Absolute proof the Pentagon was not hit by a 757 on 9/11

[Deleted]

This thread is a perfectly detailed example of Walter's inability to accurately perceive and interpret empirical evidence.

Instead of honestly and objectively looking at the actual empirical evidence -- the small fuselage of the missile that hit the Pentagon on 9/11-- people like Walter, Harry, and Daleko immediately fall back on references to the CIA's mainstream media disinformation.

They also fall back, repeatedly, on the CIA's crafty old 1969 propaganda trick of labeling any scientists and scholars who debunk their CIA psy ops disinformation as "kooky conspiracy theorists." 

Allen Dulles, C.D. Jackson, Ed Lansdale, and the Company emerged from the OSS after 1945 with the knowledge that mainstream media propaganda works.

Guys like Walter and ET Gator are the living proof.  They'll accept, uncritically, anything repeated by the mainstream media.

[oujour76]

Mar 13, 2019 14:02:50 GMT -5 @drlumbago said:

This thread is a perfectly detailed example of Walter's inability to accurately perceive and interpret empirical evidence.

Instead of honestly and objectively looking at the actual empirical evidence -- the small fuselage of the missile that hit the Pentagon on 9/11-- people like Walter, Harry, and Daleko immediately fall back on references to the CIA's mainstream media disinformation.

They also fall back, repeatedly, on the CIA's crafty old 1969 propaganda trick of labeling any scientists and scholars who debunk their CIA psy ops disinformation as "kooky conspiracy theorists." 

Allen Dulles, C.D. Jackson, Ed Lansdale, and the Company emerged from the OSS after 1945 with the knowledge that mainstream media propaganda works.

Guys like Walter and ET Gator are the living proof.  They'll accept, uncritically, anything repeated by the mainstream media.

Have you found the plane and passengers yet? Oh, let me guess...there was no plane, it was a hologram and the passengers were replicants.

[AlaCowboy]

Mar 13, 2019 14:27:27 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Mar 13, 2019 14:02:50 GMT -5 @drlumbago said:

This thread is a perfectly detailed example of Walter's inability to accurately perceive and interpret empirical evidence.

Instead of honestly and objectively looking at the actual empirical evidence -- the small fuselage of the missile that hit the Pentagon on 9/11-- people like Walter, Harry, and Daleko immediately fall back on references to the CIA's mainstream media disinformation.

They also fall back, repeatedly, on the CIA's crafty old 1969 propaganda trick of labeling any scientists and scholars who debunk their CIA psy ops disinformation as "kooky conspiracy theorists." 

Allen Dulles, C.D. Jackson, Ed Lansdale, and the Company emerged from the OSS after 1945 with the knowledge that mainstream media propaganda works.

Guys like Walter and ET Gator are the living proof.  They'll accept, uncritically, anything repeated by the mainstream media.

Have you found the plane and passengers yet? Oh, let me guess...there was no plane, it was a hologram and the passengers were replicants.

All Nie der hut, aka The Denver Idiot, has to do is go through the passenger lists from those three airplanes and produce just one of the reported victims for a live interview and he will have the news scoop of the century! Wonder why he hasn't done so?

[oujour76]

Mar 13, 2019 14:48:41 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Mar 13, 2019 14:27:27 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Have you found the plane and passengers yet? Oh, let me guess...there was no plane, it was a hologram and the passengers were replicants.

All Nie der hut, aka The Denver Idiot, has to do is go through the passenger lists from those three airplanes and produce just one of the reported victims for a live interview and he will have the news scoop of the century! Wonder why he hasn't done so?

Because he's full of shit. ::shrug::

[Deleted]

Mar 13, 2019 14:02:50 GMT -5 @drlumbago said:

This thread is a perfectly detailed example of Walter's inability to accurately perceive and interpret empirical evidence.

Instead of honestly and objectively looking at the actual empirical evidence -- the small fuselage of the missile that hit the Pentagon on 9/11-- people like Walter, Harry, and Daleko immediately fall back on references to the CIA's mainstream media disinformation.

They also fall back, repeatedly, on the CIA's crafty old 1969 propaganda trick of labeling any scientists and scholars who debunk their CIA psy ops disinformation as "kooky conspiracy theorists." 

Allen Dulles, C.D. Jackson, Ed Lansdale, and the Company emerged from the OSS after 1945 with the knowledge that mainstream media propaganda works.

Guys like Walter and ET Gator are the living proof.  They'll accept, uncritically, anything repeated by the mainstream media.

Just the facts, gentleman.

The small fuselage of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon is clearly visible in these photographic stills.

[AlaCowboy]

Mar 13, 2019 15:23:49 GMT -5 @drlumbago said:

Mar 13, 2019 14:02:50 GMT -5 @drlumbago said:

This thread is a perfectly detailed example of Walter's inability to accurately perceive and interpret empirical evidence.

Instead of honestly and objectively looking at the actual empirical evidence -- the small fuselage of the missile that hit the Pentagon on 9/11-- people like Walter, Harry, and Daleko immediately fall back on references to the CIA's mainstream media disinformation.

They also fall back, repeatedly, on the CIA's crafty old 1969 propaganda trick of labeling any scientists and scholars who debunk their CIA psy ops disinformation as "kooky conspiracy theorists." 

Allen Dulles, C.D. Jackson, Ed Lansdale, and the Company emerged from the OSS after 1945 with the knowledge that mainstream media propaganda works.

Guys like Walter and ET Gator are the living proof.  They'll accept, uncritically, anything repeated by the mainstream media.

Just the facts, gentleman.

The small fuselage of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon is clearly visible in these photographic stills.

So where are the interviews with those passengers that really didn't get killed in those airplanes that didn't really crash?

[Deleted]

Mar 13, 2019 19:22:47 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Mar 13, 2019 15:23:49 GMT -5 @drlumbago said:

Just the facts, gentleman.

The small fuselage of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon is clearly visible in these photographic stills.

So where are the interviews with those passengers that really didn't get killed in those airplanes that didn't really crash?

Just the facts, gentleman.  No more government disinformation, please.  (There's a ton of that out there, obviously.)

The small fuselage of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon is clearly visible in these photographic stills.

Anyone disagree with this obvious empirical evidence about the missile fuselage, for starters?

(Next, we'll explore the earliest visual evidence of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon on 9/11, then the "witness" testimony, then the "total vaporization" hypothesis that the government used to explain the complete absence of a jetliner crash, passenger chairs, luggage, bodies, etc.)

[oujour76]

Mar 13, 2019 20:13:46 GMT -5 @drlumbago said:

Mar 13, 2019 19:22:47 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

So where are the interviews with those passengers that really didn't get killed in those airplanes that didn't really crash?

Just the facts, gentleman.  No more government disinformation, please.  (There's a ton of that out there, obviously.)

The small fuselage of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon is clearly visible in these photographic stills.

Anyone disagree with this obvious empirical evidence about the missile fuselage, for starters?

(Next, we'll explore the earliest visual evidence of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon on 9/11, then the "witness" testimony, then the "total vaporization" hypothesis that the government used to explain the complete absence of a jetliner crash, passenger chairs, luggage, bodies, etc.)

No passengers, huh? LOL...go figure.

[Deleted]

Mar 13, 2019 20:51:15 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Mar 13, 2019 20:13:46 GMT -5 @drlumbago said:

Just the facts, gentleman.  No more government disinformation, please.  (There's a ton of that out there, obviously.)

The small fuselage of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon is clearly visible in these photographic stills.

Anyone disagree with this obvious empirical evidence about the missile fuselage, for starters?

(Next, we'll explore the earliest visual evidence of the cruise missile that hit the Pentagon on 9/11, then the "witness" testimony, then the "total vaporization" hypothesis that the government used to explain the complete absence of a jetliner crash, passenger chairs, luggage, bodies, etc.)

No passengers, huh? LOL...go figure.

We'll get to that aspect of the deeply flawed official government 9/11 narrative, but what do you have to say about the slender fuselage of the cruise missile in these photos, Harry?

Stop dodging the question.

[oujour76]

Mar 13, 2019 23:24:52 GMT -5 @drlumbago said:

Mar 13, 2019 20:51:15 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

No passengers, huh? LOL...go figure.

We'll get to that aspect of the deeply flawed official government 9/11 narrative, but what do you have to say about the slender fuselage of the cruise missile in these photos, Harry?

Stop dodging the question.

You’ve been asked where the passengers are for several years. Stop dodging the question.

[Deleted]

Mar 14, 2019 6:20:42 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Mar 13, 2019 23:24:52 GMT -5 @drlumbago said:

We'll get to that aspect of the deeply flawed official government 9/11 narrative, but what do you have to say about the slender fuselage of the cruise missile in these photos, Harry?

Stop dodging the question.

You’ve been asked where the passengers are for several years. Stop dodging the question.

Harry,

Start a thread about the curious "passenger lists" published by the government, if you want.  (I've posted some interesting anomalies about those lists several times.)

This thread is about the slender cruise missile fuselage visible in these Pentagon 9/11 security cam photo stills.

Do you have anything to say about the fuselage-- the subject of this thread?   Do YOU really believe that this is a 757 fuselage?

[Walter]

Mar 13, 2019 23:24:52 GMT -5 @drlumbago said:

Mar 13, 2019 20:51:15 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

No passengers, huh? LOL...go figure.

We'll get to that aspect of the deeply flawed official government 9/11 narrative, but what do you have to say about the slender fuselage of the cruise missile in these photos, Harry?

Stop dodging the question.

Question:
Do cruise missiles have landing gear?

[AlaCowboy]

Mar 14, 2019 9:10:27 GMT -5 Walter said:

Mar 13, 2019 23:24:52 GMT -5 @drlumbago said:

We'll get to that aspect of the deeply flawed official government 9/11 narrative, but what do you have to say about the slender fuselage of the cruise missile in these photos, Harry?

Stop dodging the question.

Question:
Do cruise missiles have landing gear?

The one Tom Cruise flew in "Top Gun" did.

[oujour76]

Mar 14, 2019 6:50:00 GMT -5 @drlumbago said:

Mar 14, 2019 6:20:42 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

You’ve been asked where the passengers are for several years. Stop dodging the question.

Harry,

Start a thread about the curious "passenger lists" published by the government, if you want.  (I've posted some interesting anomalies about those lists several times.)

This thread is about the slender cruise missile fuselage visible in these Pentagon 9/11 security cam photo stills.

Do you have anything to say about the fuselage-- the subject of this thread?   Do YOU really believe that this is a 757 fuselage?

Stop dodging the question.

[Deleted]

Mar 14, 2019 9:35:11 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Mar 14, 2019 6:50:00 GMT -5 @drlumbago said:

Harry,

Start a thread about the curious "passenger lists" published by the government, if you want.  (I've posted some interesting anomalies about those lists several times.)

This thread is about the slender cruise missile fuselage visible in these Pentagon 9/11 security cam photo stills.

Do you have anything to say about the fuselage-- the subject of this thread?   Do YOU really believe that this is a 757 fuselage?

Stop dodging the question.

Harry,

    You, Walter, Daleko, and Cowboy haven't even made it to first base yet in any of our 9/11 debates about the data.

    You ridiculous dodgers need to stop changing the subject, repeatedly, and answer the original, central question on the thread--

    Is the slender white fuselage (see photos above) that hit the Pentagon on 9/11 a Boeing 757?

    YES OR NO?