Consensus 9/11-Ted Olson Lied About AA77 Phone Calls on 9/11

[oujour76]

Oct 31, 2022 11:26:18 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 31, 2022 10:51:58 GMT -5 Walter said:

It is a simple Q, Willie.
Where are the passengers?
If it is complicated, and thus far we only have "pieces of the puzzle", surely you can tell us WHICH pieces we have.
Go!
Explain to us which pieces we have.

The fate of the alleged passengers remains one of the mysteries of the 9/11 PNAC "New Pearl Harbor" op. Alleged passengers?  Except for the one who faked her death and changed her name, right? LOL. 

Based on available information, my best guess is that the passengers aboard the WTC flights died at the WTC. Best guess? LOL. 

As for AA77, a Boeing 757 never crashed into the Pentagon wall. Eyewitnesses, downed light poles and airplane debris inside and outside the Pentagon all say otherwise. 

Now, answer my questions above. 

You and Harry need to stop dodging critical questions by changing the subject.

Neither of you has made it to first base yet in understanding the 9/11 op.

[oujour76]

Oct 31, 2022 12:28:02 GMT -5 Walter said:

Oct 31, 2022 11:26:18 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

The fate of the alleged passengers remains one of the mysteries of the 9/11 PNAC "New Pearl Harbor" op.

Based on available information, my best guess is that the passengers aboard the WTC flights died at the WTC.

As for AA77, a Boeing 757 never crashed into the Pentagon wall.

Now, answer my questions above.

You and Harry need to stop dodging critical questions by changing the subject.

Neither of you has made it to first base yet in understanding the 9/11 op.

So where are the passengers and crew of AA77?  It's too complex for you to understand.
Seems as though you have exactly zero 'pieces of the puzzle', except for one passenger, who you claim faked her own death, murdered a woman from Kentucky, took over her identity, radically remade her face to look like the murdered woman, and remarried Ted Olson. And your point is? LOL.
Have you any other pieces of said puzzle other than that?

[DrSchadenfreude]

Oct 31, 2022 10:33:40 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

THERE'S A CONSISTENT PATTERN OF OBSTRUCTION AND OBFUSCATION ON THIS FORUM IN DISCUSSIONS OF THE 9/11 SCIENTIFIC DATA.

IT HAS RECURRED FOR YEARS.


1) Walter, Harry, Daleko, Cowboy, et.al. consistently deny the established scientific facts about the obvious explosive WTC demolitions, the Pentagon missile debris, the arrest of the "Five Dancing Israeli" Mossad agents in NJ on 9/11, and the fake alleged Barabara Olson cellphone calls from AA77 at 30,000 feet.

2) They adamantly refuse to answer straightforward questions about these basic, established scientific and forensic facts.

3) They repeatedly deflect from the basic scientific facts that expose the false government Al Qaeda conspiracy theory about 9/11 and change the subject by asking the same question about the missing pieces of the jigsaw puzzle of the PNAC 9/11 op-- the passengers on flight AA77.

It's obvious that Wally and Harry are afraid to discuss the fundamental scientific facts about 9/11 that debunk the official Bush/Cheney/Zelikow narrative.

I've answered their AA77 passenger question, repeatedly, but they are too frightened to answer my basic questions about the scientific data-- including the explosive WTC demolitions, Boeing 757 dimensions, and Ted Olson's lies about the alleged AA77 phone calls that never happened.

Fact #1:  The WTC skyscrapers were demolished by pre-planted explosives on 9/11.

Fact #2:  The Pentagon wall was punctured by a cruise missile-- not by a massive Boeing 757 with a 125 foot wingspan.

The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery.  But they, certainly, never crashed into the wall of the Pentagon.

[Walter]

Oct 31, 2022 18:06:03 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 31, 2022 10:33:40 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

THERE'S A CONSISTENT PATTERN OF OBSTRUCTION AND OBFUSCATION ON THIS FORUM IN DISCUSSIONS OF THE 9/11 SCIENTIFIC DATA.

IT HAS RECURRED FOR YEARS.


1) Walter, Harry, Daleko, Cowboy, et.al. consistently deny the established scientific facts about the obvious explosive WTC demolitions, the Pentagon missile debris, the arrest of the "Five Dancing Israeli" Mossad agents in NJ on 9/11, and the fake alleged Barabara Olson cellphone calls from AA77 at 30,000 feet.

2) They adamantly refuse to answer straightforward questions about these basic, established scientific and forensic facts.

3) They repeatedly deflect from the basic scientific facts that expose the false government Al Qaeda conspiracy theory about 9/11 and change the subject by asking the same question about the missing pieces of the jigsaw puzzle of the PNAC 9/11 op-- the passengers on flight AA77.

Ot's obvious that Wally and Harry are afraid to discuss the fundamental scientific facts about 9/11 that debunk the official Bush/Cheney/Zelikow narrative.

I've answered their AA77 passenger question, repeatedly, but they are too frightened to answer my basic questions about the scientific data-- including the explosive WTC demolitions, Boeing 757 dimensions, and Ted Olson's lies about the alleged AA77 phone calls that never happened.

Fact #1:  The WTC skyscrapers were demolished by pre-planted explosives on 9/11.

Fact #2:  The Pentagon wall was punctured by a cruise missile-- not by a massive Boeing 757 with a 125 foot wingspan.

The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery.  But they, certainly, never crashed into the wall of the Pentagon.

Wait...
"The fate of the alleged passengers remains one of the mysteries of the 9/11 PNAC "New Pearl Harbor" op." or "The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery."?
THAT is an answer to the question?
LOL...well...okay then. That's how we're going to play it?

Here's my answer to your Q.
How WTCs came down remains one of the mysteries of 9/11. But it was not demolished by explosives planted inside the buildings.

Boy....that was easy-peasy!

[cbisbig]

I can't believe a grown, educated (supposedly)
man wants to argue over this assinine conspiracy.

Fascinating

[cbisbig]

Oct 31, 2022 18:37:20 GMT -5 Walter said:

Oct 31, 2022 18:06:03 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Ot's obvious that Wally and Harry are afraid to discuss the fundamental scientific facts about 9/11 that debunk the official Bush/Cheney/Zelikow narrative.

I've answered their AA77 passenger question, repeatedly, but they are too frightened to answer my basic questions about the scientific data-- including the explosive WTC demolitions, Boeing 757 dimensions, and Ted Olson's lies about the alleged AA77 phone calls that never happened.

Fact #1:  The WTC skyscrapers were demolished by pre-planted explosives on 9/11.

Fact #2:  The Pentagon wall was punctured by a cruise missile-- not by a massive Boeing 757 with a 125 foot wingspan.

The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery.  But they, certainly, never crashed into the wall of the Pentagon.

Wait...
"The fate of the alleged passengers remains one of the mysteries of the 9/11 PNAC "New Pearl Harbor" op." or "The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery."?
THAT is an answer to the question?
LOL...well...okay then. That's how we're going to play it?

Here's my answer to your Q.
How WTCs came down remains one of the mysteries of 9/11. But it was not demolished by explosives planted inside the buildings.

Boy....that was easy-peasy!

They came down because two 767s full of jet fuel crashed into the towers and the heat of the ensuing fire melted the steel frame of the towers compromising the structural integrity of the buildings which therefore crashed to the ground

Burn in hell Osama bin laden🖕

[DrSchadenfreude]

Oct 31, 2022 18:37:20 GMT -5 Walter said:

Oct 31, 2022 18:06:03 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Ot's obvious that Wally and Harry are afraid to discuss the fundamental scientific facts about 9/11 that debunk the official Bush/Cheney/Zelikow narrative.

I've answered their AA77 passenger question, repeatedly, but they are too frightened to answer my basic questions about the scientific data-- including the explosive WTC demolitions, Boeing 757 dimensions, and Ted Olson's lies about the alleged AA77 phone calls that never happened.

Fact #1:  The WTC skyscrapers were demolished by pre-planted explosives on 9/11.

Fact #2:  The Pentagon wall was punctured by a cruise missile-- not by a massive Boeing 757 with a 125 foot wingspan.

The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery.  But they, certainly, never crashed into the wall of the Pentagon.

Wait...
"The fate of the alleged passengers remains one of the mysteries of the 9/11 PNAC "New Pearl Harbor" op." or "The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery."?
THAT is an answer to the question?
LOL...well...okay then. That's how we're going to play it?

Here's my answer to your Q.
How WTCs came down remains one of the mysteries of 9/11. But it was not demolished by explosives planted inside the buildings.

Boy....that was easy-peasy!

Walter, get a clue, dude.

The explosions are clearly visible and audible on film-- and a scientific fact, confirmed also by the Newtonian physics of free fall accelerations.

Trust me on this.  I'm a Harvard guy.

As for the alleged AA77 passengers, do you have the false impression that the bodies weren't allegedly vaporized on impact-- along with the entire Boeing 757?

Do you have any data on the bodies-- as opposed to media narratives by the guys who did the 9/11 op?

[Walter]

Oct 31, 2022 20:32:04 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 31, 2022 18:37:20 GMT -5 Walter said:

Wait...
"The fate of the alleged passengers remains one of the mysteries of the 9/11 PNAC "New Pearl Harbor" op." or "The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery."?
THAT is an answer to the question?
LOL...well...okay then. That's how we're going to play it?

Here's my answer to your Q.
How WTCs came down remains one of the mysteries of 9/11. But it was not demolished by explosives planted inside the buildings.

Boy....that was easy-peasy!

Walter, get a clue, dude.

The explosions are clearly visible and audible on film-- and a scientific fact, confirmed also by the Newtonian physics of free fall accelerations.

Trust me on this.  I'm a Harvard guy.

As for the alleged AA77 passengers, do you have the false impression that the bodies weren't allegedly vaporized on impact-- along with the entire Boeing 757?

Do you have any data on the bodies-- as opposed to media narratives by the guys who did the 9/11 op?

"False impression" about AA77 passengers?
You literally just finished telling us that the passenger whereabouts is a great mystery.
Therefore, you do not know, by your own Harvard educated admission, whether any narrative about the matter is false or not.

[oujour76]

Oct 31, 2022 18:06:03 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 31, 2022 10:33:40 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

THERE'S A CONSISTENT PATTERN OF OBSTRUCTION AND OBFUSCATION ON THIS FORUM IN DISCUSSIONS OF THE 9/11 SCIENTIFIC DATA.

IT HAS RECURRED FOR YEARS.


1) Walter, Harry, Daleko, Cowboy, et.al. consistently deny the established scientific facts about the obvious explosive WTC demolitions, the Pentagon missile debris, the arrest of the "Five Dancing Israeli" Mossad agents in NJ on 9/11, and the fake alleged Barabara Olson cellphone calls from AA77 at 30,000 feet.

2) They adamantly refuse to answer straightforward questions about these basic, established scientific and forensic facts.

3) They repeatedly deflect from the basic scientific facts that expose the false government Al Qaeda conspiracy theory about 9/11 and change the subject by asking the same question about the missing pieces of the jigsaw puzzle of the PNAC 9/11 op-- the passengers on flight AA77.

It's obvious that Wally and Harry are afraid to discuss the fundamental scientific facts about 9/11 that debunk the official Bush/Cheney/Zelikow narrative.

I've answered their AA77 passenger question, repeatedly, but they are too frightened to answer my basic questions about the scientific data-- including the explosive WTC demolitions, Boeing 757 dimensions, and Ted Olson's lies about the alleged AA77 phone calls that never happened.

Fact #1:  The WTC skyscrapers were demolished by pre-planted explosives on 9/11.

Fact #2:  The Pentagon wall was punctured by a cruise missile-- not by a massive Boeing 757 with a 125 foot wingspan.

The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery.  But they, certainly, never crashed into the wall of the Pentagon.

Cool. If it were a cruise missile, love to hear the explanation for the airplane parts being inside and outside the Pentagon. And the light poles being down. And the eyewitnesses. Thanks in advance.

[oujour76]

Oct 31, 2022 18:06:03 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 31, 2022 10:33:40 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

THERE'S A CONSISTENT PATTERN OF OBSTRUCTION AND OBFUSCATION ON THIS FORUM IN DISCUSSIONS OF THE 9/11 SCIENTIFIC DATA.

IT HAS RECURRED FOR YEARS.


1) Walter, Harry, Daleko, Cowboy, et.al. consistently deny the established scientific facts about the obvious explosive WTC demolitions, the Pentagon missile debris, the arrest of the "Five Dancing Israeli" Mossad agents in NJ on 9/11, and the fake alleged Barabara Olson cellphone calls from AA77 at 30,000 feet.

2) They adamantly refuse to answer straightforward questions about these basic, established scientific and forensic facts.

3) They repeatedly deflect from the basic scientific facts that expose the false government Al Qaeda conspiracy theory about 9/11 and change the subject by asking the same question about the missing pieces of the jigsaw puzzle of the PNAC 9/11 op-- the passengers on flight AA77.

It's obvious that Wally and Harry are afraid to discuss the fundamental scientific facts about 9/11 that debunk the official Bush/Cheney/Zelikow narrative.

I've answered their AA77 passenger question, repeatedly, but they are too frightened to answer my basic questions about the scientific data-- including the explosive WTC demolitions, Boeing 757 dimensions, and Ted Olson's lies about the alleged AA77 phone calls that never happened.

Fact #1:  The WTC skyscrapers were demolished by pre-planted explosives on 9/11.

Fact #2:  The Pentagon wall was punctured by a cruise missile-- not by a massive Boeing 757 with a 125 foot wingspan.

The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery.  But they, certainly, never crashed into the wall of the Pentagon.

Cool. If it were a cruise missile, love to hear the explanation for the airplane parts being inside and outside the Pentagon. And the light poles being down. And the eyewitnesses. Thanks in advance.

[oujour76]

Oct 31, 2022 18:37:20 GMT -5 Walter said:

Oct 31, 2022 18:06:03 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Ot's obvious that Wally and Harry are afraid to discuss the fundamental scientific facts about 9/11 that debunk the official Bush/Cheney/Zelikow narrative.

I've answered their AA77 passenger question, repeatedly, but they are too frightened to answer my basic questions about the scientific data-- including the explosive WTC demolitions, Boeing 757 dimensions, and Ted Olson's lies about the alleged AA77 phone calls that never happened.

Fact #1:  The WTC skyscrapers were demolished by pre-planted explosives on 9/11.

Fact #2:  The Pentagon wall was punctured by a cruise missile-- not by a massive Boeing 757 with a 125 foot wingspan.

The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery.  But they, certainly, never crashed into the wall of the Pentagon.

Wait...
"The fate of the alleged passengers remains one of the mysteries of the 9/11 PNAC "New Pearl Harbor" op." or "The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery."?
THAT is an answer to the question?
LOL...well...okay then. That's how we're going to play it?

Here's my answer to your Q.
How WTCs came down remains one of the mysteries of 9/11. But it was not demolished by explosives planted inside the buildings.

Boy....that was easy-peasy!

Not complicated.

[oujour76]

Oct 31, 2022 20:32:04 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Oct 31, 2022 18:37:20 GMT -5 Walter said:

Wait...
"The fate of the alleged passengers remains one of the mysteries of the 9/11 PNAC "New Pearl Harbor" op." or "The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery."?
THAT is an answer to the question?
LOL...well...okay then. That's how we're going to play it?

Here's my answer to your Q.
How WTCs came down remains one of the mysteries of 9/11. But it was not demolished by explosives planted inside the buildings.

Boy....that was easy-peasy!

Walter, get a clue, dude.

The explosions are clearly visible and audible on film-- and a scientific fact, confirmed also by the Newtonian physics of free fall accelerations.

Trust me on this.  I'm a Harvard guy.

As for the alleged AA77 passengers, do you have the false impression that the bodies weren't allegedly vaporized on impact-- along with the entire Boeing 757?

Do you have any data on the bodies-- as opposed to media narratives by the guys who did the 9/11 op?

.

Cruise missile hits Pentagon and leaves debris of 757 airplane. Explain that.

[Walter]

Nov 1, 2022 8:22:13 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Oct 31, 2022 20:32:04 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Walter, get a clue, dude.

The explosions are clearly visible and audible on film-- and a scientific fact, confirmed also by the Newtonian physics of free fall accelerations.

Trust me on this.  I'm a Harvard guy.

As for the alleged AA77 passengers, do you have the false impression that the bodies weren't allegedly vaporized on impact-- along with the entire Boeing 757?

Do you have any data on the bodies-- as opposed to media narratives by the guys who did the 9/11 op?

.

Cruise missile hits Pentagon and leaves debris of 757 airplane. Explain that.

I am still trying to understand why cruise missiles have landing gear.

[oujour76]

Nov 1, 2022 9:58:35 GMT -5 Walter said:

Nov 1, 2022 8:22:13 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

.

Cruise missile hits Pentagon and leaves debris of 757 airplane. Explain that.

I am still trying to understand why cruise missiles have landing gear.

You just don’t understand the psy/op. 😂😎

[DrSchadenfreude]

Nov 1, 2022 7:45:07 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Oct 31, 2022 18:06:03 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

It's obvious that Wally and Harry are afraid to discuss the fundamental scientific facts about 9/11 that debunk the official Bush/Cheney/Zelikow narrative.

I've answered their AA77 passenger question, repeatedly, but they are too frightened to answer my basic questions about the scientific data-- including the explosive WTC demolitions, Boeing 757 dimensions, and Ted Olson's lies about the alleged AA77 phone calls that never happened.

Fact #1:  The WTC skyscrapers were demolished by pre-planted explosives on 9/11.

Fact #2:  The Pentagon wall was punctured by a cruise missile-- not by a massive Boeing 757 with a 125 foot wingspan.

The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery.  But they, certainly, never crashed into the wall of the Pentagon.

Cool. If it were a cruise missile, love to hear the explanation for the airplane parts being inside and outside the Pentagon. And the light poles being down. And the eyewitnesses. Thanks in advance.

Which 757 parts are you imaging, Harry, the aluminum fragment placed on the lawn, after the initial photos and CNN footage showed no evidence of a 757 plane crash?