WALT, TIME TO CLEAN JOHN RA MEY'S TROLL SHIT OFF THIS WALL

[Deleted]

Nine hours??  WTF?

Do you really think Ra mey's troll shit belongs on this forum wall?  

[Walter]

We let you post, so goose, meet gander.

[Deleted]

Mar 1, 2018 0:22:12 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Feb 28, 2018 23:15:06 GMT -5 Walter said:

We let you post, so goose, meet gander.

Horseshit, Walter.   More of your idiotic Trn-type false equivalence.

Fred and Ra mey's persistent off topic ad hominem troll mob posts are the diametric opposite of the facts I post here for your edification-- even though half of them sail over your head.

I've about had it with your flawed concepts of social (and social media) ethics (and  flawed understanding of history, economics, physics, theology, music, etc.) here.  You could learn a great deal from me, if you could first recognize your own ignorance.

You are a big part of the problem with this troll mob forum.

[Walter]

Mar 1, 2018 0:22:12 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Feb 28, 2018 23:15:06 GMT -5 Walter said:

We let you post, so goose, meet gander.

Horseshit, Walter.  Fred and Ra mey's persistent off topic ad hominem troll mob posts are the diametric opposite of the facts I post here for your edification-- even though half of them sail over your head.

I've about had it with your flawed concepts of social (and social media) ethics (and  flawed understanding of history, economics, physics, theology, music, etc.) here.  You could learn a great deal from me, if you could first recognize your own ignorance.

You are a big part of the problem with this troll mob forum.

Right. I am still waiting for the exhibition of your thorough understanding of structural engineering as it pertains to the WTC. You do not even understand the issues, (or more precisely, the lack of them) discussed by your own sources.
Until that is adequately addressed, pardon me if I humbly refrain from proclaiming you a savant.

...and don't even get me started about your complete ignorance of film technology as it pertains to Zapruder..

Both of those issues happen to be things of which I have hands on, first person experience of...and you don't.

[oujour76]

Mar 1, 2018 0:33:31 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

I've about had it with your flawed concepts of social (and social media) ethics (and  flawed understanding of history, economics, physics, theology, music, etc.) here.  You could learn a great deal from me, if you could first recognize your own ignorance.

[Deleted]

Mar 1, 2018 0:43:47 GMT -5 Walter said:

Mar 1, 2018 0:22:12 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Horseshit, Walter.  Fred and Ra mey's persistent off topic ad hominem troll mob posts are the diametric opposite of the facts I post here for your edification-- even though half of them sail over your head.

I've about had it with your flawed concepts of social (and social media) ethics (and  flawed understanding of history, economics, physics, theology, music, etc.) here.  You could learn a great deal from me, if you could first recognize your own ignorance.

You are a big part of the problem with this troll mob forum.

Right. I am still waiting for the exhibition of your thorough understanding of structural engineering as it pertains to the WTC. You do not even understand the issues, (or more precisely, the lack of them) discussed by your own sources.
Until that is adequately addressed, pardon me if I humbly refrain from proclaiming you a savant.

...and don't even get me started about your complete ignorance of film technology as it pertains to Zapruder..

Both of those issues happen to be things of which I have hands on, first person experience of...and you don't.

Walter,

    You are illustrating the Dunning-Kruger Effect here with your persistent ignorance of basic Newtonian physics.  The specific details of the structural engineering are irrelevant to the physics of the observed collapse-- beyond the fact that the 47 floor WTC7 building was built with steel girders that would not have been destroyed instantaneously throughout the building by an office fire.

    SO, I can understand why you deleted the detailed threads where you lost our several debates about the physics of the WTC collapses.  But let me keep it simple enough for even you, Harry, and Daleko to understand.

1)   WTC7 collapsed for several seconds in a virtual free fall, right?   (Anyone with a stop watch can deduce that much from watching the controlled demolition videos.)

    This is an easily documented scientific fact.  Not a theory.

2)    Secondly, WTC7 collapsed in a manner showing that the upper floors remained equidistant from those below during the initial free fall, right?   (I.e., there was no visible "pile driver effect" of upper floors collapsing onto lower floors and collapsing the building through such a "pile driving" gravitational force.)

3)    Ergo, something completely, suddenly destroyed the steel beams' "resistance" to the free fall collapse of the 47 floor steel skyscraper.   It was a skilled controlled demolition with pre-planted steel melting explosives-- not a mere "office fire."

       Can't put it any more straightforwardly than that.

[Deleted]

An object falling at the acceleration of gravity, by definition, is experiencing no significant resistance to free fall.