HERE COMES LZ'S MINIATURE 757... WAIT FOR IT...

[daleko]

Apr 13, 2017 11:15:26 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Apr 13, 2017 0:20:28 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Got it. The government deliberately allowed a plane to hit the Pentagon, even though a plane never hit the Pentagon...it was really a missile. Does that about cover it?

It was one part of a government-staged false flag incident, Harry.  A PNAC Pearl Harbor to mobilize public support for Rumsfeld & Cheney's "New American Century."

Have you still not figured that out? 

So what was it, a plane or a missile?

[daleko]

Willie in a conspiracy discussion.

[oujour76]

Apr 13, 2017 11:15:26 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Apr 13, 2017 0:20:28 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Got it. The government deliberately allowed a plane to hit the Pentagon, even though a plane never hit the Pentagon...it was really a missile. Does that about cover it?

It was one part of a government-staged false flag incident, Harry.  A PNAC Pearl Harbor to mobilize public support for Rumsfeld & Cheney's "New American Century."

Have you still not figured that out? 

What I have figured out is you dance well for a Slovenian. Look, up in the sky! It's a bird! It's a plane! No, it's a missile!

[oujour76]

Apr 13, 2017 11:33:00 GMT -5 Walter said:

So......was it a plane or a missile? If it was a missile, it would not have been able to be tracked because, as we just saw in Syria, cruise missiles fly under the reach of radar and so couldn't have been tracked. So I guess we've settled on a plane.....and, uh...were there any passengers on that plane?

Clearly, Willie is a a fan of the Gentrys....

[AlaCowboy]

Apr 13, 2017 13:06:26 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Apr 13, 2017 11:33:00 GMT -5 Walter said:

So......was it a plane or a missile? If it was a missile, it would not have been able to be tracked because, as we just saw in Syria, cruise missiles fly under the reach of radar and so couldn't have been tracked. So I guess we've settled on a plane.....and, uh...were there any passengers on that plane?

Clearly, Willie is a a fan of the Gentrys....

Here's some REAL dancing music.

[Deleted]

Apr 10, 2017 10:52:49 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

What do you say, fellas?

Does this look like a Boeing 757?  

YGTBFKM...

[daleko]

Apr 13, 2017 18:09:06 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Apr 10, 2017 10:52:49 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

What do you say, fellas?

Does this look like a Boeing 757?  

YGTBFKM...

YES, but one of your other two partners in posting already saw this. Pls stay current.

[Deleted]

Apr 13, 2017 18:27:35 GMT -5 daleko said:

Apr 13, 2017 18:09:06 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

What do you say, fellas?

Does this look like a Boeing 757?  

YGTBFKM...

YES, but one of your other two partners in posting already saw this. Pls stay current.

Daleko,

This appears to be a professionally (CIA) produced, photo-shopped still of a Boeing 757 superimposed on the Pentagon lawn.  Where did it come from?  And when?  (The camera used was, allegedly, a fish-eye lens which appears to be situated, oddly, toward the middle of the Pentagon lawn-- 20 yards from the building.  Obviously, not a CCTV security wall-cam at the Pentagon.  They say it's at the "guard house.") The still photo also does not correspond to the moving video image, and the video does not show the vehicle driving into the parking area prior to the "plane" crash..

Study the three unedited videos (not stills) of the Pentagon 9/11 crash that I have posted at the top of this thread, which were filmed from three very different angles-- yet match each other exactly in their depiction of a small, slender missile-like object flying into the Pentagon. Also, study the video from the Sheraton Hotel-- which was only released by the FBI to the Sheraton owner following a FOIA request. There is no evidence of a Boeing jetliner in the Sheraton video.

Having, unfortunately, grown up across the street from Denver's old Stapleton Airport, I can assure you that the white object hitting the Pentagon in the true CCTV security cam videos of 9/11 is NOT a Boeing 757.


Here's the real 9/11 video for comparison.

[Deleted]

Sheraton Hotel video cam of the 9/11 Pentagon explosion shows no airplane.

[DrSchadenfreude]

Interesting that the original 9/11 Pentagon attack videos have all been deleted by YouTube since 2017, and replaced by the Daleko's  CIA deep fakes.

Not uncommon.

Meanwhile, Walter got completely owned on this thread in our discussion of Dick Cheney and Norman Mineta's damning testimony to Zelikow's 9/11 Cover Up Commission.

P.S. The evidence that AA77 was approaching and flying over D.C. is not evidence that the Pentagon wasn't hit by the smaller object seen in the original CCTV film.

[oujour76]

Nov 1, 2022 12:06:54 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Interesting that the original 9/11 Pentagon attack videos have all been deleted by YouTube since 2017, and replaced by the Daleko's  CIA deep fakes.

Not uncommon.

Meanwhile, Walter got completely owned on this thread in our discussion of Dick Cheney and Norman Mineta's damning testimony to Zelikow's 9/11 Cover Up Commission.

P.S. The evidence that AA77 was approaching and flying over D.C. is not evidence that the Pentagon wasn't hit by the smaller object seen in the original CCTV film.

Anybody see a cruise missile that day?

[DrSchadenfreude]

Nov 1, 2022 15:19:55 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Nov 1, 2022 12:06:54 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Interesting that the original 9/11 Pentagon attack videos have all been deleted by YouTube since 2017, and replaced by the Daleko's  CIA deep fakes.

Not uncommon.

Meanwhile, Walter got completely owned on this thread in our discussion of Dick Cheney and Norman Mineta's damning testimony to Zelikow's 9/11 Cover Up Commission.

P.S. The evidence that AA77 was approaching and flying over D.C. is not evidence that the Pentagon wasn't hit by the smaller object seen in the original CCTV film.

Anybody see a cruise missile that day?

CCTV.

[oujour76]

Nov 1, 2022 18:35:38 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 1, 2022 15:19:55 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Anybody see a cruise missile that day?

CCTV.

Weak sauce.

[DrSchadenfreude]

Nov 1, 2022 18:51:30 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Nov 1, 2022 18:35:38 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

CCTV.

Weak sauce.

Just the opposite.  If it's not altered, it's the definitive "witness."

Put on your thinking cap, Harry.

If the CIA, U.S. military, Mossad, and Saudi government collaborated on a world altering black op, do you think they would have trouble designating and coaching false witnesses to promote the official narrative?

What do you think Kissinger, L. Paul Bremer, Ehud Barak, and Jerome Hauer were doing on 9/11?

[oujour76]

Nov 1, 2022 21:39:09 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 1, 2022 18:51:30 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Weak sauce.

Just the opposite.  If it's not altered, it's the definitive "witness."

Put on your thinking cap, Harry.

If the CIA, U.S. military, Mossad, and Saudi government collaborated on a world altering black op, do you think they would have trouble designating and coaching false witnesses to promote the official narrative?

What do you think Kissinger, L. Paul Bremer, Ehud Barak, and Jerome Hauer were doing on 9/11?

Weaker sauce.