GRENFELL TOWER BURNED FOR 12 HOURS-- STILL STANDING...

[Deleted]

    More terrible news-- especially for Walter, Daleko, and Harry... 

[Deleted]

[Deleted]

[Deleted]

Here's some other fake for you:

[Deleted]

Jun 14, 2017 23:34:27 GMT -5 @kelliers said:

Here's some other fake for you:

(Off topic trolling)

[Deleted]

[Walter]

Jun 14, 2017 19:44:28 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

    More terrible news-- especially for Walter, Daleko, and Harry... 

Try this...building codes matter, and circumstances matter.
Apparently, British codes have added some redundancy to the required design that doesn't occur in US codes.
I'd be curious to review what they are. If I find time, I'll let you know what it says.


uk.news.yahoo.com/grenfell-tower-collapsed-built-four-101313419.html

[daleko]

Jun 15, 2017 16:22:30 GMT -5 Walter said:

Jun 14, 2017 19:44:28 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Try this...building codes matter, and circumstances matter.
Apparently, British codes have added some redundancy to the required design that doesn't occur in US codes.
I'd be curious to review what they are. If I find time, I'll let you know what it says.


uk.news.yahoo.com/grenfell-tower-collapsed-built-four-101313419.html

24 story brutalist design block. Essentially piles of concrete. Apples/Oranges. The burning was essentially the outside flammable cladding. Nothing even close to the TTs.

[lz2112]

Jun 15, 2017 16:36:57 GMT -5 daleko said:

Jun 15, 2017 16:22:30 GMT -5 Walter said:

Try this...building codes matter, and circumstances matter.
Apparently, British codes have added some redundancy to the required design that doesn't occur in US codes.
I'd be curious to review what they are. If I find time, I'll let you know what it says.


uk.news.yahoo.com/grenfell-tower-collapsed-built-four-101313419.html

24 story brutalist design block. Essentially piles of concrete. Apples/Oranges. The burning was essentially the outside flammable cladding. Nothing even close to the TTs.

And Grenfell didn't absorb the impact of a massive hologram, either.

[daleko]

Jun 15, 2017 16:43:29 GMT -5 lz2112 said:

Jun 15, 2017 16:36:57 GMT -5 daleko said:

24 story brutalist design block. Essentially piles of concrete. Apples/Oranges. The burning was essentially the outside flammable cladding. Nothing even close to the TTs.

And Grenfell didn't absorb the impact of a massive hologram, either.

I've tried to explain tube in tube design to him but he isn't having any. Then there is that massive hologram. A death ray of epic proportions. He doesn't even look at this stuff, I'm guessing. Sees a link, click bait really, from one of his conspiracy sites and off he goes.

[Deleted]

Jun 15, 2017 16:43:29 GMT -5 lz2112 said:

Jun 15, 2017 16:36:57 GMT -5 daleko said:

24 story brutalist design block. Essentially piles of concrete. Apples/Oranges. The burning was essentially the outside flammable cladding. Nothing even close to the TTs.

And Grenfell didn't absorb the impact of a massive hologram, either.

Hey, LZ Sherlock, newsflash...

WTC7 was never hit by an airplane on 9/11.

It collapsed in a virtual free fall on 9/11.  No resistance.

Walter and Daleko still believe that WTC7 collapsed in a symmetrical virtual free fall as a result of a mere office fire.

That's like believing the Warren Commission's "magic bullet" theory.  It' ridiculous.

[frmthegrav]

[daleko]

Jun 15, 2017 19:30:54 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Jun 15, 2017 16:43:29 GMT -5 lz2112 said:

And Grenfell didn't absorb the impact of a massive hologram, either.

Hey, LZ Sherlock, newsflash...

WTC7 was never hit by an airplane on 9/11.

It collapsed in a virtual free fall on 9/11.  No resistance.

Walter and Daleko still believe that WTC7 collapsed in a symmetrical virtual free fall as a result of a mere office fire.

That's like believing the Warren Commission's "magic bullet" theory.  It' ridiculous.

So remind the class again, Willie, what a 24 story brutalist design block building fire has to do w the TTs? Apples and Oranges. Don't change the thread focus. Didn't you even open the link? Or did you just copy the click bait headlines here and move on w/even peeking. But more likely you don't understand what your reading, don't understand, when we correct you, not harshly enough I should add. You really are ignorant in this matter. I'm more than happy to tutor you. Heck, I school you for free now. 

[Deleted]

Jun 16, 2017 9:23:08 GMT -5 daleko said:

Jun 15, 2017 19:30:54 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Hey, LZ Sherlock, newsflash...

WTC7 was never hit by an airplane on 9/11.

It collapsed in a virtual free fall on 9/11.  No resistance.

Walter and Daleko still believe that WTC7 collapsed in a symmetrical virtual free fall as a result of a mere office fire.

That's like believing the Warren Commission's "magic bullet" theory.  It' ridiculous.

So remind the class again, Willie, what a 24 story brutalist design block building fire has to do w the TTs? Apples and Oranges. Don't change the thread focus. Didn't you even open the link? Or did you just copy the click bait headlines here and move on w/even peeking. But more likely you don't understand what your reading, don't understand, when we correct you, not harshly enough I should add. You really are ignorant in this matter. I'm more than happy to tutor you. Heck, I school you for free now. 

Daleko,

     Even I couldn't have tutored you and LZ to pass college physics. 

     What is the resistance to gravitational acceleration for an object falling in a virtual free fall?

     Is the rate of acceleration altered by the density or composition of the falling object?

     (BTW, WTC 7 was about TWICE the height of the Grenfell Tower in London.)

[Lee The Locksmith]

Jun 15, 2017 16:22:30 GMT -5 Walter said:

If I find time, I'll let you know what it says.

Well, I know yer a busy man, so I'll go ahead and help you out with some easy viewing ...Go in 40 seconds and check out the dude with big neck muscles..OOOOPS !!! The dude is Rachel Maddow !!! DAYUM !!!! ..YES, this is the first time I've posted this clip...Yer welcome bro....