Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 19, 2022 20:21:16 GMT -5
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that the PNAC 9/11 op guys flew AA77 into the Pentagon with their successfully-tested Raytheon remote-piloting technology. (Still doesn't explain the video evidence of a smaller aircraft hitting the Pentagon, BUT...) Now, explain the visible, serial explosions that pulverized all of the WTC concrete and liquefied the steel. You're up to bat, since Harry Chicken won't step up to the plate. You're the designated hitter for O'Chicken. Harry and Walter-- two guys who keep desperately changing the subject, while refusing to step up to the plate. There's an old saying in psychoanalytic circles-- "What the patient doesn't want to talk about is the very thing that they need to talk about." Why are Harry and Walter so resistant to talking about the obvious explosive demolitions of WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 on 9/11? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Nov 20, 2022 11:19:08 GMT -5
Harry and Walter-- two guys who keep desperately changing the subject, while refusing to step up to the plate. There's an old saying in psychoanalytic circles-- "What the patient doesn't want to talk about is the very thing that they need to talk about." Why are Harry and Walter so resistant to talking about the obvious explosive demolitions of WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 on 9/11? ...Because the patient doesn't want to discuss the Pentagon incident... |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 20, 2022 11:33:56 GMT -5
...Because the patient doesn't want to discuss the Pentagon incident... We already discussed the Pentagon incident in detail on this thread. Go back and study the discussion. Now, moving right along, any thoughts about why you and Harry are so desperate to dodge any discussion about the obvious serial explosions that pulverized the Twin Towers? What is your resistance to discussing the obvious explosions all about? Day #16
Below: Harry after being asked about the serial WTC explosions |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Nov 20, 2022 11:37:01 GMT -5
...Because the patient doesn't want to discuss the Pentagon incident... Well, there’s that. 😂 |
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 20, 2022 11:40:25 GMT -5
...Because the patient doesn't want to discuss the Pentagon incident... Well, there’s that. 😂 Wrong. We already discussed the Pentagon in detail (above.) Stop lying, O'Chicken, and explain the WTC explosions. Day #16. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Nov 20, 2022 12:41:03 GMT -5
...Because the patient doesn't want to discuss the Pentagon incident... Go back and study the discussion. Now, moving right along, any thoughts about why you and Harry are so desperate to dodge any discussion about the obvious serial explosions that pulverized the Twin Towers? What is your resistance to discussing the obvious explosions all about? Day #16
Below: Harry after being asked about the serial WTC explosionsAh, so you admit you were wrong about the missile, wrong about the passengers and crew, wrong about the phone calls from the plane, wrong about the Olsen plastic surgery and remarry, and wrong about witnesses who saw the plane. Then yes, we can move on to the WTC discussion if you like. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 20, 2022 14:17:02 GMT -5
We already discussed the Pentagon incident in detail on this thread.Go back and study the discussion. Now, moving right along, any thoughts about why you and Harry are so desperate to dodge any discussion about the obvious serial explosions that pulverized the Twin Towers? What is your resistance to discussing the obvious explosions all about? Day #16
Below: Harry after being asked about the serial WTC explosions Ah, so you admit you were wrong about the missile, wrong about the passengers and crew, wrong about the phone calls from the plane, wrong about the Olsen plastic surgery and remarry, and wrong about witnesses who saw the plane. Then yes, we can move on to the WTC discussion if you like.
FACTS
1) The original CCTV footage from the Pentagon shows a small plane or missile hitting the Pentagon (see posted footage on forum.) 2) The lone titanium rotor photographed in the Pentagon wreckage is NOT from a Boeing 757 jet engine. It's much too small. 3) FBI experts testified, under oath in the Moussaiou trial, that Barbara Olson never made a phone call to Ted Olson from AA77 on 9/11. Period. 4) American Airlines did not have functional passenger phones on 757s in 2001, and cellphones could not make calls from 30,000 feet. 5) It is easy for the CIA, Mossad, and U.S. military to deploy false witnesses for military black ops and psy ops. 6) A number of alleged 9/11 "witnesses" were members of PNAC and the Bush/Cheney administration-- including Ted Olson. 7) A number of on-site witnesses, including the first CNN reporter on the scene, reported that there was no plane wreckage at the Pentagon. 8) The Bush/Cheney/PNAC team claimed that the entire 757, luggage, seats, passengers, etc., were instantly "vaporized" at the Pentagon-- except for a miraculously intact paper passport of a Muslim who was not listed on the flight manifests, or ever photographed by Dulles Airport security cameras. Re-Direction
Walter, what caused the serial WTC explosions?
Did Al Qaeda Muslims put those explosives in Larry Silverstein's sky scrapers?
And how did the Mossad know that the WTC Towers would be demolished?
Why did the Mossad celebrate the WTC demolitions?
YOU'RE UP TO BAT, WALTER. Answer the questions!
You've been stalling and changing the subject for 16 DAYS now!
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Nov 20, 2022 15:57:35 GMT -5
Ah, so you admit you were wrong about the missile, wrong about the passengers and crew, wrong about the phone calls from the plane, wrong about the Olsen plastic surgery and remarry, and wrong about witnesses who saw the plane. Then yes, we can move on to the WTC discussion if you like.
FACTS
1) The original CCTV footage from the Pentagon shows a small plane or missile hitting the Pentagon (see posted footage on forum.) 2) The lone titanium rotor photographed in the Pentagon wreckage is NOT from a Boeing 757 jet engine. It's much too small. 3) FBI experts testified, under oath in the Moussaiou trial, that Barbara Olson never made a phone call to Ted Olson from AA77 on 9/11. Period. 4) American Airlines did not have functional passenger phones on 757s in 2001, and cellphones could not make calls from 30,000 feet. 5) It is easy for the CIA, Mossad, and U.S. military to deploy false witnesses for military black ops and psy ops. 6) A number of alleged 9/11 "witnesses" were members of PNAC and the Bush/Cheney administration-- including Ted Olson. 7) A number of on-site witnesses, including the first CNN reporter on the scene, reported that there was no plane wreckage at the Pentagon. 8) The Bush/Cheney/PNAC team claimed that the entire 757, luggage, seats, passengers, etc., were instantly "vaporized" at the Pentagon-- except for a miraculously intact paper passport of a Muslim who was not listed on the flight manifests, or ever photographed by Dulles Airport security cameras. Re-Direction
Walter, what caused the serial WTC explosions?
Did Al Qaeda Muslims put those explosives in Larry Silverstein's sky scrapers?
And how did the Mossad know that the WTC Towers would be demolished?
Why did the Mossad celebrate the WTC demolitions?
YOU'RE UP TO BAT, WALTER. Answer the questions!
You've been stalling and changing the subject for 16 DAYS now!
Just to be clear, you agree with the following? You admit you were wrong about the missile, wrong about the passengers and crew, wrong about the phone calls from the plane, wrong about the Olsen plastic surgery and remarry, and wrong about witnesses who saw the plane. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 20, 2022 16:02:10 GMT -5
Response to Walter's repeated deflection from Topic #1-- followed by re-directing Walter to the topic he and Harry have been aggressively dodging for 16 DAYS now.
FACTS
1) The original CCTV footage from the Pentagon shows a small plane or missile hitting the Pentagon (see posted footage on forum.) 2) The lone titanium rotor photographed in the Pentagon wreckage is NOT from a Boeing 757 jet engine. It's much too small. 3) FBI experts testified, under oath in the Moussaiou trial, that Barbara Olson never made a phone call to Ted Olson from AA77 on 9/11. Period. 4) American Airlines did not have functional passenger phones on 757s in 2001, and cellphones could not make calls from 30,000 feet. 5) It is easy for the CIA, Mossad, and U.S. military to deploy false witnesses for military black ops and psy ops. 6) A number of alleged 9/11 "witnesses" were members of PNAC and the Bush/Cheney administration-- including Ted Olson. 7) A number of on-site witnesses, including the first CNN reporter on the scene, reported that there was no plane wreckage at the Pentagon. 8) The Bush/Cheney/PNAC team claimed that the entire 757, luggage, seats, passengers, etc., were instantly "vaporized" at the Pentagon-- except for a miraculously intact paper passport of a Muslim who was not listed on the flight manifests, or ever photographed by Dulles Airport security cameras. Re-Direction
Walter, what caused the serial WTC explosions?
Did Al Qaeda Muslims put those explosives in Larry Silverstein's sky scrapers?
And how did the Mossad know that the WTC Towers would be demolished?
Why did the Mossad celebrate the WTC demolitions?
YOU'RE UP TO BAT, WALTER. Answer the questions!
You've been stalling and changing the subject for 16 DAYS now!
Just to be clear, you agree with the following? You admit you were wrong about the missile, wrong about the passengers and crew, wrong about the phone calls from the plane, wrong about the Olsen plastic surgery and remarry, and wrong about witnesses who saw the plane. Read what I just wrote, dammit. Did you forget how to read English? The alleged AA77 phone calls never happened. Then study the Pentagon film clips. Then answer the questions you have dodged for 16 days now. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Nov 20, 2022 17:21:08 GMT -5
Just to be clear, you agree with the following? You admit you were wrong about the missile, wrong about the passengers and crew, wrong about the phone calls from the plane, wrong about the Olsen plastic surgery and remarry, and wrong about witnesses who saw the plane. Read what I just wrote, dammit. Did you forget how to read English? The alleged AA77 phone calls never happened. Then study the Pentagon film clips. Then answer the questions you have dodged for 16 days now. Hmmm...seems as though we are not done with the Pentagon attack yet, so the WTC discussion will need to wait. As soon as we complete AA77, we can move on. Let us take it slow. Do we agree that landing gear parts were found inside The Pentagon? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 20, 2022 17:56:59 GMT -5
Read what I just wrote, dammit. Did you forget how to read English? The alleged AA77 phone calls never happened. Then study the Pentagon film clips. Then answer the questions you have dodged for 16 days now. Hmmm...seems as though we are not done with the Pentagon attack yet, so the WTC discussion will need to wait. As soon as we complete AA77, we can move on. Let us take it slow. Do we agree that landing gear parts were found inside The Pentagon? Still dodging the discussion of the WTC explosions, eh, Walter? O.K., LA Dodger, show us your photo of the alleged Boeing 757 landing gear at the Pentagon-- with the source of the photo and the date when the photo first appeared on the internet. Let's take a look at what you've got and when it surfaced. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Nov 20, 2022 18:34:07 GMT -5
Here's an entire discussion about the landing gear. www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0290.shtmlWhen it surfaced is of no consequence. If it is, then you must please do the same for every claim you have made as well; all eight of them. Go! You wanna play stupid internet games, fine. The rule apply for all of us. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 20, 2022 20:55:30 GMT -5
Here's an entire discussion about the landing gear. www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0290.shtmlWhen it surfaced is of no consequence. If it is, then you must please do the same for every claim you have made as well; all eight of them. Go! You wanna play stupid internet games, fine. The rule apply for all of us. Walter,
I don't play stupid games. I'm a Harvard man.
This aerospaceweb.org analysis of the wreckage in the Pentagon photographs is good. I think the analysts make a compelling case that the charred wheel hub is from a Boeing 757, rather than a Global Hawk or Sky Hawk.
But they also, suspiciously, parrot the Bush/Cheney/Zelikow propaganda about Muslim hijackers.
No Muslim/Saudi names appear on their own AA77 passenger list.
How do they know that Raytheon's successfully-tested remote-piloting technology wasn't used on 9/11 to fly a Boeing 757 into the Pentagon?
Answer: They don't.
There is also the original puzzling video evidence of the Pentagon being hit by a flying object that is much smaller than a Boeing 757-- and the entire story of what exactly happened at the Pentagon on 9/11 has been obfuscated for years by the strange governmental secrecy surrounding the evidence, including the confiscation and hoarding of the security cam evidence.
The subject is well described by the guys at 9/11 Research, (who happen to believe that AA77 did hit the Pentagon.)
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by cbisbig on Nov 21, 2022 4:48:26 GMT -5
Here's an entire discussion about the landing gear. www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0290.shtmlWhen it surfaced is of no consequence. If it is, then you must please do the same for every claim you have made as well; all eight of them. Go! You wanna play stupid internet games, fine. The rule apply for all of us. Walter, I don't play stupid games. I'm a Harvard man. [/b][/font] [/div][/quote] LMAO! Says mr cartoon |
|
|
ROLL TIDE!
29 SEC Championships
18 National Championships
2015-16 Bowl Champion Douche
2020 Pandemic Bowl Champ
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Nov 21, 2022 9:09:48 GMT -5
Here's an entire discussion about the landing gear. www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0290.shtmlWhen it surfaced is of no consequence. If it is, then you must please do the same for every claim you have made as well; all eight of them. Go! You wanna play stupid internet games, fine. The rule apply for all of us. Walter, I don't play stupid games. I'm a Harvard man. This aerospaceweb.org analysis of the wreckage in the Pentagon photographs is good. I think the analysts make a compelling case that the charred wheel hub is from a Boeing 757, rather than a Global Hawk or Sky Hawk. But they also, suspiciously, parrot the Bush/Cheney/Zelikow propaganda about Muslim hijackers. No Muslim/Saudi names appear on their own AA77 passenger list. How do they know that Raytheon's successfully-tested remote-piloting technology wasn't used on 9/11 to fly a Boeing 757 into the Pentagon? Answer: They don't.
There is also the original puzzling video evidence of the Pentagon being hit by a flying object that is much smaller than a Boeing 757-- and the entire story of what exactly happened at the Pentagon on 9/11 has been obfuscated for years by the strange governmental secrecy surrounding the evidence, including the confiscation and hoarding of the security cam evidence. The subject is well described by the guys at 9/11 Research, (who happen to believe that AA77 did hit the Pentagon.) Good Lord. Either your 20 year claim of a cruise missile was right or it was wrong. Which is it? |
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
