Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2019 12:31:40 GMT -5
No more of your Cheney-Wolfowitz 9/11 clickbait, Wally. Just the facts. Did Lady Evelyn Booth Olsen graduate from Georgetown Law School, as originally claimed?
You claim she isn't a real person. I posted a pic of her as a teenager with her family. Try to get out of the batter's box. Explain how that can be.
Clickbait. Un-sourced. No link.
Do you really believe that organizations like the CIA can't fabricate fake identities?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 19, 2019 13:16:23 GMT -5
You claim she isn't a real person. I posted a pic of her as a teenager with her family. Try to get out of the batter's box. Explain how that can be. Clickbait. Un-sourced. No link.
Do you really believe that organizations like the CIA can't fabricate fake identities?
...or Hawaiian birth certificates? FTR, I found the photo in the Kentucky Courier-Journal. www.courier-journal.com/story/entertainment/2016/03/09/three-kentucky-sisters-share-success-secrets/81440358/If you are claiming that a fluff piece about the family is somehow a sinister deep state plant, replete with fake photos, stories and dates, I believe you will become instantly eligible to receive your Official Birther Club Decoder Ring. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2019 13:40:50 GMT -5
Clickbait. Un-sourced. No link.
Do you really believe that organizations like the CIA can't fabricate fake identities?
...or Hawaiian birth certificates? FTR, I found the photo in the Kentucky Courier-Journal. www.courier-journal.com/story/entertainment/2016/03/09/three-kentucky-sisters-share-success-secrets/81440358/If you are claiming that a fluff piece about the family is somehow a sinister deep state plant, replete with fake photos, stories and dates, I believe you will become instantly eligible to receive your Official Birther Club Decoder Ring.
Yo, Wally, what's the date on your "Lady Booth" news article? 2016? 15 years after the op?
You strike out again.
"Lady" Evelyn Booth Olson originally listed her law school as Georgetown. (See the documentation at Let's Roll.com)
Then some sleuths figured out that no one named Lady Evelyn Booth ever graduated from Georgetown Law School.
Again, stop posting Cheney-Wolfowitz 9/11 click-bait.
I never claimed that these CIA black ops guys weren't skilled at creating "legends" and false narratives. Far from it.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 19, 2019 14:20:24 GMT -5
Yo, Wally, what's the date on your "Lady Booth" news article? 2016? 15 years after the op?
You strike out again. "Lady" Evelyn Booth Olson originally listed her law school as Georgetown. (See the documentation at Let's Roll.com)
Then some sleuths figured out that no one named Lady Evelyn Booth ever graduated from Georgetown Law School. Again, stop posting Cheney-Wolfowitz 9/11 click-bait. I never claimed that these CIA black ops guys weren't skilled at creating "legends" and false narratives. Far from it.
Georgetown BS isn't relevant. Facts are. Here. Explain this, Birther-Boy. www.kybar.org/members/?id=32541479and you can view her law license revocation order, issued 10 months prior to 9/11, which you can get to from the above link. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2019 19:22:57 GMT -5
Yo, Wally, what's the date on your "Lady Booth" news article? 2016? 15 years after the op?
You strike out again. "Lady" Evelyn Booth Olson originally listed her law school as Georgetown. (See the documentation at Let's Roll.com)
Then some sleuths figured out that no one named Lady Evelyn Booth ever graduated from Georgetown Law School. Again, stop posting Cheney-Wolfowitz 9/11 click-bait. I never claimed that these CIA black ops guys weren't skilled at creating "legends" and false narratives. Far from it.
Georgetown BS isn't relevant. Facts are. Here. Explain this, Birther-Boy. www.kybar.org/members/?id=32541479and you can view her law license revocation order, issued 10 months prior to 9/11, which you can get to from the above link.
Something here doesn't pass the sniff test.
I'll concede that the 3/3/94 admission date on the Kentucky Bar Association web page is telling. You've got a single date on a single web page.
Is it a web page that could have been easily created or forged ex post facto by a skillful Company hacker? Probably.
Meanwhile, there are too many oddities about the scant pre-9/11 record of Lady Evelyn Booth's existence.
For example, if Lady Booth claims to have graduated from Georgetown Law School, why is there no record that she graduated there?
Why was she registered by Ted Olson as an attorney for a SCOTUS case within a year of being dis-barred in Kentucky for failing to complete some CE courses?
Where did she go to college?
Why is her external ear anatomy, height, bone structure, and habitus identical to Barbara Olson's?
(BTW, the history of George W. Bush Administration insiders, Ted and Barbara Olson, prior to 9/11 is an incredible rabbit hole. Their closest friends were a virtual Who's Who of the GOP arch-conservative establishment-- including Kenneth Starr, Robert Bork, William Barr, Judge Silberman, Clarence Thomas, the Scaife Foundation, Fox News, and the Federalist Society. Ted Olson represented Dubya in Bush v. Gore.)
P.S. If you think you can solve the Barbara Olson/Lady Evelyn Booth Olson case with a single putative factoid, you've got a lot of homework to do, boy.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 19, 2019 19:34:24 GMT -5
Georgetown BS isn't relevant. Facts are. Here. Explain this, Birther-Boy. www.kybar.org/members/?id=32541479and you can view her law license revocation order, issued 10 months prior to 9/11, which you can get to from the above link. Something here doesn't pass the sniff test. I'll concede that the 3/3/94 admission date on the Kentucky Bar Association web page is telling. You've got a single date on a single web page. Is it a web page that could have been easily created or forged ex post facto by a skillful Company hacker? Probably. Meanwhile, there are too many oddities about the scant pre-9/11 record of Lady Evelyn Booth's existence. For example, if Lady Booth claims to have graduated from Georgetown Law School, why is there no record that she graduated there? Why was she registered by Ted Olson as an attorney for a SCOTUS case within a year of being dis-barred in Kentucky for failing to complete some CE courses? Where did she go to college? Why is her external ear anatomy, height, bone structure, and habitus identical to Barbara Olson's? (BTW, the history of George W. Bush Administration insiders, Ted and Barbara Olson, prior to 9/11 is an incredible rabbit hole. Their closest friends were a virtual Who's Who of the GOP arch-conservative establishment-- including Kenneth Starr, Robert Bork, William Barr, Judge Silberman, Clarence Thomas, the Scaife Foundation, Fox News, and the Federalist Society. Ted Olson represented Dubya in Bush v. Gore.)
P.S. If you think you can solve the Barbara Olson/Lady Evelyn Booth Olson case with a single putative factoid, you've got a lot of homework to do, boy.
Uh...the document is not a single web page. It is the result of a search submission to the Kentucky Bar that I made, and if you go to the page, it is linked to the letter that terminated her membership. So unless you are telling me that the entire Kentucky Bar is in cahoots with the State of Hawaii to forge documents so that tin-foil-hat kooks like you can enrich a bunch of clickbait phonies on the web, I'm going to say it: Sit down. You just got your ass kicked. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2019 19:42:59 GMT -5
Something here doesn't pass the sniff test. I'll concede that the 3/3/94 admission date on the Kentucky Bar Association web page is telling. You've got a single date on a single web page. Is it a web page that could have been easily created or forged ex post facto by a skillful Company hacker? Probably. Meanwhile, there are too many oddities about the scant pre-9/11 record of Lady Evelyn Booth's existence. For example, if Lady Booth claims to have graduated from Georgetown Law School, why is there no record that she graduated there? Why was she registered by Ted Olson as an attorney for a SCOTUS case within a year of being dis-barred in Kentucky for failing to complete some CE courses? Where did she go to college? Why is her external ear anatomy, height, bone structure, and habitus identical to Barbara Olson's? (BTW, the history of George W. Bush Administration insiders, Ted and Barbara Olson, prior to 9/11 is an incredible rabbit hole. Their closest friends were a virtual Who's Who of the GOP arch-conservative establishment-- including Kenneth Starr, Robert Bork, William Barr, Judge Silberman, Clarence Thomas, the Scaife Foundation, Fox News, and the Federalist Society. Ted Olson represented Dubya in Bush v. Gore.)
P.S. If you think you can solve the Barbara Olson/Lady Evelyn Booth Olson case with a single putative factoid, you've got a lot of homework to do, boy.
Uh...the document is not a single web page. It is the result of a search submission to the Kentucky Bar that I made, and if you go to the page, it is linked to the letter that terminated her membership. So unless you are telling me that the entire Kentucky Bar is in cahoots with the State of Hawaii to forge documents so that tin-foil-hat kooks like you can enrich a bunch of clickbait phonies on the web, I'm going to say it: Sit down. You just got your ass kicked.
Don't flatter yourself, Wally. Tell us where Lady Evelyn Booth went to high school, college, and law school.
She originally claimed that she graduated from Georgetown, right? (Have you figured that out yet?)
Any court cases with Lady Evelyn Booth's name on them prior to December 19, 2000? (Interestingly, a date that is eerily close to the date of Ted Olson's famous Bush v. Gore ruling.)
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 19, 2019 20:08:21 GMT -5
Uh...the document is not a single web page. It is the result of a search submission to the Kentucky Bar that I made, and if you go to the page, it is linked to the letter that terminated her membership. So unless you are telling me that the entire Kentucky Bar is in cahoots with the State of Hawaii to forge documents so that tin-foil-hat kooks like you can enrich a bunch of clickbait phonies on the web, I'm going to say it: Sit down. You just got your ass kicked. Don't flatter yourself, Wally. Tell us where Lady Evelyn Booth went to high school, college, and law school. She originally claimed that she graduated from Georgetown, right? (Have you figured that out yet?)
Any court cases with Lady Evelyn Booth's name on them prior to December 19, 2000? (Interestingly, a date that is eerily close to the date of Ted Olson's famous Bush v. Gore ruling.) No.. First, you explain how her name lands on the list of licensed attorneys in the State of Kentucky in 1994. You haven't made it to first base yet. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2019 21:06:27 GMT -5
Don't flatter yourself, Wally. Tell us where Lady Evelyn Booth went to high school, college, and law school. She originally claimed that she graduated from Georgetown, right? (Have you figured that out yet?)
Any court cases with Lady Evelyn Booth's name on them prior to December 19, 2000? (Interestingly, a date that is eerily close to the date of Ted Olson's famous Bush v. Gore ruling.) No.. First, you explain how her name lands on the list of licensed attorneys in the State of Kentucky in 1994. You haven't made it to first base yet. How do you know her name landed on that list in 1994? As I tried to tell you, what you have is a date of "3/3/94" printed on a web page. When was that web page created? You, obviously, don't know much about how experts create false identities and "back stories." What evidence do you really have about the existence of Lady Evelyn Booth prior to 2000? Any school records, old friends, court cases, etc.?? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Mar 19, 2019 21:10:08 GMT -5
No.. First, you explain how her name lands on the list of licensed attorneys in the State of Kentucky in 1994. You haven't made it to first base yet. How do you know her name landed on that list in 1994? As I tried to tell you, what you have is a date of "3/3/94" printed on a web page. When was that web page created? You, obviously, don't know much about how experts create false identities and "back stories." What evidence do you really have about the existence of Lady Evelyn Booth prior to 2000? Any school records, old friends, court cases, etc.?? 1994 isn’t prior to 2000? |
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 19, 2019 22:22:39 GMT -5
No.. First, you explain how her name lands on the list of licensed attorneys in the State of Kentucky in 1994. You haven't made it to first base yet. How do you know her name landed on that list in 1994? As I tried to tell you, what you have is a date of "3/3/94" printed on a web page. When was that web page created? You, obviously, don't know much about how experts create false identities and "back stories." What evidence do you really have about the existence of Lady Evelyn Booth prior to 2000? Any school records, old friends, court cases, etc.?? I could say the very same thing about birth certs in Hawaii. Like I said, your Birther Decoder Ring is in the mail. Congrats. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2019 12:40:26 GMT -5
How do you know her name landed on that list in 1994? As I tried to tell you, what you have is a date of "3/3/94" printed on a web page. When was that web page created? You, obviously, don't know much about how experts create false identities and "back stories." What evidence do you really have about the existence of Lady Evelyn Booth prior to 2000? Any school records, old friends, court cases, etc.?? 1994 isn’t prior to 2000?
As always, Harry jumps in to change the subject and dodge my key question.
To wit, how do you know that her name "landed" on that list in 1994? Answer: You don't.
BUT, LET'S CLARIFY WALTER'S OBFUSCATION...
I. FIRST BASE is acknowledging that the only FOUR 9/11 Pentagon videos available to the public (out of the 85 controlled by the Cheney-Wolfowitz 9/11 psy ops team) PROVE THAT A BOEING 757 DID NOT HIT THE PENTAGON. (See the videos I posted)
As for the "third base" questions about the 53 "passengers" listed by the Cheney-Wolfowitz team on the 220 seat Flight AA 77...
II. NO ONE (other than the Cheney-Wolfowitz team) EVER SAW OR IDENTIFIED THE ALLEGED PASSENGER REMAINS. (And only 5 "family members" ever attempted to claim compensation.)
III. The entire plane (including luggage and metal seat frames) was, allegedly VAPORIZED ON IMPACT-- not visible to the original eyewitnesses (including Lt. Col. Kwiatkowski.) How, then, were the alleged bodies identified?? Makes no sense.
IV. Walter, Harry, and Daleko have still not explained to us how a paper Muslim passport survived a 757 crash that "vaporized" all of the luggage and metal seats.
V. Walter and Harry have still not explained why Bush's Solicitor General Ted Olson lied about receiving phone calls from Barbara Olson (nee Braucher) on Flight AA 77.*
You boys have a lot of 'splainin' to do.. READY, GO !!!
* November 17, 2009
The Wisdom Fund
9/11: FBI Exhibit Contradicts U.S. Solicitor General's Account of Phone Calls From Barbara Olson
by Enver Masud
In a front page article on September 12, 2001 -- On Flight 77: 'Our Plane Is Being Hijacked' -- Marc Fisher and Don Phillips of the Washington Post reported that Barbara K. Olson called her husband twice in the final minutes before the crash of Flight 77. The FBI contradicts this account.
According to the Washington Post, Olson's last words to her husband were, "What do I tell the pilot to do?"
Barbara Walters interviews Ted Olson -- ABC, September 14, 2001
"She called from the plane while it was being hijacked," said Theodore Olson -- 42nd Solicitor General of the United States. "I wish it wasn't so, but it is." "The two conversations each lasted about a minute, said Tim O'Brien, a CNN reporter and friend of the Olsons." FBI exhibit Olson phone calls However, FBI exhibit (P200054 above) from the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui contradicts the Solicitor General's account. It shows that Barbara Olson made only one phone call -- it did not connect, and it lasted for 0 seconds. We contacted Mr. Olson (tolson@gibsondunn.com) for comment. None was received. Mr. Olson's account is repeated in The 9/11 Commission Report. 9/11 Facts, History — Not Propaganda
Tweet Follow @wisdomfund [Under the weight of evidence that the cellphone (not airfone) calls were essentially impossible as described by the Bush White House and the major media on the day in question, we have no alternative but to give serious consideration to the operational possibilities, as outlined here.--A. K. Dewdney, "The Cellphone and Airfone Calls from Flight UA93," physics911.net, September 13, 2005] [In 2004, Ian Henshall and Rowland Morgan, having asked American Airlines whether their "757s [are] fitted with phones that passengers can use," received this reply from an AA spokesperson: "American Airlines 757s do not have onboard phones for passenger use." To check on the possibility that Barbara Olson might have borrowed a phone intended for crew use, they then asked, " re there any onboard phones at all on AA 757s, i.e., that could be used either by passengers or cabin crew?" The response was: "AA 757s do not have any onboard phones, either for passenger or crew use. Crew have other means of communication available."--David Ray Griffin and Rob Balsamo, "Could Barbara Olson Have Made Those Calls? An Analysis of New Evidence about Onboard Phones," pilotsfor911truth.org, June 26, 2007]
Enver Masud's email to Andy Alexander, Ombudsman, The Washington Post, December 6, 2009
VIDEO: Griffin, "David Ray Griffin on the 9/11 Cell Phone Calls: Exclusive CBC Interview," youtube.com, December 18, 2009
[The FBI report for the Moussaoui trial affirmed only two cell phone calls from the airliners, both of which were from United Flight 93 after it had descended to 5,000 feet.--David Ray Griffin, "Phone Calls from the 9/11 Airliners," Global Research, January 12, 2010]
Enver Masud, "Pentagon Transcripts, Official Records Belie 'The 9/11 Commission Report'," The Wisdom Fund, August 27, 2010
Enver Masud's email to Patrick B. Pexton, Ombudsman, The Washington Post, August 26, 2011
MORE: "What Really Happened on September 11, 2001," The Wisdom Fund
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 20, 2019 14:08:22 GMT -5
1994 isn’t prior to 2000? As always, Harry jumps in to change the subject and dodge my key question.
To wit, how do you know that her name "landed" on that list in 1994? Answer: You don't. BUT, LET'S CLARIFY WALTER'S OBFUSCATION... I. FIRST BASE is acknowledging that the only FOUR 9/11 Pentagon videos available to the public (out of the 85 controlled by the Cheney-Wolfowitz 9/11 psy ops team) PROVE THAT A BOEING 757 DID NOT HIT THE PENTAGON. (See the videos I posted) As for the "third base" questions about the 53 "passengers" listed by the Cheney-Wolfowitz team on the 220 seat Flight AA 77... II. NO ONE (other than the Cheney-Wolfowitz team) EVER SAW OR IDENTIFIED THE ALLEGED PASSENGER REMAINS. (And only 5 "family members" ever attempted to claim compensation.)
III. The entire plane (including luggage and metal seat frames) was, allegedly VAPORIZED ON IMPACT-- not visible to the original eyewitnesses (including Lt. Col. Kwiatkowski.) How, then, were the alleged bodies identified?? Makes no sense. IV. Walter, Harry, and Daleko have still not explained to us how a paper Muslim passport survived a 757 crash that "vaporized" all of the luggage and metal seats. V. Walter and Harry have still not explained why Bush's Solicitor General Ted Olson lied about receiving phone calls from Barbara Olson (nee Braucher) on Flight AA 77.* You boys have a lot of 'splainin' to do.. READY, GO !!! * November 17, 2009
The Wisdom Fund
9/11: FBI Exhibit Contradicts U.S. Solicitor General's Account of Phone Calls From Barbara Olson by Enver Masud
In a front page article on September 12, 2001 -- On Flight 77: 'Our Plane Is Being Hijacked' -- Marc Fisher and Don Phillips of the Washington Post reported that Barbara K. Olson called her husband twice in the final minutes before the crash of Flight 77. The FBI contradicts this account.
According to the Washington Post, Olson's last words to her husband were, "What do I tell the pilot to do?"
Barbara Walters interviews Ted Olson -- ABC, September 14, 2001
"She called from the plane while it was being hijacked," said Theodore Olson -- 42nd Solicitor General of the United States. "I wish it wasn't so, but it is." "The two conversations each lasted about a minute, said Tim O'Brien, a CNN reporter and friend of the Olsons." FBI exhibit Olson phone calls However, FBI exhibit (P200054 above) from the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui contradicts the Solicitor General's account. It shows that Barbara Olson made only one phone call -- it did not connect, and it lasted for 0 seconds. We contacted Mr. Olson (tolson@gibsondunn.com) for comment. None was received. Mr. Olson's account is repeated in The 9/11 Commission Report. 9/11 Facts, History — Not Propaganda
Tweet Follow @wisdomfund [Under the weight of evidence that the cellphone (not airfone) calls were essentially impossible as described by the Bush White House and the major media on the day in question, we have no alternative but to give serious consideration to the operational possibilities, as outlined here.--A. K. Dewdney, "The Cellphone and Airfone Calls from Flight UA93," physics911.net, September 13, 2005] [In 2004, Ian Henshall and Rowland Morgan, having asked American Airlines whether their "757s [are] fitted with phones that passengers can use," received this reply from an AA spokesperson: "American Airlines 757s do not have onboard phones for passenger use." To check on the possibility that Barbara Olson might have borrowed a phone intended for crew use, they then asked, " re there any onboard phones at all on AA 757s, i.e., that could be used either by passengers or cabin crew?" The response was: "AA 757s do not have any onboard phones, either for passenger or crew use. Crew have other means of communication available."--David Ray Griffin and Rob Balsamo, "Could Barbara Olson Have Made Those Calls? An Analysis of New Evidence about Onboard Phones," pilotsfor911truth.org, June 26, 2007]
Enver Masud's email to Andy Alexander, Ombudsman, The Washington Post, December 6, 2009
VIDEO: Griffin, "David Ray Griffin on the 9/11 Cell Phone Calls: Exclusive CBC Interview," youtube.com, December 18, 2009
[The FBI report for the Moussaoui trial affirmed only two cell phone calls from the airliners, both of which were from United Flight 93 after it had descended to 5,000 feet.--David Ray Griffin, "Phone Calls from the 9/11 Airliners," Global Research, January 12, 2010]
Enver Masud, "Pentagon Transcripts, Official Records Belie 'The 9/11 Commission Report'," The Wisdom Fund, August 27, 2010
Enver Masud's email to Patrick B. Pexton, Ombudsman, The Washington Post, August 26, 2011
MORE: "What Really Happened on September 11, 2001," The Wisdom Fund
LOL... I could kick your ass again with this latest nonsense, but in the end, you'd just jump under the Birther Box for cover and fall back to your "deep state" silliness. So, instead, I'm going to make it short. All those sources are bullshit. Without even going to them, it is certain that they are, because none of your links have been anything else but nonsense. Every one of them. They are all making a living by fooling the slow-witted. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and say you are just pretending to be slow-witted, so take solace in that. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2019 16:24:07 GMT -5
Wally,
Your mission, should you decide to accept it-- is to finally explain your delusions, specified below...
(Along with explaining what explosively pulverized thousands of tons of WTC concrete and liquefied those massive steel beams.)
You're still batting zero...
BUT, LET'S CLARIFY WALTER'S OBFUSCATION... I. FIRST BASE is acknowledging that the only FOUR 9/11 Pentagon videos available to the public (out of the 85 controlled by the Cheney-Wolfowitz 9/11 psy ops team) PROVE THAT A BOEING 757 DID NOT HIT THE PENTAGON. (See the videos I posted) As for the "third base" questions about the 53 "passengers" listed by the Cheney-Wolfowitz team on the 220 seat Flight AA 77... II. NO ONE (other than the Cheney-Wolfowitz team) EVER SAW OR IDENTIFIED THE ALLEGED PASSENGER REMAINS. (And only 5 "family members" ever attempted to claim compensation.) III. The entire plane (including luggage and metal seat frames) was, allegedly VAPORIZED ON IMPACT-- not visible to the original eyewitnesses (including Lt. Col. Kwiatkowski.) How, then, were the alleged bodies identified?? Makes no sense.IV. Walter, Harry, and Daleko have still not explained to us how a paper Muslim passport survived a 757 crash that "vaporized" all of the luggage and metal seats.
V. Walter and Harry have still not explained why Bush's Solicitor General Ted Olson lied about receiving phone calls from Barbara Olson (nee Braucher) on Flight AA 77.*
You boys have a lot of 'splainin' to do.. READY, GO !!! Read more: aolcfboutcasts.proboards.com/thread/40552/ma-757-hit-pentagon-on?page=3#ixzz5ikVxxpDf
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 20, 2019 22:40:39 GMT -5
Wally,
Your mission, should you decide to accept it-- is to finally explain your delusions, specified below...
(Along with explaining what explosively pulverized thousands of tons of WTC concrete and liquefied those massive steel beams.)
You're still batting zero...
BUT, LET'S CLARIFY WALTER'S OBFUSCATION... I. FIRST BASE is acknowledging that the only FOUR 9/11 Pentagon videos available to the public (out of the 85 controlled by the Cheney-Wolfowitz 9/11 psy ops team) PROVE THAT A BOEING 757 DID NOT HIT THE PENTAGON. (See the videos I posted) As for the "third base" questions about the 53 "passengers" listed by the Cheney-Wolfowitz team on the 220 seat Flight AA 77... II. NO ONE (other than the Cheney-Wolfowitz team) EVER SAW OR IDENTIFIED THE ALLEGED PASSENGER REMAINS. (And only 5 "family members" ever attempted to claim compensation.) III. The entire plane (including luggage and metal seat frames) was, allegedly VAPORIZED ON IMPACT-- not visible to the original eyewitnesses (including Lt. Col. Kwiatkowski.) How, then, were the alleged bodies identified?? Makes no sense.IV. Walter, Harry, and Daleko have still not explained to us how a paper Muslim passport survived a 757 crash that "vaporized" all of the luggage and metal seats.
V. Walter and Harry have still not explained why Bush's Solicitor General Ted Olson lied about receiving phone calls from Barbara Olson (nee Braucher) on Flight AA 77.*
You boys have a lot of 'splainin' to do.. READY, GO !!! Read more: aolcfboutcasts.proboards.com/thread/40552/ma-757-hit-pentagon-on?page=3#ixzz5ikVxxpDfStill waiting for Birther-boy to comment on how it is that Lady E. Booth became a licensed attorney in Kentucky when she did not exist, and 7 years before 9/11. Musta been the same folks who planted fake evidence of a Hawaiian birth...you know...just in case. |
|
