Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2018 13:43:14 GMT -5
Blowing up Lack of ‘Evidence’ in Syria Chemical AttackIt is wise to remember the U.S.S. Maine, the Gulf of Tonkin and Iraqi WMD in assessing the rationale for the U.S. attack last weekend on Syriaconsortiumnews.com/2018/04/17/blowing-up-lack-of-evidence-in-syria-chemical-attack/
by former U.S. Col. Ann Wright
April 17, 2018
Just a few hours before the arrival in Syria of UN chemical weapons inspectors to investigate the use of chemicals in Douma, a Damascus suburb where last week 42 persons were reportedly killed, the attack against Syrian government chemical facilities by the U.S. and its British and French allies with neither U.N. nor Congressional authorization is a bit suspicious–to put it mildly.
For the three Western nations to bomb before the international inspectors from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) could check the bodies of those killed for chemicals, take soil samples, talk to survivors and compare the results with what is in the Syrian government chemical facilities is bewildering– unless the U.S., UK and France knew the UN inspectors were going to find NOTHING to substantiate their assessment. Without any evidence, but with merely a “high possibility”, the three countries were going to attack Syria anyway.
With the alphabet soup of militias in Syria, hired and equipped by the US, UK, France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Russia, the UAE, Qatar and Israel, each group has the capability of executing a Douma attack. Chemical attacks are easy to do, especially by groups that have access to the targeted area and to chemicals that can be used as weapons.
The question of why a group would execute such an attack should leave fingerprints on the operation.
What would be the purpose for the Syrian government to use chemicals when they know Western countries are itching to use missiles to hit locations their militias have been unable to reach?
Would the Syrian government and their Russian allies purposefully use chemicals to invite an attack?
Are militia groups trying to keep their international sponsors and need an immediate reason to get continued funding especially when President Trump said last week that he wants to pull 2,000 U.S. troops out of Syria?
Proof of responsibility for the attack was still missing the day before the missile strikes when Secretary of Defense Jim Mattis said, “the US is looking for evidence” and the British government merely said “it is highly likely the Syrian government did the attack.”
This US strike follows in the line of other Presidential administrations that have ordered US military attacks that have gotten our country into civil wars, invasions, and occupations by telling Congress and the American people lies:
The U.S.S. Maine
Remember the Maine? (Cuba)
Remember the “Tonkin Gulf Attack”? (Viet Nam)
Remember US medical students “at risk?” (Grenada)
Remember “I saw Saddm’s troops throw Kuwaiti babies out of incubators”? (Iraq War 1)
Remember Iraq’s “Weapons of Mass Destruction”? (Iraq War II)
Remember the earlier gas attacks in Syria in which the British Parliament refused to authorize an attack on the Syrian government because it was unclear who was responsible–and Obama threw the decision of a U.S. attack to Congress–which to their credit voted No?
Remember Gaddafi is going to massacre the people of Benghazi and is giving viagra to his troops to rape the women? (Libya)
Remember the “nerve gas” attack in Salisbury, England that still has not been linked to Russia?
Remember Russia’s March 17 warning that the US was planning to stage a chemical attack in Syria to provoke a military “response”?
President Trump has been played by the war hawks in his cabinet–CIA Director Mike Pompeo and his new National Security Advisor, the eternal war-monger John Bolton.
Meanwhile the people of Syria continue to be killed by the bombings from all sides.
Ann Wright is a retired US Army Reserve Colonel and a former US diplomat who resigned in 2003 in opposition to the weapons of mass destruction lies of the Bush administration for the invasion and occupation of Iraq. She is the co-author of “Dissent: Voices of Conscience.”
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 21, 2018 15:10:58 GMT -5
"...Meanwhile the people of Syria continue to be killed by the bombings from all sides..."
DING-DING!!
Still waiting for Willie to acknowledge that fact here.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2018 15:59:31 GMT -5
"...Meanwhile the people of Syria continue to be killed by the bombings from all sides..."DING-DING!! Still waiting for Willie to acknowledge that fact here. Syria has been destroyed by a war that, from what I have read, was initiated by CIA/NATO/Saudi/Mosad trained Sunni proxy militias with a goal of overthrowing the Syrian government. Most of these "rebel" mercenaries-- Al Qaeda, Al Nusra, and ISIS-- are not even Syrians. The Syrian Army, with help from Russia since 2015, has almost destroyed the foreign "radical Islamic terrorist" mercenaries. Is that a bad thing, Walter? Don't the Syrian people have a right to defend their country from Western-funded Islamic terrorists? What bothers me the most is our nation's despicable dishonesty about running another covert genocidal war against a sovereign nation--as we did in Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Vietnam, Indonesia, Angola, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, etc. That doesn't make me a fan of Putin or the fascist Russian Federation. It makes me a human being. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 21, 2018 18:08:15 GMT -5
"...Meanwhile the people of Syria continue to be killed by the bombings from all sides..."DING-DING!! Still waiting for Willie to acknowledge that fact here. Syria has been destroyed by a war that, from what I have read, was initiated by CIA/NATO/Saudi/Mosad trained Sunni proxy militias with a goal of overthrowing the Syrian government. Most of these "rebel" mercenaries-- Al Qaeda, Al Nusra, and ISIS-- are not even Syrians. The Syrian Army, with help from Russia since 2015, has almost destroyed the foreign "radical Islamic terrorist" mercenaries. Is that a bad thing, Walter? Don't the Syrian people have a right to defend their country from Western-funded Islamic terrorists? What bothers me the most is our nation's despicable dishonesty about running another covert genocidal war against a sovereign nation--as we did in Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Vietnam, Indonesia, Angola, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, etc. That doesn't make me a fan of Putin or the fascist Russian Federation. It makes me a human being. No acknowledgment yet. Still waiting, Pravda-boy. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 21, 2018 23:52:00 GMT -5
Syria has been destroyed by a war that, from what I have read, was initiated by CIA/NATO/Saudi/Mosad trained Sunni proxy militias with a goal of overthrowing the Syrian government. Most of these "rebel" mercenaries-- Al Qaeda, Al Nusra, and ISIS-- are not even Syrians. The Syrian Army, with help from Russia since 2015, has almost destroyed the foreign "radical Islamic terrorist" mercenaries. Is that a bad thing, Walter? Don't the Syrian people have a right to defend their country from Western-funded Islamic terrorists? What bothers me the most is our nation's despicable dishonesty about running another covert genocidal war against a sovereign nation--as we did in Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Vietnam, Indonesia, Angola, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Yemen, etc. That doesn't make me a fan of Putin or the fascist Russian Federation. It makes me a human being. No acknowledgment yet. Still waiting, Pravda-boy. Walt, The U.S., NATO, Saudi Arabia, and Israel have been trying to overthrow the Assad government for many, many years. The story is not being told truthfully in the mainstream U.S. media. Beginning in the late 1990s, with Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and the PNAC/Neocon "Vulcans," there was a renewed emphasis on regime change in, 1) Iraq, 2) Syria, and 3) Iran. John Bolton has been part of that Neocon grand plan for the past 20 years. Now that Bolton is Trump's NSC advisor, further attacks on Syria and Iran seem almost certain, IMO. They will be preceded by some sort of false flag provocations-- blamed on Assad and/or Tehran. The only thing stopping Bolton (and Israel) from bombing Syria and Iran, IMO, is the threat of Russian retaliation. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 22, 2018 11:12:40 GMT -5
No acknowledgment yet. Still waiting, Pravda-boy. Walt, The U.S., NATO, Saudi Arabia, and Israel have been trying to overthrow the Assad government for many, many years. The story is not being told truthfully in the mainstream U.S. media. Beginning in the late 1990s, with Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and the PNAC/Neocon "Vulcans," there was a renewed emphasis on regime change in, 1) Iraq, 2) Syria, and 3) Iran. John Bolton has been part of that Neocon grand plan for the past 20 years. Now that Bolton is Trump's NSC advisor, further attacks on Syria and Iran seem almost certain, IMO. They will be preceded by some sort of false flag provocations-- blamed on Assad and/or Tehran. The only thing stopping Bolton (and Israel) from bombing Syria and Iran, IMO, is the threat of Russian retaliation. ...still waiting... |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2018 12:41:55 GMT -5
Walt, The U.S., NATO, Saudi Arabia, and Israel have been trying to overthrow the Assad government for many, many years. The story is not being told truthfully in the mainstream U.S. media. Beginning in the late 1990s, with Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, and the PNAC/Neocon "Vulcans," there was a renewed emphasis on regime change in, 1) Iraq, 2) Syria, and 3) Iran. John Bolton has been part of that Neocon grand plan for the past 20 years. Now that Bolton is Trump's NSC advisor, further attacks on Syria and Iran seem almost certain, IMO. They will be preceded by some sort of false flag provocations-- blamed on Assad and/or Tehran. The only thing stopping Bolton (and Israel) from bombing Syria and Iran, IMO, is the threat of Russian retaliation. ...still waiting...
I'll assume for the moment that you are referring to Assad's response to the CIA's "Arab Spring" black op, eh?
But you don't understand the historical context.
Here's a good recently-published historical reference work for you about the longstanding U.S. goal of toppling the Assad regime.*
It will help you parse and accurately interpret the fake U.S. mainstream media "news" reports that you have heard and read about Assad during the past 20 years-- including the CIA/NATO/Mossad origins of the 2011 "Arab Spring."
As a general rule, the U.S. "news" about any covert black op is CIA propaganda.
As an example, the CIA didn't even de-classify their files about their assassination of Iranian President Mossadeq until last year!
* The U.S. Role in the Destruction of Syria www.informationclearinghouse.info/49267.htmby David Ray Griffin |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 22, 2018 12:56:52 GMT -5
Walter,
I'll assume for the moment that you are referring to Assad's response to he CIA's "Arab Spring" black op, eh?
But you don't understand the historical context.
Here's a good recently-published historical reference work for you about the longstanding U.S. goal of toppling the Assad regime.*
It will help you parse and accurately interpret the fake U.S. mainstream media "news" reports that you have heard and read about Assad during the past 20 years-- including the CIA/NATO/Mossad origins of the 2011 "Arab Spring."
As a general rule, the U.S. "news" about any covert black op is CIA propaganda.
As an example, the CIA didn't even de-classify their files about their assassination of Iranian President Mossadeq until last year!
* The U.S. Role in the Destruction of Syria www.informationclearinghouse.info/49267.htmby David Ray Griffin Still waiting, Pravda-boy. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by AlaCowboy on Apr 22, 2018 13:24:14 GMT -5
Nie der hut reminds me of the old joke Soviet citizens used to say about Pravda and TASS. Pravda translates to truth, and TASS claimed to be the news.
The citizens used to say, "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
Nie der hut spouts more baloney than Hormel
|
|
|
56-43-2* OVER FLORIDA. ALWAYS IN THE LEAD.
THE CRYBABY LIZARDS WOULD ACCEPT THIS IF THEY WERE HONEST
*2020 Is Negated By Covid-19
15 SEC CHAMPIONSHIPS FOR GEORGIA
FLORIDA HAS ONLY 8 SEC CHAMPIONSHIPS
BACK-TO-BACK NATIONAL CHAMPIONS 2021! 2022!
FOUR NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS!
AMERICAN BY BIRTH. SOUTHERN BY THE GRACE OF GOD!!!
2017 GRAND DOUCHE AWARD WINNER - NOW RETIRED
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2018 13:27:26 GMT -5
Walter,
I'll assume for the moment that you are referring to Assad's response to he CIA's "Arab Spring" black op, eh?
But you don't understand the historical context.
Here's a good recently-published historical reference work for you about the longstanding U.S. goal of toppling the Assad regime.*
It will help you parse and accurately interpret the fake U.S. mainstream media "news" reports that you have heard and read about Assad during the past 20 years-- including the CIA/NATO/Mossad origins of the 2011 "Arab Spring."
As a general rule, the U.S. "news" about any covert black op is CIA propaganda.
As an example, the CIA didn't even de-classify their files about their assassination of Iranian President Mossadeq until last year!
* The U.S. Role in the Destruction of Syria www.informationclearinghouse.info/49267.htmby David Ray Griffin Still waiting, Pravda-boy. Well, don't keep us in such suspense. Tell us about your mainstream media "history" of the demoniacal Assad, and post a reference for us to analyze in the context of David Ray Griffin's historical analysis above. Are you referring to the CIA's 2011 "Arab Spring," or what, exactly? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 22, 2018 14:27:07 GMT -5
Still waiting, Pravda-boy. Well, don't keep us in such suspense. Tell us about your mainstream media "history" of the demoniacal Assad, and post a reference for us to analyze in the context of David Ray Griffin's historical analysis above. Are you referring to the CIA's 2011 "Arab Spring," or what, exactly? LMAO... Wait...is this "expert" on recent middle east history the same David Ray Griffin who is also a high rise structural engineering expert who can tell us about what really happened on 9/11? And is this the same DRG who is a retired professor of philosophy and religion, an expertise that neither qualifies him to pontificate on engineering or history and international relations? THAT DAVID RAY GRIFFIN? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 22, 2018 16:34:13 GMT -5
Well, don't keep us in such suspense. Tell us about your mainstream media "history" of the demoniacal Assad, and post a reference for us to analyze in the context of David Ray Griffin's historical analysis above. Are you referring to the CIA's 2011 "Arab Spring," or what, exactly? LMAO... Wait...is this "expert" on recent middle east history the same David Ray Griffin who is also a high rise structural engineering expert who can tell us about what really happened on 9/11? And is this the same DRG who is a retired professor of philosophy and religion, an expertise that neither qualifies him to pontificate on engineering or history and international relations? THAT DAVID RAY GRIFFIN? Right on cue, you invoke Daleko's old goofball "logic" that scholars can only be knowledgeable in one specific field. No polymaths allowed, eh? Who are Griffin's historical sources? Naiman? Wikileaks? Diplomatic cables? But, for the sake of argument, let's say that Griffin is writing outside of his specific academic area of expertise. What about Professor Jeffrey Sachs at Columbia-- the Harvard wunderkind? Was he adequately informed when he told MSNBC that CIA Operation Timber Sycamore has "DONE ENOUGH DAMAGE IN SYRIA," and we need to get OUT? Explain. Is 600,000 deaths and 12 million refugees enough damage, or should we keep destroying what's left of Syria? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 22, 2018 16:42:55 GMT -5
LMAO... Wait...is this "expert" on recent middle east history the same David Ray Griffin who is also a high rise structural engineering expert who can tell us about what really happened on 9/11? And is this the same DRG who is a retired professor of philosophy and religion, an expertise that neither qualifies him to pontificate on engineering or history and international relations? THAT DAVID RAY GRIFFIN? Right on cue, you invoke Daleko's old goofball "logic" that scholars can only be knowledgeable in one specific field. No polymaths allowed, eh? Who are Griffin's historical sources? Naiman? Wikileaks? Diplomatic cables? But, for the sake of argument, let's say that Griffin is writing outside of his specific academic area of expertise. What about Professor Jeffrey Sachs at Columbia-- the Harvard wunderkind? Was he adequately informed when he told MSNBC that CIA Operation Timber Sycamore has "DONE ENOUGH DAMAGE IN SYRIA," and we need to get OUT? Explain. Is 600,000 deaths and 12 million refugees enough damage, or should we keep destroying what's left of Syria? LOL....right. A polymath who just happens to be an expert in pyroclastic concrete flow, structural steel, and middle eastern geopolitics. And he happens to run a clickbait website about all those topics. What are the odds? What are the odds he's working for the Russians...you know....just like you? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Apr 22, 2018 17:19:33 GMT -5
Right on cue, you invoke Daleko's old goofball "logic" that scholars can only be knowledgeable in one specific field. No polymaths allowed, eh? Who are Griffin's historical sources? Naiman? Wikileaks? Diplomatic cables? But, for the sake of argument, let's say that Griffin is writing outside of his specific academic area of expertise. What about Professor Jeffrey Sachs at Columbia-- the Harvard wunderkind? Was he adequately informed when he told MSNBC that CIA Operation Timber Sycamore has "DONE ENOUGH DAMAGE IN SYRIA," and we need to get OUT? Explain. Is 600,000 deaths and 12 million refugees enough damage, or should we keep destroying what's left of Syria? LOL....right. A polymath who just happens to be an expert in pyroclastic concrete flow, structural steel, and middle eastern geopolitics. And he happens to run a clickbait website about all those topics. What are the odds? What are the odds he's working for the Russians...you know....just like you? |
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 22, 2018 17:32:28 GMT -5
LOL....right. A polymath who just happens to be an expert in pyroclastic concrete flow, structural steel, and middle eastern geopolitics. And he happens to run a clickbait website about all those topics. What are the odds? What are the odds he's working for the Russians...you know....just like you? I'm pretty certain that polymath David Ray Griffin wrote a comprehensive report about that, a report you clearly have not yet studied, but that, luckily, is available on his website, 9/11clickbaitsuckers.com Not surprising, though that you haven't studied such a well-written, thorough and extremely well-referenced technical document...what with you being a longtime CIA dupe and all.  |
|
