VP Harris ripped by sheriff for refusing to reveal her vote

[trnyerheadncough]

Nov 6, 2024 10:03:08 GMT -5 kaz said:

Nov 6, 2024 9:28:58 GMT -5 trnyerheadncough said:

Ok...and her answer was what it was. There's no need to see her ballot.

Glad we cleared that up.

We did clear that up, didn't we? She was asked, she refused, no one demanded anything. Thanks for admitting you were wrong. Have a nice day - I certainly will.

I wasn’t stating that. I was responding to Bryan in his statement that she be required to, and criticizing the sheriff for ripping her because she refused.

Now you’re up to speed. You’re welcome.

[nu5ncbigred]

Nov 6, 2024 10:10:40 GMT -5 trnyerheadncough said:

Nov 6, 2024 10:03:08 GMT -5 kaz said:

We did clear that up, didn't we? She was asked, she refused, no one demanded anything. Thanks for admitting you were wrong. Have a nice day - I certainly will.

I wasn’t stating that. I was responding to Bryan in his statement that she be required to, and criticizing the sheriff for ripping her because she refused.

Now you’re up to speed. You’re welcome.

And her refusal to answer was a round about way of saying she voted no and that cost her some me votes here. We closed the gap in Ca and other blue states for that matter to deny her the popular vote too.

[trnyerheadncough]

Nov 6, 2024 11:54:54 GMT -5 nu5ncbigred said:

Nov 6, 2024 10:10:40 GMT -5 trnyerheadncough said:

I wasn’t stating that. I was responding to Bryan in his statement that she be required to, and criticizing the sheriff for ripping her because she refused.

Now you’re up to speed. You’re welcome.

And her refusal to answer was a round about way of saying she voted no and that cost her some me votes here. We closed the gap in Ca and other blue states for that matter to deny her the popular vote too.

And that’s the point. You took her words and drew a conclusion. That’s completely fair and how it should be.

Demanding to see her ballot is a bullshit move and shouldn’t have been done. Either by the sheriff or Bryan.

[dilligaf]

Nov 6, 2024 11:56:42 GMT -5 trnyerheadncough said:

Nov 6, 2024 11:54:54 GMT -5 nu5ncbigred said:

And her refusal to answer was a round about way of saying she voted no and that cost her some me votes here. We closed the gap in Ca and other blue states for that matter to deny her the popular vote too.

And that’s the point. You took her words and drew a conclusion. That’s completely fair and how it should be.

Demanding to see her ballot is a bullshit move and shouldn’t have been done. Either by the sheriff or Bryan.

NO ONE demanded to see her ballot, LIAR.
I said she is obligated to answer ONE question regarding a matter of public safety.  I think that's all the Sheriff requested too.
Both us are RIGHT.

It doesn't matter any more anyway.   

The bitch was never qualified to be POTUS, and got her lying hateful ass royally kicked as it needed to be.

Good riddance.

[trnyerheadncough]

Nov 6, 2024 12:02:32 GMT -5 dilligaf said:

Nov 6, 2024 11:56:42 GMT -5 trnyerheadncough said:

And that’s the point. You took her words and drew a conclusion. That’s completely fair and how it should be.

Demanding to see her ballot is a bullshit move and shouldn’t have been done. Either by the sheriff or Bryan.

NO ONE demanded to see her ballot, LIAR.
I said she is obligated to answer ONE question regarding a matter of public safety.  I think that's all the Sheriff requested too.
Both us are RIGHT.

It doesn't matter any more anyway.   

The bitch was never qualified to be POTUS, and got her lying hateful ass royally kicked as it needed to be.

Good riddance.

You demanded to know how she voted. That’s asking to see it. The fact that you followed it up with the school board reference reinforces that.

[Panama pfRedd]

Is stevie on another never-ending riff again?

[trnyerheadncough]

Nov 6, 2024 15:11:04 GMT -5 Panama pfRedd said:

Is stevie on another never-ending riff again?

Rent free.

[nu5ncbigred]

Nov 6, 2024 11:56:42 GMT -5 trnyerheadncough said:

Nov 6, 2024 11:54:54 GMT -5 nu5ncbigred said:

And her refusal to answer was a round about way of saying she voted no and that cost her some me votes here. We closed the gap in Ca and other blue states for that matter to deny her the popular vote too.

And that’s the point. You took her words and drew a conclusion. That’s completely fair and how it should be.

Demanding to see her ballot is a bullshit move and shouldn’t have been done. Either by the sheriff or Bryan.

The sheriff didn’t demand anything. A reporter asked her the question. She gave her answer. The sheriff made his comment on her choice and we here took it from there

[kaz]

Nov 6, 2024 12:30:42 GMT -5 trnyerheadncough said:

Nov 6, 2024 12:02:32 GMT -5 dilligaf said:

NO ONE demanded to see her ballot, LIAR.
I said she is obligated to answer ONE question regarding a matter of public safety.  I think that's all the Sheriff requested too.
Both us are RIGHT.

It doesn't matter any more anyway.   

The bitch was never qualified to be POTUS, and got her lying hateful ass royally kicked as it needed to be.

Good riddance.

You demanded to know how she voted. That’s asking to see it. The fact that you followed it up with the school board reference reinforces that.

Nobody asked to see it. Doesn't matter how you interpret the situation. Don't words matter anymore? Never mind - doesn't matter. She lost. Nobody cares.

[trnyerheadncough]

Nov 7, 2024 1:16:28 GMT -5 kaz said:

Nov 6, 2024 12:30:42 GMT -5 trnyerheadncough said:

You demanded to know how she voted. That’s asking to see it. The fact that you followed it up with the school board reference reinforces that.

Nobody asked to see it. Doesn't matter how you interpret the situation. Don't words matter anymore? Never mind - doesn't matter. She lost. Nobody cares.

Oh wait…words suddenly matter to you? Lol

How many ways are there to interpret “refusing to reveal her vote”?

[trnyerheadncough]

Nov 6, 2024 22:42:20 GMT -5 nu5ncbigred said:

Nov 6, 2024 11:56:42 GMT -5 trnyerheadncough said:

And that’s the point. You took her words and drew a conclusion. That’s completely fair and how it should be.

Demanding to see her ballot is a bullshit move and shouldn’t have been done. Either by the sheriff or Bryan.

The sheriff didn’t demand anything. A reporter asked her the question. She gave her answer. The sheriff made his comment on her choice and we here took it from there

By ripping her for “refusing to reveal her vote”.

Not “refusing to explain her position”. Or “avoiding her stance on the matter”. But, “refusing to reveal her vote”.

[nu5ncbigred]

Nov 6, 2024 15:11:04 GMT -5 Panama pfRedd said:

Is stevie on another never-ending riff again?

Yes. He wants to blame everyone else for how she handled a reportera question. As if her evasion was not allowed to be questioned or called out

[kaz]

Nov 7, 2024 7:07:46 GMT -5 trnyerheadncough said:

Nov 7, 2024 1:16:28 GMT -5 kaz said:

Nobody asked to see it. Doesn't matter how you interpret the situation. Don't words matter anymore? Never mind - doesn't matter. She lost. Nobody cares.

Oh wait…words suddenly matter to you? Lol

How many ways are there to interpret “refusing to reveal her vote”?

By not answering the question as to how she voted, she refused to reveal her vote. She already said her ballot was in the mail, so she couldn't have shown it even if she wanted to. It would be pretty dumb to interpret that as "refusing to show her ballot".

Words always matter to me. Just not yours.

Lol.

[Panama pfRedd]

Nov 7, 2024 9:53:26 GMT -5 kaz said:

Nov 7, 2024 7:07:46 GMT -5 trnyerheadncough said:

Oh wait…words suddenly matter to you? Lol

How many ways are there to interpret “refusing to reveal her vote”?

By not answering the question as to how she voted, she refused to reveal her vote. She already said her ballot was in the mail, so she couldn't have shown it even if she wanted to. It would be pretty dumb to interpret that as "refusing to show her ballot".

Words always matter to me. Just not yours.

Lol.

He's got his finger on the wordsmithing scale.

[trnyerheadncough]

Nov 7, 2024 9:53:26 GMT -5 kaz said:

Nov 7, 2024 7:07:46 GMT -5 trnyerheadncough said:

Oh wait…words suddenly matter to you? Lol

How many ways are there to interpret “refusing to reveal her vote”?

By not answering the question as to how she voted, she refused to reveal her vote. She already said her ballot was in the mail, so she couldn't have shown it even if she wanted to. It would be pretty dumb to interpret that as "refusing to show her ballot".

Words always matter to me. Just not yours.

Lol.

So is voting private or not? Why is it anyone’s business to ask? It’s not.

Words don’t matter to you. Lol. I’ve shown that on multiple occasions.