Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2019 20:16:14 GMT -5
Why do I always end up having to help Wally with his basic physics homework?
This would never have happened if I had tutored Wally in college physics. 
II. If a steel skyscraper completely collapsed into its own footprint in a symmetrical, near free-fall, which of the following MUST have been true?
A) The collapse was caused by the gravitational pancaking of upper floors onto lower floors-- Boom-boom-crunch! -ouch! - boom -- boom, etc... (e.g., per the belated Bush-Cheney NIST Report "simulation")
B) The collapse of upper floors caused step-wise, sequential perpendicular "shearing" of the steel beams on the lower sub-structures (e.g., per Wally's beloved Bush-Cheney NIST Report) Boom! Shear...BOOM! Shear...Boompity-boom-boom...Shear, etc.
C) The resistance to total collapse caused by the steel beams of the lower sub-structure was progressively destroyed by the weight of the upper floors (per the NIST Report.) "Look! It could possibly go...GEEZ!...Boom!...OUCH!..all..the...way...down...floor after..floor...after another .. BOOM!...floor...CRUNCH!...look, Wally... boom...boom! Still crumbling slowly down! Boom!"
D) Jet fuel (kerosene) dripping from high level floors simultaneously liquefied all of the lower steel girders (Look, Wally! It's molten steel pouring from the floors right after those serial explosions!)
E) The resistance to total, symmetrical, near free fall collapse was close to ZERO -- i.e., the steel beams of the lower sub-structure were rapidly demolished by something other than gravitational force, to the extent that they caused ZERO resistance to free fall collapse.
The correct answer is E)
A) The collapse was caused by the gravitational pancaking of upper floors onto lower floors-- Boom-boom-crunch! -ouch! - boom -- boom, etc... (e.g., per the belated Bush-Cheney NIST Report "simulation")
B) The collapse of upper floors caused step-wise, sequential perpendicular "shearing" of the steel beams on the lower sub-structures (e.g., per Wally's beloved Bush-Cheney NIST Report) Boom! Shear...BOOM! Shear...Boompity-boom-boom...Shear, etc.
C) The resistance to total collapse caused by the steel beams of the lower sub-structure was progressively destroyed by the weight of the upper floors (per the NIST Report.) "Look! It could possibly go...GEEZ!...Boom!...OUCH!..all..the...way...down...floor after..floor...after another .. BOOM!...floor...CRUNCH!...look, Wally... boom...boom! Still crumbling slowly down! Boom!"
D) Jet fuel (kerosene) dripping from high level floors simultaneously liquefied all of the lower steel girders (Look, Wally! It's molten steel pouring from the floors right after those serial explosions!)
E) The resistance to total, symmetrical, near free fall collapse was close to ZERO -- i.e., the steel beams of the lower sub-structure were rapidly demolished by something other than gravitational force, to the extent that they caused ZERO resistance to free fall collapse.
The correct answer is E)
The observed near free fall collapse of the WTC towers (and WTC7) on 9/11 NECESSARILY implies near zero RESISTANCE to collapse by the lower steel subs-structures of these skyscrapers.
In other words, the steel sub-structures were explosively demolished.
Until you do that, you're wasting pixels.
You and I have fairly similar perspectives on most issues.
The two major exceptions have to do with, 1) my skepticism about certain government narratives (e.g., JFK, 9/11, Syria) and, 2) your skepticism about Christianity (including traditional Eastern Orthodox Christianity-- since I'm not an apologist for Protestant Fundamentalists or the RC.)
