as close to "legal" full automatic as you can get

[nitronole]

www.bing.com/videos/search?q=digital+trigger+video&view=detail&mid=7507B2C7E940F8B473367507B2C7E940F8B47336&FORM=VIRE



anti-gun morons heads are exploding.

[Deleted]

The Franklin Armory trigger:
www.franklinarmory.com/products/binary-firing-system-gen-iii-trigger-pack

I think the Tac-Con is the best of these type triggers though:
tacconusa.com/

[Deleted]

Slide Fire stock PLUS Tac-Con trigger:

[Deleted]

All great ways of hitting nothing faster than usual.    
That "pull/release" feature of the digital trigger is going to get a few morons shot, or cause a few morons to shoot innocent people.

Also, federal law defines semiautomatic as firing one shot with each PULL of the trigger.  There is no mention of firing a shot with each trigger release, so I can see a smart federal prosecutor arguing that this is in effect an AUTOMATIC weapon.  Best to avoid it altogether, IMHO.

[Deleted]

Jul 23, 2017 23:14:00 GMT -5 @muttthemaster said:

All great ways of hitting nothing faster than usual.    
That "pull/release" feature of the digital trigger is going to get a few morons shot, or cause a few morons to shoot innocent people. First thing I thought of when I watched the video.

Also, federal law defines semiautomatic as firing one shot with each PULL of the trigger.  There is no mention of firing a shot with each trigger release, so I can see a smart federal prosecutor arguing that this is in effect an AUTOMATIC weapon.  Best to avoid it altogether, IMHO.

Which is why the Tac-Con or SlideFire stock are the best options if you want to waste money on ammo.

[nitronole]

Jul 23, 2017 23:14:00 GMT -5 @muttthemaster said:

All great ways of hitting nothing faster than usual.    
That "pull/release" feature of the digital trigger is going to get a few morons shot, or cause a few morons to shoot innocent people.

Also, federal law defines semiautomatic as firing one shot with each PULL of the trigger.  There is no mention of firing a shot with each trigger release, so I can see a smart federal prosecutor arguing that this is in effect an AUTOMATIC weapon.  Best to avoid it altogether, IMHO.

nope, legal as ATF says pulling the trigger and releasing the trigger is 2 functions of the trigger, thus not 1 shot:


digitrigger.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/batfe-2-shot-001.pdf

[bamorin]

Jul 24, 2017 12:09:12 GMT -5 nitronole said:

Jul 23, 2017 23:14:00 GMT -5 @muttthemaster said:

All great ways of hitting nothing faster than usual.    
That "pull/release" feature of the digital trigger is going to get a few morons shot, or cause a few morons to shoot innocent people.

Also, federal law defines semiautomatic as firing one shot with each PULL of the trigger.  There is no mention of firing a shot with each trigger release, so I can see a smart federal prosecutor arguing that this is in effect an AUTOMATIC weapon.  Best to avoid it altogether, IMHO.

nope, legal as ATF says pulling the trigger and releasing the trigger is 2 functions of the trigger, thus not 1 shot:


digitrigger.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/batfe-2-shot-001.pdf

a release trigger has been around a long time.......was a bit of a "fad" in the ATA during the mid 60's. Press, or release considered a single function.

[Deleted]

Jul 24, 2017 12:09:12 GMT -5 nitronole said:

Jul 23, 2017 23:14:00 GMT -5 @muttthemaster said:

All great ways of hitting nothing faster than usual.    
That "pull/release" feature of the digital trigger is going to get a few morons shot, or cause a few morons to shoot innocent people.

Also, federal law defines semiautomatic as firing one shot with each PULL of the trigger.  There is no mention of firing a shot with each trigger release, so I can see a smart federal prosecutor arguing that this is in effect an AUTOMATIC weapon.  Best to avoid it altogether, IMHO.

nope, legal as ATF says pulling the trigger and releasing the trigger is 2 functions of the trigger, thus not 1 shot:


digitrigger.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/batfe-2-shot-001.pdf

Well, I stand corrected.

As they say though, what is legal is not always smart.    In the heat of a confontatio0n, who is going to remember to hold the trigger for 8 seconds, or disable it while holding a bad guy at gunpoint after a firefight?    It's a nice toy for the range, but should never be allowed on the street.

IMHO. 

[daleko]

Jul 24, 2017 12:24:33 GMT -5 bamorin said:

Jul 24, 2017 12:09:12 GMT -5 nitronole said:

nope, legal as ATF says pulling the trigger and releasing the trigger is 2 functions of the trigger, thus not 1 shot:


digitrigger.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/batfe-2-shot-001.pdf

a release trigger has been around a long time.......was a bit of a "fad" in the ATA during the mid 60's. Press, or release considered a single function.

Has a use in trap, if you can't control the flinch. But if you lose focus........

[bamorin]

Jul 24, 2017 15:27:28 GMT -5 daleko said:

Jul 24, 2017 12:24:33 GMT -5 bamorin said:

a release trigger has been around a long time.......was a bit of a "fad" in the ATA during the mid 60's. Press, or release considered a single function.

Has a use in trap, if you can't control the flinch. But if you lose focus........

correct, which is why "we" outlawed them at winchester gun club when i worked there. The ATA said we had to allow them for folks who were shooting registered birds since they were still used at the Grand American.