Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 1, 2022 11:17:32 GMT -5
What happened to the two large titanium 757 rotors at the Pentagon?
Were they also vaporized, along with the entire plane, chairs, luggage, passengers, etc.?
And where did they both collide with the first floor wall?
Since Harry and Walter still can't see the small, slender aircraft shown on the initial CCTV footage from the Pentagon, perhaps they can finally answer the question.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Nov 1, 2022 12:09:08 GMT -5
Cool. If it were a cruise missile, love to hear the explanation for the airplane parts being inside and outside the Pentagon. And the light poles being down. And the eyewitnesses. Thanks in advance. Which 757 parts are you imaging, Harry, the aluminum fragment placed on the lawn, after the initial photos and CNN footage showed no evidence of a 757 plane crash? LOL. As to be expected, most pieces were recovered inside the building. Many in fragments, but also larger parts like wheel housings, parts of landing gear, tires and the like. You know, what is commonly referred to here on Earth as physical evidence.
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Nov 1, 2022 12:19:29 GMT -5
Cool. If it were a cruise missile, love to hear the explanation for the airplane parts being inside and outside the Pentagon. And the light poles being down. And the eyewitnesses. Thanks in advance. Which 757 parts are you imaging, Harry, the aluminum fragment placed on the lawn, after the initial photos and CNN footage showed no evidence of a 757 plane crash? No. Example: pictures of the chunks of landing gear amid the rubble taken inside the building.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Nov 1, 2022 13:19:02 GMT -5
What happened to the two large titanium 757 rotors at the Pentagon? Were they also vaporized, along with the entire plane, chairs, luggage, passengers, etc.? And where did they both collide with the first floor wall? Since Harry and Walter still can't see the small, slender aircraft shown on the initial CCTV footage from the Pentagon, perhaps they can finally answer the question. First of all, they aren't 100% made of titanium. They use titanium alloys and the amount depends on what job is being performed. Second, what is your obsession with titanium? It's not indestructible. In fact, titanium with oxygen burns at about 1100 Fahrenheit. Third, a rotor with several metals (including titanium) and composites can certainly be broken into fragments. All that said, of course a rotor could also survive largely intact. Apparently at least one did, by your own admission. Only problem is you keep insisting it's from a cruise missile. Carry on with that nonsense if you must, but it just makes you look foolish.
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by cbisbig on Nov 1, 2022 19:07:51 GMT -5
THERE'S A CONSISTENT PATTERN OF OBSTRUCTION AND OBFUSCATION ON THIS FORUM IN DISCUSSIONS OF THE 9/11 SCIENTIFIC DATA.
IT HAS RECURRED FOR YEARS.
1) Walter, Harry, Daleko, Cowboy, et.al. consistently deny the established scientific facts about the obvious explosive WTC demolitions, the Pentagon missile debris, the arrest of the "Five Dancing Israeli" Mossad agents in NJ on 9/11, and the fake alleged Barabara Olson cellphone calls from AA77 at 30,000 feet.
2) They adamantly refuse to answer straightforward questions about these basic, established scientific and forensic facts.
3) They repeatedly deflect from the basic scientific facts that expose the false government Al Qaeda conspiracy theory about 9/11 and change the subject by asking the same question about the missing pieces of the jigsaw puzzle of the PNAC 9/11 op-- the passengers on flight AA77.
It's obvious that Wally and Harry are afraid to discuss the fundamental scientific facts about 9/11 that debunk the official Bush/Cheney/Zelikow narrative. I've answered their AA77 passenger question, repeatedly, but they are too frightened to answer my basic questions about the scientific data-- including the explosive WTC demolitions, Boeing 757 dimensions, and Ted Olson's lies about the alleged AA77 phone calls that never happened. Fact #1: The WTC skyscrapers were demolished by pre-planted explosives on 9/11. Fact #2: The Pentagon wall was punctured by a cruise missile-- not by a massive Boeing 757 with a 125 foot wingspan. The fate of the alleged AA77 passengers is a mystery. But they, certainly, never crashed into the wall of the Pentagon. Get it right moron aircraft involved, a Boeing 767-223ER, en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Airlines_Flight_11
|
|
ROLL TIDE!
29 SEC Championships 18 National Championships
2015-16 Bowl Champion Douche 2020 Pandemic Bowl Champ
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 1, 2022 20:11:37 GMT -5
Which 757 parts are you imaging, Harry, the aluminum fragment placed on the lawn, after the initial photos and CNN footage showed no evidence of a 757 plane crash? No. Example: pictures of the chunks of landing gear amid the rubble taken inside the building. You bring up a good point, if the photos are authentic-- not planted by the CIA and U.S. military people who staged the op. If the landing gear were there (not planted or photographed elsewhere) the building was hit by a small plane or military drone. What we know from the original film is that the aircraft (or missile)was NOT a Boeing 757. It was far smaller.
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Nov 1, 2022 20:34:44 GMT -5
No. Example: pictures of the chunks of landing gear amid the rubble taken inside the building. You bring up a good point, if the photos are authentic-- not planted by the CIA and U.S. military people who staged the op. If the landing gear were there (not planted or photographed elsewhere) the building was hit by a small plane or military drone. What we know from the original film is that the aircraft (or missile)was NOT a Boeing 757. It was far smaller. It wasn’t small plane landing gear that was found.
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Solid Member
|
Post by DrSchadenfreude on Nov 1, 2022 21:19:37 GMT -5
You bring up a good point, if the photos are authentic-- not planted by the CIA and U.S. military people who staged the op. If the landing gear were there (not planted or photographed elsewhere) the building was hit by a small plane or military drone. What we know from the original film is that the aircraft (or missile)was NOT a Boeing 757. It was far smaller. It wasn’t small plane landing gear that was found. Link?
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by oujour76 on Nov 1, 2022 22:18:47 GMT -5
|
|
Full Season 2022 Douche Champion
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Administrator
|
Post by Walter on Nov 2, 2022 11:11:54 GMT -5
|
|
Woah, this is a default personal text! Edit your profile to change this to what you like!
Godlike Member
|
Post by cbisbig on Nov 3, 2022 6:48:02 GMT -5
It wasn’t small plane landing gear that was found. Link? YOU are the weakest link.
|
|
ROLL TIDE!
29 SEC Championships 18 National Championships
2015-16 Bowl Champion Douche 2020 Pandemic Bowl Champ
|