Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 1, 2018 21:01:29 GMT -5
Evangelical Trump trolls are giving Trump a Mulligan for whoring around with Stormy Daniels and other porn stars in 2006, after Melania gave birth to Barron W. Trump. WTF, Trump trolls? Any DIY Protestant theologians around here who want to explain that one?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 3, 2018 17:15:46 GMT -5
BTW, folks, I couldn't care less what Donald J. Rat Brain does with his tiny dick.
BUT, Republicons have always made a big deal out of this subject in the cases of Democrats like Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy, Gary Hart, et.al.
So, to rephrase my question...
Why are Evangelical Repubs suddenly giving Trump a Mulligan for whoring around--after being so morally indignant about Bill Clinton's private sex life?
Ra mey? Jensen? Shard-shite?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by Buckeye Dale on Feb 3, 2018 22:54:29 GMT -5
That would be between DJT and God...as for YOU, you should read John 8:7. And let's not forget Matthew, 7:1-3.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 11, 2018 14:23:51 GMT -5
That would be between DJT and God...as for YOU, you should read John 8:7. And let's not forget Matthew, 7:1-3. Uh, Shard-shite, where were John 8:7 and Mathew 7:1-3 during the past several years when you, Jensen, and Cowboy Ra mey started all of those derogatory threads about Bill Clinton and Ted Kennedy?
Explain yer Republicon logic...
Are these scriptures only relevant in the case of Republicons who whore around?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2018 17:16:46 GMT -5
Looks like the Evangelical pseudo-Christian Republicons in Trumptopia are still defending Trump's blatant, extra-marital lechery-- even as the details of Trump's tango with Stormy Daniels become increasingly farcical...
MAGA...
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 12, 2018 0:53:47 GMT -5
Looks like the Evangelical pseudo-Christian Republicons in Trumptopia are still defending Trump's blatant, extra-marital lechery-- even as the details of Trump's tango with Stormy Daniels become increasingly farcical... MAGA... I have to say that after all the lechery that Bill engaged in, I still thought he was a preferable candidate to most Republicans. The difference is, I would never have voted for him again. He cheated on his own wife, so what hope could I have that he held voters in any higher esteem? That is the part I do not get about conservatives. They seem to eschew morality for party. The most flagrant was the Alabama creep. But it is an obvious trend.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 12, 2018 12:59:43 GMT -5
Looks like the Evangelical pseudo-Christian Republicons in Trumptopia are still defending Trump's blatant, extra-marital lechery-- even as the details of Trump's tango with Stormy Daniels become increasingly farcical... MAGA... I have to say that after all the lechery that Bill engaged in, I still thought he was a preferable candidate to most Republicans. The difference is, I would never have voted for him again. He cheated on his own wife, so what hope could I have that he held voters in any higher esteem? That is the part I do not get about conservatives. They seem to eschew morality for party. The most flagrant was the Alabama creep. But it is an obvious trend. Bill Clinton was a very effective POTUS, in terms of public policy objectives and achievements. Greenspan, himself, was impressed by Clinton's wonkishness. And, IMO, Clinton was always, generally, committed to the public good--not a saint, by any means, but, certainly, a man of the people and for the people. I have always tended to view a politician's private, personal affairs separately from matters of public policy (as in the case of Thomas Jefferson.) JFK and his brothers were raised to be rakes, but they were also, like Clinton, always committed to the public good, IMO. In Trump's case, that simply isn't true at all. Not only is Trump a lifelong rake, he's a man who has governed by and for the Robber Barons. I have only focused on his lechery here to point out the obvious Republicon hypocrisy on the subject.
|
|