Consensus 9/11-Ted Olson Lied About AA77 Phone Calls on 9/11

[oujour76]

Oct 30, 2022 20:35:25 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 30, 2022 18:48:13 GMT -5 cbisbig said:

How do you explain the 2 Boeing 767s flying into both towers?

      My opinion is that they were remotely-piloted by the Raytheon GPS-guided remote-piloting technology that had been successfully tested in Boeing jetliners in August of 2001 in Marana, Arizona.   By 9/11/01 the U.S. military had the technological ability to remotely pilot Boeing 757s-- to take off, precision maneuver, and land Boeing jetliners without pilots.

So, real passengers or fake ones on those planes?

[oujour76]

Oct 30, 2022 20:16:14 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 30, 2022 17:46:45 GMT -5 Walter said:

How'd we get to the WTC?
Stay on the AA77 story.
After we finish that, we can move to other stories.

Tell us what happened to the dead passengers and crew, about radar records of the flight path, where that particular plane is now, how more than a dozen eyewitnesses and real time recordings of people describing the plane crash as they watched it happen isn't relevant.

Go.

Wrong questions, Walter.   And you and Harry both dodged my earlier question.

I answered Harry's question about WTC security.

Now answer my earlier question, and focus on the scientifically verifiable facts-- not on aspects of the alleged events reported by Bush/Cheney government officials.


1)  Why did Ted Olson lie about the "boxcutter" phone calls from AA77?

2)  What is the wingspan of a Boeing 757?

3)  Where did the wings and titanium jet engines of the Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon walls?

4)  Where are those large titanium 757 engines?  Were they also "vaporized," along with the entire plane, landing gear, seats, luggage, and passengers-- sparing only an intact paper Muslim passport?  

Get real, fellas.

Are you claiming those engines were 100% titanium?

[DrSchadenfreude]

Oct 30, 2022 21:32:20 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Oct 30, 2022 20:16:14 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Wrong questions, Walter.   And you and Harry both dodged my earlier question.

I answered Harry's question about WTC security.

Now answer my earlier question, and focus on the scientifically verifiable facts-- not on aspects of the alleged events reported by Bush/Cheney government officials.


1)  Why did Ted Olson lie about the "boxcutter" phone calls from AA77?

2)  What is the wingspan of a Boeing 757?

3)  Where did the wings and titanium jet engines of the Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon walls?

4)  Where are those large titanium 757 engines?  Were they also "vaporized," along with the entire plane, landing gear, seats, luggage, and passengers-- sparing only an intact paper Muslim passport?  

Get real, fellas.

Are you claiming those engines were 100% titanium?

Nope.  Stop dodging my questions. 

So sick of you dodging my questions and deflecting from the key issues.

Answer my questions, for once!

[oujour76]

Oct 30, 2022 22:24:59 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 30, 2022 21:32:20 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Are you claiming those engines were 100% titanium?

Nope.  Stop dodging my questions. 

So sick of you dodging my questions and deflecting from the key issues.

Answer my questions, for once!

You asked me when Silverstein took over security at WTC. I’d say July, after he closed the deal on the properties.

[oujour76]

Oct 30, 2022 22:24:59 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 30, 2022 21:32:20 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Are you claiming those engines were 100% titanium?

Nope.  Stop dodging my questions. 

So sick of you dodging my questions and deflecting from the key issues.

Answer my questions, for once!

Then stop calling them titanium engines.

[Panama pfRedd]

Comedy gold!

[Walter]

Oct 30, 2022 20:16:14 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 30, 2022 17:46:45 GMT -5 Walter said:

How'd we get to the WTC?
Stay on the AA77 story.
After we finish that, we can move to other stories.

Tell us what happened to the dead passengers and crew, about radar records of the flight path, where that particular plane is now, how more than a dozen eyewitnesses and real time recordings of people describing the plane crash as they watched it happen isn't relevant.

Go.

Wrong questions, Walter.   And you and Harry both dodged my earlier question.

I answered Harry's question about WTC security.

Now answer my earlier question, and focus on the scientifically verifiable facts-- not on aspects of the alleged events reported by Bush/Cheney government officials.


1)  Why did Ted Olson lie about the "boxcutter" phone calls from AA77?

2)  What is the wingspan of a Boeing 757?

3)  Where did the wings and titanium jet engines of the Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon walls?

4)  Where are those large titanium 757 engines?  Were they also "vaporized," along with the entire plane, landing gear, seats, luggage, and passengers-- sparing only an intact paper Muslim passport?  

Get real, fellas.

LMAO!
I can imagine that you think I ask the wrong Qs. They are the ones you cannot answer.

[DrSchadenfreude]

Oct 30, 2022 23:41:57 GMT -5 Walter said:

Oct 30, 2022 20:16:14 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Wrong questions, Walter.   And you and Harry both dodged my earlier question.

I answered Harry's question about WTC security.

Now answer my earlier question, and focus on the scientifically verifiable facts-- not on aspects of the alleged events reported by Bush/Cheney government officials.


1)  Why did Ted Olson lie about the "boxcutter" phone calls from AA77?

2)  What is the wingspan of a Boeing 757?

3)  Where did the wings and titanium jet engines of the Boeing 757 hit the Pentagon walls?

4)  Where are those large titanium 757 engines?  Were they also "vaporized," along with the entire plane, landing gear, seats, luggage, and passengers-- sparing only an intact paper Muslim passport?  

Get real, fellas.

LMAO!
I can imagine that you think I ask the wrong Qs. They are the ones you cannot answer.

Answer my foundational  questions.  You guys keep dodging them and changing the subject.

I answered Harry's (later) question about the two month time frame for placing explosives for the WTC demolitions.

Your passenger question, as I have repeatedly pointed out, is a complex op question. We have some pieces of the CIA jigsaw puzzle, but not all of them.  Comprende?

First you have to get to first base by understanding the true scientific facts about the explosive WTC demolitions and cruise missile that punctured the Pentagon wall segment.

757s don't simply vaporize into small holes.  Among other evidence, the large titanium rotors would have lodged in the walls in two places along the 757 wingspan of 125 feet.  Didn't happen.

[oujour76]

Oct 31, 2022 0:00:38 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 30, 2022 23:41:57 GMT -5 Walter said:

LMAO!
I can imagine that you think I ask the wrong Qs. They are the ones you cannot answer.

Answer my foundational  questions.  You guys keep dodging them and changing the subject.

I answered Harry's (later) question about the two month time frame for placing explosives for the WTC demolitions.

Your passenger question, as I have repeatedly pointed out, is a complex op question. We have some pieces of the CIA jigsaw puzzle, but not all of them.  Comprende?

First you have to get to first base by understanding the true scientific facts about the explosive WTC demolitions and cruise missile that punctured the Pentagon wall segment.

757s don't simply vaporize into small holes.  Among other evidence, the large titanium rotors would have lodged in the walls in two places along the 757 wingspan of 125 feet.  Didn't happen.

Your ‘foundational’ questions are built on sand. Plenty of airplane parts were recovered both inside and outside the Pentagon. Including landing gear. Hint: cruise missiles don’t have landing gear. The plane didn’t ‘vaporize’…but at that speed and amount of fuel it would (and did) immediately break up into thousands of small pieces. The light poles knocked down outside the Pentagon didn’t get that way from a cruise missile. It was from the plane that was seen by hundreds of people. And what the hell is the significance of titanium? Do you think it’s indestructible? Your story is full of holes. And that’s being kind.

[Walter]

"Your passenger question, as I have repeatedly pointed out, is a complex op question. We have some pieces of the CIA jigsaw puzzle, but not all of them. Comprende?"

We have 'some pieces'?
What pieces do we have?

[oujour76]

Oct 31, 2022 9:06:18 GMT -5 Walter said:

"Your passenger question, as I have repeatedly pointed out, is a complex op question. We have some pieces of the CIA jigsaw puzzle, but not all of them. Comprende?"

We have 'some pieces'?
What pieces do we have?

LOL. What's so complex about answering where are the passengers?

[DrSchadenfreude]

THERE'S A CONSISTENT PATTERN OF OBSTRUCTION AND OBFUSCATION ON THIS FORUM IN DISCUSSIONS OF THE 9/11 SCIENTIFIC DATA.

IT HAS RECURRED FOR YEARS.


1) Walter, Harry, Daleko, Cowboy, et.al. consistently deny the established scientific facts about the obvious explosive WTC demolitions, the Pentagon missile debris, the arrest of the "Five Dancing Israeli" Mossad agents in NJ on 9/11, and the fake alleged Barabara Olson cellphone calls from AA77 at 30,000 feet.

2) They adamantly refuse to answer straightforward questions about these basic, established scientific and forensic facts.

3) They repeatedly deflect from the basic scientific facts that expose the false government Al Qaeda conspiracy theory about 9/11 and change the subject by asking the same question about the missing pieces of the jigsaw puzzle of the PNAC 9/11 op-- the passengers on flight AA77.

[Walter]

Oct 31, 2022 10:33:40 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

THERE'S A CONSISTENT PATTERN OF OBSTRUCTION AND OBFUSCATION ON THIS FORUM IN DISCUSSIONS OF THE 9/11 SCIENTIFIC DATA.

IT HAS RECURRED FOR YEARS.


1) Walter, Harry, Daleko, Cowboy, et.al. consistently deny the established scientific facts about the obvious explosive WTC demolitions, the Pentagon missile debris, the arrest of the "Five Dancing Israeli" Mossad agents in NJ on 9/11, and the fake alleged Barabara Olson cellphone calls from AA77 at 30,000 feet.

2) They adamantly refuse to answer straightforward questions about these basic, established scientific and forensic facts.

3) They repeatedly deflect from the basic scientific facts that expose the false government Al Qaeda conspiracy theory about 9/11 and change the subject by asking the same question about the missing pieces of the jigsaw puzzle of the PNAC 9/11 op-- the passengers on flight AA77.

It is a simple Q, Willie.
Where are the passengers?
If it is complicated, and thus far we only have "pieces of the puzzle", surely you can tell us WHICH pieces we have.
Go!
Explain to us which pieces we have.

[DrSchadenfreude]

Oct 31, 2022 10:51:58 GMT -5 Walter said:

Oct 31, 2022 10:33:40 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

THERE'S A CONSISTENT PATTERN OF OBSTRUCTION AND OBFUSCATION ON THIS FORUM IN DISCUSSIONS OF THE 9/11 SCIENTIFIC DATA.

IT HAS RECURRED FOR YEARS.


1) Walter, Harry, Daleko, Cowboy, et.al. consistently deny the established scientific facts about the obvious explosive WTC demolitions, the Pentagon missile debris, the arrest of the "Five Dancing Israeli" Mossad agents in NJ on 9/11, and the fake alleged Barabara Olson cellphone calls from AA77 at 30,000 feet.

2) They adamantly refuse to answer straightforward questions about these basic, established scientific and forensic facts.

3) They repeatedly deflect from the basic scientific facts that expose the false government Al Qaeda conspiracy theory about 9/11 and change the subject by asking the same question about the missing pieces of the jigsaw puzzle of the PNAC 9/11 op-- the passengers on flight AA77.

It is a simple Q, Willie.
Where are the passengers?
If it is complicated, and thus far we only have "pieces of the puzzle", surely you can tell us WHICH pieces we have.
Go!
Explain to us which pieces we have.

The fate of the alleged passengers remains one of the mysteries of the 9/11 PNAC "New Pearl Harbor" op.

Based on available information, my best guess is that the passengers aboard the WTC flights died at the WTC.

As for AA77, a Boeing 757 never crashed into the Pentagon wall.

Now, answer my questions above.

You and Harry need to stop dodging critical questions by changing the subject.

Neither of you has made it to first base yet in understanding the 9/11 op.

[Walter]

Oct 31, 2022 11:26:18 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 31, 2022 10:51:58 GMT -5 Walter said:

It is a simple Q, Willie.
Where are the passengers?
If it is complicated, and thus far we only have "pieces of the puzzle", surely you can tell us WHICH pieces we have.
Go!
Explain to us which pieces we have.

The fate of the alleged passengers remains one of the mysteries of the 9/11 PNAC "New Pearl Harbor" op.

Based on available information, my best guess is that the passengers aboard the WTC flights died at the WTC.

As for AA77, a Boeing 757 never crashed into the Pentagon wall.

Now, answer my questions above.

You and Harry need to stop dodging critical questions by changing the subject.

Neither of you has made it to first base yet in understanding the 9/11 op.

So where are the passengers and crew of AA77?
Seems as though you have exactly zero 'pieces of the puzzle', except for one passenger, who you claim faked her own death, murdered a woman from Kentucky, took over her identity, radically remade her face to look like the murdered woman, and remarried Ted Olson.
Have you any other pieces of said puzzle other than that?