Major General Explains 9/11 to Harry, Walter, and C-Biscuit

[cbisbig]

Nov 6, 2022 11:10:34 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 5, 2022 9:58:00 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

"No Collusion" Harry Strikes Out Again!!

Well, there it is, folks.

Harry simply can't explain the visible serial explosions that demolished the Twin Towers on 9/11.

The official Bush/Cheney/Al Qaeda Conspiracy Theory of 9/11 has no explanation for the facts.

Harry still hasn't made it to first base in understanding what really happened on 9/11.

I called Harry out two days ago, and he still won't show the forum his cards.

He's pretending to have a winning hand on 9/11, but he doesn't.  He lost.

So, Harry keeps changing the subject and hiding his cards.

Why are Walter, Daleko, Fred, and C-Biscuit enabling Harry's cowardice and lies, instead of telling him to simply show us his cards?

It's weird-- a group denial of reality about the visible explosions that demolished the Twin Towers on 9/11!

You need to see a therapist....

www.architectureanddesign.com.au/features/features-articles/building-engineering-experts-explain-how-the-twin#

Progressive collapse
This fact also spawned one of the most common conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11: that a bomb or explosives must have been detonated somewhere within the buildings.

These theories have developed from video footage showing the towers rapidly collapsing downwards some time after impact, similar to a controlled demolition. But it is possible for them to have collapsed this way without explosives.

It was fire that caused this. And this fire is believed to have come from the burning of remaining aircraft fuel.

According to the FEMA report, fire within the buildings caused thermal expansion of the floors in a horizontal and outwards direction, pushing against the rigid steel columns, which then deflected to an extent but resisted further movement



www.thoughtco.com/why-world-trade-center-towers-fell-177706

Jet fuel burns at 800 to 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit. This temperature is not hot enough to melt structural steel.2 But engineers say that for the World Trade Center towers to collapse, its steel frames didn't need to melt—they just had to lose some of their structural strength from the intense heat. Steel will lose about half its strength at 1,200 Fahrenheit. Steel also becomes distorted and will buckle when the heat is not a uniform temperature. The exterior temperature was much cooler than the burning jet fuel inside. Videos of both buildings showed inward bowing of perimeter columns resulting from sagging of heated trusses on many floors.

[DrSchadenfreude]

Nov 5, 2022 9:58:00 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 4, 2022 10:28:50 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

What a joke.

Harry, using your Bush/Cheney/Al Qaeda-Did-It paradigm, tell the forum how you explain the obvious, visible serial explosions that demolished the WTC Twin Towers on 9/11-- explosively pulverizing hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete into the atmosphere over Manhattan, and liquefying the steel girders.

No more of your endless bullshit and deflections.

Let's see if you can finally get to first base on 9/11.




Your explanation of the visible explosive demolitions goes here:

"No Collusion" Harry Strikes Out Again!!

Well, there it is, folks.

Harry simply can't explain the visible serial explosions that demolished the Twin Towers on 9/11.

The official Bush/Cheney/Al Qaeda Conspiracy Theory of 9/11 has no explanation for the facts.

Harry still hasn't made it to first base in understanding what really happened on 9/11.

I called Harry out two days ago, and he still won't show the forum his cards.

He's pretending to have a winning hand on 9/11, but he doesn't. He lost.

So, Harry keeps changing the subject and hiding his cards.  

Why are Walter, Daleko, Fred, and C-Biscuit enabling Harry's cowardice and lies, instead of telling him to simply show us his cards?

It's weird-- a group denial of reality about the visible explosions that demolished the Twin Towers on 9/11!

[oujour76]

Nov 6, 2022 11:27:17 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Nov 6, 2022 11:10:34 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

I called Harry out two days ago, and he still won't show the forum his cards.

He's pretending to have a winning hand on 9/11, but he doesn't.  He lost.

So, Harry keeps changing the subject and hiding his cards.

Why are Walter, Daleko, Fred, and C-Biscuit enabling Harry's cowardice and lies, instead of telling him to simply show us his cards?

It's weird-- a group denial of reality about the visible explosions that demolished the Twin Towers on 9/11!

You need to see a therapist....

www.architectureanddesign.com.au/features/features-articles/building-engineering-experts-explain-how-the-twin#

Progressive collapse
This fact also spawned one of the most common conspiracy theories surrounding 9/11: that a bomb or explosives must have been detonated somewhere within the buildings.

These theories have developed from video footage showing the towers rapidly collapsing downwards some time after impact, similar to a controlled demolition. But it is possible for them to have collapsed this way without explosives.

It was fire that caused this. And this fire is believed to have come from the burning of remaining aircraft fuel.

According to the FEMA report, fire within the buildings caused thermal expansion of the floors in a horizontal and outwards direction, pushing against the rigid steel columns, which then deflected to an extent but resisted further movement



www.thoughtco.com/why-world-trade-center-towers-fell-177706

Jet fuel burns at 800 to 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit. This temperature is not hot enough to melt structural steel.2 But engineers say that for the World Trade Center towers to collapse, its steel frames didn't need to melt—they just had to lose some of their structural strength from the intense heat. Steel will lose about half its strength at 1,200 Fahrenheit. Steel also becomes distorted and will buckle when the heat is not a uniform temperature. The exterior temperature was much cooler than the burning jet fuel inside. Videos of both buildings showed inward bowing of perimeter columns resulting from sagging of heated trusses on many floors.

CB, save your breath. The Ivy League Idiot thinks a cruise missile left a 95-foot entrance hole in the Pentagon. 😂

[cbisbig]

Nov 6, 2022 11:37:20 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 5, 2022 9:58:00 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

"No Collusion" Harry Strikes Out Again!!

Well, there it is, folks.

Harry simply can't explain the visible serial explosions that demolished the Twin Towers on 9/11.

The official Bush/Cheney/Al Qaeda Conspiracy Theory of 9/11 has no explanation for the facts.

Harry still hasn't made it to first base in understanding what really happened on 9/11.

I called Harry out two days ago, and he still won't show the forum his cards.

He's pretending to have a winning hand on 9/11, but he doesn't. He lost.

So, Harry keeps changing the subject and hiding his cards.  

Why are Walter, Daleko, Fred, and C-Biscuit enabling Harry's cowardice and lies, instead of telling him to simply show us his cards?

It's weird-- a group denial of reality about the visible explosions that demolished the Twin Towers on 9/11!

[/quotthe

HELLO!
no response to my post above debunking your the theory?

[Panama pfRedd]

I'm shocked that he hasn't posted his favorite midget and pony photo to prove that oujour76 is wrong...

[DrSchadenfreude]

Nov 4, 2022 10:28:50 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 4, 2022 9:51:56 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

What a joke.

Harry, using your Bush/Cheney/Al Qaeda-Did-It paradigm, tell the forum how you explain the obvious, visible serial explosions that demolished the WTC Twin Towers on 9/11-- explosively pulverizing hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete into the atmosphere over Manhattan, and liquefying the steel girders.

No more of your endless bullshit and deflections.

Let's see if you can finally get to first base on 9/11.




Your explanation of the visible explosive demolitions goes here:

Coming up on one week.

Harry O'Chicken is still dodging the request for an explanation.

Come on, Harry, stop hiding in your hidey hole!

[cbisbig]

Nov 10, 2022 15:51:48 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 4, 2022 10:28:50 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

What a joke.

Harry, using your Bush/Cheney/Al Qaeda-Did-It paradigm, tell the forum how you explain the obvious, visible serial explosions that demolished the WTC Twin Towers on 9/11-- explosively pulverizing hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete into the atmosphere over Manhattan, and liquefying the steel girders.

No more of your endless bullshit and deflections.

Let's see if you can finally get to first base on 9/11.




Your explanation of the visible explosive demolitions goes here:

Coming up on one week.

Harry O'Chicken is still dodging the request for an explanation.

Come on, Harry, stop hiding in your hidey hole!

Why won't you respond to my debunking of your ridiculous conspiracy theory?

[oujour76]

Nov 11, 2022 8:17:02 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Nov 10, 2022 15:51:48 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Coming up on one week.

Harry O'Chicken is still dodging the request for an explanation.

Come on, Harry, stop hiding in your hidey hole!

Why won't you respond to my debunking of your ridiculous conspiracy theory?

Simple. Answering questions isn't part of his narrative.

[DrSchadenfreude]

Nov 11, 2022 10:59:34 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Nov 11, 2022 8:17:02 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

Why won't you respond to my debunking of your ridiculous conspiracy theory?

Simple. Answering questions isn't part of his narrative.

I'm Harry Chicken, and I refuse to post an explanation.

Harry has now refused for seven days to post an explanation.

[Walter]

Nov 11, 2022 11:29:01 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 11, 2022 10:59:34 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Simple. Answering questions isn't part of his narrative.

I'm Harry Chicken, and I refuse to post an explanation.

Harry has now refused for seven days to post an explanation.

Speaking of refusing to answer, still waiting for your explanation of how landing gear turned up inside the Pentagon. "It's a mystery" doesn't cut it.

[oujour76]

Nov 11, 2022 11:56:29 GMT -5 Walter said:

Nov 11, 2022 11:29:01 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Harry has now refused for seven days to post an explanation.

Speaking of refusing to answer, still waiting for your explanation of how landing gear turned up inside the Pentagon. "It's a mystery" doesn't cut it.

Exactly. Finish one discussion before starting on another. His problem with that is it prevents him from moving the goalposts. Shocker.

[DrSchadenfreude]

Nov 11, 2022 11:56:29 GMT -5 Walter said:

Nov 11, 2022 11:29:01 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Harry has now refused for seven days to post an explanation.

Speaking of refusing to answer, still waiting for your explanation of how landing gear turned up inside the Pentagon. "It's a mystery" doesn't cut it.

You're being intellectually dishonest, Walter.  For Harry, that's common practice.  For you, not so much.

There are two major issues under discussion here.

1)  The visible WTC explosions (which were filmed and celebrated on 9/11 by five Mossad agents.)

2)  The Pentagon crash site.

The issue that Harry has dodged for seven days now-- with your repeated help-- is 1) the WTC explosions.

Regardless of what happened at the Pentagon, the WTC was demolished by explosives.

I already mentioned that the Pentagon crash site could, possibly, have been the result of a Boeing 757-- although I still have questions about some of the data, including the original CCTV footage of a far smaller aircraft hitting the building.  Jenkins analysis has raised some good questions.

Do I think a Boeing 757 could have been remotely-piloted into the Pentagon with the Raytheon remote-piloting technology?  Yes.

Let's hear Harry's explanation for the obvious, visible, serial explosions that demolished the Twin Towers, while the Mossad agents were filming and celebrating the demolitions.

Fair enough?

Stop enabling Harry's dodging of the WTC explosions.

If you look at this thread-- about General Stubblebine-- he described the obvious WTC explosions as the basis for realizing that 9/11 was a false flag op.

HARRY IS THE GUY WHO KEEPS TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT BACK TO 2) THE PENTAGON.

HARRY IS DODGING THE QUESTIONS HE CAN'T ANSWER WITH THE FALSE BUSH/CHENEY/ZELIKOW 9/11 AL QAEDA CONSPIRACY THEORY.

[Walter]

Nov 11, 2022 18:12:11 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 11, 2022 11:56:29 GMT -5 Walter said:

Speaking of refusing to answer, still waiting for your explanation of how landing gear turned up inside the Pentagon. "It's a mystery" doesn't cut it.

You're being intellectually dishonest, Walter.  For Harry, that's common practice.  For you, not so much.

There are two major issues under discussion here. As far as I'm concerned, we are only discussing the Pentagon.

1)  The visible WTC explosions (which were filmed and celebrated on 9/11 by five Mossad agents.) Not a part of this discussion

2)  The Pentagon crash site.

The issue that Harry has dodged for seven days now-- with your repeated help-- is 1) the WTC explosions. Not a part of this discussion

Regardless of what happened at the Pentagon, the WTC was demolished by explosives. Not a part of this discussion

I already mentioned that the Pentagon crash site could, possibly, have been the result of a Boeing 757-- although I still have questions about some of the data, including the original CCTV footage of a far smaller aircraft hitting the building.  Jenkins analysis has raised some good questions.

Do I think a Boeing 757 could have been remotely-piloted into the Pentagon with the Raytheon remote-piloting technology?  Yes.
If so, then could it also be possible that 4 dickwads from Saudi Arabia hijacked the plane and flew it into the building?

Let's hear Harry's explanation for the obvious, visible, serial explosions that demolished the Twin Towers, while the Mossad agents were filming and celebrating the demolitions. Not a part of this discussion

Fair enough? No.

Stop enabling Harry's dodging of the WTC explosions. Not a part of this discussion

If you look at this thread-- about General Stubblebine-- he described the obvious WTC explosions as the basis for realizing that 9/11 was a false flag op. Not a part of this discussion

HARRY IS THE GUY WHO KEEPS TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT BACK TO 2) THE PENTAGON. No. mostly, it's me doing it.

HARRY IS DODGING THE QUESTIONS HE CAN'T ANSWER WITH THE FALSE BUSH/CHENEY/ZELIKOW 9/11 AL QAEDA CONSPIRACY THEORY. Not a part of this discussion

[cbisbig]

Wow this living dead thread is still alive💀

[cbisbig]

Nov 11, 2022 19:57:02 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 11, 2022 18:51:06 GMT -5 Walter said:

You are Wack