New University Study Debunks the NIST Report

[Deleted]

2,300 academic and professional engineers and architects now agree that the WTC was demolished by explosives on 9/11.

Why are U.S. media moguls still censoring the truth about 9/11?

[Walter]

Well, at least it seems to be a legitimate engineering study, even if it was paid for by the clickbait squad.
I noticed that it has not been peer-reviewed, so I will reserve judgment. I skimmed through it, and it seemed to be a diligent attempt at engineering analysis, though I have no idea how accurate. But at least they try. I'll give them that.

[Deleted]

Sept 21, 2019 17:01:25 GMT -5 Walter said:

Well, at least it seems to be a legitimate engineering study, even if it was paid for by the clickbait squad.
I noticed that it has not been peer-reviewed, so I will reserve judgment. I skimmed through it, and it seemed to be a diligent attempt at engineering analysis, though I have no idea how accurate. But at least they try. I'll give them that.

Wally,

    Get real.

    You should have joined 2,300 of your educated, honest colleagues at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth several years ago, as I advised.

    Instead, you have spent the last 18 years pushing government-funded internet disinformation about 9/11 and living a lie that has been repeatedly debunked by overwhelming scientific, forensic, and historical evidence.

     You are living proof that systematic government disinformation/psy ops about military black ops can bamboozle gullible populations.

[Walter]

Sept 22, 2019 9:31:31 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Sept 21, 2019 17:01:25 GMT -5 Walter said:

Well, at least it seems to be a legitimate engineering study, even if it was paid for by the clickbait squad.
I noticed that it has not been peer-reviewed, so I will reserve judgment. I skimmed through it, and it seemed to be a diligent attempt at engineering analysis, though I have no idea how accurate. But at least they try. I'll give them that.

Wally,

    Get real.

    You should have joined 2,300 of your educated, honest colleagues at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth several years ago, as I advised.

    Instead, you have spent the last 18 years pushing government-funded internet disinformation about 9/11 and living a lie that has been repeatedly debunked by overwhelming scientific, forensic, and historical evidence.

     You are living proof that systematic government disinformation/psy ops about military black ops can bamboozle gullible populations.

I could have joined the 2300, or I could stick with the 1.5 million architects and engineers who do not believe the nonsense.

For instance: Have you any idea how much thermite explosive it would take to cut a W14x730?
Do you even know what a W14x730 is? How much it weighs and what its dimensions are?
No?
Go look it up. Then repost that stupid video of the guy using thermite to cut a piece of steel and explain to us why it is relevant.

[oujour76]

Sept 22, 2019 11:10:31 GMT -5 Walter said:

Sept 22, 2019 9:31:31 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Wally,

    Get real.

    You should have joined 2,300 of your educated, honest colleagues at Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth several years ago, as I advised.

    Instead, you have spent the last 18 years pushing government-funded internet disinformation about 9/11 and living a lie that has been repeatedly debunked by overwhelming scientific, forensic, and historical evidence.

     You are living proof that systematic government disinformation/psy ops about military black ops can bamboozle gullible populations.

I could have joined the 2300, or I could stick with the 1.5 million architects and engineers who do not believe the nonsense.

For instance: Have you any idea how much thermite explosive it would take to cut a W14x730?
Do you even know what a W14x730 is? How much it weighs and what its dimensions are?
No?
Go look it up. Then repost that stupid video of the guy using thermite to cut a piece of steel and explain to us why it is relevant.

But, but...there were cleaning crews and maintenance workers at WTC for the whole week before 9-11. And some were there after hours. 😂

[Walter]

Sept 22, 2019 12:52:30 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Sept 22, 2019 11:10:31 GMT -5 Walter said:

I could have joined the 2300, or I could stick with the 1.5 million architects and engineers who do not believe the nonsense.

For instance: Have you any idea how much thermite explosive it would take to cut a W14x730?
Do you even know what a W14x730 is? How much it weighs and what its dimensions are?
No?
Go look it up. Then repost that stupid video of the guy using thermite to cut a piece of steel and explain to us why it is relevant.

But, but...there were cleaning crews and maintenance workers at WTC for the whole week before 9-11. And some were there after hours. 😂

Just in case you don't know, the nomenclature of a wide flange beam or column is stated as depth x weight per linear foot.
Thus, a one-foot long piece of the column that Willie is claiming was blown up weighs 730 lbs. The flanges are just shy of 5 inches thick. Added to that were two 2" thick steel plates welded to the ends of the flanges. All total, the net cross-section of the column that failed was blown up with thermite was over 300 square inches of steel. That's roughly a 17"x 17" block of steel.

Here's the video Willie posted "proving" thermite could cut through a steel column.


Does the steel the video guy is trying to cut through look like a 17" x 17" block of solid steel? No. It does not.

You're up, Willie.

[oujour76]

Sept 22, 2019 14:50:47 GMT -5 Walter said:

Sept 22, 2019 12:52:30 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

But, but...there were cleaning crews and maintenance workers at WTC for the whole week before 9-11. And some were there after hours. 😂

Just in case you don't know, the nomenclature of a wide flange beam or column is stated as depth x weight per linear foot.
Thus, a one-foot long piece of the column that Willie is claiming was blown up weighs 730 lbs. The flanges are just shy of 5 inches thick. Added to that were two 2" thick steel plates welded to the ends of the flanges. All total, the net cross-section of the column that failed was blown up with thermite was over 300 square inches of steel. That's roughly a 17"x 17" block of steel.

Here's the video Willie posted "proving" thermite could cut through a steel column.


Does the steel the video guy is trying to cut through look like a 17" x 17" block of solid steel? No. It does not.

You're up, Willie.

Thanks for the info...no, did not know the nomenclature or specifics. But, did know that the steel beams in those buildings are huge and to bring them down would take a shitload of explosives.

[Deleted]

Sept 21, 2019 14:14:25 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

2,300 academic and professional engineers and architects now agree that the WTC was demolished by explosives on 9/11.

Why are U.S. media moguls still censoring the truth about 9/11?

     It's 2,300 academic and professional engineers and architects from around the world vs."Clickbait" Walter of Troy, Lying Harry-the-Salesman-Non-Scientist and Dick Cheney's Commerce Department NIST fraudsters, whose fake computer "simulation" of the WTC demolitions has been repeatedly debunked by multiple scientists...

     Yet Clickbait Walter and his hairy, squawking chicken sidekick are still refusing to admit that they got plucked by Dick Cheney's fake 9/11 narrative.

[Walter]

Sept 22, 2019 19:59:07 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Sept 21, 2019 14:14:25 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

2,300 academic and professional engineers and architects now agree that the WTC was demolished by explosives on 9/11.

Why are U.S. media moguls still censoring the truth about 9/11?

     It's 2,300 academic and professional engineers and architects from around the world vs."Clickbait" Walter of Troy, Lying Harry-the-Salesman-Non-Scientist and Dick Cheney's Commerce Department NIST fraudsters, whose fake computer "simulation" of the WTC demolitions has been repeatedly debunked by multiple scientists...

     Yet Clickbait Walter and his hairy, squawking chicken sidekick are still refusing to admit that they got plucked by Dick Cheney's fake 9/11 narrative.

Still waiting for you to explain to us how a column with over 300 sq. in of solid steel was severed using thermite.

Yer up. Go.

Hint: It is not feasibly possible to do it. Uh oh...Now what?

How demo companies do it is by having crews cut through the columns with acetylene torches and then place charges at the weakened area.
Now, if you want to explain to us how crews with torches worked for months setting up the demo in occupied lease space without anyone noticing, have at it.
Personally, I think you will have an easier time explaining where all the plane passengers disappeared to. You have yet to explain that to us either.

[oujour76]

Sept 22, 2019 21:46:44 GMT -5 Walter said:

Sept 22, 2019 19:59:07 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

     It's 2,300 academic and professional engineers and architects from around the world vs."Clickbait" Walter of Troy, Lying Harry-the-Salesman-Non-Scientist and Dick Cheney's Commerce Department NIST fraudsters, whose fake computer "simulation" of the WTC demolitions has been repeatedly debunked by multiple scientists...

     Yet Clickbait Walter and his hairy, squawking chicken sidekick are still refusing to admit that they got plucked by Dick Cheney's fake 9/11 narrative.

Still waiting for you to explain to us how a column with over 300 sq. in of solid steel was severed using thermite.

Yer up. Go.

Hint: It is not feasibly possible to do it. Uh oh...Now what?

How demo companies do it is by having crews cut through the columns with acetylene torches and then place charges at the weakened area.
Now, if you want to explain to us how crews with torches worked for months setting up the demo in occupied lease space without anyone noticing, have at it.
Personally, I think you will have an easier time explaining where all the plane passengers disappeared to. You have yet to explain that to us either.

Oops. You mean it takes more than 2 oz. of thermite to bring down 100 story buildings? Who knew? Anybody who has ever seen a building prepared for demolition knows it is a long, arduous process. And not one that can be done in secret.

[Deleted]

Sept 22, 2019 22:47:14 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Sept 22, 2019 21:46:44 GMT -5 Walter said:

Still waiting for you to explain to us how a column with over 300 sq. in of solid steel was severed using thermite.

Yer up. Go.

Hint: It is not feasibly possible to do it. Uh oh...Now what?

How demo companies do it is by having crews cut through the columns with acetylene torches and then place charges at the weakened area.
Now, if you want to explain to us how crews with torches worked for months setting up the demo in occupied lease space without anyone noticing, have at it.
Personally, I think you will have an easier time explaining where all the plane passengers disappeared to. You have yet to explain that to us either.

Oops. You mean it takes more than 2 oz. of thermite to bring down 100 story buildings? Who knew? Anybody who has ever seen a building prepared for demolition knows it is a long, arduous process. And not one that can be done in secret.

Who said anything about "2 oz. of thermite?"

You two pathetic, lying, old suckers need to get a room.

Here are some basic questions about the 9/11 WTC demolitions that you two poofers have dodged for 10 years!!

1)  What explosively pulverized 1.8 million tons of WTC concrete (and over 1,000 human bodies) at the WTC?

2)  What liquefied all of the steel flowing at Ground Zero "like a foundry?"

3)   Why did the 9/11 Commission (and NIST) censor all of the witness testimony, and audio-visual evidence, of the serial explosions that demolished the WTC?

4)   Why did they never conduct a forensic arson evaluation of the debris?

5)   Why did WTC7 collapse in a free fall demolition on 9/11 right after Larry Silverstein "told them to pull it?"