Major General Explains 9/11 to Harry, Walter, and C-Biscuit

[AlaCowboy]

Nov 21, 2022 22:25:34 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 21, 2022 22:08:08 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

It would have taken weeks to rig the WTC towers with explosives. There were thousands of people in and out of those buildings around the clock. Why did no one report before or after the fact of suspicious activity? Every time you change course you still run in a ditch.

Where did you get the notion that there were no demolition crews working in those WTC buildings prior to 9/11?

What's your source?

The buildings were expertly demolished by explosives.   That is an empirically and scientifically obvious fact.

So, it's not a question of if, but how, the demolition crews got the job done in advance.

Whistle blower Susan Lindauer claims that the demolition crews were working the graveyard shifts in the weeks prior to 9/11.

There are reports of crews "working on the elevators" and closing floors in the Twin Towers prior to 9/11.

Unfortunately, 3,000 tenants in the Twin Towers were killed on 9/11, so much of the witness testimony was destroyed by the demolitions.

Many survivors (including NYFD fire fighters) heard and reported the serial explosions in the Twin Towers on 9/11, but their witness testimony was assiduously suppressed by Phillip Zelikow's 9/11 Commission white wash/cover up "report" -- not unlike what happened with the Warren Commission Report.

Photos? Video? Sworn testimony? Where is your PROOF that explosives were planted? How about sworn testimony from one of the demolition experts, with evidence to back it up?
Best yet. Simply produce even one of the passengers on the manifests of the planes you claim never crashed. Someone from the Pentagon plane would be solid proof. How about the plot or copilot? I'll believe them.

[DrSchadenfreude]

Nov 22, 2022 23:01:40 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Nov 21, 2022 22:25:34 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Where did you get the notion that there were no demolition crews working in those WTC buildings prior to 9/11?

What's your source?

The buildings were expertly demolished by explosives.   That is an empirically and scientifically obvious fact.

So, it's not a question of if, but how, the demolition crews got the job done in advance.

Whistle blower Susan Lindauer claims that the demolition crews were working the graveyard shifts in the weeks prior to 9/11.

There are reports of crews "working on the elevators" and closing floors in the Twin Towers prior to 9/11.

Unfortunately, 3,000 tenants in the Twin Towers were killed on 9/11, so much of the witness testimony was destroyed by the demolitions.

Many survivors (including NYFD fire fighters) heard and reported the serial explosions in the Twin Towers on 9/11, but their witness testimony was assiduously suppressed by Phillip Zelikow's 9/11 Commission white wash/cover up "report" -- not unlike what happened with the Warren Commission Report.

Photos? Video? Sworn testimony? Where is your PROOF that explosives were planted? How about sworn testimony from one of the demolition experts, with evidence to back it up?

International demolitions expert Danny Jowenko confirmed that the WTC7 demolition was an expert explosive demolition.

When he testified about that, after being shown the film, he wasn't told in advance that the film was WTC7 on 9/11.

As for proof that WTC1 and WTC2 were explosively demolished, look at the film, Dungkopf.

If you can't see these serial explosions, you're blind.

Let's cut the lying Bush/Cheney horseshit already.

21 years of mass delusions about 9/11 are 21 too many.

[AlaCowboy]

Nov 22, 2022 23:12:07 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 22, 2022 23:01:40 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Photos? Video? Sworn testimony? Where is your PROOF that explosives were planted? How about sworn testimony from one of the demolition experts, with evidence to back it up?

International demolitions expert Danny Jowenko confirmed that the WTC7 demolition was an expert explosive demolition.

When he testified about that, after being shown the film, he wasn't told in advance that the film was WTC7 on 9/11.

As for proof that WTC1 and WTC2 were explosively demolished, look at the film, Dungkopf.

If you can't see these serial explosions, you're blind.

Let's cut the lying Bush/Cheney horseshit already.

21 years of mass delusions about 9/11 are 21 too many.

So you can't produce one single person that can prove explosives were planted in the towers? Why am I not surprised?
I can produce video that shows both towers being hit by large aircraft. Can you produce expert testimony that those planes were empty and operated by remote control? No? Can you produce one person from any of the flight manifests to testify they were on that plane and it did not crash?
Until you produce live testimony no one will believe you. How much money have you spent on books sold by these hucksters? And you claim to be intelligent.

[Panama pfRedd]

Isn't it pretty obvious that he/she/they is/are the patient(s) and not the doctor?

[oujour76]

Nov 22, 2022 15:31:21 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Alleged [9/11] Hijackers May Have Trained At U.S. Bases
2001-09-14, Newsweek Magazine
www.newsweek.com/2001/09/14/alleged-hijackers-may-have-trained-at-u-s-...

U.S. military sources have given the FBI information that suggests five of the alleged hijackers of the planes that were used in [the 9/11] terror attacks received training at secure U.S. military installations in the 1990s. Three of the alleged hijackers listed their address on drivers licenses and car registrations as the Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Fla. -- known as the "Cradle of U.S. Navy Aviation," according to a high-ranking U.S. Navy source. Another of the alleged hijackers may have been trained in strategy and tactics at the Air War College in Montgomery, Ala., said another high-ranking Pentagon official. The fifth man may have received language instruction at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Tex. Both were former Saudi Air Force pilots who had come to the United States, according to the Pentagon source. The five men were on a list of 19 people identified as hijackers by the FBI on [September 14]. The three foreign nationals training in Pensacola appear to be Saeed Alghamdi and Ahmad Alnami, who were among the four men who allegedly commandeered United Airlines Flight 93. That flight [ended in] rural Pennsylvania. The third man who may have trained in Pensacola, Ahmed Alghamdi, allegedly helped highjack United Airlines Flight 75, which hit the south tower of the World Trade Center. Military records show that the three used as their address 10 Radford Boulevard, a base roadway on which residences for foreign-military flight trainees are located.

Note: For more on this vitally important news, see this Washington Post news article and this Los Angeles Times news article. Several of the alleged hijackers also contacted US media shortly after 9/11 to report that they were alive and were not on the hijacked planes, as reported in this BBC article and this Times of London article. Yet the 9/11 Commission Report lists these men as the official hijackers. Explore many other major media news articles suggesting that rogue elements of government were involved in 9/11. See also our excellent 9/11 Information Center.

You’re saying the plot started when Clinton was President?

[DrSchadenfreude]

Nov 23, 2022 9:36:48 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

Nov 22, 2022 15:31:21 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Alleged [9/11] Hijackers May Have Trained At U.S. Bases
2001-09-14, Newsweek Magazine
www.newsweek.com/2001/09/14/alleged-hijackers-may-have-trained-at-u-s-...

U.S. military sources have given the FBI information that suggests five of the alleged hijackers of the planes that were used in [the 9/11] terror attacks received training at secure U.S. military installations in the 1990s. Three of the alleged hijackers listed their address on drivers licenses and car registrations as the Naval Air Station in Pensacola, Fla. -- known as the "Cradle of U.S. Navy Aviation," according to a high-ranking U.S. Navy source. Another of the alleged hijackers may have been trained in strategy and tactics at the Air War College in Montgomery, Ala., said another high-ranking Pentagon official. The fifth man may have received language instruction at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Tex. Both were former Saudi Air Force pilots who had come to the United States, according to the Pentagon source. The five men were on a list of 19 people identified as hijackers by the FBI on [September 14]. The three foreign nationals training in Pensacola appear to be Saeed Alghamdi and Ahmad Alnami, who were among the four men who allegedly commandeered United Airlines Flight 93. That flight [ended in] rural Pennsylvania. The third man who may have trained in Pensacola, Ahmed Alghamdi, allegedly helped highjack United Airlines Flight 75, which hit the south tower of the World Trade Center. Military records show that the three used as their address 10 Radford Boulevard, a base roadway on which residences for foreign-military flight trainees are located.

Note: For more on this vitally important news, see this Washington Post news article and this Los Angeles Times news article. Several of the alleged hijackers also contacted US media shortly after 9/11 to report that they were alive and were not on the hijacked planes, as reported in this BBC article and this Times of London article. Yet the 9/11 Commission Report lists these men as the official hijackers. Explore many other major media news articles suggesting that rogue elements of government were involved in 9/11. See also our excellent 9/11 Information Center.

You’re saying the plot started when Clinton was President?

Osama Bin Laden and his "Al Qaeda" mujaheddin militia were initially trained and funded by the CIA during the Soviet Afghan War.

They also worked with the CIA in Bosnia and Kosovo in the 1990s, fighting against the communist Yugoslav government in Belgrade.

Osama Bin Laden's brother was a major investor in George W. Bush's Arbusto Oil Company.

According to former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, Osama Bin Laden was still working for the CIA before and after 9/11.



America and the “Mujahideen”, when Brzezinski said: God is on your side!
Osama Bin Laden was CIA asset Tim Osman

english.almayadeen.net/articles/analysis/america-and-the-mujahideen-when-brzezinski-said:-god-is-on-y

[Walter]

Nov 23, 2022 11:44:28 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 23, 2022 9:36:48 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

You’re saying the plot started when Clinton was President?

Osama Bin Laden and his "Al Qaeda" mujaheddin militia were initially trained and funded by the CIA during the Soviet Afghan War.

They also worked with the CIA in Bosnia and Kosovo in the 1990s, fighting against the communist Yugoslav government in Belgrade.

Osama Bin Laden's brother was a major investor in George W. Bush's Arbusto Oil Company.

According to former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, Osama Bin Laden was still working for the CIA before and after 9/11.



America and the “Mujahideen”, when Brzezinski said: God is on your side!
Osama Bin Laden was CIA asset Tim Osman

english.almayadeen.net/articles/analysis/america-and-the-mujahideen-when-brzezinski-said:-god-is-on-y

GET OUT OF THE RABBIT HOLE.
Renee May made a phone call to her mother from AA77 and told her that the plane had been hijacked.
Explain how that happened.

[DrSchadenfreude]

Nov 22, 2022 12:45:44 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Saudi officials were 'supporting' 9/11 hijackers, commission member says

2016-05-12, The Guardian (One of the UK's leading newspapers)
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/12/911-commission-saudi-arabia-hi...

Saudi government employees were part of a support network for the 9/11 hijackers. The Obama administration should move quickly to declassify a long-secret congressional report on Saudi ties to the 2001 terrorist attack, [said former 9/11 commission member John Lehman]. The comments ... signal the first serious public split among the 10 commissioners since they issued a 2004 final report that was largely read as an exoneration of Saudi Arabia, which was home to 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11. The former chairman and vice-chairman of the commission [have] urged the Obama administration to be cautious about releasing the full congressional report on the Saudis and 9/11 – “the 28 pages”, as they are widely known in Washington. In fact, there were repeated showdowns, especially over the Saudis, between the staff and the commission’s hard-charging executive director ... Philip Zelikow. Zelikow fired a staffer, who had repeatedly protested over limitations on the Saudi investigation, after she obtained a copy of the 28 pages outside of official channels. Other staffers described an angry scene late one night, near the end of the investigation, when two investigators who focused on the Saudi allegations were forced to rush back to the commission’s offices after midnight after learning to their astonishment that some of the most compelling evidence about a Saudi tie to 9/11 was being edited out of the report.

Note: Zelikow's close ties to the Bush White House are among many problems with the official 9/11 Commission Report. Read more on the Saudi role in Sept. 11 and the hidden 9/11 report pages. For more along these lines, see concise summaries of deeply revealing 9/11 news articles from reliable major media sources. Then explore the excellent, reliable resources provided in our 9/11 Information Center.

Question for Walter, Harry, and the poorly informed 9/11 ostriches in Wally World.

Why did Saudi Prince Bandar call himself, "Bandar Bush?"

And why did U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell first learn from Prince Bandar, in December of 2002, that Bush and Cheney were going to invade Iraq, according to Bob Woodward's account in Plan of Attack?

[Walter]

Nov 23, 2022 13:09:48 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 22, 2022 12:45:44 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Saudi officials were 'supporting' 9/11 hijackers, commission member says

2016-05-12, The Guardian (One of the UK's leading newspapers)
www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/12/911-commission-saudi-arabia-hi...

Saudi government employees were part of a support network for the 9/11 hijackers. The Obama administration should move quickly to declassify a long-secret congressional report on Saudi ties to the 2001 terrorist attack, [said former 9/11 commission member John Lehman]. The comments ... signal the first serious public split among the 10 commissioners since they issued a 2004 final report that was largely read as an exoneration of Saudi Arabia, which was home to 15 of the 19 hijackers on 9/11. The former chairman and vice-chairman of the commission [have] urged the Obama administration to be cautious about releasing the full congressional report on the Saudis and 9/11 – “the 28 pages”, as they are widely known in Washington. In fact, there were repeated showdowns, especially over the Saudis, between the staff and the commission’s hard-charging executive director ... Philip Zelikow. Zelikow fired a staffer, who had repeatedly protested over limitations on the Saudi investigation, after she obtained a copy of the 28 pages outside of official channels. Other staffers described an angry scene late one night, near the end of the investigation, when two investigators who focused on the Saudi allegations were forced to rush back to the commission’s offices after midnight after learning to their astonishment that some of the most compelling evidence about a Saudi tie to 9/11 was being edited out of the report.

Note: Zelikow's close ties to the Bush White House are among many problems with the official 9/11 Commission Report. Read more on the Saudi role in Sept. 11 and the hidden 9/11 report pages. For more along these lines, see concise summaries of deeply revealing 9/11 news articles from reliable major media sources. Then explore the excellent, reliable resources provided in our 9/11 Information Center.

Question for Walter, Harry, and the poorly informed 9/11 ostriches in Wally World.

Why did Saudi Prince Bandar call himself, "Bandar Bush?"

And why did U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell first learn from Prince Bandar, in December of 2002, that Bush and Cheney were going to invade Iraq, according to Bob Woodward's account in Plan of Attack?

Renee May made a phone call to her mother from AA77 and told her that the plane had been hijacked.
Explain how that happened.

[DrSchadenfreude]

Nov 23, 2022 13:50:37 GMT -5 Walter said:

Nov 23, 2022 13:09:48 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Question for Walter, Harry, and the poorly informed 9/11 ostriches in Wally World.

Why did Saudi Prince Bandar call himself, "Bandar Bush?"

And why did U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell first learn from Prince Bandar, in December of 2002, that Bush and Cheney were going to invade Iraq, according to Bob Woodward's account in Plan of Attack?

Renee May made a phone call to her mother from AA77 and told her that the plane had been hijacked.
Explain how that happened.

And you are certain that this claim about an alleged phone call was not orchestrated by the guys who orchestrated the 9/11 false flag op, eh?

How do you explain the heavily publicized lies about the Barbara Olson phone calls that never happened?

And how do you explain the definitive evidence that the Mossad knew the Twin Towers would be demolished?

Come on, L.A. Dodger.  You have run out of excuses.

[Walter]

Nov 23, 2022 14:00:31 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 23, 2022 13:50:37 GMT -5 Walter said:

Renee May made a phone call to her mother from AA77 and told her that the plane had been hijacked.
Explain how that happened.

And you are certain that this claim about an alleged phone call was not orchestrated by the guys who orchestrated the 9/11 false flag op, eh?
You are free to provide evidence of this orchestration. I can't wait to read it.

How do you explain the heavily publicized lies about the Barbara Olson phone calls that never happened?
Lies? What lies?
And how do you explain the definitive evidence that the Mossad knew the Twin Towers would be demolished?
Evidence? What evidence?

Come on, L.A. Dodger.  You have run out of excuses.

Your 9/11 claims are identical to the MAGA big lie claims.
They claim a massive conspiracy with no evidence that will withstand any sunshine.
Cowboy comes over here asking for evidence, and on Big Lie threads refuses to provide evidence of his beliefs about election fraud.
You go to Big Lie threads asking for evidence, but here you don't ever seem to have any.

Same story, different title.

[oujour76]

Nov 23, 2022 11:44:28 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 23, 2022 9:36:48 GMT -5 oujour76 said:

You’re saying the plot started when Clinton was President?

Osama Bin Laden and his "Al Qaeda" mujaheddin militia were initially trained and funded by the CIA during the Soviet Afghan War.

They also worked with the CIA in Bosnia and Kosovo in the 1990s, fighting against the communist Yugoslav government in Belgrade.

Osama Bin Laden's brother was a major investor in George W. Bush's Arbusto Oil Company.

According to former FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, Osama Bin Laden was still working for the CIA before and after 9/11.



America and the “Mujahideen”, when Brzezinski said: God is on your side!
Osama Bin Laden was CIA asset Tim Osman

english.almayadeen.net/articles/analysis/america-and-the-mujahideen-when-brzezinski-said:-god-is-on-y

Oh, so now it goes back to Reagan and possibly Carter. Good to know...look forward to you stop blaming Dubya.

[oujour76]

Nov 23, 2022 14:00:31 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

Nov 23, 2022 13:50:37 GMT -5 Walter said:

Renee May made a phone call to her mother from AA77 and told her that the plane had been hijacked.
Explain how that happened.

And you are certain that this claim about an alleged phone call was not orchestrated by the guys who orchestrated the 9/11 false flag op, eh?

How do you explain the heavily publicized lies about the Barbara Olson phone calls that never happened?

And how do you explain the definitive evidence that the Mossad knew the Twin Towers would be demolished?

Come on, L.A. Dodger.  You have run out of excuses.

LOL...always a go to story when your story falls apart: False Flag! CIA! Conspiracy! Trust me, I'm from Harvard! Blah, blah, blah. You and Donald Trump have the same personality.

[AlaCowboy]

Nov 23, 2022 14:09:34 GMT -5 Walter said:

Nov 23, 2022 14:00:31 GMT -5 DrSchadenfreude said:

And you are certain that this claim about an alleged phone call was not orchestrated by the guys who orchestrated the 9/11 false flag op, eh?
You are free to provide evidence of this orchestration. I can't wait to read it.

How do you explain the heavily publicized lies about the Barbara Olson phone calls that never happened?
Lies? What lies?
And how do you explain the definitive evidence that the Mossad knew the Twin Towers would be demolished?
Evidence? What evidence?

Come on, L.A. Dodger.  You have run out of excuses.

Your 9/11 claims are identical to the MAGA big lie claims.
They claim a massive conspiracy with no evidence that will withstand any sunshine.
Cowboy comes over here asking for evidence, and on Big Lie threads refuses to provide evidence of his beliefs about election fraud.
You go to Big Lie threads asking for evidence, but here you don't ever seem to have any.

Same story, different title.

I provided evidence of 10,000 ballots being dropped off at a homeless shelter in Atlanta. How many votes did Ralphie Warnock have in 2020 to get into that runoff?

[Walter]

Nov 23, 2022 15:18:42 GMT -5 AlaCowboy said:

Nov 23, 2022 14:09:34 GMT -5 Walter said:

Your 9/11 claims are identical to the MAGA big lie claims.
They claim a massive conspiracy with no evidence that will withstand any sunshine.
Cowboy comes over here asking for evidence, and on Big Lie threads refuses to provide evidence of his beliefs about election fraud.
You go to Big Lie threads asking for evidence, but here you don't ever seem to have any.

Same story, different title.

I provided evidence of 10,000 ballots being dropped off at a homeless shelter in Atlanta. How many votes did Ralphie Warnock have in 2020 to get into that runoff?

...and Willie posted evidence just like yours that the WTC was demolished with explosives.
Like I said, same book, different title.