Panel Says Trump sought to 'undermine' COVID-19 response

[DrSchadenfreude]

Trump sought to 'undermine' COVID-19 response, says panel

thehill.com/homenews/administration/586287-house-oversight-report-trump-administration-sought-to-undermine-covid



December 17, 2021

[AlaCowboy]

Did that panel also mention that the same President Trump is the President Trump that fast-tracked the development of the Covid-19 vaccine they claim he tried to undermine?
Does this mean Democrats don't believe that forced mass vaccination will not give us herd immunity? Does The Esteemed FDFD believe forced mass vaccination will not achieve herd immunity? Does The Esteemed FDFD also deny that not allowing people to keep or obtain a job is forced mass vaccination?
Easy questions but watch The FDFD ignore my questions or post about the 9-11 Conspiracy in order to change the subject of his own copy-and-paste thread. Or maybe Walter will delete my post entirely. If he does I'll post my response on every board daily until he kicks me out of his failing creation.
Here's The FDFDs original copy-and-paste post. Note he hadn't found anything in the Fake Media to quote to us with in-depth" analysis to support it.

Trump sought to 'undermine' COVID-19 response, says panel

thehill.com/homenews/administration/586287-house-oversight-report-trump-administration-sought-to-undermine-covid



December 17, 2021

[Panama pfRedd]

Why the effing eff is this in the politics section?
Effyew liberal shitstains.

[Panama pfRedd]

Reports Surface of CDC Overcounting U.S. Vaccine Rates

This is likely not surprising to many Americans; however, Bloomberg {LINK} and now Axios {LINK} are reporting that official U.S. CDC vaccination rates are considerably overstated.

The issue stems from exceptionally high previous vaccination rates reported by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) that remained static despite the same CDC reporting that vaccines continued.

Common sense would ask: if vaccination rates were long-ago in the 99% range for age-groups the CDC reported, then how could the CDC continue assigning hundreds of thousands of new vaccinations into the group? Thus, downward revisions are now being made to reconcile the issue.

Anecdotally, this would align with several tangential datapoints which have always seemed to be in conflict with the preferred government narrative. Additionally, there’s also an obvious motive on behalf of the government to overinflate vaccination in order to generate peer pressure and the self-fulfilling prophecy needed to garner vaccine acceptance.

As now noted by Bloomberg:

[…] “CDC data show 240 million people with at least one shot, or about 72.5% of the population. But the agency says only 203 million are fully vaccinated, or 61.3%, an 11-percentage-point difference that is far larger than in other developed countries.

State and local officials say it’s improbable that 37 million Americans got one shot without completing their inoculations. Instead, they say, the government has regularly and incorrectly counted booster shots and second doses as first doses.” (more)

Perhaps this disparity reconciles why many people look quizzically at the high vaccine data while not finding any correlation to their own community, friends or family. Indeed, there has always been a disconnect between the number of people the government reports as having been vaccinated, when contrast against the open admissions of those who have not wanted to participate in this wide-scale vaccination program.

Not only does this disconnect appear visible in the U.S., but clear examples of the seemingly odd disconnect also surface in Australia where the government vaccine mandate is perhaps the most extreme.

Vaccine hesitancy is not driven by pure opposition to vaccines in/of themselves; rather the commonsense hesitancy is driven by the reality of an mRNA vaccine potentially not being reversible if any long-term negative outcome was to eventually surface.

The unvaccinated population are essentially a real world control group, and in the interest of public disclosure, I am a member of that group.

Specific to the United States, we must also remember there is a large number, tens-of-millions of Americans, who have watched in real time how various institutions of government have been revealed to be corrupt. Never before, in recent memory, have so many people lost trust in government institutions as a result of sunlight upon them.

Institutions including the U.S. Dept of Justice, the FBI and the various intelligence agencies, as well as corporate media, the U.S. education network, and now the medical establishment -writ large- have seen stunning collapses in trust and credibility.

The impact of the collapse in trust of those institutions is going to reverberate for generations. The issue of whether anything resembling their prior credibility ever being achieved again is an open-ended question for the next several generations.

Watching the metastatic virus of corruption and corporate influence infect the institutions of government is also not a unique issue for the United States. Globally, one only has to glance around at the visible protests to see that trust in almost all government is now at its lowest point in memory. That reality only provides more reason to doubt the vaccination rates being reported by those same corporate/government institutions.

The “we are doing it for your health” talking point seems absolutely ridiculous when you contrast that claim against the harm caused by the COVID dictates. A solid argument can be made that the popular government deployed solution, totalitarian oppressions, has been far more detrimental than the virus itself.

Put all of that together with the visible anger amid the daily protests on almost every continent, and yeah, it makes sense to read that these vaccination rates are wildly over accounted by the government entities and institutions who have demanded them.

James Garrow, a spokesperson for the Philadelphia Department of Public Health, which has worked with the state to blend data sets for a more accurate view of vaccination trends, said “we don’t have any faith in the numbers on the CDC website, and we never refer to them.”

As Neil Oliver has stated frequently, “We are the many – they are the few.” And given that reality, there must be a great deal of fear amid a group of politicians that eventually they will be overwhelmed. Indeed, the need for control is a reaction to fear.

[AlaCowboy]

Dec 19, 2021 10:52:49 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Did that panel also mention that the same President Trump is the President Trump that fast-tracked the development of the Covid-19 vaccine they claim he tried to undermine?
Does this mean Democrats don't believe that forced mass vaccination will not give us herd immunity? Does The Esteemed FDFD believe forced mass vaccination will not achieve herd immunity? Does The Esteemed FDFD also deny that not allowing people to keep or obtain a job is forced mass vaccination?
Easy questions but watch The FDFD ignore my questions or post about the 9-11 Conspiracy in order to change the subject of his own copy-and-paste thread. Or maybe Walter will delete my post entirely. If he does I'll post my response on every board daily until he kicks me out of his failing creation.
Here's The FDFDs original copy-and-paste post. Note he hadn't found anything in the Fake Media to quote to us with in-depth" analysis to support it.

Trump sought to 'undermine' COVID-19 response, says panel

thehill.com/homenews/administration/586287-house-oversight-report-trump-administration-sought-to-undermine-covid

December 17, 2021

And The FDFD goes quiet. Is he waiting for a Dr. Fauci hologram to give him a response?

[Panama pfRedd]