Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 11, 2022 20:35:07 GMT -5
You're being intellectually dishonest, Walter. For Harry, that's common practice. For you, not so much. There are two major issues under discussion here. As far as I'm concerned, we are only discussing the Pentagon.Says who? Harry? The thread is about General Stubblebine's realization that 9/11 was a false flag op-- based, in part, on the visible explosions that demolished the Twin Towers.
Did you watch the video at the top of the thread?1) The visible WTC explosions (which were filmed and celebrated on 9/11 by five Mossad agents.) Not a part of this discussionSays who? I started this thread, not Harry.
2) The Pentagon crash site. The issue that Harry has dodged for seven days now-- with your repeated help-- is 1) the WTC explosions. Not a part of this discussionRegardless of what happened at the Pentagon, the WTC was demolished by explosives. Not a part of this discussionI already mentioned that the Pentagon crash site could, possibly, have been the result of a Boeing 757-- although I still have questions about some of the data, including the original CCTV footage of a far smaller aircraft hitting the building. Jenkins analysis has raised some good questions. Do I think a Boeing 757 could have been remotely-piloted into the Pentagon with the Raytheon remote-piloting technology? Yes. If so, then could it also be possible that 4 dickwads from Saudi Arabia hijacked the plane and flew it into the building?Not according to expert pilots, including Phillip Marshall. Hanjour couldn't even fly a Cessna.
Let's hear Harry's explanation for the obvious, visible, serial explosions that demolished the Twin Towers, while the Mossad agents were filming and celebrating the demolitions. Not a part of this discussionFair enough? No.Stop enabling Harry's dodging of the WTC explosions. Not a part of this discussionIf you look at this thread-- about General Stubblebine-- he described the obvious WTC explosions as the basis for realizing that 9/11 was a false flag op. Not a part of this discussionSo, the subject of the thread is not part of this discussion?
WTF, Walter? You're not making any sense here.
HARRY IS THE GUY WHO KEEPS TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT BACK TO 2) THE PENTAGON. No. mostly, it's me doing it.Why? Why are you continuing to change the subject, instead of letting Harry respond to my week old request for an explanation of the visible WTC explosions?
HARRY IS DODGING THE QUESTIONS HE CAN'T ANSWER WITH THE FALSE BUSH/CHENEY/ZELIKOW 9/11 AL QAEDA CONSPIRACY THEORY. Not a part of this discussion ? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by cbisbig on Nov 12, 2022 8:07:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
ROLL TIDE!
29 SEC Championships
18 National Championships
2015-16 Bowl Champion Douche
2020 Pandemic Bowl Champ
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Nov 12, 2022 8:40:13 GMT -5
Speaking of refusing to answer, still waiting for your explanation of how landing gear turned up inside the Pentagon. "It's a mystery" doesn't cut it. You're being intellectually dishonest, Walter. For Harry, that's common practice. For you, not so much. There are two major issues under discussion here. 1) The visible WTC explosions (which were filmed and celebrated on 9/11 by five Mossad agents.) 2) The Pentagon crash site. The issue that Harry has dodged for seven days now-- with your repeated help-- is 1) the WTC explosions. Regardless of what happened at the Pentagon, the WTC was demolished by explosives. I already mentioned that the Pentagon crash site could, possibly, have been the result of a Boeing 757-- although I still have questions about some of the data, including the original CCTV footage of a far smaller aircraft hitting the building. Jenkins analysis has raised some good questions. Do I think a Boeing 757 could have been remotely-piloted into the Pentagon with the Raytheon remote-piloting technology? Yes. Let's hear Harry's explanation for the obvious, visible, serial explosions that demolished the Twin Towers, while the Mossad agents were filming and celebrating the demolitions. Fair enough? Stop enabling Harry's dodging of the WTC explosions. If you look at this thread-- about General Stubblebine-- he described the obvious WTC explosions as the basis for realizing that 9/11 was a false flag op. HARRY IS THE GUY WHO KEEPS TRYING TO CHANGE THE SUBJECT BACK TO 2) THE PENTAGON. HARRY IS DODGING THE QUESTIONS HE CAN'T ANSWER WITH THE FALSE BUSH/CHENEY/ZELIKOW 9/11 AL QAEDA CONSPIRACY THEORY.
You're usually so confident in your views...but on AA 77 you're suddenly all wishy washy. Just state what you think happened at the Pentagon without the "revise my paradigm" double talk, or the blah, blah, blah "might have been" qualifiers and I'll answer your WTC question.
You demand yes/no answers from others, but you're piss poor on providing them. Either you still believe it was a cruise missile or you don't. Pretty simple. |
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 12, 2022 12:01:29 GMT -5
Folks,
Any predictions about how many days Harry O'Chicken will dodge posting an explanation for the visible WTC explosions?
Harry is now on Day 8.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by cbisbig on Nov 12, 2022 12:06:51 GMT -5
Folks,
Any predictions about how many days Harry O'Chicken will dodge posting an explanation for the visible WTC explosions?
Harry is now on Day 8.
How many days have you been dodging reality? |
|
|
ROLL TIDE!
29 SEC Championships
18 National Championships
2015-16 Bowl Champion Douche
2020 Pandemic Bowl Champ
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 12, 2022 12:46:02 GMT -5
Folks,
Any predictions about how many days Harry O'Chicken will dodge posting an explanation for the visible WTC explosions?
Harry is now on Day 8.
How many days have you been dodging reality? Horse Paste, I'm the only guy on this forum who ISN'T dodging reality about the expert, explosive demolitions of the World Trade Center on 9/11, and the arrest of the foreign intelligence agents who were caught filming and celebrating the demolitions of the Twin Towers on 9/11. Look at the film clip (above) and tell us how YOU would explain the visible serial explosions that demolished the Twin Towers. Even Donald Trump realized on 9/11 that the Twin Towers were demolished by explosives. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Nov 12, 2022 13:38:35 GMT -5
How many days have you been dodging reality? Horse Paste, I'm the only guy on this forum who ISN'T dodging reality about the expert, explosive demolitions of the World Trade Center on 9/11, and the arrest of the foreign intelligence agents who were caught filming and celebrating the demolitions of the Twin Towers on 9/11. Look at the film clip (above) and tell us how YOU would explain the visible serial explosions that demolished the Twin Towers. Even Donald Trump realized on 9/11 that the Twin Towers were demolished by explosives. You are to reality what Ted Kennedy is to sobriety. |
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 12, 2022 14:39:09 GMT -5
Horse Paste, I'm the only guy on this forum who ISN'T dodging reality about the expert, explosive demolitions of the World Trade Center on 9/11, and the arrest of the foreign intelligence agents who were caught filming and celebrating the demolitions of the Twin Towers on 9/11. Look at the film clip (above) and tell us how YOU would explain the visible serial explosions that demolished the Twin Towers. Even Donald Trump realized on 9/11 that the Twin Towers were demolished by explosives. You are to reality what Ted Kennedy is to sobriety. Another stupid, inaccurate trope by Harry the dancing chicken. We need some honest guys on this forum who will confront Harry's evasions, and tell him to step up to the plate and take some pitches. I'm not holding my breath. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by cbisbig on Nov 12, 2022 14:47:39 GMT -5
How many days have you been dodging reality? Horse Paste, I'm the only guy on this forum who ISN'T dodging reality about the expert, explosive demolitions of the World Trade Center on 9/11, and the arrest of the foreign intelligence agents who were caught filming and celebrating the demolitions of the Twin Towers on 9/11. Look at the film clip (above) and tell us how YOU would explain the visible serial explosions that demolished the Twin Towers. Even Donald Trump realized on 9/11 that the Twin Towers were demolished by explosives. Dr bombay, Ive already responded to your question twice.only for you not to respond.. Aircraft Impact When hijacked commercial jets piloted by terrorists struck the twin towers, some 10,000 gallons (38 kiloliters) of jet fuel-fed an enormous fireball.1 But the impact of the Boeing 767-200ER series aircraft and the burst of flames did not make the towers collapse right away. Like most buildings, the twin towers had a redundant design, which means that when one system fails, another carries the load. Heat From Fires Even if the sprinklers had been working, they could not have maintained enough pressure to stop the fire. Fed by the spray of jet fuel, the heat became intense. It is no comfort to realize that each aircraft carried less than half of its full capacity of 23,980 U.S. gallons of fuel. Jet fuel burns at 800 to 1,500 degrees Fahrenheit |
|
|
ROLL TIDE!
29 SEC Championships
18 National Championships
2015-16 Bowl Champion Douche
2020 Pandemic Bowl Champ
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 12, 2022 15:45:39 GMT -5
Geez, Horse Paste, you're not even close.
Go back and study the film of the visible serial explosions that pulverized all of the WTC concrete and liquefied the steel.
Do you know what a melting point is, in Chemistry?
Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to liquefy steel. Period.
Jerome Hauer's 9/11 jet fuel narrative for the visible explosive demolitions is pseudo-scientific bunk. A cover story.
And Hauer was in charge of WTC security during the weeks before 9/11, when the buildings were wired for demolition.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Nov 12, 2022 16:39:56 GMT -5
Geez, Horse Paste, you're not even close. Go back and study the film of the visible serial explosions that pulverized all of the WTC concrete and liquefied the steel. Do you know what a melting point is, in Chemistry? Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to liquefy steel. Period. Jerome Hauer's 9/11 jet fuel narrative for the visible explosive demolitions is pseudo-scientific bunk. A cover story. And Hauer was in charge of WTC security during the weeks before 9/11, when the buildings were wired for demolition. We long ago dispelled the notion that the fire temps were not high enough to destroy the structural integrity of the steel. How many times do we have to go through this nonsense? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Nov 12, 2022 16:57:19 GMT -5
Geez, Horse Paste, you're not even close. Go back and study the film of the visible serial explosions that pulverized all of the WTC concrete and liquefied the steel. Do you know what a melting point is, in Chemistry? Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to liquefy steel. Period. Jerome Hauer's 9/11 jet fuel narrative for the visible explosive demolitions is pseudo-scientific bunk. A cover story. And Hauer was in charge of WTC security during the weeks before 9/11, when the buildings were wired for demolition. We long ago dispelled the notion that the fire temps were not high enough to destroy the structural integrity of the steel. How many times do we have to go through this nonsense?
On related subject of WTC, I read somewhere that those buildings were 95% air...is that normal?
|
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 12, 2022 17:21:34 GMT -5
Geez, Horse Paste, you're not even close. Go back and study the film of the visible serial explosions that pulverized all of the WTC concrete and liquefied the steel. Do you know what a melting point is, in Chemistry? Jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to liquefy steel. Period. Jerome Hauer's 9/11 jet fuel narrative for the visible explosive demolitions is pseudo-scientific bunk. A cover story. And Hauer was in charge of WTC security during the weeks before 9/11, when the buildings were wired for demolition. We long ago dispelled the notion that the fire temps were not high enough to destroy the structural integrity of the steel. How many times do we have to go through this nonsense?
Liquefied steel was "flowing like a foundry" at Ground Zero!
Liquid steel can also be seen cascading from the Twin Towers during the explosive demolitions!
Daleko tried to claim it was molten aluminum, but that has been debunked by colorimetry.
What temperature is required to liquefy steel?
1) What is the melting point of steel?
2) Did you study chemistry on a collegiate or post-graduate level?
Yes or no? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Nov 12, 2022 18:00:56 GMT -5
We long ago dispelled the notion that the fire temps were not high enough to destroy the structural integrity of the steel. How many times do we have to go through this nonsense?
On related subject of WTC, I read somewhere that those buildings were 95% air...is that normal?
Not sure I understand what that means. |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 12, 2022 18:01:01 GMT -5
Remedial science facts about the molten steel at Ground Zero -- for the non-scientists, Walter, Harry, and Daleko.
How many times do I have to educate you guys about the basic science?
|
|
?
