Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by Mickey34jb on Sept 8, 2017 5:37:32 GMT -5
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by Mickey34jb on Sept 8, 2017 5:41:59 GMT -5
It will be interesting to see how Taco Bell deals with the 3 employees who violated their 'no weapons' policy
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2017 7:48:08 GMT -5
It will be interesting to see how Taco Bell deals with the 3 employees who violated their 'no weapons' policy
Taco Belch is offering "counseling" to their employees. They SHOULD be offering guns and training to their employees. I'm sure those 3 had good reasons to be armed at work.
The way I see it, the 3 with the guns and all the other employees are ALIVE to be fired. That's a WIN.
Stay tuned ............... this is bound to turn into some kind of racial bullshit, unless everyone involved is the same color.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Sept 8, 2017 14:18:43 GMT -5
But all they wanted to steal was property........
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 8, 2017 19:18:42 GMT -5
But all they wanted to steal was property........
Nice try, but you fail.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Sept 9, 2017 8:24:24 GMT -5
They were threatening to use deadly force to steal that property.
well, we don't know exactly what they said. seems like he got murdered for exercising his 1st amendment rights. Being shot and killed by 3 different workers looks to me like the workers were just itching to murder somebody. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2017 8:41:05 GMT -5
They were threatening to use deadly force to steal that property.
well, we don't know exactly what they said. seems like he got murdered for exercising his 1st amendment rights. Being shot and killed by 3 different workers looks to me like the workers were just itching to murder somebody. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Sept 9, 2017 8:54:46 GMT -5
well, we don't know exactly what they said. seems like he got murdered for exercising his 1st amendment rights. Being shot and killed by 3 different workers looks to me like the workers were just itching to murder somebody. just parroting .........robber wants to steal something.......store was insured I bet........if not, that's the stores fault. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2017 9:12:04 GMT -5
Is there a reason you are sounding ridiculous this morning? just parroting .........robber wants to steal something.......store was insured I bet........if not, that's the stores fault.
Why? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Sept 9, 2017 9:38:00 GMT -5
just parroting .........robber wants to steal something.......store was insured I bet........if not, that's the stores fault.
Why?somebody other than the robber die? if not, deadly force wasn't being used. Maybe the "threat of". Between the two threads, you're talking out of both sides of your mouth.........that's a euro thang i bet........seems I've heard it before.....forked tongue or some such thing. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2017 9:47:56 GMT -5
You keep ignoring the fact that deadly force was being used to aid the theft.
Why? somebody other than the robber die? if not, deadly force wasn't being used. Maybe the "threat of". Between the two threads, you're talking out of both sides of your mouth.........that's a euro thang i bet........seems I've heard it before.....forked tongue or some such thing.
Do you honestly think I am going to let the bad guy get off the first shot? If there is a gun pointed at another person, the threat of death or bodily injury is real, and the defender has every right in the world to shoot first.
The bad guy who died was stupid AND slow. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Sept 11, 2017 9:29:43 GMT -5
somebody other than the robber die? if not, deadly force wasn't being used. Maybe the "threat of". Between the two threads, you're talking out of both sides of your mouth.........that's a euro thang i bet........seems I've heard it before.....forked tongue or some such thing.
Do you honestly think I am going to let the bad guy get off the first shot? If there is a gun pointed at another person, the threat of death or bodily injury is real, and the defender has every right in the world to shoot first.
The bad guy who died was stupid AND slow.You're the one that said deadly force was being used..........if nobody had been shot, deadly force hadn't been used. The threat of deadly force was there.........but that's not what you typed. Somebody comes into "my house", unless they used a key to unlock the door, they had a "tool of entry".......is that tool of entry a "dangerous ordinance, or deadly weapon" ? What if I only rent the house? is that different? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2017 9:37:36 GMT -5
You don't really believe what you wrote.
Do you honestly think I am going to let the bad guy get off the first shot? If there is a gun pointed at another person, the threat of death or bodily injury is real, and the defender has every right in the world to shoot first.
The bad guy who died was stupid AND slow. You're the one that said deadly force was being used..........if nobody had been shot, deadly force hadn't been used. The threat of deadly force was there.........but that's not what you typed. Somebody comes into "my house", unless they used a key to unlock the door, they had a "tool of entry".......is that tool of entry a "dangerous ordinance, or deadly weapon" ? What if I only rent the house? is that different?
If I am in the house that I rent, I have the legal right to be there. It is MY domicile. I don't have to see a deadly weapon if you break into my house, key or not.
Why do you keep being absurd? Are you going for the "I Am TRN's Dumbass Twin Award?" |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by bamorin on Sept 11, 2017 9:42:56 GMT -5
You're the one that said deadly force was being used..........if nobody had been shot, deadly force hadn't been used. The threat of deadly force was there.........but that's not what you typed. Somebody comes into "my house", unless they used a key to unlock the door, they had a "tool of entry".......is that tool of entry a "dangerous ordinance, or deadly weapon" ? What if I only rent the house? is that different?
If I am in the house that I rent, I have the legal right to be there. It is MY domicile. I don't have to see a deadly weapon if you break into my house, key or not.
Why do you keep being absurd? Are you going for the "I Am TRN's Dumbass Twin Award?"but it was you who said I didn't have the right to take a life of somebody who broke in........yet in the other thread, you said you didn't care why they came in uninvited..............which is it? you're the only one being absurd between these two threads......only you can do what you said you could do, but you chastise anyone else. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 11, 2017 9:51:10 GMT -5
The threat of deadly force is the same as actually using it.
If I am in the house that I rent, I have the legal right to be there. It is MY domicile. I don't have to see a deadly weapon if you break into my house, key or not.
Why do you keep being absurd? Are you going for the "I Am TRN's Dumbass Twin Award?" but it was you who said I didn't have the right to take a life of somebody who broke in........yet in the other thread, you said you didn't care why they came in uninvited..............which is it? you're the only one being absurd between these two threads......only you can do what you said you could do, but you chastise anyone else.
I'm through with your nonsense. |
|
Jan 13, 2020 17:38:49 GMT -5
Jan 13, 2020 17:38:49 GMT -5
May 1, 2022 14:04:40 GMT -5
May 1, 2022 14:04:40 GMT -5
