Number 4, who's getting 'em?

[Panama pfRedd]

quote:
The Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday authorized a second booster shot of the Pfizer and Moderna coronavirus vaccines for individuals aged 50 and above.


That would be a 4th shot...

quote:
The shots are designed to work as short-term immunity boosters as the novel virus continues to morph into new and more contagious variants. The shot is meant to protect recipients against severe illness.


Short-term? How short?
Well, it gets shorter with each dose.
The risks, however, are both short-term and long-term. Not only that, but the more a country jabs, the worse it gets.

Look at England.

We know not what we do
By July, 98 percent of British adults had coronavirus antibodies, mostly through vaccination. Yet 35,000 Britons since then have died of COVID. Nearly all were jabbed. Now cases are soaring again.

Britain authorized Pfizer’s mRNA Covid vaccine even before the United States. It vaccinated against Covid faster than any other advanced country except Israel.


Canada data shows vaccinated have higher infection rates
New post on The Expose

The Government of Canada recently started to include the triple vaccinated in their weekly data on Covid-19 deaths by vaccination status. But unfortunately for those who have succumbed to three doses of a Covid-19 injection, that data shows they are over 5 times more likely to die of Covid-19 than the unvaccinated population.



More data, charts, graphs here:
dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/23/gov-canada-data-triple-vaccinated-5x-likely-die-covid/

[cbisbig]

Lol
But who's counting🤗

[Panama pfRedd]

Mar 30, 2022 20:20:02 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Lol
But who's counting🤗

Not wolly or the US gov't.

[Walter]

Mar 30, 2022 20:49:22 GMT -5 Panama pfRedd said:

Mar 30, 2022 20:20:02 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Lol
But who's counting🤗

Not wolly or the US gov't.

FTR, a 4th dose is indicated for high risk people, and while it is approved for everyone over 50, I won't be getting it unless there is a big spike in cases in my area.

[daleko]

Mar 30, 2022 22:24:17 GMT -5 Walter said:

Mar 30, 2022 20:49:22 GMT -5 Panama pfRedd said:

Not wolly or the US gov't.

FTR, a 4th dose is indicated for high risk people, and while it is approved for everyone over 50, I won't be getting it unless there is a big spike in cases in my area.

So I'll ask. Why wouldn't you?

[Walter]

Mar 31, 2022 10:28:18 GMT -5 daleko said:

Mar 30, 2022 22:24:17 GMT -5 Walter said:

FTR, a 4th dose is indicated for high risk people, and while it is approved for everyone over 50, I won't be getting it unless there is a big spike in cases in my area.

So I'll ask. Why wouldn't you?

Good Q.
First, I haven't paid much attention to the science, so there is a learning curve to getting up to speed.
Second, if there isn't an uptick in cases, I don't see the point.
Third, I heard a blurb on radio that the vax as an endemic, yearly vax, has not been adequately studied. So the notion of blindly re-upping absent any risk in the community (as noted above) is not terribly appealing.
Bottom line, I am not closing the door; just hesitant.

[daleko]

Mar 31, 2022 10:43:12 GMT -5 Walter said:

Mar 31, 2022 10:28:18 GMT -5 daleko said:

So I'll ask. Why wouldn't you?

Good Q.
First, I haven't paid much attention to the science, so there is a learning curve to getting up to speed.
Second, if there isn't an uptick in cases, I don't see the point.
Third, I heard a blurb on radio that the vax as an endemic, yearly vax, has not been adequately studied. So the notion of blindly re-upping absent any risk in the community (as noted above) is not terribly appealing.
Bottom line, I am not closing the door; just hesitant.

Thanks. It was, ftwiw, an honest Q.

[cbisbig]

Mar 31, 2022 10:43:12 GMT -5 Walter said:

Mar 31, 2022 10:28:18 GMT -5 daleko said:

So I'll ask. Why wouldn't you?

Good Q.
First, I haven't paid much attention to the science, so there is a learning curve to getting up to speed.
Second, if there isn't an uptick in cases, I don't see the point.
Third, I heard a blurb on radio that the vax as an endemic, yearly vax, has not been adequately studied. So the notion of blindly re-upping absent any risk in the community (as noted above) is not terribly appealing.
Bottom line, I am not closing the door; just hesitant.

Lol
Hello!!

[Panama pfRedd]

Mar 31, 2022 18:45:14 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Mar 31, 2022 10:43:12 GMT -5 Walter said:

Good Q.
First, I haven't paid much attention to the science, so there is a learning curve to getting up to speed.
Second, if there isn't an uptick in cases, I don't see the point.
Third, I heard a blurb on radio that the vax as an endemic, yearly vax, has not been adequately studied. So the notion of blindly re-upping absent any risk in the community (as noted above) is not terribly appealing.
Bottom line, I am not closing the door; just hesitant.

Lol
Hello!!

He's starting to sound like a "kook" like the rest of us.
Funny how nothing is legit until wolly says it is. What a dick.

[Walter]

Mar 31, 2022 18:45:14 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Mar 31, 2022 10:43:12 GMT -5 Walter said:

Good Q.
First, I haven't paid much attention to the science, so there is a learning curve to getting up to speed.
Second, if there isn't an uptick in cases, I don't see the point.
Third, I heard a blurb on radio that the vax as an endemic, yearly vax, has not been adequately studied. So the notion of blindly re-upping absent any risk in the community (as noted above) is not terribly appealing.
Bottom line, I am not closing the door; just hesitant.

Lol
Hello!!

LOL...
Unlike Ivermectin, which has been thoroughly studied...Oh...wait....
At least I'm consistent.
I said that if Ivermectin was adequately studied and the FDA approved it, that I'd consider taking it. Same applies for vax as endemic yearly regimen.
You? Yeah, not so much consistency.

[cbisbig]

Mar 31, 2022 19:28:22 GMT -5 Walter said:

Mar 31, 2022 18:45:14 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Lol
Hello!!

LOL...
Unlike Ivermectin, which has been thoroughly studied...Oh...wait....
At least I'm consistent.
I said that if Ivermectin was adequately studied and the FDA approved it, that I'd consider taking it. Same applies for vax as endemic yearly regimen.
You? Yeah, not so much consistency.

Have you had covid/omicron?

I have, ivermectin knocked it right out in about 2-3 days, same for the wife.
But you keep blindly following the Administration and do whatever they tell you, ok?

[Panama pfRedd]

Apr 1, 2022 5:32:46 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Mar 31, 2022 19:28:22 GMT -5 Walter said:

LOL...
Unlike Ivermectin, which has been thoroughly studied...Oh...wait....
At least I'm consistent.
I said that if Ivermectin was adequately studied and the FDA approved it, that I'd consider taking it. Same applies for vax as endemic yearly regimen.
You? Yeah, not so much consistency.

Have you had covid/omicron?

I have, ivermectin knocked it right out in about 2-3 days, same for the wife.
But you keep blindly following the Administration and do whatever they tell you, ok?

It's a brave, nay blind, new world.

[Walter]

Apr 1, 2022 5:32:46 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Mar 31, 2022 19:28:22 GMT -5 Walter said:

LOL...
Unlike Ivermectin, which has been thoroughly studied...Oh...wait....
At least I'm consistent.
I said that if Ivermectin was adequately studied and the FDA approved it, that I'd consider taking it. Same applies for vax as endemic yearly regimen.
You? Yeah, not so much consistency.

Have you had covid/omicron?

I have, ivermectin knocked it right out in about 2-3 days, same for the wife.
But you keep blindly following the Administration and do whatever they tell you, ok?

My neighbor tells me about the drugs she buys at GNC that she swears does all kinds of great things for her. My guitar coach swears by glucosumine.
I tell them the same thing I have been telling you.
I don't doubt your story. But anecdotal evidence does not cut it for me. If it is such a good product, convince the FDA. If you can't do that, I'm not interested. If you can't do that, why should anyone believe you?

And lastly comes the bizarre contradiction.

When the FDA DOES finally approve something, (the vax), you dismiss it and claim what they approved doesn't work.
No amount of evidence to the contrary will convince you.
Yet you expect me to believe you, who has far less efficacy proof than the FDA.

How do you square that contradiction?
Why should I believe you and not the FDA?

[cbisbig]

Apr 1, 2022 9:58:50 GMT -5 Walter said:

Apr 1, 2022 5:32:46 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Have you had covid/omicron?

I have, ivermectin knocked it right out in about 2-3 days, same for the wife.
But you keep blindly following the Administration and do whatever they tell you, ok?

My neighbor tells me about the drugs she buys at GNC that she swears does all kinds of great things for her. My guitar coach swears by glucosumine.
I tell them the same thing I have been telling you.
I don't doubt your story. But anecdotal evidence does not cut it for me. If it is such a good product, convince the FDA. If you can't do that, I'm not interested. If you can't do that, why should anyone believe you?

And lastly comes the bizarre contradiction.

When the FDA DOES finally approve something, (the vax), you dismiss it and claim what they approved doesn't work.
No amount of evidence to the contrary will convince you.
Yet you expect me to believe you, who has far less efficacy proof than the FDA.

How do you square that contradiction?
Why should I believe you and not the FDA?

GNC is for rookies
Starwest,Duda Energy,IHerb, on line

The Administration runs the fda

You keep blindly doing what the Administration tells you to mmmk?

[cbisbig]

Apr 1, 2022 8:53:13 GMT -5 Panama pfRedd said:

Apr 1, 2022 5:32:46 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Have you had covid/omicron?

I have, ivermectin knocked it right out in about 2-3 days, same for the wife.
But you keep blindly following the Administration and do whatever they tell you, ok?

It's a brave, nay blind, new world.

You right Geezer