Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2019 17:06:17 GMT -5
1) The claim that burning kerosene (and office furniture) caused the sudden-onset, explosive demolitions and free fall collapses of three massive steel skyscrapers. 2) Calling the visible and audible serial explosions that demolished the WTC towers "pressure pulses."
3) Refusing to provide or discuss any fire engineering data about the WTC debris-- which proved that steel liquefying thermate explosives were used in the demolitions. 4) Refusing to include any forensic analysis or discussion of the obvious audio-visual and overwhelmingly consistent testimony of witnesses about the serial explosions and liquefied steel at Ground Zero.
Other than that, you and Harry are good to go.
Are you suggesting that fires involving contents, notwithstanding an accelerant, cannot reach a temperature that would affect the performance of a steel beam?
Two simple science questions for you and Harry, Walter. Chemistry 101 stuff.
1) At what temperature does steel transition from solid state to molten (flowing) liquid-- as clearly seen during the WTC demolitions on 9/11?
(And, to anticipate Daleko's usual crap, it was definitely NOT molten aluminum-- per colorimetry.)
2) What is the maximum temperature of burning office furniture? Kerosene?
Ready, go!
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 6, 2019 17:21:50 GMT -5
Are you suggesting that fires involving contents, notwithstanding an accelerant, cannot reach a temperature that would affect the performance of a steel beam? Two simple science questions for you and Harry, Walter. Chemistry 101 stuff.
1) At what temperature does steel transition from solid to molten liquid-- as seen in copious amounts at Ground Zero? 2) What is the maximum temperature of burning office furniture? Kerosene? Ready, go!
What was the temperature of the fires that burned at the point of impact by the planes? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2019 17:27:02 GMT -5
Two simple science questions for you and Harry, Walter. Chemistry 101 stuff.
1) At what temperature does steel transition from solid to molten liquid-- as seen in copious amounts at Ground Zero? 2) What is the maximum temperature of burning office furniture? Kerosene? Ready, go!
What was the temperature of the fires that burned at the point of impact by the planes?
Study the data, Walter. The steel melting thermate explosives had to be positioned throughout the 220 floor steel cores for the entire edifices to disintegrate and pulverize.
Besides, the first explosions are known to have occurred in the north tower before the remotely-piloted planes arrived.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 6, 2019 17:39:40 GMT -5
What was the temperature of the fires that burned at the point of impact by the planes? Study the data, Walter. The steel melting thermate explosives had to be positioned throughout the 220 floor steel cores for the entire edifices to disintegrate and pulverize. Besides, the first explosions are known to have occurred in the north tower before the remotely-piloted planes arrived.
Wait....remotely piloted planes? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Apr 6, 2019 18:19:03 GMT -5
Study the data, Walter. The steel melting thermate explosives had to be positioned throughout the 220 floor steel cores for the entire edifices to disintegrate and pulverize. Besides, the first explosions are known to have occurred in the north tower before the remotely-piloted planes arrived.
Wait....remotely piloted planes? He’s on a roll. 😂😎 |
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 6, 2019 18:37:52 GMT -5
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Apr 6, 2019 19:03:47 GMT -5
I’m sure Wilson has a theory. 😎 |
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by AlaCowboy on Apr 6, 2019 19:49:56 GMT -5
Two simple science questions for you and Harry, Walter. Chemistry 101 stuff.
1) At what temperature does steel transition from solid to molten liquid-- as seen in copious amounts at Ground Zero? 2) What is the maximum temperature of burning office furniture? Kerosene? Ready, go!
What was the temperature of the fires that burned at the point of impact by the planes? |
|
|
56-43-2* OVER FLORIDA. ALWAYS IN THE LEAD.
THE CRYBABY LIZARDS WOULD ACCEPT THIS IF THEY WERE HONEST
*2020 Is Negated By Covid-19
15 SEC CHAMPIONSHIPS FOR GEORGIA
FLORIDA HAS ONLY 8 SEC CHAMPIONSHIPS
BACK-TO-BACK NATIONAL CHAMPIONS 2021! 2022!
FOUR NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS!
AMERICAN BY BIRTH. SOUTHERN BY THE GRACE OF GOD!!!
2017 GRAND DOUCHE AWARD WINNER - NOW RETIRED
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2019 19:50:43 GMT -5
What, specifically, was "bunk"?
1) The claim that burning kerosene (and office furniture) caused the sudden-onset, explosive demolitions and free fall collapses of three massive steel skyscrapers.
2) Calling the visible and audible serial explosions that demolished the WTC towers "pressure pulses."
3) Refusing to provide or discuss any fire engineering data about the WTC debris-- which proved that steel liquefying thermate explosives were used in the demolitions.
4) Refusing to include any forensic analysis or discussion of the obvious audio-visual and overwhelmingly consistent testimony of witnesses about the serial explosions and liquefied steel at Ground Zero.
Other than that, you and Harry are good to go.
Wunderlich 55 Wally/Harry 0 |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2019 19:53:31 GMT -5
What was the temperature of the fires that burned at the point of impact by the planes? Were those steel rails liquefied, like the molten steel at the WTC? Answer the question. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 6, 2019 21:29:26 GMT -5
Both Union and Confederate soldiers used to disrupt railroad traffic during the War Between The States by pulling up steel rails, ripping up the railroad ties and building a bonfire, and heat the rails to near melting and then bending the rails around a tree. The soldiers called them Sherman's Neckties. Were those steel rails liquefied, like the molten steel at the WTC? Answer the question. What was the temp of the fire at the floor where the planes hit? How long did those fires burn? Where is Betty Ann Ong today? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2019 21:39:16 GMT -5
Were those steel rails liquefied, like the molten steel at the WTC? Answer the question. What was the temp of the fire at the floor where the planes hit? How long did those fires burn? Where is Betty Ann Ong today? Walter,
You haven't answered a single 9/11 science question that I have asked. Zilch.
The extraordinarily high heat of the thermitic explosives used to demolish the WTC towers lasted for 15 smoldering weeks!
WTF caused these concrete-pulverizing explosions and steel-liquefying, 15 week foundry-like temperatures in your idiotic opinion, kerosene?
You and Harry both get an "F" in the Science of the WTC Explosive 9/11 Demolitions.
Did you two intellectual crash-test dummies even watch the 4 minute introductory science video above?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 6, 2019 22:16:11 GMT -5
You cannot answer the simplest questions about your assertions.
Until you do, the rest is bullshit.
Try to stay focused.
Were there fires on the floors where the planes hit?
How long did those fires burn?
At what temp?
What is the code requirement for fire protection of steel in a Type 1 structure? Any idea?
Do you even know what a Type 1 structure is?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2019 23:29:10 GMT -5
Walter, answer my questions. Cut the crap.
Did you study the thread's video?
Whati .liquefied the massive steel beams in the 7th level sub-basement of the WTC towers-- more than 100 lloors below the locaized kerosene fires at impaCt?
Do you understand the original calculations I posted here proving that the quantity of jet fuel was grossly insufficient to destroy the massive volume of steel melted on 9/11?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 7, 2019 12:04:42 GMT -5
Walter, answer my questions. Cut the crap. Did you study the thread's video? Whati .liquefied the massive steel beams in the 7th level sub-basement of the WTC towers-- more than 100 lloors below the locaized kerosene fires at impaCt? Do you understand the original calculations I posted here proving that the quantity of jet fuel was grossly insufficient to destroy the massive volume of steel melted on 9/11? Wilson, cut the crap. Answer my questions. What was the temperature of the fire and how long did it burn at that temp? Those are crucial questions. The jet fuel is an accelerant, not a source of fuel for a fire. The code does not require me to add fireproofing to a steel column because of fear of a plane crashing into the building. I do it to protect from fire fed by contents. So tell me. What was the temp and for how long? |
|
