Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2019 13:03:56 GMT -5
The Obvious Scientific Evidence of Explosive Controlled-Demolitions on 9/11
by W.F. Wunderlich
Perceiving the obvious scientific evidence that the World Trade Center Towers (and WTC7) were demolished by explosives on 9/11 is not rocket science. In fact, a person would have to be blind and deaf (physically or "cognitively") to avoid seeing (and hearing) the serial explosions that caused the steel WTC skyscrapers to rapidly, symmetrically collapse into their own footprints in virtual free falls (sans resistance) on 9/11.
So, why is it so difficult for many Americans -- even some educated Americans-- to see the explosive demolitions?
Simple. It's a case of cognitive "blinders" resulting from "authorities" repeating a false, pseudo-scientific narrative-- beginning with L. Paul Bremer's CNN narrative within one hour of the first plane striking L. Paul Bremer's office in the WTC north tower.
DOJ Criminal Division Chief Michael Chertoff oversaw the official Bush-Cheney government cover up of the 9/11 black op-- and Chertoff's cousin wrote a ridiculous, pseudo-scientific article about 9/11 that was published in Popular Mechanics in 2002 (following an aggressive change in the management of Popular Mechanics.)
After 9/11 families began protesting the absence of a bona fide 9/11 forensic investigation in 2002, the Bush-Cheney administration recruited the NIST to create a pseudo-scientific, computerized "explanation" (sans data) for the WTC demolitions, which has been thoroughly debunked by the international scientific community-- including demolitions experts, engineers, and architects.
The sham NIST "explanation" did not even attempt to explain the observed free fall collapse of the 47 floor WTC7 skyscraper on 9/11 -- after owner Larry Silverstein, reportedly, "told them to pull it." Nor did the NIST discuss the obvious chemical evidence of explosive demolition. (In fact, most of the evidence was illegally destroyed.)
Bush's pseudo-scientific NIST report repeatedly referred to the obvious visible (and audible) serial explosions that demolished the WTC skyscrapers as "pressure pulses." Huh? "Pressure pulses?"
Here's the short (4 minute) version of the scientific documentary, Explosive Evidence, that Walter deleted from the board last year.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 4, 2019 15:58:10 GMT -5
So, to recap, everything is as I say it is and all others are fools...because I said so.
Let us test it.
Did planes fly into the two towers?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 4, 2019 17:50:20 GMT -5
So, to recap, everything is as I say it is and all others are fools...because I said so. Let us test it. Did planes fly into the two towers?
Walter,
Look, listen, and learn. * Take off your cognitive-perceptual 9/11 blinders.
WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 were professionally demolished by pre-planted, steel-liquefying, concrete-pulverizing explosives.
Even the 3,000 people trapped in the WTC towers were mostly pulverized.
(I heard about this first hand from someone who was at Ground Zero immediately after the 9/11 demolitions.)
*
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 4, 2019 21:16:48 GMT -5
So, to recap, everything is as I say it is and all others are fools...because I said so. Let us test it. Did planes fly into the two towers? Walter,
Look, listen, and learn. * Take off your cognitive-perceptual 9/11 blinders.
WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 were professionally demolished by pre-planted, steel-liquefying, concrete-pulverizing explosives.
Even the 3,000 people trapped in the WTC towers were mostly pulverized.
(I heard about this first hand from someone who was at Ground Zero immediately after the 9/11 demolitions.) *
It was a simple question. Did planes fly into the buildings. Simple yes or no question. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2019 0:16:05 GMT -5
Walter,
Look, listen, and learn. * Take off your cognitive-perceptual 9/11 blinders.
WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 were professionally demolished by pre-planted, steel-liquefying, concrete-pulverizing explosives.
Even the 3,000 people trapped in the WTC towers were mostly pulverized.
(I heard about this first hand from someone who was at Ground Zero immediately after the 9/11 demolitions.) *
It was a simple question. Did planes fly into the buildings. Simple yes or no question. Yes. But, irregardless, those buildings were, definitely, demolished by pre-planted, steel-liquefying, concrete-pulverizing explosives-- including WTC7, the 47 floor skyscraper that was never hit by a plane. Kerosene doesn't liquefy steel or explosively pulverize concrete-- and, in any case, the serial explosions are visible and audible. Multiple witnesses described serial explosions, including the massive explosion below the ground level BEFORE the first plane hit the north tower (e.g., the testimony of Willie Rodriguez, et.al.) Look, listen, and learn. You need to remove your cognitive blinders and FINALLY examine the empirical data. Aren't you a self-professed Cartesian? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 5, 2019 9:46:57 GMT -5
Were there any passengers on those planes?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2019 10:19:15 GMT -5
Were there any passengers on those planes?
Read Dean Harwell's, Planes Without Passengers, Wally. He presents a lot of interesting details about the strange FAA data on 9/11.
Do you know anything about the remote-piloting of Boeing jetliners? (Hint: The first successful landing was in August of 2001.)
But, again, let's get back to the pre-planned explosive demolitions of the WTC towers and WTC7 on 9/11.
Do you think those CIA-trained "Al Qaeda" goatherds placed high-tech, steel-melting explosives in Larry Silverstein's skyscrapers during the weeks before 9/11?
And how did the Israelis (e.g., Odigo) and CIA/Pentagon personnel know about the 9/11 "attacks" before they happened?
Put on your Trojan thinking cap, dude. You've dodged the facts about 9/11 for too many years.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 5, 2019 10:36:50 GMT -5
Were there any passengers on those planes? Read Dean Harwell's, Planes Without Passengers, Wally. He presents a lot of interesting details about the strange FAA data on 9/11.
Do you know anything about the remote-piloting of Boeing jetliners? (Hint: The first successful landing was in August of 2001.)
But, again, let's get back to the pre-planned explosive demolitions of the WTC towers and WTC7 on 9/11. Do you think those CIA-trained "Al Qaeda" goatherds placed high-tech, steel-melting explosives in Larry Silverstein's skyscrapers during the weeks before 9/11? And how did the Israelis (e.g., Odigo) and CIA/Pentagon personnel know about the 9/11 "attacks" before they happened? Put on your Trojan thinking cap, dude. You've dodged the facts about 9/11 for too many years.
So...passengers on those planes or not? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2019 12:52:13 GMT -5
Read Dean Harwell's, Planes Without Passengers, Wally. He presents a lot of interesting details about the strange FAA data on 9/11.
Do you know anything about the remote-piloting of Boeing jetliners? (Hint: The first successful landing was in August of 2001.)
But, again, let's get back to the pre-planned explosive demolitions of the WTC towers and WTC7 on 9/11. Do you think those CIA-trained "Al Qaeda" goatherds placed high-tech, steel-melting explosives in Larry Silverstein's skyscrapers during the weeks before 9/11? And how did the Israelis (e.g., Odigo) and CIA/Pentagon personnel know about the 9/11 "attacks" before they happened? Put on your Trojan thinking cap, dude. You've dodged the facts about 9/11 for too many years.
So...passengers on those planes or not?
Walter,
Stop dodging the data. You're asking me where that missing "Indian subcontinent piece" of the 9/11 (Eastern Hemisphere) jigsaw puzzle is.
Do you understand the analogy? We don't need that piece of the 9/11 puzzle to conclude that the puzzle is not a map of the "Western Hemisphere" -- as the Bush-Cheney propaganda team has repeatedly claimed.
I'm asking you NOW to cut the bullshit and look at all of the pieces of the completed puzzle that clearly indicate it is a map of the Eastern Hemishpere.
What do you have to say about the obvious evidence that the WTC buildings were explosively demolished on 9/11?
They were not pulverized and demolished quickly on 9/11 by burning kerosene. Get a clue.
Answer the question about this 4:00 minute summary of the scientific data about the explosive, controlled demolitions.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 5, 2019 15:38:08 GMT -5
So...passengers on those planes or not? Walter, Stop dodging the data. You're asking me where that missing "Indian subcontinent piece" of the 9/11 (Eastern Hemisphere) jigsaw puzzle is. Do you understand the analogy? We don't need that piece of the 9/11 puzzle to conclude that the puzzle is not a map of the "Western Hemisphere" -- as the Bush-Cheney propaganda team has repeatedly claimed.
I'm asking you NOW to cut the bullshit and look at all of the pieces of the completed puzzle that clearly indicate it is a map of the Eastern Hemishpere. What do you have to say about the obvious evidence that the WTC buildings were explosively demolished on 9/11? They were not pulverized and demolished quickly on 9/11 by burning kerosene. Get a clue.
Answer the question about this 4:00 minute summary of the scientific data about the explosive, controlled demolitions.
Oh dear...we seem to have hit another wall. Simple question, Wilson. Were there passengers on the two planes that hit the WTCs? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2019 16:33:32 GMT -5
Oh dear, Walter is still afraid to discuss the scientific facts about 9/11.
Walter, explain how the observed controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center skyscrapers by steel-melting explosives fits with the official Bush-Cheney-Zelikow conspiracy theory that 9/11 was an attack by the CIA's 'Al Qaeda" goatherds.
Did these alleged Saudi "hijackers" plant military-grade explosives in the WTC tomers (including WTC7) before 9/11?
Also, why did WTC7 collapse in a free fall demolition immediately after the building's owner, Larry Silverstein, "told them to pull it?"
Whom did Silverstein speak to? Who "pulled" WTC7 for Silverstein, and how?
You've got some major 'splainin' to do, fella. At present, there are hundreds of data that debunk YOUR theory of 9/11.
Do you understand your 9/11 paradigm problems yet?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 5, 2019 16:40:50 GMT -5
Oh dear, Walter is still afraid to discuss the scientific facts about 9/11. Walter, explain how the observed controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center skyscrapers by steel-melting explosives fits with the official Bush-Cheney-Zelikow conspiracy theory that 9/11 was an attack by the CIA's 'Al Qaeda" goatherds. Did these alleged Saudi "hijackers" plant military-grade explosives in the WTC tomers (including WTC7) before 9/11? Also, why did WTC7 collapse in a free fall demolition immediately after the building's owner, Larry Silverstein, "told them to pull it?" Whom did Silverstein speak to? Who "pulled" WTC7 for Silverstein, and how? You've got some major 'splainin' to do, fella. At present, there are hundreds of data that debunk YOUR theory of 9/11. Do you understand your 9/11 paradigm problems yet?
I am asking a simple question, Wilson. Were there passengers on those planes? Yes or no? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2019 16:45:44 GMT -5
Oh dear, Walter is still afraid to discuss the scientific facts about 9/11. Walter, explain how the observed controlled demolitions of the World Trade Center skyscrapers by steel-melting explosives fits with the official Bush-Cheney-Zelikow conspiracy theory that 9/11 was an attack by the CIA's 'Al Qaeda" goatherds. Did these alleged Saudi "hijackers" plant military-grade explosives in the WTC tomers (including WTC7) before 9/11? Also, why did WTC7 collapse in a free fall demolition immediately after the building's owner, Larry Silverstein, "told them to pull it?" Whom did Silverstein speak to? Who "pulled" WTC7 for Silverstein, and how? You've got some major 'splainin' to do, fella. At present, there are hundreds of data that debunk YOUR theory of 9/11. Do you understand your 9/11 paradigm problems yet?
I am asking a simple question, Wilson. Were there passengers on those planes? Yes or no?
It's irrelevant to the subject under discussion-- the controlled demolitions of the WTC skyscrapers by concrete-pulverizing explosives.
THAT much is a scientific fact that DEBUNKS your bogus Bush-Cheney-Zelikow-NIST 9/11 narrative.
Do you understand why and how? It's true regardless of whether there were passengers on those "planes."
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 5, 2019 17:27:01 GMT -5
I am asking a simple question, Wilson. Were there passengers on those planes? Yes or no? It's irrelevant to the subject under discussion-- the controlled demolitions of the WTC skyscrapers by concrete-pulverizing explosives. THAT much is a scientific fact that DEBUNKS your bogus Bush-Cheney-Zelikow-NIST 9/11 narrative. Do you understand why and how? It's true regardless of whether there were passengers on those "planes." Well, see, unlike you, I read a good chunk of the NIST report, and I also read a critique by one of your so-called experts at your urging. I've also read about the code changes that flowed from that NIST report, such as: Shafts enclosing elevators and exit stairways that have impact resistant walls; (a strange requirement if the building was blown up) A higher standard for fire resistance in high-rise buildings more than 420 feet tall; (a strange requirement if fire was not a factor in the collapse as you suggest) and designing structures to mitigate disproportionate progressive collapse. (how would that help if the joint was demolished?) Your "expert" critique made a few very minor points about the NIST report that may or may not have been correct, but even if we assume they were correct, on the whole, the conclusions drawn from those issues were 100%, total bullshit. What is unfortunate is that you don't know enough about structural engineering or building design to know that. So, tell ya what....if I were you, I'd stick to simpler things. Try this..."Were there passengers on those planes?". |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Apr 5, 2019 17:59:39 GMT -5
It's irrelevant to the subject under discussion-- the controlled demolitions of the WTC skyscrapers by concrete-pulverizing explosives. THAT much is a scientific fact that DEBUNKS your bogus Bush-Cheney-Zelikow-NIST 9/11 narrative. Do you understand why and how? It's true regardless of whether there were passengers on those "planes." Well, see, unlike you, I read a good chunk of the NIST report, and I also read a critique by one of your so-called experts at your urging. I've also read about the code changes that flowed from that NIST report, such as: Shafts enclosing elevators and exit stairways that have impact resistant walls; (a strange requirement if the building was blown up) A higher standard for fire resistance in high-rise buildings more than 420 feet tall; (a strange requirement if fire was not a factor in the collapse as you suggest) and designing structures to mitigate disproportionate progressive collapse. (how would that help if the joint was demolished?) Your "expert" critique made a few very minor points about the NIST report that may or may not have been correct, but even if we assume they were correct, on the whole, the conclusions drawn from those issues were 100%, total bullshit. What is unfortunate is that you don't know enough about structural engineering or building design to know that. So, tell ya what....if I were you, I'd stick to simpler things. Try this..."Were there passengers on those planes?". When responding to Wilson, might make sense to just post Vincent Gambini’s famous quote: “everything that guy just said is bullshit.” 😂😎 |
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
