A real study about the effects of the vaccine...

[Walter]

www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/largest-covid-vaccine-study-yet-finds-links-to-health-conditions/ar-BB1iuvvi?ocid=msedgntp&pc=DCTS&cvid=c47389a62f2f4a879887fd781c01d8b4&ei=23

Out of 13 billion doses, there is a very small group that were adversely affected.
That is just about the same story as for ANY vaccine.
One can make a decision with this data as to whether or not to get vaccinated, but at least you're working with real data and not the misinformation that floods the internet.

[Panama pfRedd]

Many someones got unbelievably rich selling 13,000,000,000 doses of this snake oil that doesn't do anything but permanently change your body's immune system. I truly feel sorry for every one of you who believed your government/doctors and took this poison.

[Walter]

Feb 19, 2024 14:35:48 GMT -5 Panama pfRedd said:

Many someones got unbelievably rich selling 13,000,000,000 doses of this snake oil that doesn't do anything but permanently change your body's immune system. I truly feel sorry for every one of you who believed your government/doctors and took this poison.

LOL...just can't stop spewing Q-Anon bullshit, can you?

[daleko]

Feb 19, 2024 14:35:48 GMT -5 Panama pfRedd said:

Many someones got unbelievably rich selling 13,000,000,000 doses of this snake oil that doesn't do anything but permanently change your body's immune system. I truly feel sorry for every one of you who believed your government/doctors and took this poison.

You may be right Fred or not. Maybe we'll find out in 20 yrs, or not. But the event was certainly brutal, in real time, to some cross section. Of that there is no doubt.

[Panama pfRedd]

Sure glad I didn't take the shot...

[Walter]

Feb 19, 2024 22:48:20 GMT -5 daleko said:

Feb 19, 2024 14:35:48 GMT -5 Panama pfRedd said:

Many someones got unbelievably rich selling 13,000,000,000 doses of this snake oil that doesn't do anything but permanently change your body's immune system. I truly feel sorry for every one of you who believed your government/doctors and took this poison.

You may be right Fred or not. Maybe we'll find out in 20 yrs, or not. But the event was certainly brutal, in real time, to some cross section. Of that there is no doubt.

LOL...I can hear it now. In the year 2044 that woman who was the first to get the vax is going to die and Fred and the antivax crowd are going to say, "...See? We told you so!"

Too funny.

[Panama pfRedd]

"zzzzzz zzzzzzzz zzzzz..."
walter, 24/7

[Panama pfRedd]

The truth keeps getting out a little bit at a time. Of course they had to throw the blanket bullshit in that Covid infection ALSO causes the same conditions in and of itself but it’s clear that the truth is unavoidable- the “vaccines” caused elevated injury when compared to traditional, time tested, TRIALED vaccines.

thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4477406-largest-multi-country-covid-study-links-vaccines-to-potential-adverse-effects/

Largest multicountry COVID study links vaccines to potential adverse effects

A new study on COVID-19 vaccines that looked at nearly 100 million vaccinated individuals affirmed the vaccines’ previously observed links to increased risks for certain adverse effects including myocarditis and Guillain-Barré syndrome.

The researchers noted in their analysis that COVID-19 infections have consistently been found to be more likely to cause the conditions observed in this study than vaccinations, adding that factor should be considered when weight the risk-to-benefit ratio of immunization.

The study was conducted by the Global COVID Vaccine Safety project and took into account 99,068,901 vaccinated individuals across eight countries: Argentina, Australia, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, New Zealand and Scotland.

The report specifically looked at adverse events following administration of the Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca vaccines.

The researchers looked for 13 adverse events of special interest that occurred in vaccine recipients for up to 42 days after shots were administered. These conditions included Guillain-Barré syndrome, Bell’s palsy, convulsions, myocarditis and pericarditis.

Researchers observed a “significant increase” in cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome among those who received the AstraZeneca vaccine with 42 days of administration.


They also noted higher-than-expected instances of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM), inflammation of the brain and spinal cord, among those who received their first dose of Moderna’s vaccine.

However, the study noted that when it came to ADEM there was “no consistent pattern in terms of vaccine or timing following vaccination, and larger epidemiological studies have not confirmed any potential association.”

Both mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna were associated with instances of myocarditis, inflammation of the heart muscle, which occurred more than was expected in the study, with the condition having a significant observed-to-expected ratio consistently after the first, second and third doses.

Significantly higher than expected cases of pericarditis, inflammation of the sac-like structure that surrounds the heart, were also observed following first and fourth doses of Moderna’s vaccine.

“The safety signals identified in this study should be evaluated in the context of their rarity, severity, and clinical relevance,” the researchers wrote.

“Moreover, overall risk–benefit evaluations of vaccination should take the risk associated with infection into account, as multiple studies demonstrated higher risk of developing the events under study, such as GBS, myocarditis, or ADEM, following SARS-CoV-2 infection than vaccination.”

[Panama pfRedd]

quote:
"Of course they had to throw the blanket bullshit in that Covid infection ALSO causes the same conditions in and of itself but it’s clear that the truth is unavoidable- the “vaccines” caused elevated injury"

^^^ It's called a "limited hangout".

www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/vital-signs-wednesday-february-21?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=463409&post_id=141893521&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=y77n3&utm_medium=email

Remarkably, a large covid vaccine safety study dropped last week finding some problems with the jabs, and got my immediate attention by breaking through into corporate media. Why cover this one? The study, stuffed with 35 authors, was titled, “COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals.” The Hill’s article covering the study published two days ago under the headline, “Largest multicountry COVID study links vaccines to potential adverse effects.”

Linking vaccines to potential adverse effects used to get people canceled. So what on Earth is going on?

Our first clue lies in the Hill article’s revealing final paragraph (which should have been the first):

Several of the researchers also reported having relationships or having previously received payments from biopharmaceutical companies Pfizer, Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, and GlaxoSmithKline.

Pharma researchers! It got even more interesting when the study itself disclosed it was funded by the CDC, the New Zealand Ministry of Health, and the Canadian Institutes of Health. It was a “public/private” joint effort between big pharma and the most jab-invested big government agencies in the world. But it still found problems. Could this be honest science, at long last? Or was it something else?

It was high-level gaslighting combined with a limited hangout.

First of all, a point missed by most corporate media, probably intentionally, was the researchers cherry-picked only thirteen categories of adverse events, allowing lying corporate media outlets to mislead readers by generically claiming “the researchers looked for adverse events” as if they looked for any and all safety signals. They didn’t. They only looked for their carefully-curated list of injury types. Next, the researchers muted their findings with hand-waving about covid causing the same adverse events equally or more often than the jabs, so the risk/benefit analysis still favors the shots. (It doesn’t.)

The researchers admitted finding much higher risks of neurological, cardiovascular, and blood disorder complications than they expected. True, they found serious adverse events to be ‘rare’ and — hallelujah for profits — they found them mostly occurring in the already-withdrawn vaccine types like J&J and AstraZeneca and, fortunately, not so much in the fat cash cows, Pfizer and Moderna (whew).

But despite all that, in spite of all the hand-waving about risks and benefits, and despite minimizing the injuries as ‘rare’, the study ultimately disclosed broad increases in jabbed risk between +20% to +70% across 40 or more causes of death. The risks and benefits comparing covid infection versus the shots might have evened out when comparing two 85-year-olds with diabetes and hypertension. But there is no rational risk comparison for healthy or working-age people, who were never at any enhanced risk of serious complications from covid, and as for the young, they should have been nowhere near the shots.

In other words, for healthy, working-age, and young people, the shots are all risk and no benefit.

Given the study’s “reassuring but informing” narrative framing and the wide coverage by corporate media, this looks like a limited hangout. They are — just barely — admitting to a wide variety of disabling, not-mild, permanent side effects, far beyond simple allergic reactions, injection site pain, and temporary flu-like symptoms.

It’s kind of like when finding two chocolate chips between your eight-year-old’s bedsheets, and under intense questioning the child blurts out that, okay, he did break the rules — only a little! — and stole a teeny-tiny part off an already-broken cookie when nobody was looking, but he definitely wasn’t the one who cleaned out the jar. No way.

It’s just a teeny-tiny enhanced risk of death or permanent disability, but not the whole excess deaths jar. That wasn’t us.

In other words, the injuries are getting impossible to deny, and they quickly needed to gaslight everybody. So they bought themselves a nice little study, to put some stuffing in their argument that their jab program maybe wasn’t perfect, but it also wasn’t a catastrophic disaster either.

[Walter]

Antivax temper tantrum noted.
And as usual, nothing but innuendo and insults, like a child who doesn't want to eat his spinach..

[Panama pfRedd]

filthy lying troll