Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 16, 2019 5:40:41 GMT -5
How are you doing with your studies of the NIST report regarding WTC7? Have you finished it yet?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2019 10:43:35 GMT -5
How are you doing with your studies of the NIST report regarding WTC7? Have you finished it yet? Get a clue, Wally. Go back and read my last post.
Your beloved NIST Report is a complete pseudo-scientific sham. It didn't even try to explain the observed, abrupt, symmetrical, free fall collapse of the entire 47 floor WTC7 steel skyscraper on 9/11.
It was commissioned by the Bush-Cheney PNAC team to cover up the fact that the WTC buildings (including WTC7) were demolished on 9/11 by pre-planted explosives.
The owner and builder of WTC7, Larry Silverstein, (a close personal friend of Bibi Netanyahu) explicitly said that he "told them to pull it" (WTC7) on 9/11, before watching the building collapse in a free fall. Who is "THEM?" Certainly not the NYFD, because the NYFD is not in the business of demolishing 47 floor steel skyscrapers.
We also know now that Silverstein had drafted architectural plans for a new WTC7 building BEFORE 9/11.
Time to come clean and pull your head out of your ass about 9/11, Wally.
You've dodged and lied about the scientific facts for 18 years now...
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 16, 2019 11:06:41 GMT -5
How are you doing with your studies of the NIST report regarding WTC7? Have you finished it yet? Get a clue, Wally. Go back and read my last post. Your beloved NIST Report is a complete pseudo-scientific sham. It didn't even try to explain the observed, abrupt, symmetrical, free fall collapse of the entire 47 floor WTC7 steel skyscraper on 9/11.
It was commissioned by the Bush-Cheney PNAC team to cover up the fact that the WTC buildings (including WTC7) were demolished on 9/11 by pre-planted explosives. The owner and builder of WTC7, Larry Silverstein, (a close personal friend of Bibi Netanyahu) explicitly said that he "told them to pull it" (WTC7) on 9/11, before watching the building collapse in a free fall. Who is "THEM?" Certainly not the NYFD, because the NYFD is not in the business of demolishing 47 floor steel skyscrapers. We also know now that Silverstein had drafted architectural plans for a new WTC7 building BEFORE 9/11. Time to come clean and pull your head out of your ass about 9/11, Wally. You've dodged and lied about the scientific facts for 18 years now...
How do you know the NIST report is a sham? You've never read it. In addition, If you had, you don't have the expertise to even know if it is a sham or not. Why? Because you are completely ignorant of the engineering principles they discuss. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2019 11:30:26 GMT -5
Get a clue, Wally. Go back and read my last post. Your beloved NIST Report is a complete pseudo-scientific sham. It didn't even try to explain the observed, abrupt, symmetrical, free fall collapse of the entire 47 floor WTC7 steel skyscraper on 9/11.
It was commissioned by the Bush-Cheney PNAC team to cover up the fact that the WTC buildings (including WTC7) were demolished on 9/11 by pre-planted explosives. The owner and builder of WTC7, Larry Silverstein, (a close personal friend of Bibi Netanyahu) explicitly said that he "told them to pull it" (WTC7) on 9/11, before watching the building collapse in a free fall. Who is "THEM?" Certainly not the NYFD, because the NYFD is not in the business of demolishing 47 floor steel skyscrapers. We also know now that Silverstein had drafted architectural plans for a new WTC7 building BEFORE 9/11. Time to come clean and pull your head out of your ass about 9/11, Wally. You've dodged and lied about the scientific facts for 18 years now...
How do you know the NIST report is a sham? You've never read it. In addition, If you had, you don't have the expertise to even know if it is a sham or not. Why? Because you are completely ignorant of the engineering principles they discuss.
The sham NIST Report only offered a computer model for the initiation of the partial collapse of an upper floor of WTC7.
They didn't try to explain the abrupt, symmetrical, free fall collapse of the entire 47 floor steel structure.
If you deny this fact, post the specific details of their explanation for the abrupt, symmetrical, free fall collapse of the building.
(Good luck, dude. You'll need it.)
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 16, 2019 12:23:47 GMT -5
How do you know the NIST report is a sham? You've never read it. In addition, If you had, you don't have the expertise to even know if it is a sham or not. Why? Because you are completely ignorant of the engineering principles they discuss. The sham NIST Report only offered a computer model for the initiation of the partial collapse of an upper floor of WTC7. They didn't try to explain the abrupt, symmetrical, free fall collapse of the entire 47 floor steel structure. If you deny this fact, post the specific details of their explanation for the abrupt, symmetrical, free fall collapse of the building. (Good luck, dude. You'll need it.)
Why don't you just read the damn report? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 16, 2019 16:07:39 GMT -5
The sham NIST Report only offered a computer model for the initiation of the partial collapse of an upper floor of WTC7. They didn't try to explain the abrupt, symmetrical, free fall collapse of the entire 47 floor steel structure. If you deny this fact, post the specific details of their explanation for the abrupt, symmetrical, free fall collapse of the building. (Good luck, dude. You'll need it.)
Why don't you just read the damn report? You're a hopeless case, Wally. I can"t debate with a Dunning-Kruger type dupe who is too ignorant to recognize his own ignorance. Geez, I posted a detailed scientific debunking of the fraudulent NIST Report scam here five years ago, and you're still riding around in circles on your delusional Wally World merry-go-round, pretending that Jaffe's NIST "simulation" wasn't part of the 9/11 op cover up... |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 16, 2019 21:36:36 GMT -5
Why don't you just read the damn report? You're a hopeless case, Wally. I can"t debate with a Dunning-Kruger type dupe who is too ignorant to recognize his own ignorance. Geez, I posted a detailed scientific debunking of the fraudulent NIST Report scam here five years ago, and you're still riding around in circles on your delusional Wally World merry-go-round, pretending that Jaffe's NIST "simulation" wasn't part of the 9/11 op cover up... Only problem is I read what you posted, and posted a rebuttal at the time. The idiot nibbled at minor discrepancies and then drew firm, erroneous conclusions that were not supported by the data. You, of course, with no engineering education, had no idea about the nature of the discussion and bailed, as you are wont to do when challenged. Why? Because you do not understand the underlying engineering principles that define the discussion. Face it, Willie. You have no idea if NIST is right or not. You have never even read it. You cannot understand what they discuss, and so rely on internet hacks and profiteers to inform you. It is all pretty pathetic for a guy I think is pretty smart. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2019 16:38:14 GMT -5
Wally, Feel free to post a rebuttal of the FACTS about 9/11 outlined in the brief Corbett Report video at the top of the thread. Good luck. As always, you won't even make it to first base. (You never have.)
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 17, 2019 18:31:29 GMT -5
Wally, Feel free to post a rebuttal of the FACTS about 9/11 outlined in the brief Corbett Report video at the top of the thread. Good luck. As always, you won't even make it to first base. (You never have.)
As long as you refuse to study the available data and are adamant about remaining stupid about the subject, there isn't much point. Read NIST. Then at least we will have a basic understanding of the nature of the collapse. Until then, you're wasting my time with your clickbait nonsense. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 17, 2019 20:58:42 GMT -5
Wally, Feel free to post a rebuttal of the FACTS about 9/11 outlined in the brief Corbett Report video at the top of the thread. Good luck. As always, you won't even make it to first base. (You never have.)
As long as you refuse to study the available data and are adamant about remaining stupid about the subject, there isn't much point. Read NIST. Then at least we will have a basic understanding of the nature of the collapse. Until then, you're wasting my time with your clickbait nonsense.
Here's the data for you, Wally. If you deny this scientific data, you're officially NUTS...
The free fall collapse of WTC7 is now an established scientific fact
Dick Cheney's NIST fraudsters lied about the WTC7 data!!
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 18, 2019 8:56:26 GMT -5
As long as you refuse to study the available data and are adamant about remaining stupid about the subject, there isn't much point. Read NIST. Then at least we will have a basic understanding of the nature of the collapse. Until then, you're wasting my time with your clickbait nonsense. Here's the data for you, Wally. If you deny this scientific data, you're officially NUTS...
The free fall collapse of WTC7 is now an established scientific fact
Dick Cheney's NIST fraudsters lied about the WTC7 data!!
Chandler ignores nearly everything that happens prior to the final collapse. Why does he do that? Explain. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 18, 2019 10:51:40 GMT -5
Here's the data for you, Wally. If you deny this scientific data, you're officially NUTS...
The free fall collapse of WTC7 is now an established scientific fact
Dick Cheney's NIST fraudsters lied about the WTC7 data!!
Chandler ignores nearly everything that happens prior to the final collapse. Why does he do that? Explain.
Walter,
1) What is "free fall?" How is it measured, specifically, in physics?
2) How do we know that WTC7 did, in fact, collapse in a "free fall"-- as Chandler demonstrates quite clearly?
3) What happens to the measurable distances between the upper floors of WTC7 as the building collapses in a free fall?
4) Does the distance between upper floors; a) decrease, b) increase, c) remain roughly unchanged?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 18, 2019 13:05:37 GMT -5
Chandler ignores nearly everything that happens prior to the final collapse. Why does he do that? Explain. Walter, 1) What is "free fall?" How is it measured, specifically, in physics?
2) How do we know that WTC7 did, in fact, collapse in a "free fall"-- as Chandler demonstrates quite clearly? 3) What happens to the measurable distances between the upper floors of WTC7 as the building collapses in a free fall? 4) Does the distance between upper floors; a) decrease, b) increase, c) remain roughly unchanged?
Answer my question. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Sept 18, 2019 13:13:39 GMT -5
Walter, 1) What is "free fall?" How is it measured, specifically, in physics?
2) How do we know that WTC7 did, in fact, collapse in a "free fall"-- as Chandler demonstrates quite clearly? 3) What happens to the measurable distances between the upper floors of WTC7 as the building collapses in a free fall? 4) Does the distance between upper floors; a) decrease, b) increase, c) remain roughly unchanged?
Answer my question.  |
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 18, 2019 13:21:21 GMT -5
Just saying... LOL...I am not expecting different results. I am just allowing Willie to illustrate his insanity. So far, he has not let me down. |
|
Jan 13, 2020 17:38:49 GMT -5
Jan 13, 2020 17:38:49 GMT -5
May 1, 2022 14:04:40 GMT -5
May 1, 2022 14:04:40 GMT -5
