fake space program

[frmthegrav]

 
  nice green screen glitch at 14:44.  the guy in the background on the zipline wire... LOL!!

  

[frmthegrav]

  for a few laughs more...


 

[Lee The Locksmith]

[frmthegrav]

lee:
you found that gif on the NASA website, didnt you?

[Deleted]

It was the inspiration for Pacific Rim (job).

[frmthegrav]

May 16, 2017 20:49:48 GMT -5 @kelliers said:

It was the inspiration for Pacific Rim (job).

   fred, whats your opinion on this?  im curious.

[Deleted]

I didn't see a green screen glitch. Looked like a glitch in the transmission from orbit.
I'm not on board with the fake moon landing stuff or the supposed lies and deceit in those clips.

[frmthegrav]

green screen glitch is there-- just checked it. play it again just before that time frame and youll see the hiccup. you dont notice how the people look somehow "off" in that shoot, as if either the background or the people are in too sharp of a focus? if it was a transmission error, why are only the PEOPLE affected by that glitch?

im not sure if we landed on the moon, but i am convinced that the photos are faked. one then wonders why the photos would be faked in the first place if we did go to the moon. either something was in the photos that the public shouldnt see, or for some reason, nasa needed extra photos since the cameras were not functioning (maybe the radiation ruined the film IF they got there). both of those scenarios just seem too unlikely.

i remember years ago how someone wanted to bring this into court to prove it, but it was eventually rejected by the court. i recall thinking how ridiculous the whole thing was-- that this guy was a nut. of course we went! years and years later, i saw the evidence he was talking about. there is a good case there.

theres plenty of evidence that kubrick was involved. another story.

[frmthegrav]

theres also another glitch with the man in blues cap at about 16:11. also, the glitch only affects him, and nothing else.

[Deleted]

I'll have to check it again.

[lz2112]

May 17, 2017 21:06:01 GMT -5 frmthegrav said:

green screen glitch is there-- just checked it. play it again just before that time frame and youll see the hiccup. you dont notice how the people look somehow "off" in that shoot, as if either the background or the people are in too sharp of a focus? if it was a transmission error, why are only the PEOPLE affected by that glitch?

im not sure if we landed on the moon, but i am convinced that the photos are faked. one then wonders why the photos would be faked in the first place if we did go to the moon. either something was in the photos that the public shouldnt see, or for some reason, nasa needed extra photos since the cameras were not functioning (maybe the radiation ruined the film IF they got there). both of those scenarios just seem too unlikely.

i remember years ago how someone wanted to bring this into court to prove it, but it was eventually rejected by the court. i recall thinking how ridiculous the whole thing was-- that this guy was a nut. of course we went! years and years later, i saw the evidence he was talking about. there is a good case there.

theres plenty of evidence that kubrick was involved. another story.

Do you know how many people would have to be involved in this type of conspiracy? It's not just a couple photos, NASA has a large archive of all their photos that can be publicly accessed. We have rocks brought back from the moon, and do you think Apollo 13 was all staged just to throw off the super smart sleuths like yourself?

I'm sorry graver, but when you venture into this kind of fantasy, I have to put you in the fruitbat category, and wonder about anything you've ever said.

[frmthegrav]

May 18, 2017 1:20:26 GMT -5 lz2112 said:

May 17, 2017 21:06:01 GMT -5 frmthegrav said:

green screen glitch is there-- just checked it. play it again just before that time frame and youll see the hiccup. you dont notice how the people look somehow "off" in that shoot, as if either the background or the people are in too sharp of a focus? if it was a transmission error, why are only the PEOPLE affected by that glitch?

im not sure if we landed on the moon, but i am convinced that the photos are faked. one then wonders why the photos would be faked in the first place if we did go to the moon. either something was in the photos that the public shouldnt see, or for some reason, nasa needed extra photos since the cameras were not functioning (maybe the radiation ruined the film IF they got there). both of those scenarios just seem too unlikely.

i remember years ago how someone wanted to bring this into court to prove it, but it was eventually rejected by the court. i recall thinking how ridiculous the whole thing was-- that this guy was a nut. of course we went! years and years later, i saw the evidence he was talking about. there is a good case there.

theres plenty of evidence that kubrick was involved. another story.

Do you know how many people would have to be involved in this type of conspiracy? It's not just a couple photos, NASA has a large archive of all their photos that can be publicly accessed. We have rocks brought back from the moon, and do you think Apollo 13 was all staged just to throw off the super smart sleuths like yourself?

I'm sorry graver, but when you venture into this kind of fantasy, I have to put you in the fruitbat category, and wonder about anything you've ever said.

       i got the footage above from the nasa channel on youtube.  matter of fact, all of those are from nasa (who else, of course). 

       i am not convinced that those rocks are from the moon after looking into it. 

      i dont claim to be a super smart sleuth-- i do claim to have looked into it and found too many anomalies to believe the official story.  when there are air bubbles rising up in some footage of the astronauts supposedly out in space, what other explanation is there?  those shots are filmed underwater.   dont believe me?  look at the following video.  they openly admit they have the facility.

[frmthegrav]

  now this...

  




      so what we are told is filmed on the ISS is apparently being filmed underwater, presumably at NASA.  ... unless you can tell me how there are bubbles in outer space.  id like to know.

 

[frmthegrav]

 
 stop motion animation in `65.   the head swivel is a blunder.    as to your good question about the number of people involved-- i dont know.  i DO know that you dont need a lot of people involved.  just the guys filming and performing it.  news personnel and scientists never look into it.  they just accept what they are told is real (same deal with GMOs, vaccines, etc. --- they are just told its safe or real by higher authorities and they accept it).

    there are a few nasa whistleblowers out there.  i would guess they would want to keep a low profile and not draw so much attention for obvious reasons. 





  we will discuss the moon rocks next time.

[frmthegrav]

   if anyone reviews my comments and recalls that i said there was something funny about how the astroNOTs had a glitch on their forearm, i now have my proof.   go right to 4:45 and youll see the same arm that had that "blur" of a transmission on it.  its microsoft VR hololense, and it works in real time.  take a look at the video.  start at 3:20.

  


   what other evidence do you want?