THE BIGGEST DOUCHE OF THE FULL SEASON TOURNAMENT - 2021
Godlike Member
|
Post by daleko on Jun 16, 2017 22:43:36 GMT -5
So remind the class again, Willie, what a 24 story brutalist design block building fire has to do w the TTs? Apples and Oranges. Don't change the thread focus. Didn't you even open the link? Or did you just copy the click bait headlines here and move on w/even peeking. But more likely you don't understand what your reading, don't understand, when we correct you, not harshly enough I should add. You really are ignorant in this matter. I'm more than happy to tutor you. Heck, I school you for free now.
Even I couldn't have tutored you and LZ to pass college physics.
So, right on Q, you change gears when caught in an ignorant post. Look up Brutalist construction and tube in tube construction. Don't be so dull. |
|
|
THE BIGGEST DOUCHE OF THE FULL SEASON TOURNAMENT - 2021
Bowl Season Champion - 2023
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 16, 2017 23:58:15 GMT -5
Daleko,
Even I couldn't have tutored you and LZ to pass college physics.
So, right on Q, you change gears when caught in an ignorant post. Look up Brutalist construction and tube in tube construction. Don't be so dull.
The specific nature of the steel construction is a moot point in our debate about the WTC 7 compared to Grenfell Tower. Why?
Pay attention this time! Learn something for once.
Symmetrical, free fall collapse of a 47 floor steel skyscraper like WTC 7 indicates that there was a fairly sudden "removal"/absence of any significant resistance to free fall collapse of the upper floors by the steel girders throughout the sub-structure of the building. Do you understand what no resistance to free fall (i.e., the acceleration of gravity) means?
Use your head, big guy, rather than simply believing the false narrative that you heard on television.
A sudden demolition/melting of the entire steel substructure could not possibly have been caused by mere office fires on some upper floors. At most, that might cause some regional collapse and a possible slow, pile-driver effect. Not a sudden symmetrical demolition.
Besides, Larry Silverstein, himself, said that he told "them" to "pull it," before he watched it collapse. (Of course, "them" was NOT the NYFD-- as attested in the video above. So who was it?)
The NIST non-explanation for the collapse of WTC 7 was a complete non-scientific farce. Like many key people involved in the 9/11 black op, Zelikow, the NIST "expert," and even the Popular Mechanics author were working for PNAC. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2017 9:02:48 GMT -5
So, right on Q, you change gears when caught in an ignorant post. Look up Brutalist construction and tube in tube construction. Don't be so dull.
The specific nature of the steel construction is a moot point in our debate about the WTC 7 compared to Grenfell Tower. Why?
Pay attention this time! Learn something for once.
Symmetrical, free fall collapse of a 47 floor steel skyscraper like WTC 7 indicates that there was a fairly sudden "removal"/absence of any significant resistance to free fall collapse of the upper floors by the steel girders throughout the sub-structure of the building. Do you understand what no resistance to free fall (i.e., the acceleration of gravity) means?
Use your head, big guy, rather than simply believing the false narrative that you heard on television.
A sudden demolition/melting of the entire steel substructure could not possibly have been caused by mere office fires on some upper floors. At most, that might cause some regional collapse and a possible slow, pile-driver effect. Not a sudden symmetrical demolition.
Besides, Larry Silverstein, himself, said that he told "them" to "pull it," before he watched it collapse. (Of course, "them" was NOT the NYFD-- as attested in the video above. So who was it?)
The NIST non-explanation for the collapse of WTC 7 was a complete non-scientific farce. Like many key people involved in the 9/11 black op, Zelikow, the NIST "expert," and even the Popular Mechanics author were working for PNAC. |
|
THE BIGGEST DOUCHE OF THE FULL SEASON TOURNAMENT - 2021
Godlike Member
|
Post by daleko on Jun 17, 2017 13:01:08 GMT -5
So, right on Q, you change gears when caught in an ignorant post. Look up Brutalist construction and tube in tube construction. Don't be so dull.
The specific nature of the steel construction is a moot point in our debate about the WTC 7 compared to Grenfell Tower. Why?
Pay attention this time! Learn something for once.
Symmetrical, free fall collapse of a 47 floor steel skyscraper like WTC 7 indicates that there was a fairly sudden "removal"/absence of any significant resistance to free fall collapse of the upper floors by the steel girders throughout the sub-structure of the building. Do you understand what no resistance to free fall (i.e., the acceleration of gravity) means?
Use your head, big guy, rather than simply believing the false narrative that you heard on television.
A sudden demolition/melting of the entire steel substructure could not possibly have been caused by mere office fires on some upper floors. At most, that might cause some regional collapse and a possible slow, pile-driver effect. Not a sudden symmetrical demolition.
Besides, Larry Silverstein, himself, said that he told "them" to "pull it," before he watched it collapse. (Of course, "them" was NOT the NYFD-- as attested in the video above. So who was it?)
The NIST non-explanation for the collapse of WTC 7 was a complete non-scientific farce. Like many key people involved in the 9/11 black op, Zelikow, the NIST "expert," and even the Popular Mechanics author were working for PNAC. |
|
|
THE BIGGEST DOUCHE OF THE FULL SEASON TOURNAMENT - 2021
Bowl Season Champion - 2023
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2017 13:06:04 GMT -5
Engaging the child is a net loss, my geezerly friend.  |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by nitronole on Jun 17, 2017 17:24:46 GMT -5
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2017 18:27:32 GMT -5
Daleko,
The specific nature of the steel construction is a moot point in our debate about the WTC 7 compared to Grenfell Tower. Why?
Pay attention this time! Learn something for once.
Symmetrical, free fall collapse of a 47 floor steel skyscraper like WTC 7 indicates that there was a fairly sudden "removal"/absence of any significant resistance to free fall collapse of the upper floors by the steel girders throughout the sub-structure of the building. Do you understand what no resistance to free fall (i.e., the acceleration of gravity) means?
Use your head, big guy, rather than simply believing the false narrative that you heard on television.
A sudden demolition/melting of the entire steel substructure could not possibly have been caused by mere office fires on some upper floors. At most, that might cause some regional collapse and a possible slow, pile-driver effect. Not a sudden symmetrical demolition.
Besides, Larry Silverstein, himself, said that he told "them" to "pull it," before he watched it collapse. (Of course, "them" was NOT the NYFD-- as attested in the video above. So who was it?)
The NIST non-explanation for the collapse of WTC 7 was a complete non-scientific farce. Like many key people involved in the 9/11 black op, Zelikow, the NIST "expert," and even the Popular Mechanics author were working for PNAC.
It was actual "free fall" for most of the collapse-- and near free fall for the remainder. Ergo, resistance was zero or near zero.
Your argument is moot. There was virtually no resistance to the acceleration of gravity-- indicating that the lower steel sub-structures were fairly abruptly demolished-- (as opposed to melting from scattered fires on some upper floors.)
Don't be such a willfully ignorant, obfuscating idiot.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2017 18:29:56 GMT -5
We've gone over this. It wasn't free fall. I'll invite anyone who cares to visit another thread in this section and others, where Walt, Harry and myself took him to the woodshed, point by point. Spanked him real hard. You're 0368 V Harry & myself.
It was actual "free fall" for most of the collapse-- and near free fall for the remainder. Ergo, resistance was zero or near zero.
Your argument is moot. There was virtually no resistance to the acceleration of gravity-- indicating that the lower steel sub-structures were fairly abruptly demolished-- (as opposed to melting from scattered fires on some upper floors.)
Don't be such a willfully ignorant, obfuscating idiot.
Are you still breathing? Too bad for us. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2017 18:37:09 GMT -5
NIST Whistleblower on 9/11 Cover-UP
www.allanstime.com/NIST_Whistleblower_on_911_Cover-Up/
As a former employee of the Time and Frequency division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) since 1960, with ongoing involvement in NIST conferences to this day, David W. Allan is disgusted with the prostitution of truth that has taken place in the case of the 9/11 investigations by NIST. Overview
From 1960 through 1992, David W. Allan was as an atomic clock physicist at NIST. He has over 100 published papers in the field, being esteemed as the go-to guy on precise time measurements. Still today, the "Allan Variance" is at the heart of international time keeping, which is core to modern society's technological infrastructure. Since his "retirement" in '92, he has continued his scientific work, including the development of a new Unified Field Theory, working from a lab in his showcase solar home in Fountain Green, Utah. From before the time of his retirement, David has become informed about evidence of conspiratorial forces that seek to subvert freedom in order to establish of a world socialist dictatorship under the control of an insider elite. So it is not hard for him to fathom such a conspiracy being involved in the events of 9/11, including dark elements within the U.S. government who are controlled by or are part of such a cabal. As a part of NIST, formerly the National Bureau of Standards, David is disappointed that NIST appears to have become party to the 9/11 cover-up, falsifying information, cooking the data, and otherwise acting in disregard to the ethics of science it is supposed to not only uphold but epitomize as the official body for the United States establishing standards of measurement. NIST is supposed to be the final word on measurement accuracy, but in the case of 9/11, they have prostituted themselves at the hands of their Federal masters who are likewise involved in the cover-up. Contrary to the Federal Government official story supported by the NIST report, many facts point to controlled demolition being the cause of the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings 1, 2 and 7:
Falling at near free-fall speed
Falling into their footprint
Symmetrical "collapse" through path of greatest resistance
Pulverization of the building into powder
Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
Squibs (horizontal, outward explosions) seen in advance of the collapsing portion
Many explosions heard by emergency personnel on the scene
Thermite and nanothermite found in the dust
The occurrence of micro-spheres in the dust, which could only happen under super high temperatures (from thermitic reactions), not consistent with a building fire fire
Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses
Liquid iron in the wreckage a month after the collapse (from continued thermite reaction)
The fact that never before had a fire caused a steel structure building to fail
The fact that the buildings had recently undergone elevator upgrades, giving access to the support structure
The fact that the building had an emergency evacuation just a few days prior to 9/11 in which security cameras were disabled (providing access)
The owner of WTC building 7 (Larry Silverstein) videotaped saying that they "pulled" (demolished) the building
Cover-up galore by those who were capable of pulling this offNone of the characteristics of destruction by fire were present: Slow onset with large visible deformations
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
Volumes of evidence and commentary on each of the above points are found throughout the web, but are presented concisely on the home page of ae911truth.org in the right hand column with links to supporting evidence.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2017 18:39:10 GMT -5
NIST Whistleblower on 9/11 Cover-UP
www.allanstime.com/NIST_Whistleblower_on_911_Cover-Up/
As a former employee of the Time and Frequency division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) since 1960, with ongoing involvement in NIST conferences to this day, David W. Allan is disgusted with the prostitution of truth that has taken place in the case of the 9/11 investigations by NIST. Overview
From 1960 through 1992, David W. Allan was as an atomic clock physicist at NIST. He has over 100 published papers in the field, being esteemed as the go-to guy on precise time measurements. Still today, the "Allan Variance" is at the heart of international time keeping, which is core to modern society's technological infrastructure. Since his "retirement" in '92, he has continued his scientific work, including the development of a new Unified Field Theory, working from a lab in his showcase solar home in Fountain Green, Utah. From before the time of his retirement, David has become informed about evidence of conspiratorial forces that seek to subvert freedom in order to establish of a world socialist dictatorship under the control of an insider elite. So it is not hard for him to fathom such a conspiracy being involved in the events of 9/11, including dark elements within the U.S. government who are controlled by or are part of such a cabal. As a part of NIST, formerly the National Bureau of Standards, David is disappointed that NIST appears to have become party to the 9/11 cover-up, falsifying information, cooking the data, and otherwise acting in disregard to the ethics of science it is supposed to not only uphold but epitomize as the official body for the United States establishing standards of measurement. NIST is supposed to be the final word on measurement accuracy, but in the case of 9/11, they have prostituted themselves at the hands of their Federal masters who are likewise involved in the cover-up. Contrary to the Federal Government official story supported by the NIST report, many facts point to controlled demolition being the cause of the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings 1, 2 and 7:
Falling at near free-fall speed
Falling into their footprint
Symmetrical "collapse" through path of greatest resistance
Pulverization of the building into powder
Massive volume of expanding pyroclastic dust clouds
Squibs (horizontal, outward explosions) seen in advance of the collapsing portion
Many explosions heard by emergency personnel on the scene
Thermite and nanothermite found in the dust
The occurrence of micro-spheres in the dust, which could only happen under super high temperatures (from thermitic reactions), not consistent with a building fire fire
Several tons of molten metal reported by numerous highly-qualified witnesses
Liquid iron in the wreckage a month after the collapse (from continued thermite reaction)
The fact that never before had a fire caused a steel structure building to fail
The fact that the buildings had recently undergone elevator upgrades, giving access to the support structure
The fact that the building had an emergency evacuation just a few days prior to 9/11 in which security cameras were disabled (providing access)
The owner of WTC building 7 (Larry Silverstein) videotaped saying that they "pulled" (demolished) the building
Cover-up galore by those who were capable of pulling this offNone of the characteristics of destruction by fire were present: Slow onset with large visible deformations
Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, to the side most damaged by the fires)
Evidence of fire temperatures capable of softening steel
Volumes of evidence and commentary on each of the above points are found throughout the web, but are presented concisely on the home page of ae911truth.org in the right hand column with links to supporting evidence. Another day, another worthless willie appearance here. Disappear. Forever. Thanks. |
|
THE BIGGEST DOUCHE OF THE FULL SEASON TOURNAMENT - 2021
Godlike Member
|
Post by daleko on Jun 17, 2017 23:29:16 GMT -5
We've gone over this. It wasn't free fall. I'll invite anyone who cares to visit another thread in this section and others, where Walt, Harry and myself took him to the woodshed, point by point. Spanked him real hard. You're 0368 V Harry & myself.
It was actual "free fall" for most of the collapse-- and near free fall for the remainder. Ergo, resistance was zero or near zero.
Your argument is moot. There was virtually no resistance to the acceleration of gravity-- indicating that the lower steel sub-structures were fairly abruptly demolished-- (as opposed to melting from scattered fires on some upper floors.)
Don't be such a willfully ignorant, obfuscating idiot.
|
|
|
THE BIGGEST DOUCHE OF THE FULL SEASON TOURNAMENT - 2021
Bowl Season Champion - 2023
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 17, 2017 23:55:05 GMT -5
Failed rebuttal. I have debunked your "it wasn't free fall" argument several times already.
It was actual "free fall" for most of the collapse-- and near free fall for the remainder. Ergo, resistance was zero or near zero.
Your argument is moot. There was virtually no resistance to the acceleration of gravity-- indicating that the lower steel sub-structures were fairly abruptly demolished-- (as opposed to melting from scattered fires on some upper floors.)
Don't be such a willfully ignorant, obfuscating idiot.
You still have a screwball notion about how much high-level math and science I studied before and after starting medical school at Harvard.
I was asked by my physics professor to tutor undergrads in physics, and scored a perfect 15 in the MCAT physics section.
I won scholarships and awards in general and organic chemistry at Brown, as the top student (of 500.) I also studied physical chemistry, and took an advanced organic synthesis course. I was a math ace and school chess champ-- did very well in calculus and differential equations.
Now go back and studied what I told you above about symmetrical, virtual free fall indicating rapid demolition of the entire steel substructure of WTC 7.
Dispense with your typical gibberish... |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by Lee The Locksmith on Jun 18, 2017 7:02:38 GMT -5
Dispense with your typical gibberish...
Then let's get back to the basics and go right to the source of yer pain so the healing can begin.... |
|
|
Free Mutt from political asylum
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 18, 2017 9:10:44 GMT -5
Poor willie... nobody likes him, his wife won't have sex with him, his daughter's hate him and the authorities will take away his pronography.
Must really suck being you, willie the blind.
|
|
Jan 13, 2020 17:38:49 GMT -5
Jan 13, 2020 17:38:49 GMT -5
May 1, 2022 14:04:40 GMT -5
May 1, 2022 14:04:40 GMT -5
