Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2017 23:49:41 GMT -5
Ernest, you can easily convert these non-believers over to your side. Post verifiable interviews with each of the passengers on the four 9/11 airplanes with them describing where they have been hiding for 16 years.
D-Head,
Let me ask you a few questions.
What is the source of your information about these alleged 9/11 "passengers?"
What percentage of the passenger seats were allegedly occupied on these flights? Anything unusual there?
Were any Muslims listed as passengers on these 9/11 flights?
How many relatives of these alleged passengers later came forward to claim benefits after 9/11?
What did the FBI say about alleged phone calls from Flight 77 in the Moussaiou trial?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Apr 7, 2017 0:36:13 GMT -5
Yes. Didn't GHWB deploy bunker buster missiles of some kind during the Persian Gulf War? I'm hardly an expert on modern military technology, but take a look at these videos of the Pentagon on 9/11. Whatever hit the Pentagon looks like some sort of white missile (or small white jet?) You've been claiming for years it was a cruise missile. Now, you're not sure? If it was a cruise missile, the videos clearly show it exploded on impact. How did it then go through two additional walls, which you also claim happened? And what about the passengers listed on Flight 77? Those people existed before 9/11, but none have been seen since. Where are they? Explain.
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Apr 7, 2017 1:01:24 GMT -5
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Now THIS here...is a member
|
Post by lz2112 on Apr 7, 2017 1:20:30 GMT -5
Willie needs to call every one of those people's loved ones and tell them that they are alive and where they are. If he can't do that, he should call them and apologize for how he has shit on their loved one's deaths for 16 years. My guess is this putrid individual will do something more vile than sane folks can imagine, and claim they never existed.
|
|
Gator Bait!
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Apr 7, 2017 9:16:11 GMT -5
Willie needs to call every one of those people's loved ones and tell them that they are alive and where they are. If he can't do that, he should call them and apologize for how he has shit on their loved one's deaths for 16 years. My guess is this putrid individual will do something more vile than sane folks can imagine, and claim they never existed. Would love to be a fly on the wall for those conversations.
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2017 10:34:30 GMT -5
Willie needs to call every one of those people's loved ones and tell them that they are alive and where they are. If he can't do that, he should call them and apologize for how he has shit on their loved one's deaths for 16 years. My guess is this putrid individual will do something more vile than sane folks can imagine, and claim they never existed. Would love to be a fly on the wall for those conversations.
Well, Harry, we know that Barbara Olson is alive and well, and still married to Ted Olson, right? Her new name is "Lady" Evelyn Booth Olson.
We also know that Ted Olson's narrative about Barbara's 9/11 phone calls from Flight 77-- which were foundational for the government's false narrative about 9/11-- never happened, according to the FBI testimony in the Moussaiou trial, right?
As for the other alleged passengers-- did they ever exist?
And, if they did, did any relatives come forward to claim compensation?
One other comment. A high percentage of the passengers on the list were high-level Pentagon officials and consultants, from Raytheon and other tech companies associated with Raytheon's remote-piloting technology.
Raytheon first successfully piloted a Boeing jetliner using their remote-piloting technology in AUGUST of 2001-- shortly before the 9/11 false flag attacks that launched the PNAC wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Some research people believe that the possible murder of these high-level Pentagon scientists and engineers (on the Flight 77 passenger list) was a CIA "clean up" operation.
It doesn't imply that they died by crashing into the Pentagon.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 7, 2017 12:07:24 GMT -5
Would love to be a fly on the wall for those conversations.
Well, Harry, we know that Barbara Olson is alive and well, and still married to Ted Olson, right? Her new name is "Lady" Evelyn Booth Olson.
We also know that Ted Olson's narrative about Barbara's 9/11 phone calls from Flight 77-- which were foundational for the government's false narrative about 9/11-- never happened, according to the FBI testimony in the Moussaiou trial, right?
As for the other alleged passengers-- did they ever exist?
And, if they did, did any relatives come forward to claim compensation?
One other comment. A high percentage of the passengers on the list were high-level Pentagon officials and consultants, from Raytheon and other tech companies associated with Raytheon's remote-piloting technology.
Raytheon first successfully piloted a Boeing jetliner using their remote-piloting technology in AUGUST of 2001-- shortly before the 9/11 false flag attacks that launched the PNAC wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Some research people believe that the possible murder of these high-level Pentagon scientists and engineers (on the Flight 77 passenger list) was a CIA "clean up" operation.
It doesn't imply that they died by crashing into the Pentagon.
Do some research and find out if they are real or not. Shouldn't be difficult. Let us know what you discover. A trip to the county registrar of the birthplaces of every person on the flight would be a good place to start. Here's a little help to get you started. pentagonmemorial.org/explore/biographies
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2017 12:31:24 GMT -5
Well, Harry, we know that Barbara Olson is alive and well, and still married to Ted Olson, right? Her new name is "Lady" Evelyn Booth Olson.
We also know that Ted Olson's narrative about Barbara's 9/11 phone calls from Flight 77-- which were foundational for the government's false narrative about 9/11-- never happened, according to the FBI testimony in the Moussaiou trial, right?
As for the other alleged passengers-- did they ever exist?
And, if they did, did any relatives come forward to claim compensation?
One other comment. A high percentage of the passengers on the list were high-level Pentagon officials and consultants, from Raytheon and other tech companies associated with Raytheon's remote-piloting technology.
Raytheon first successfully piloted a Boeing jetliner using their remote-piloting technology in AUGUST of 2001-- shortly before the 9/11 false flag attacks that launched the PNAC wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Some research people believe that the possible murder of these high-level Pentagon scientists and engineers (on the Flight 77 passenger list) was a CIA "clean up" operation.
It doesn't imply that they died by crashing into the Pentagon.
Do some research and find out if they are real or not. Shouldn't be difficult. Let us know what you discover. A trip to the county registrar of the birthplaces of every person on the flight would be a good place to start. Here's a little help to get you started. pentagonmemorial.org/explore/biographiesWell, Walter, since it's obvious that a 757 never crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11, who whacked these Raytheon scientists-- and why? (Assuming that these "passenger" identities were not generated by some sort of CIA computer program.)
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Apr 7, 2017 12:46:55 GMT -5
Well, Harry, we know that Barbara Olson is alive and well, and still married to Ted Olson, right? Her new name is "Lady" Evelyn Booth Olson. ::Snicker:: No, we don't know that at all. Just another of your fantasies. We also know that Ted Olson's narrative about Barbara's 9/11 phone calls from Flight 77-- which were foundational for the government's false narrative about 9/11-- never happened, according to the FBI testimony in the Moussaiou trial, right? As for the other alleged passengers-- did they ever exist? Yes. And, if they did, did any relatives come forward to claim compensation? Give some of them a call and let them know their loved ones never existed. Let me know how that goes. One other comment. A high percentage of the passengers on the list were high-level Pentagon officials and consultants, from Raytheon and other tech companies associated with Raytheon's remote-piloting technology. Sez you. Raytheon first successfully piloted a Boeing jetliner using their remote-piloting technology in AUGUST of 2001-- shortly before the 9/11 false flag attacks that launched the PNAC wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Sez you.
Some research people believe that the possible murder of these high-level Pentagon scientists and engineers (on the Flight 77 passenger list) was a CIA "clean up" operation. More obfuscation on your part. It doesn't imply that they died by crashing into the Pentagon. Oh....so, now they're dead, when before they didn't exist? When and where were they killed? Let's see...the CIA undertakes a "clean up" operation...they kidnap and kill 64 people off site and launch a missile at the Pentagon. And then wait for the 757 to take off from Dulles to dispose of it after the fact. Because, you know, that's just so much more efficient than flying the plane into the building. Only a moron or a Harvard grad would believe such a story. Sadly, you're both. So, tell me again...how did that "cruise missile" explode on impact and leave those exit holes? Explain. [/font][/quote]
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 7, 2017 13:09:18 GMT -5
Do some research and find out if they are real or not. Shouldn't be difficult. Let us know what you discover. A trip to the county registrar of the birthplaces of every person on the flight would be a good place to start. Here's a little help to get you started. pentagonmemorial.org/explore/biographiesWell, Walter, since it's obvious that a 757 never crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11, who whacked these Raytheon scientists-- and why? (Assuming that these "passenger" identities were not generated by some sort of CIA computer program.) Raytheon developed computer-operated systems to fly Boeing aircraft...aircraft like the one that didn't crash into the Pentagon with those same Raytheon engineers on board that developed it, so that the CIA could clean up after the mess of having to explain a missile with nobody on board that crashed into the Pentagon with the Raytheon engineers on board a missile with no passenger seats, which explains why Barbara Olson, who wasn't on the plane either because it was a missile, had to undergo a complete identity change to cover up the fact she was a fake person generated by a CIA computer program and who couldn't possibly have been on the plane that was a missile since she never actually existed, which explains why the identity change was necessary. Thanks, Willie....I think I got it now.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Apr 7, 2017 13:58:10 GMT -5
Raytheon developed computer-operated systems to fly Boeing aircraft...aircraft like the one that didn't crash into the Pentagon with those same Raytheon engineers on board that developed it, so that the CIA could clean up after the mess of having to explain a missile with nobody on board that crashed into the Pentagon with the Raytheon engineers on board a missile with no passenger seats, which explains why Barbara Olson, who wasn't on the plane either because it was a missile, had to undergo a complete identity change to cover up the fact she was a fake person generated by a CIA computer program and who couldn't possibly have been on the plane that was a missile since she never actually existed, which explains why the identity change was necessary. Thanks, Willie....I think I got it now. And...your point is?
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Apr 7, 2017 14:24:50 GMT -5
Raytheon developed computer-operated systems to fly Boeing aircraft...aircraft like the one that didn't crash into the Pentagon with those same Raytheon engineers on board that developed it, so that the CIA could clean up after the mess of having to explain a missile with nobody on board that crashed into the Pentagon with the Raytheon engineers on board a missile with no passenger seats, which explains why Barbara Olson, who wasn't on the plane either because it was a missile, had to undergo a complete identity change to cover up the fact she was a fake person generated by a CIA computer program and who couldn't possibly have been on the plane that was a missile since she never actually existed, which explains why the identity change was necessary. Thanks, Willie....I think I got it now. And...your point is? That I sometimes learn really, really important stuff by coming to this board because the really complicated stuff is made easier to understand by the brilliant minds that post here.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2017 15:10:49 GMT -5
Raytheon developed computer-operated systems to fly Boeing aircraft...aircraft like the one that didn't crash into the Pentagon with those same Raytheon engineers on board that developed it, so that the CIA could clean up after the mess of having to explain a missile with nobody on board that crashed into the Pentagon with the Raytheon engineers on board a missile with no passenger seats, which explains why Barbara Olson, who wasn't on the plane either because it was a missile, had to undergo a complete identity change to cover up the fact she was a fake person generated by a CIA computer program and who couldn't possibly have been on the plane that was a missile since she never actually existed, which explains why the identity change was necessary. Thanks, Willie....I think I got it now. Walter,
Thus far, you've got zilch-- despite my ongoing efforts in recent years to share the scientific and historical facts about 9/11 with you and others.
SO, let me make a heuristic suggestion for you and Harry.
Instead of beginning with the assumption that the bogus 9/11 Commission (PNAC) narrative is the truth, try to begin with the hypothetical assumption that 9/11 was a false flag psy op organized by the U.S. Deep State (and the Mossad) as a pretext for launching their "Project for a New American Century."
PNAC, itself, had written in September of 2000 that they would need a catalyzing "Pearl Harbor" type event to implement their military program in the Middle East, right?
Are you with me?
NOW... let us assume, based on the evidence, that the PNAC masterminds in the Bush-Cheney Pentagon, CIA, State Department, etc., began to develop detailed ops for 9/11 in late 2000-- after Bush v. Gore sent Dubya to the White House.
Raytheon had developed the cruise missile technology (see Dov Zakheim) to remotely pilot Boeing jetliners.
Komatsu and affiliates (see Ehud Barak) had developed nano-thermite technology for the demolition of steel skyscrapers.
The new PNAC "Pearl Harbor" would entail a shocking, spectacularly staged attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, that would be blamed on a group of "radical" Islamic patsies-- run by (?) Saudi (or possibly Israeli) intelligence.
These patsies would be accused of hijacking Boeing jetliners that could be remotely piloted (with the new Raytheon technology) to crash into homing devices in the WTC-- specifically, into L. Paul Bremer's Marsh & McLennan office suite.
But, to make things even more shocking, the WTC towers would be completely demolished with high tech nano-thermite explosives-- remotely detonated an hour or so after the shocking plane crashes into the building.
The Pentagon, itself, could be attacked with a plane or a cruise missile, to add to the national shock & awe.
Cheney and Rumsfeld would pre-arrange for a general stand down of normal NORAD and USAF defenses against air attacks and hijacked airplanes.
L. Paul Bremer, Jerome Hauer, Ehud Barak, and Kissinger would go on the international airwaves IMMEDIATELY after the shocking plane crashes to blame the "terrorist" attacks on a group of Islamic "radicals."
Government black ops experts would plant incriminating evidence in the trunk of a rental car at Logan airport-- specifically naming 19 Muslim "terrorists," with full details. They would also plant miraculously preserved Muslim passports at the WTC, Pentagon, and Shanksville crash sites.
Any potentially serious whistleblowers could "perish" in plane crashes.
A trustworthy public figure-- like Fox News Clinton-basher Barbara Olson-- could be set up as a well-known victim of the terrorist hijackings.
Psy ops specialists could also record simulated phone calls, which would provide the public with a dramatic narrative of the hijackings, etc.
All physical evidence of the demolitions at the WTC and Pentagon would be tightly restricted and demolished by PNAC team members in NYC and D.C. (including New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani.)
THEN, look for data that supports (or contradicts) this hypothesis...
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Apr 7, 2017 15:49:02 GMT -5
Raytheon developed computer-operated systems to fly Boeing aircraft...aircraft like the one that didn't crash into the Pentagon with those same Raytheon engineers on board that developed it, so that the CIA could clean up after the mess of having to explain a missile with nobody on board that crashed into the Pentagon with the Raytheon engineers on board a missile with no passenger seats, which explains why Barbara Olson, who wasn't on the plane either because it was a missile, had to undergo a complete identity change to cover up the fact she was a fake person generated by a CIA computer program and who couldn't possibly have been on the plane that was a missile since she never actually existed, which explains why the identity change was necessary. Thanks, Willie....I think I got it now. Walter,
Thus far, you've got zilch-- despite my ongoing efforts in recent years to share the scientific and historical facts about 9/11 with you and others.
SO, let me make a heuristic suggestion for you and Harry.
Instead of beginning with the assumption that the bogus 9/11 Commission (PNAC) narrative is the truth, try to begin with the hypothetical assumption that 9/11 was a false flag psy op organized by the U.S. Deep State (and the Mossad) as a pretext for launching their "Project for a New American Century."
PNAC, itself, had written in September of 2000 that they would need a catalyzing "Pearl Harbor" type event to implement their military program in the Middle East, right?
Are you with me?
NOW... let us assume, based on the evidence, that the PNAC masterminds in the Bush-Cheney Pentagon, CIA, State Department, etc., began to develop detailed ops for 9/11 in late 2000-- after Bush v. Gore sent Dubya to the White House.
Raytheon had developed the cruise missile technology (see Dov Zakheim) to remotely pilot Boeing jetliners.
Komatsu and affiliates (see Ehud Barak) had developed nano-thermite technology for the demolition of steel skyscrapers.
The new PNAC "Pearl Harbor" would entail a shocking, spectacularly staged attack on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, that would be blamed on a group of "radical" Islamic patsies-- run by (?) Saudi (or possibly Israeli) intelligence.
These patsies would be accused of hijacking Boeing jetliners that could be remotely piloted (with the new Raytheon technology) to crash into homing devices in the WTC-- specifically, into L. Paul Bremer's Marsh & McLennan office suite.
But, to make things even more shocking, the WTC towers would be completely demolished with high tech nano-thermite explosives-- remotely detonated an hour or so after the shocking plane crashes into the building.
The Pentagon, itself, could be attacked with a plane or a cruise missile, to add to the national shock & awe.
Cheney and Rumsfeld would pre-arrange for a general stand down of normal NORAD and USAF defenses against air attacks and hijacked airplanes.
L. Paul Bremer, Jerome Hauer, Ehud Barak, and Kissinger would go on the international airwaves IMMEDIATELY after the shocking plane crashes to blame the "terrorist" attacks on a group of Islamic "radicals."
Government black ops experts would plant incriminating evidence in the trunk of a rental car at Logan airport-- specifically naming 19 Muslim "terrorists," with full details. They would also plant miraculously preserved Muslim passports at the WTC, Pentagon, and Shanksville crash sites.
Any potentially serious whistleblowers could "perish" in plane crashes.
A trustworthy public figure-- like Fox News Clinton-basher Barbara Olson-- could be set up as a well-known victim of the terrorist hijackings.
Psy ops specialists could also record simulated phone calls, which would provide the public with a dramatic narrative of the hijackings, etc.
All physical evidence of the demolitions at the WTC and Pentagon would be tightly restricted and demolished by PNAC team members in NYC and D.C. (including New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani.)
THEN, look for data that supports (or contradicts) this hypothesis...
Wow. Just wow.
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2017 16:12:21 GMT -5
Harry,
Spare us the rhetoric.
Do you have any data that disproves the above hypothesis?
If so, by all means post it.
|
|