Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2017 14:24:15 GMT -5
Folks,
Think about it for a minute...
Isn't strange that the Republicon Congress, Fox News, and the right wing media have repeated the lie-- for years-- that Hillary issued a "stand down" order for Benghazi, BUT they've never said a word about the fact that Dick Cheney issued a bona fide "stand down" order as Washington, D.C. was being attacked on 9/11? Cheney's stand down order came to light in Norman Mineta's testimony before the 9/11 Commission.
Congress spent millions of dollars and countless hours investigating the four-death Benghazi tragedy, only to conclude that Hillary had never issued a "stand down" order, as claimed by Republicons. Hillary was forced to answer questions from the Tea Party Congress on national television.
Conversely, very little money or time was spent investigating the 9/11 attacks that took over 3,000 lives.
Phillip Zelikow's 9/11 Commission adamantly refused to review or publicize a great deal of the scientific and forensic evidence that clearly refuted the official U.S. government narrative. Cheney and Bush only agreed to be questioned TOGETHER-- behind closed doors.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Someone who needs to post more
|
Post by frmthegrav on Apr 13, 2017 21:57:26 GMT -5
all true. high level politicos are no different from each other except for societys really insignificant in-fighting issues (gay marriage, abortion, etc.). they both take their orders from higher up.
"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it."
Woodrow Wilson,The New Freedom (1913)
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 13, 2017 22:59:13 GMT -5
all true. high level politicos are no different from each other except for societys really insignificant in-fighting issues (gay marriage, abortion, etc.). they both take their orders from higher up. "Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it." Woodrow Wilson,The New Freedom (1913) Yes, Graver, and that Woodrow Wilson quote reminded me of something Voltaire once said.
"If you want to know who rules over you, consider who it is that you dare not criticize."
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Someone who needs to post more
|
Post by frmthegrav on Apr 13, 2017 23:20:40 GMT -5
"The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen....At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties."
New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922
the only change to the above quote is that they absolutely control both parties (if they hadnt fully controlled them by then). since 22, theyve metastasized and changed form. check out the video on the origins of rockefeller and standard oil and what theyre doing now. essential viewing. how powerful are they? big enough to create their own historians to change history into something that would benefit them. watch from 49:17 to 53:00.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2017 12:36:40 GMT -5
"The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen....At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties." New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922 the only change to the above quote is that they absolutely control both parties (if they hadnt fully controlled them by then). since 22, theyve metastasized and changed form. check out the video on the origins of rockefeller and standard oil and what theyre doing now. essential viewing. how powerful are they? big enough to create their own historians to change history into something that would benefit them. watch from 49:17 to 53:00. Indeed. Hillary would have responded to the recent Syrian false flag the same way Trump did.
It's a true pity that Bernie Sanders was sabotaged by Hillary and the DNC last year.
As far as I'm concerned, Hillary needs to get lost. She should not be the spokesperson for the Democratic Party, going forward.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Someone who needs to post more
|
Post by frmthegrav on Apr 14, 2017 19:53:24 GMT -5
i thought bernie was well meaning, but naive. best person was probably ben carson or jill stein, but theyd never get in without being part of the club of the initiated.
doc, i dont think hillary will be around much longer to represent the DNC with her health being so bad. theyll bring in someone else to push the agenda-- a non-white or a female would be ideal.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 14, 2017 22:07:01 GMT -5
i thought bernie was well meaning, but naive. best person was probably ben carson or jill stein, but theyd never get in without being part of the club of the initiated. doc, i dont think hillary will be around much longer to represent the DNC with her health being so bad. theyll bring in someone else to push the agenda-- a non-white or a female would be ideal. Possibly Senator Elizabeth Warren. She is the incarnation of the Anti-Trump-- an honest, well-educated populist and swamp-drainer.
Here's one of my favorite Warrenisms...
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Someone who needs to post more
|
Post by frmthegrav on Apr 15, 2017 20:42:13 GMT -5
if shes honest, she will never get anywhere. the controllers decide who becomes the spokesperson, and they want order-following corrupt politicians.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2017 21:24:37 GMT -5
if shes honest, she will never get anywhere. the controllers decide who becomes the spokesperson, and they want order-following corrupt politicians. Yep. Wall Street would never allow Elizabeth Warren (or Bernie) in the White House. Even Paul Krugman was circling the wagons against Bernie last year.
|
|