS are no longer in poverty, have health care, quality education and all the rest, then all of our resources need to go to AMERICANS, not outsiders. Why is this so hard for loony libs to understand?
NO ONE should be allowed in as an immigrant. From ANY country.
If all the f-ing loony libs who threatened to leave would go ahead and get the f-word out, maybe we would have room for people who APPRECIATE our country.
It is a shame we didnt adopt this standard when your family was on the boat. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Jan 29, 2017 9:43:34 GMT -5
Is it more humane for the U.S. to accept immigrants or for those potential immigrants to remain in their country of origin? Consider that generically immigrants are better off than those left behind. They have ambition and resources, often with a higher education. Immigration therefore drains the country of origin of those best positioned to bring about change in their country to improve the quality of life for their fellow countrymen. Do we really help humanity by allowing immigration? Immigration can make life better for an individual, but not society at large. If they are too lazy, or too scared to make a difference in their country, how will they make a positive difference in our country? It is a shame we didnt....uh...nevermind. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2017 9:44:32 GMT -5
There was no United States when Fred's family was on the boat over. That wouldn't happen for another 130 years so who's this "we"?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Jan 29, 2017 9:50:15 GMT -5
There was no United States when Fred's family was on the boat over. That wouldn't happen for another 130 years so who's this "we"? Ask BaM. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2017 9:51:38 GMT -5
There was no United States when Fred's family was on the boat over. That wouldn't happen for another 130 years so who's this "we"? Ask BaM. I'm asking you. You said it. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Jan 29, 2017 10:03:45 GMT -5
I'm asking you. You said it. By your own standard your family helped destroy the government of this country and install a new Euro-centric one. Then you arbitrarily draw a line and tell us it doesn't count before that line. Do you like your hypocrisy original recipe or white meat only? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2017 10:21:16 GMT -5
I'm asking you. You said it. By your own standard your family helped destroy the government of this country and install a new Euro-centric one. Then you arbitrarily draw a line and tell us it doesn't count before that line. Do you like your hypocrisy original recipe or white meat only? I'm going to start a thread about the sky being blue. You will come in and start arguing that it's not blue because atmosphere has no color. Then I will say the ocean is blue and you will argue that it isn't actually blue because water is clear and it's just reflecting the sky. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Jan 29, 2017 10:26:04 GMT -5
By your own standard your family helped destroy the government of this country and install a new Euro-centric one. Then you arbitrarily draw a line and tell us it doesn't count before that line. Do you like your hypocrisy original recipe or white meat only? I'm going to start a thread about the sky being blue. You will come in and start arguing that it's not blue because atmosphere has no color. Then I will say the ocean is blue and you will argue that it isn't actually blue because water is clear and it's just reflecting the sky. LOL...your family did what you are claiming isn't good for society. Unless you are telling us Native Americans had no society, or that what they left was not a society, your family is part of the problem. That sky is blue. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2017 10:37:41 GMT -5
I'm going to start a thread about the sky being blue. You will come in and start arguing that it's not blue because atmosphere has no color. Then I will say the ocean is blue and you will argue that it isn't actually blue because water is clear and it's just reflecting the sky. LOL...your family did what you are claiming isn't good for society. Unless you are telling us Native Americans had no society, or that what they left was not a society, your family is part of the problem. That sky is blue. It's clear that you just like being contrary no matter what the subject is. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by roxalot on Jan 29, 2017 10:41:40 GMT -5
I'm going to start a thread about the sky being blue. You will come in and start arguing that it's not blue because atmosphere has no color. Then I will say the ocean is blue and you will argue that it isn't actually blue because water is clear and it's just reflecting the sky. LOL...your family did what you are claiming isn't good for society. Unless you are telling us Native Americans had no society, or that what they left was not a society, your family is part of the problem. That sky is blue. If you're THAT ashamed of European immigrates coming here and helping to create a civilized country with laws, hundreds of years ago, why don't you and whoopi leave ...please... WAIT... there's a fairly long list of people that you can take with you. I'll gather the names. RAC'IST: noun; 1.Someone who wins an argument with a liberal. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 29, 2017 10:45:14 GMT -5
I would like for Walt to actually address the original intent of this thread rather than attack me.
I quote it here for convenience:
Is it more humane for the U.S. to accept immigrants or for those potential immigrants to remain in their country of origin?
Consider that generically immigrants are better off than those left behind. They have ambition and resources, often with a higher education.
Immigration therefore drains the country of origin of those best positioned to bring about change in their country to improve the quality of life for their fellow countrymen. Do we really help humanity by allowing immigration?
Immigration can make life better for an individual, but not society at large.
|
|
