Never ever ever ever ever happens

[oujour76]

May 10, 2023 15:47:56 GMT -5 Walter said:

May 10, 2023 15:38:03 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

I am suggesting that roughly one in five guns used in crimes have no official paper trail of a transfer of ownership.

they could be stolen, straw purchased or private transaction, but one in five leave no trail.

My guess is the majority are stolen. And the vast majority of those are handguns. What do you suggest be done in those cases?

[oujour76]

May 10, 2023 15:52:43 GMT -5 Walter said:

May 10, 2023 15:39:29 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

FIFY.

My bad. Actually, the 40 MM is the estimated number of guns that are sold and/or somehow change hands in a year.

No worries.

[Walter]

May 10, 2023 16:09:48 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

May 10, 2023 15:47:56 GMT -5 Walter said:

I am suggesting that roughly one in five guns used in crimes have no official paper trail of a transfer of ownership.

they could be stolen, straw purchased or private transaction, but one in five leave no trail.

My guess is the majority are stolen. And the vast majority of those are handguns. What do you suggest be done in those cases?

Not going to go there.

I am done telling the pro-gun folks what I think. If I suggest blue ink instead of black on a form, I am accused of wanting to confiscate all guns or at least advocating the slippery slope toward it.

So, "Nah-ganna-do it. Wouldn't be prudent."

We ID'd a problem. Let the pro-gun folks come up with some ideas for a change.

[oujour76]

May 10, 2023 18:49:28 GMT -5 Walter said:

May 10, 2023 16:09:48 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

My guess is the majority are stolen. And the vast majority of those are handguns. What do you suggest be done in those cases?

Not going to go there.

I am done telling the pro-gun folks what I think. If I suggest blue ink instead of black on a form, I am accused of wanting to confiscate all guns or at least advocating the slippery slope toward it.

So, "Nah-ganna-do it. Wouldn't be prudent."

We ID'd a problem. Let the pro-gun folks come up with some ideas for a change.

Fair enough re: not going there.

[dilligaf]

May 10, 2023 13:54:00 GMT -5 CWGBuckeyes said:

May 10, 2023 13:31:25 GMT -5 dilligaf said:

Most of the shootings happen in Demonrat controlled cities/states where "gun control" is very strict.

So why don't criminals obey those laws?

Isn't it illegal to intentionally harm someone without his permission?

When did Texas become blue?

You can't read, can you?

AND, FYI, there are quite a few Demonrat-controlled cities in Texas, dumbass.   Do some research.

Isn't it illegal to intentionally harm someone without his permission?

[dilligaf]

May 10, 2023 18:49:28 GMT -5 Walter said:

May 10, 2023 16:09:48 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

My guess is the majority are stolen. And the vast majority of those are handguns. What do you suggest be done in those cases?

Not going to go there.

I am done telling the pro-gun folks what I think. If I suggest blue ink instead of black on a form, I am accused of wanting to confiscate all guns or at least advocating the slippery slope toward it.

So, "Nah-ganna-do it. Wouldn't be prudent."

We ID'd a problem. Let the pro-gun folks come up with some ideas for a change.

The problem is criminals who don't obey laws.  Period.

The problem is criminals who don't think it is wrong to harm someone else.

Now what law do you propose to fix that without infringing on the rights of most Americans?

The first idea is to stop doing like criminal-coddling Commiefornia and New York and turning repeat offenders back out on the streets. 

Let's start with locking them up and KEEPING them locked up.

Step 2: If they have been sentenced to death, and had any appeals denied, put them to death.

Step 3: If a criminal is convicted of using a firearm to commit a crime, INCREASE the penalties over what already exists  Impose those penalties.