Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by roxalot on Mar 1, 2018 22:38:57 GMT -5
Still waiting for that list of the members of Congress who have said they want to ban guns. I guess the long list of those who do not are just "exceptions" as well.
They are operating on the "give me an inch and I'll take a mile" doctrine.
Demoncrats have been attacking handgun owners for decades. Right now the AR-15 is their flavor of the day, even though handguns are still the leading tools of the murderers' trade.
liberals 'think' if they can ban guns, no one will get shot anymore. That's how we stopped everyone from doing drugs, ya know. Here's something for the idiots to think about , a hammer is used in hundreds of murder cases each year. Can get one in any hardware store. No background check needed. No age limit. I don't listen to anti-gun lectures from people who think it's ok to kill a baby. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2018 22:43:14 GMT -5
Do you REALLY think they are going to announce "We intend to disarm all civilians in the U.S.?" Even Damnedocrats aren't THAT stupid.
They are operating on the "give me an inch and I'll take a mile" doctrine.
Demoncrats have been attacking handgun owners for decades. Right now the AR-15 is their flavor of the day, even though handguns are still the leading tools of the murderers' trade.
Ah...so it is all a big secret, eh? LOL... Hopefully there is room in Fred's bunker for you.
The writing on the wall is plain to anyone with a brain. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 1, 2018 22:56:04 GMT -5
Do you REALLY think they are going to announce "We intend to disarm all civilians in the U.S.?" Even Damnedocrats aren't THAT stupid.
They are operating on the "give me an inch and I'll take a mile" doctrine.
Demoncrats have been attacking handgun owners for decades. Right now the AR-15 is their flavor of the day, even though handguns are still the leading tools of the murderers' trade.
liberals 'think' if they can ban guns, no one will get shot anymore. That's how we stopped everyone from doing drugs, ya know. Here's something for the idiots to think about , a hammer is used in hundreds of murder cases each year. Can get one in any hardware store. No background check needed. No age limit. I don't listen to anti-gun lectures from people who think it's ok to kill a baby. I would be more than happy if kids in school were only subjected to the danger of a maniac with a hammer. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2018 23:34:33 GMT -5
liberals 'think' if they can ban guns, no one will get shot anymore. That's how we stopped everyone from doing drugs, ya know. Here's something for the idiots to think about , a hammer is used in hundreds of murder cases each year. Can get one in any hardware store. No background check needed. No age limit. I don't listen to anti-gun lectures from people who think it's ok to kill a baby. I would be more than happy if kids in school were only subjected to the danger of a maniac with a hammer.
If "assault rifles" are banned, mass shooters will turn to using shotguns.
"Ban shotguns!"
OK, we ban shotguns.
Mass shooters will turn to using handguns.
"Ban handguns!"
Where does your unconstitutional gun ban end, Walt?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 1, 2018 23:51:41 GMT -5
I would be more than happy if kids in school were only subjected to the danger of a maniac with a hammer.
If "assault rifles" are banned, mass shooters will turn to using shotguns.
"Ban shotguns!"
OK, we ban shotguns.
Mass shooters will turn to using handguns.
"Ban handguns!"
Where does your unconstitutional gun ban end, Walt?
My gun ban ends where the Constitution says it ends. Where in the 2nd A is there provision to deny guns from felons? Nowhere. Do you favor such a thing? If so, are you not doing exactly what I may propose in suggesting reasonable limitations? All we are doing is quibbling over "reasonable". |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2018 0:08:42 GMT -5
So you DO favor banning all guns.
If "assault rifles" are banned, mass shooters will turn to using shotguns.
"Ban shotguns!"
OK, we ban shotguns.
Mass shooters will turn to using handguns.
"Ban handguns!"
Where does your unconstitutional gun ban end, Walt?
My gun ban ends where the Constitution says it ends. Where in the 2nd A is there provision to deny guns from felons? Nowhere. Do you favor such a thing? If so, are you not doing exactly what I may propose in suggesting reasonable limitations? All we are doing is quibbling over "reasonable".
No, I do NOT favor certain felons losing their right to self-defense. A bank embezzler is not on the same violence level as an armed bank ROBBER.
There is no quibbling.
People with clean backgrounds have the right to own ANY small arm they desire. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 2, 2018 0:14:23 GMT -5
My gun ban ends where the Constitution says it ends. Where in the 2nd A is there provision to deny guns from felons? Nowhere. Do you favor such a thing? If so, are you not doing exactly what I may propose in suggesting reasonable limitations? All we are doing is quibbling over "reasonable".
No, I do NOT favor certain felons losing their right to self-defense. A bank embezzler is not on the same violence level as an armed bank ROBBER.
There is no quibbling.
People with clean backgrounds have the right to own ANY small arm they desire.Where does the 2nd A make that distinction? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2018 0:59:14 GMT -5
Felons lose more than just their 2A rights.
No, I do NOT favor certain felons losing their right to self-defense. A bank embezzler is not on the same violence level as an armed bank ROBBER.
There is no quibbling.
People with clean backgrounds have the right to own ANY small arm they desire. Where does the 2nd A make that distinction?
Then go find the Federal gun laws that deny ex-cons their rights. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 2, 2018 1:46:28 GMT -5
Where does the 2nd A make that distinction?
Then go find the Federal gun laws that deny ex-cons their rights.A federal gun law restricts that which is set forth in an amendment to the Constitution? Hmmmm. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by roxalot on Mar 2, 2018 6:23:10 GMT -5
liberals 'think' if they can ban guns, no one will get shot anymore. That's how we stopped everyone from doing drugs, ya know. Here's something for the idiots to think about , a hammer is used in hundreds of murder cases each year. Can get one in any hardware store. No background check needed. No age limit. I don't listen to anti-gun lectures from people who think it's ok to kill a baby. I would be more than happy if kids in school were only subjected to the danger of a maniac with a hammer. So to hell with those 400 or 500 people murdered with a blunt object...?.. I believe someone has already pointed out the Virginia Tech shooter wasn't armed with an ar-15 yet killed twice as many. So ban the ar-15. Murderous cowards will find some other way to go about it. Unless they are met with those who can resist them. Like I said, I don't take lectures from people who can't show common sense. I trust actions, not words. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 2, 2018 8:43:52 GMT -5
I would be more than happy if kids in school were only subjected to the danger of a maniac with a hammer. So to hell with those 400 or 500 people murdered with a blunt object...?.. I believe someone has already pointed out the Virginia Tech shooter wasn't armed with an ar-15 yet killed twice as many. So ban the ar-15. Murderous cowards will find some other way to go about it. Unless they are met with those who can resist them. Like I said, I don't take lectures from people who can't show common sense. I trust actions, not words. Common sense, eh? Well okay then. Would you have preferred the VaTech killer been aremed with his guns or a hammer? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2018 9:29:20 GMT -5
So you DO favor banning all guns.
If "assault rifles" are banned, mass shooters will turn to using shotguns.
"Ban shotguns!"
OK, we ban shotguns.
Mass shooters will turn to using handguns.
"Ban handguns!"
Where does your unconstitutional gun ban end, Walt?
My gun ban ends where the Constitution says it ends. Where in the 2nd A is there provision to deny guns from felons? Nowhere. Do you favor such a thing? If so, are you not doing exactly what I may propose in suggesting reasonable limitations? All we are doing is quibbling over "reasonable". that's all you ever do... quibble and dribble like a dutiful little liberal skunk and lie to yourself |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2018 9:31:38 GMT -5
So to hell with those 400 or 500 people murdered with a blunt object...?.. I believe someone has already pointed out the Virginia Tech shooter wasn't armed with an ar-15 yet killed twice as many. So ban the ar-15. Murderous cowards will find some other way to go about it. Unless they are met with those who can resist them. Like I said, I don't take lectures from people who can't show common sense. I trust actions, not words. Common sense, eh? Well okay then. Would you have preferred the VaTech killer been aremed with his guns or a hammer? Ahhh.... so we finally get walt to admit that he want's to ban handguns. He can lie but he can't hide. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 2, 2018 11:00:39 GMT -5
Common sense, eh? Well okay then. Would you have preferred the VaTech killer been aremed with his guns or a hammer? Ahhh.... so we finally get walt to admit that he want's to ban handguns. He can lie but he can't hide. Nice try, but no. I admitted that I prefer that lunatics choose hammers over pistols when planning their attacks. Which of the two is your preference? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 2, 2018 19:28:42 GMT -5
Ahhh.... so we finally get walt to admit that he want's to ban handguns. He can lie but he can't hide. Nice try, but no. I admitted that I prefer that lunatics choose hammers over pistols when planning their attacks. Which of the two is your preference?
In the real world, fighting "fair" is NOT how it's done. |
|
