Absolute proof the Pentagon was not hit by a 757 on 9/11

[Deleted]

   Anyone who thinks this white missile-like object that hit the Pentagon on 9/11 was a 757 is either a fool or a liar.

   This object is WAY to small to be a 757.  Case closed.

   Use your eye peepers, you brainwashed loons.

[daleko]

Jul 20, 2017 21:38:24 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

   Anyone who thinks this white missile-like object that hit the Pentagon on 9/11 was a 757 is either a fool or a liar.

   This object is WAY to small to be a 757.  Case closed.

   Use your eye peepers, you brainwashed loons.

www.9-11tv.org/the-pentagon-plane-puzzle/85-pentagon-area-surveillance-cameras

[Deleted]

Jul 20, 2017 21:38:24 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

   Anyone who thinks this white missile-like object that hit the Pentagon on 9/11 was a 757 is either a fool or a liar.

   This object is WAY to small to be a 757.  Case closed.

   Use your eye peepers, you brainwashed loons.

Daleko,

      Let's stay on topic.  Just study the film clip that I posted at the top of this thread.

       That white cylinder is small.  It's NOT a 757 fuselage.  Look at it.

       There are endless government funded websites that focus on distracting the public from the basic facts about these ops.  They are usually slick productions with sketchy falsified "evidence" to support the govt false flag narrative.

   Some sites even have photo-shopped blotches which the nsrrator descrkbes as an AA77, but these are not seen on the originals.   

   Instead of always posting the CIA fake evidence, try looking at the evidence I posted first, and commenting on what you see.

[daleko]

Jul 21, 2017 0:14:59 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Jul 20, 2017 21:38:24 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Daleko,

      Let's stay on topic.  Just study the film clip that I posted at the top of this thread.
       That white cylinder is small.  It's NOT a 757 fuselage.  Look at it.
       There are endless government funded websites that focus on distracting the public from the basic facts about these ops.  They are usually slick productions with sketchy falsified "evidence" to support the govt false flag narrative.
   Some sites even have photo-shopped blotches which the nsrrator descrkbes as an AA77, but these are not seen on the originals.   
   Instead of always posting the CIA fake evidence, try looking at the evidence I posted first, and commenting on what you see.

You're not entitled to your own facts. If staying on topic means I can't refute the garbage you post. Good day. The Board knows full well that the stuff you post from the conspiracy sites is all nonsense anyway. Going forward I'll just start a new thread to refute, as you have suggested. I and the rest of the reasonable world knows what happened on 9/11 at the Pentagon. Enough of the eye witnesses are way beyond rock solid. For me, it's a closed issue because of that and personal contacts w eyewitnesses. Good day. I'll take your advise and just start my own threads, as a response. 

[Deleted]

Jul 21, 2017 8:51:07 GMT -5 daleko said:

Jul 21, 2017 0:14:59 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Daleko,

      Let's stay on topic.  Just study the film clip that I posted at the top of this thread.
       That white cylinder is small.  It's NOT a 757 fuselage.  Look at it.
       There are endless government funded websites that focus on distracting the public from the basic facts about these ops.  They are usually slick productions with sketchy falsified "evidence" to support the govt false flag narrative.
   Some sites even have photo-shopped blotches which the nsrrator descrkbes as an AA77, but these are not seen on the originals.   
   Instead of always posting the CIA fake evidence, try looking at the evidence I posted first, and commenting on what you see.

You're not entitled to your own facts. If staying on topic means I can't refute the garbage you post. Good day. The Board knows full well that the stuff you post from the conspiracy sites is all nonsense anyway. Going forward I'll just start a new thread to refute, as you have suggested. I and the rest of the reasonable world knows what happened on 9/11 at the Pentagon. Enough of the eye witnesses are way beyond rock solid. For me, it's a closed issue because of that and personal contacts w eyewitnesses. Good day. I'll take your advise and just start my own threads, as a response. 

You are not refuting my facts.

Instead, you are diverting the thread by posting more disinformation.

I am fully aware that government funded disinformation about 9/11 is ubiquitous in our media (and on the internet.)

That is what Deep State psy ops are all about.

1)  Control the false narrative immediately (Bremer, Kissinger, Ehud Barak)

2)  Sequester and/or destroy all of the contradictory evidence.

3)  Repeat the lies, using CIA contractors who own the mainstream media, private authors, and websites.

4)  Marginalize and disparage non-government scientists, investigators, and scholars who point out the obvious holes in the Deep State narrative.

5)  Plant kooky "conspiracy theories" in the alternative media, to create the impression that all people questioning the official narrative are "kooky."

[Walter]

Jul 21, 2017 13:07:15 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Jul 21, 2017 8:51:07 GMT -5 daleko said:

You're not entitled to your own facts. If staying on topic means I can't refute the garbage you post. Good day. The Board knows full well that the stuff you post from the conspiracy sites is all nonsense anyway. Going forward I'll just start a new thread to refute, as you have suggested. I and the rest of the reasonable world knows what happened on 9/11 at the Pentagon. Enough of the eye witnesses are way beyond rock solid. For me, it's a closed issue because of that and personal contacts w eyewitnesses. Good day. I'll take your advise and just start my own threads, as a response. 

You are not refuting my facts.

Instead, you are diverting the thread by posting more disinformation.

I am fully aware that government funded disinformation about 9/11 is ubiquitous in our media (and on the internet.)

That is what Deep State psy ops are all about.

1)  Control the false narrative immediately (Bremer, Kissinger, Ehud Barak)

2)  Sequester and/or destroy all of the contradictory evidence.

3)  Repeat the lies, using CIA contractors who own the mainstream media, private authors, and websites.

4)  Marginalize and disparage non-government scientists, investigators, and scholars who point out the obvious holes in the Deep State narrative.

5)  Plant kooky "conspiracy theories" in the alternative media, to create the impression that all people questioning the official narrative are "kooky."

LOL...you believe it's possible that a hologram was used to fool the hundreds of eyewitnesses to the event. You were even willing to accept it happened at the WTC as well.
I believe that qualifies you as a first class, numero uno, world class KOOK. And as this silliness has been going on for years, I shall grant you the status of Kook Emeritus.

[Deleted]

Walter,

    A kook is what a kook does.

    If you and Cheese Whiz sincerely believe that the small white nose cone/ fuselage seen on the video here is a 757, you are, definitely, KOOKS.

   You guys remind of the psychology studies showing that most people will believe what they are told by putative "authority" figures, rather than trusting their own perceptions.

[Walter]

Jul 21, 2017 13:25:11 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Walter,

    A kook is what a kook does.

    If you and Cheese Whiz sincerely believe that the small white nose cone/ fuselage seen on the video here is a 757, you are, definitely, KOOKS.

   You guys remind of the psychology studies showing that most people will believe what they are told by putative "authority" figures, rather than trusting their own perceptions.

Could be worse.
We could believe kooks on the internet.

[Deleted]

Jul 21, 2017 13:31:27 GMT -5 Walter said:

Jul 21, 2017 13:25:11 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Walter,

    A kook is what a kook does.

    If you and Cheese Whiz sincerely believe that the small white nose cone/ fuselage seen on the video here is a 757, you are, definitely, KOOKS.

   You guys remind of the psychology studies showing that most people will believe what they are told by putative "authority" figures, rather than trusting their own perceptions.

Could be worse.
We could believe kooks on the internet.

True.  Better to avoid the kooks, CIA propagandists, and dupes, and stick with the scientists and scholars on the internet, like the Scholars, Architects, and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

[Walter]

Jul 21, 2017 13:50:36 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Jul 21, 2017 13:31:27 GMT -5 Walter said:

Could be worse.
We could believe kooks on the internet.

True.  Better to avoid the kooks, CIA propagandists, and dupes, and stick with the scientists and scholars on the internet, like the Scholars, Architects, and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Like I said...kooks on the internet.

[Deleted]

Jul 21, 2017 14:29:38 GMT -5 Walter said:

Jul 21, 2017 13:50:36 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

True.  Better to avoid the kooks, CIA propagandists, and dupes, and stick with the scientists and scholars on the internet, like the Scholars, Architects, and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Like I said...kooks on the internet.

Walter,


   I don't want to hurt your feelings too badly, but, frankly, you ARE one of the kooks on the internet.

   That slender white fuselage seen on the Pentagon's video cam is WAY too small to be a 757.  Look how low to the ground that thing is!  (The tail of a 757 is 44 feet above the ground, right?)

     Trust me.  I had the misfortune of growing up right across the street from Stapleton International Airport.

[Walter]

Jul 21, 2017 15:51:36 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Jul 21, 2017 14:29:38 GMT -5 Walter said:

Like I said...kooks on the internet.

Walter,


   I don't want to hurt your feelings too badly, but, frankly, you ARE one of the kooks on the internet.

   That slender white fuselage seen on the Pentagon's video cam is WAY too small to be a 757.  Look how low to the ground that thing is!  (The tail of a 757 is 44 feet above the ground, right?)

     Trust me.  I had the misfortune of growing up right across the street from Stapleton International Airport.

Right, and the video you posted noted it. The narrator said something like, "you can clearly see the tail section in the foreground" and even has an arrow pointing to it. It's at around the 2:00 mark of your video.
What part of that are you not getting? It's your own freakin' video.

[Deleted]

Looks like willie needs a CFB permanent sabbatical, Walter.
His ad hominem repartee and libelous calumny extant, ergo and to wit, he's a portion of dog excrement.
Just do it. You'll be doing him a favor.

[Deleted]

Jul 21, 2017 15:51:36 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Jul 21, 2017 14:29:38 GMT -5 Walter said:

Like I said...kooks on the internet.

Walter,


   I don't want to hurt your feelings too badly, but, frankly, you ARE one of the kooks on the internet.

   That slender white fuselage seen on the Pentagon's video cam is WAY too small to be a 757.  Look how low to the ground that thing is!  (The tail of a 757 is 44 feet above the ground, right?)

     Trust me.  I had the misfortune of growing up right across the street from Stapleton International Airport.

Walter,

      A Boeing 757 is a big bird. 

     The slender white nose cone and fuselage seen in the Pentagon''s 9/11 video is a MUCH smaller bird.

      Put on your 3X reading glasses and take another look... 

[Deleted]