Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2019 11:25:00 GMT -5
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 14, 2019 12:00:39 GMT -5
I'd debunk this for about the 5th time, but what's the point?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2019 13:06:24 GMT -5
I'd debunk this for about the 5th time, but what's the point? Walter, Your dishonesty and willful ignorance about the 9/11 facts is truly appalling, and bizarre. You haven't debunked ANY facts about the CIA-Mossad 9/11 false flag op. EVER. Secondly, this 5 minute Corbett Report analysis has NEVER been posted here. EVER. What is wrong with you, fella? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 14, 2019 13:55:54 GMT -5
I'd debunk this for about the 5th time, but what's the point? Walter, Your dishonesty and willful ignorance about the 9/11 facts is truly appalling, and bizarre. You haven't debunked ANY facts about the CIA-Mossad 9/11 false flag op. EVER. Secondly, this 5 minute Corbett Report analysis has NEVER been posted here. EVER. What is wrong with you, fella? I haven't debunked any facts about the CIA-Mossad 9/11 false flag...because there aren't any. I debunked the assertion that they ARE facts. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2019 14:45:03 GMT -5
Walter, Your dishonesty and willful ignorance about the 9/11 facts is truly appalling, and bizarre. You haven't debunked ANY facts about the CIA-Mossad 9/11 false flag op. EVER. Secondly, this 5 minute Corbett Report analysis has NEVER been posted here. EVER. What is wrong with you, fella? I haven't debunked any facts about the CIA-Mossad 9/11 false flag...because there aren't any. I debunked the assertion that they ARE facts.
Get a clue, Wally. There are an OVERWHELMING number of scientific and historical facts implicating the U.S. military, the Saudi government, and the Mossad in 9/11.
You have debunked NONE of them. Zero.
You never could explain the facts about the 900,00 tons of explosively pulverized concrete (per tower) and liquefied steel girders at Ground Zero.
You never could explain the fact that office fires could not have caused a total, symmetrical, free-fall demolition of WTC7. (Neither could the NIST.)
You never could explain why the "Five Dancing Israeli" Mossad agents admitted filming and celebrating the WTC demolitions on 9/11.
But you have a neat trick. You dodge the documentary evidence presented in the 9/11 Truth research videos-- including the famous "Explosive Evidence" (PBS aired) video that you deleted twice-- then you simply claim that you debunked the evidence, hoping that no one on the forum will watch the videos and learn the facts.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 14, 2019 15:56:22 GMT -5
I haven't debunked any facts about the CIA-Mossad 9/11 false flag...because there aren't any. I debunked the assertion that they ARE facts. Get a clue, Wally. There are an OVERWHELMING number of scientific and historical facts implicating the U.S. military, the Saudi government, and the Mossad in 9/11. You have debunked NONE of them. Zero. You never could explain the facts about the 900,00 tons of explosively pulverized concrete (per tower) and liquefied steel girders at Ground Zero. You never could explain the fact that office fires could not have caused a total, symmetrical, free-fall demolition of WTC7. (Neither could the NIST.) You never could explain why the "Five Dancing Israeli" Mossad agents admitted filming and celebrating the WTC demolitions on 9/11.
But you have a neat trick. You dodge the documentary evidence presented in the 9/11 Truth research videos-- including the famous "Explosive Evidence" (PBS aired) video that you deleted twice-- then you simply claim that you debunked the evidence, hoping that no one on the forum will watch the videos and learn the facts.
LOL...I don't dodge it. I debunk it and then you pretend nothing happened and then disappear in a haze of new fake "facts" to obscure the reality that your 'fact'...isn't one. Then you rinse and repeat as if it never happened, which is why I asked rhetorically why it's even worth bothering about. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2019 17:51:37 GMT -5
Get a clue, Wally. There are an OVERWHELMING number of scientific and historical facts implicating the U.S. military, the Saudi government, and the Mossad in 9/11. You have debunked NONE of them. Zero. You never could explain the facts about the 900,00 tons of explosively pulverized concrete (per tower) and liquefied steel girders at Ground Zero. You never could explain the fact that office fires could not have caused a total, symmetrical, free-fall demolition of WTC7. (Neither could the NIST.) You never could explain why the "Five Dancing Israeli" Mossad agents admitted filming and celebrating the WTC demolitions on 9/11.
But you have a neat trick. You dodge the documentary evidence presented in the 9/11 Truth research videos-- including the famous "Explosive Evidence" (PBS aired) video that you deleted twice-- then you simply claim that you debunked the evidence, hoping that no one on the forum will watch the videos and learn the facts.
LOL...I don't dodge it. I debunk it and then you pretend nothing happened and then disappear in a haze of new fake "facts" to obscure the reality that your 'fact'...isn't one. Then you rinse and repeat as if it never happened, which is why I asked rhetorically why it's even worth bothering about. Lies. Damned lies. If you debunked anything, tell us why the five "Dancing Israelis" admitted filming and celebrating the WTC demolitions on 9/11, before they were arrested. (The FBI was recently forced by an FOIA to release their 9/11 photos.) Tell us why the major story of their arrest and FBI detention was completely blacked out of the U.S. media for 18 years. Tell us what explosively pulverized 1.8 million tons of WTC concrete on 9/11. Tell us how WTC7 collapsed in a sudden, complete, symmetrical free fall on 9/11. (The NIST Report presented NO EXPLANATION for the free fall collapse of WTC7.) |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 14, 2019 19:06:04 GMT -5
LOL...I don't dodge it. I debunk it and then you pretend nothing happened and then disappear in a haze of new fake "facts" to obscure the reality that your 'fact'...isn't one. Then you rinse and repeat as if it never happened, which is why I asked rhetorically why it's even worth bothering about. Lies. Damned lies. If you debunked anything, tell us why the five "Dancing Israelis" admitted filming and celebrating the WTC demolitions on 9/11, before they were arrested. (The FBI was recently forced by an FOIA to release their 9/11 photos.) Tell us why the major story of their arrest and FBI detention was completely blacked out of the U.S. media for 18 years. Tell us what explosively pulverized 1.8 million tons of WTC concrete on 9/11. Tell us how WTC7 collapsed in a sudden, complete, symmetrical free fall on 9/11. (The NIST Report presented NO EXPLANATION for the free fall collapse of WTC7.) Blacked out for 18 years? 20/20 devoted a big chunk of their program to the "dancing Israelis" in June of 2002. Pulverize 1.8 million tons of concrete? How much PE did that concrete and all the rest of the building contain? Do the math. NIST does have an explanation of the WTC7 collapse, but as we discovered over the summer, you've never read the NIST report, are ignorant of its findings, and rely on your clickbait websites to make shit up that you suck up like a Hoover. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 14, 2019 21:05:58 GMT -5
Lies. Damned lies. If you debunked anything, tell us why the five "Dancing Israelis" admitted filming and celebrating the WTC demolitions on 9/11, before they were arrested. (The FBI was recently forced by an FOIA to release their 9/11 photos.) Tell us why the major story of their arrest and FBI detention was completely blacked out of the U.S. media for 18 years. Tell us what explosively pulverized 1.8 million tons of WTC concrete on 9/11. Tell us how WTC7 collapsed in a sudden, complete, symmetrical free fall on 9/11. (The NIST Report presented NO EXPLANATION for the free fall collapse of WTC7.) Blacked out for 18 years? 20/20 devoted a big chunk of their program to the "dancing Israelis" in June of 2002. THE NEW YORK TIMES HAS BLACKED OUT THE TRUE STORY OF THE "DANCING ISRAELIS" FOR 18 YEARS!! NYT !!Pulverize 1.8 million tons of concrete? How much PE did that concrete and all the rest of the building contain? Do the math. Look at the film, Wally !! You can easily see (and hear) the massive, serial explosive pulverizations!!NIST does have an explanation of the WTC7 collapse, but as we discovered over the summer, you've never read the NIST report, are ignorant of its findings, and rely on your clickbait websites to make shit up that you suck up like a Hoover. WRONG!! The NIST Report did not attempt to explain the free fall demolition of WTC7 AT ALL!!All that their ludicrous pseudo-scientific computer "simulation" pretended to explain was the INITIATION of a collapse.That NIST computer "simulation" has now been officially DEBUNKED by a new scientific study from the University of Alaska.
9/11 mystery solved: World Trade Center building didn't collapse due to fire – study finds
ONE of the towers during the 9/11 terror attacks did not collapse due to a fire, a shocking study has determined
September 8, 2019
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 15, 2019 7:06:40 GMT -5
You did not read the NIST report. Until you do, and post salient parts of it with which you disagree, you are nothing but a raving conspiracy kook.
Deal with it.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2019 14:44:58 GMT -5
You did not read the NIST report. Until you do, and post salient parts of it with which you disagree, you are nothing but a raving conspiracy kook. Deal with it. Walter, I've read enough of the NIST Report to know that it was a sham "investigation." 1) No, they did not explain the abrupt, symmetrical free fall collapse of WTC7. 2) They refused to publish the "data" used in their 9/11 WTC computer "simulation." 3) They did not even analyze the WTC debris for a legitimate forensic arson analysis. 4) They called the obvious serial explosions in the buildings, "pressure pulses." Correct? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 15, 2019 15:40:48 GMT -5
You did not read the NIST report. Until you do, and post salient parts of it with which you disagree, you are nothing but a raving conspiracy kook. Deal with it. Walter, I've read enough of the NIST Report to know that it was a sham "investigation." 1) No, they did not explain the abrupt, symmetrical free fall collapse of WTC7. 2) They refused to publish the "data" used in their 9/11 WTC computer "simulation." 3) They did not even analyze the WTC debris for a legitimate forensic arson analysis. 4) They called the obvious serial explosions in the buildings, "pressure pulses." Correct? LOL....NIST wrote a 130 page report specifically explaining the probable process of collapse of WTC7. Your problem is you just never read it. So, go read it. Then post the areas of their report with which you disagree. Come on, Harvard-boy. It's only 130 pages. You should be able to knock it out in a few days. And BTW, they discuss hypothetical intentionally set blast scenarios. Maybe you should read that part twice. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by AlaCowboy on Sept 15, 2019 21:23:28 GMT -5
Get a clue, Wally. There are an OVERWHELMING number of scientific and historical facts implicating the U.S. military, the Saudi government, and the Mossad in 9/11. You have debunked NONE of them. Zero. You never could explain the facts about the 900,00 tons of explosively pulverized concrete (per tower) and liquefied steel girders at Ground Zero. You never could explain the fact that office fires could not have caused a total, symmetrical, free-fall demolition of WTC7. (Neither could the NIST.) You never could explain why the "Five Dancing Israeli" Mossad agents admitted filming and celebrating the WTC demolitions on 9/11.
But you have a neat trick. You dodge the documentary evidence presented in the 9/11 Truth research videos-- including the famous "Explosive Evidence" (PBS aired) video that you deleted twice-- then you simply claim that you debunked the evidence, hoping that no one on the forum will watch the videos and learn the facts.
LOL...I don't dodge it. I debunk it and then you pretend nothing happened and then disappear in a haze of new fake "facts" to obscure the reality that your 'fact'...isn't one. Then you rinse and repeat as if it never happened, which is why I asked rhetorically why it's even worth bothering about. |
|
|
56-43-2* OVER FLORIDA. ALWAYS IN THE LEAD.
THE CRYBABY LIZARDS WOULD ACCEPT THIS IF THEY WERE HONEST
*2020 Is Negated By Covid-19
15 SEC CHAMPIONSHIPS FOR GEORGIA
FLORIDA HAS ONLY 8 SEC CHAMPIONSHIPS
BACK-TO-BACK NATIONAL CHAMPIONS 2021! 2022!
FOUR NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIPS!
AMERICAN BY BIRTH. SOUTHERN BY THE GRACE OF GOD!!!
2017 GRAND DOUCHE AWARD WINNER - NOW RETIRED
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 15, 2019 23:06:02 GMT -5
LOL...I don't dodge it. I debunk it and then you pretend nothing happened and then disappear in a haze of new fake "facts" to obscure the reality that your 'fact'...isn't one. Then you rinse and repeat as if it never happened, which is why I asked rhetorically why it's even worth bothering about. Stop hijacking these threads, Ra mey. Did you watch the brief Corbett Report video that is the subject of this thread? Explain which facts presented in the video you disagree with. I'll wait. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Sept 16, 2019 5:37:11 GMT -5
Isn't it odd that the person that has never presented a live interview with any of the people listed as passengers on those 4 planes claims we debunk "evidence" he can't verify. An interview from just one of those people would blow the lid off the biggest conspiracy in history and he can't do it. Stop hijacking these threads, Ra mey. Did you watch the brief Corbett Report video that is the subject of this thread? Explain which facts presented in the video you disagree with. I'll wait. That will be tough. There weren't any. |
|
Jan 13, 2020 17:38:49 GMT -5
Jan 13, 2020 17:38:49 GMT -5
May 1, 2022 14:04:40 GMT -5
May 1, 2022 14:04:40 GMT -5
