Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2019 13:33:48 GMT -5
Post a link and a source. In studying the subject of 9/11 "witness" testimony, some research scholars have found direct links to the Bush-Cheney administration. The most famous case is Bush's Solicitor General Ted Olsen's debunked claims about receiving AA 77 cellphone calls from Barbara Olsen. Post a link and a source? LOL...why, so you can call it fake, doctored or some other variant of a plot by the deep state? Look it up yourself. Type "AA77 Dulles" into the YouTube search engine and there are dozens of sources to hear pilots commenting about seeing the plane in real time. According to the 9/11 report, there are 130+ people interviewed who saw the plane, either from the ground or the air.
Post a link, Walter.
False witnesses for U.S. military black ops are a dime a dozen.
Creating false narratives for psychological ops ALWAYS depends on 1) destroying and/or preventing public access to the evidence, 2) consistently promoting the false narrative with fake witness testimony.
Here are two related question for you, Harry, and Daleko.
1) Why did the U.S. government immediately confiscate and sequester public access to all of the Pentagon (and local, private) security cam footage of 9/11?
2) If all of the Flight A77 seats, luggage, and passengers were "vaporized" on impact with the Pentagon on 9/11, (the U.S. government claim) how did a paper Muslim passport, (allegedly found on the Pentagon lawn) survive unscathed?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 20, 2019 23:43:50 GMT -5
Post a link and a source? LOL...why, so you can call it fake, doctored or some other variant of a plot by the deep state? Look it up yourself. Type "AA77 Dulles" into the YouTube search engine and there are dozens of sources to hear pilots commenting about seeing the plane in real time. According to the 9/11 report, there are 130+ people interviewed who saw the plane, either from the ground or the air.
Post a link, Walter.
False witnesses for U.S. military black ops are a dime a dozen.
Creating false narratives for psychological ops ALWAYS depends on 1) destroying and/or preventing public access to the evidence, 2) consistently promoting the false narrative with fake witness testimony.
Here are two related question for you, Harry, and Daleko.
1) Why did the U.S. government immediately confiscate and sequester public access to all of the Pentagon (and local, private) security cam footage of 9/11?
2) If all of the Flight A77 seats, luggage, and passengers were "vaporized" on impact with the Pentagon on 9/11, (the U.S. government claim) how did a paper Muslim passport, (allegedly found on the Pentagon lawn) survive unscathed?
Still waiting for Wally and Harry to answer these questions from LAST WEEK...
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 20, 2019 23:56:52 GMT -5
Post a link, Walter. False witnesses for U.S. military black ops are a dime a dozen. Creating false narratives for psychological ops ALWAYS depends on 1) destroying and/or preventing public access to the evidence, 2) consistently promoting the false narrative with fake witness testimony. Here are two related question for you, Harry, and Daleko. 1) Why did the U.S. government immediately confiscate and sequester public access to all of the Pentagon (and local, private) security cam footage of 9/11? 2) If all of the Flight A77 seats, luggage, and passengers were "vaporized" on impact with the Pentagon on 9/11, (the U.S. government claim) how did a paper Muslim passport, (allegedly found on the Pentagon lawn) survive unscathed?
Still waiting for Wally and Harry to answer these questions from LAST WEEK...
Sill waiting for you to have the balls to defend your own assertions. How did a non-existent person pass the bar in Kentucky? And why would Kentucky suspend membership in the KY bar 6 yrs later of someone who did not exist? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by AlaCowboy on Mar 21, 2019 13:47:20 GMT -5
Still waiting for Wally and Harry to answer these questions from LAST WEEK...
Sill waiting for you to have the balls to defend your own assertions. How did a non-existent person pass the bar in Kentucky?And why would Kentucky suspend membership in the KY bar 6 yrs later of someone who did not exist? |
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Deleted
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 21, 2019 18:56:47 GMT -5
Still waiting for Wally and Harry to answer these questions from LAST WEEK...
Sill waiting for you to have the balls to defend your own assertions. How did a non-existent person pass the bar in Kentucky? And why would Kentucky suspend membership in the KY bar 6 yrs later of someone who did not exist?
I need to see more definitive evidence.
As I said initially-- something about Lady Evelyn Booth's scant biographical data (on-line) doesn't pass the sniff test.
When was your web page listing a date of 3/3/94 created-- in September of 2001?
She claimed to have graduated from Georgetown, but wasn't listed as a Georgetown graduate (on the document I posted earlier.)
And why was "Lady Evelyn involved in litigating a SCOTUS case within a year of being dis-barred for failure to complete CE requirements?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Mar 22, 2019 12:58:24 GMT -5
Sill waiting for you to have the balls to defend your own assertions. How did a non-existent person pass the bar in Kentucky? And why would Kentucky suspend membership in the KY bar 6 yrs later of someone who did not exist? I need to see more definitive evidence. As I said initially-- something about Lady Evelyn Booth's scant biographical data (on-line) doesn't pass the sniff test. When was your web page listing a date of 3/3/94 created-- in September of 2001?
She claimed to have graduated from Georgetown, but wasn't listed as a Georgetown graduate (on the document I posted earlier.)
And why was "Lady Evelyn involved in litigating a SCOTUS case within a year of being dis-barred for failure to complete CE requirements?
The website is run by the KyBar. It is an active database with official records of the state. It contains a pdf of a court order in her file, signed by some official, that officially pulled her license 10 months before 9/11. It is analogous to a birth announcement in a Hawaiian newspaper in the absurdity of the notion you are pushing. |
|
